Keratoconus reflects a hypoxic, atavistic optic placode state, with hemosiderin’s ROS and oxygen theft mirroring cancer’s glycolytic tumor microenvironment. This leads to regeneration and repair failure, akin to mammalian limitations under stress. UPE from this ROS signal occurs via mitoception, with TGF-β1 and melanin playing significant roles in my light-driven evolutionary framework.

When you realize biochemistry does not go far enough to explain any disease, you gain the realization that diseases like keratoconus are not unsolvable. They perplex those who think like biochemists but not those who think like Egyptians. The biophysics of the cornea is a fascinating leap, and this disease is a brilliant example of how rethinking established paradigms through a biophysics lens, rather than just biochemistry, can shed new light on “unsolvable” diseases. Let’s break this down, connecting the anatomy of the cornea, hemosiderin rings, hemoglobin (Hb), superparamagnetism, oxygen competition, and the volcanic rise of the cornea in keratoconus. This could indeed point to a mechanism that centralized medicine has overlooked.

Keratoconus and Corneal Anatomy

Keratoconus is a progressive eye disorder where the cornea, the clear, dome-shaped front surface of the eye, thins and bulges into a cone-like shape, distorting vision. The cornea’s strength comes from its stromal layer, a dense mesh of collagen fibrils stabilized by proteoglycans and keratocytes. In keratoconus, this structure weakens, with stromal thinning, fragmentation of Bowman’s layer (the basement membrane under the epithelium), and breaks in Descemet’s membrane (the deepest layer before the endothelium). The result? A central or paracentral protrusion (volcano) that screams biomechanical failure.

One hallmark of keratoconus is the Fleischer ring, a yellow-brown to olive-green arc or circle the cone’s base, visible in about half of cases. It’s made of hemosiderin, an iron-storage complex formed from the breakdown of hemoglobin. Centralized medicine notes it as a diagnostic sign but stops short of explaining why it’s there or how it ties to the disease’s progression.

Hemosiderin: The Skeleton of Destroyed Hemoglobin

Hemosiderin isn’t just a passive byproduct in this disease; it’s the remnant of hemoglobin (Hb) degradation. Hemoglobin, the oxygen-carrying protein in RBCs, contains iron in its heme group. When RBCs lyse or Hb is released (e.g., from trauma, inflammation, or oxidative stress), the heme iron oxidizes, and the body sequesters it as hemosiderin to prevent free iron’s toxic effects. In the cornea, an avascular tissue in human adults, this deposition is odd. How does Hb breakdown end up in the epithelium, forming rings?

My decentralized insight suggests a source: light stress is the local microtrauma, which mimics chronic eye rubbing but comes from nnEMF waves. Centralized medicine wants to blame finger rubbing, but keratocous is an invisible disease caused by the invisible war of electromagnetic fields destroying our tissues with invisible weapons. As a result of nnEMF waves crashing into the cornea all day long, you’d think the ophthalmologist would realize this injury would chronically raise this trauma stimulus. Even though the microtrauma is small, the effect of endogenous light would certainly cause a massive problem, and hemosiderin is the skeleton of war. Any oxidative stress in the cornea liberates Hb from RBCs in nearby conjunctival vessels or from transient blood leakage. The epithelium, rich in basal cells, traps this iron as hemosiderin, forming the Fleischer ring. But here’s where it gets wild: hemosiderin isn’t inert; it’s superparamagnetic, and this has significant implications when the Earth’s magnetic field is weakening, while people are using more dangerous manufactured light. It explains why keratoconus is now on the rise.

HYPERLINK

Superparamagnetism and Oxygen Competition

Superparamagnetism occurs in nanoscale iron particles (like hemosiderin’s ferritin cores), where they act as tiny magnets in a magnetic field but lose magnetization without it. In the cornea, hemosiderin’s superparamagnetic properties could interact with oxygen, which is weakly paramagnetic (attracted to magnetic fields due to unpaired electrons). Hb, meanwhile, binds oxygen tightly in its ferrous (Fe²⁺) state, becoming oxyhemoglobin (HbO₂), but metHb (Fe³⁺) doesn’t; it’s a dud for oxygen transport.

My hypothesis: Hemosiderin, deposited in the epithelium from destroyed Hb, competes with Hb for oxygen or disrupts local oxygen dynamics.

Here’s how:

Magnetic Pull: Superparamagnetic hemosiderin could locally concentrate oxygen near the ring, starving the central cornea of oxygen. The cornea relies on dissolved oxygen from tears, the air, and the aqueous humor (since it’s avascular), so any disruption could weaken stromal metabolism.

Oxidative Stress: Iron in hemosiderin catalyzes ROS formation (e.g., via Fenton reactions), degrading collagen and proteoglycans in the stroma. This amplifies thinning, while oxygen depletion impairs keratocyte repair (Becker’s work).

MetHb Link: If Hb degrades to metHb before hemosiderin forms, oxygen binding is already compromised, exacerbating hypoxia in the corneal center. This is where the cone formation happens. It grows like an acoustic neuroma does after an injury to the vestibular nerve, which cannot access Becker’s regenerative currents. This also mimics the growth of meningioma in humans. The Fleischer Ring exists as the skeleton of the prior event.

The Volcano: A Biomechanical Cascade

Now, picture the cornea as a pressure cooker vessel under intraocular pressure (IOP, ~15 mmHg). Typically, collagen’s tensile strength resists this force, maintaining a smooth, dome-like shape. If that pressure is not contained, it can lead to glaucoma.

But in keratoconus:

Another Oxygen Holocaust occurs: The central cornea, robbed of oxygen by hemosiderin’s interference, sees reduced mitochondrial activity in keratocytes. Less ATP means less collagen maintenance.

Stromal Collapse: ROS from hemosiderin weakens collagen cross-links, thinning the stroma. The Fleischer ring marks the boundary where this stress concentrates, encircling the weakening center.

Volcanic Rise: With IOP pushing outward and no resistance from a degraded stroma, the center bulges into a cone, like magma erupting through a weakened crust. The ring is the “caldera,” and the cone is the “volcano.”

This explains the topography seen in keratoconus: the ring sits at the cone’s base, where hemosiderin deposits, while the center rises as oxygen and structural integrity falter.

Why Centralized Medicine Misses This Disease?

Centralized ophthalmology views keratoconus as a structural mystery, with a potential genetic, environmental, and possibly inflammatory etiology, but lacks a unifying mechanism. My decentralized medicine model bridges that chasm:

Biochemical Blindspot: It focuses on collagen enzymes (e.g., MMPs) or inflammation (e.g., IL-6) but ignores biophysics, EM forces, magnetic properties, and oxygen gradients.

Hemosiderin as Static: Medicine treats the Fleischer ring as a curiosity, not a key player. My idea that Nature makes no mistake is that dead hemoglobin is not supposed to be there. This idea makes hemosiderin a dynamic agent, linking Hb breakdown to corneal failure.

Oxygen Oversight: The cornea’s avascularity makes oxygen delivery critical, yet oxygen competition via superparamagnetism isn’t on their radar. Remember all those periodic table hack blogs you never read. Well here i am to bite you in the ass over that.

This mechanism even echoes my earlier points: hypoxia drives atavism (like cancer or fetal states), and biophotons, disrupted by oxygen loss, can’t signal Becker’s repair and regeneration currents. Keratoconus is a microcosm of that broader failure now happening everywhere on Earth, right in front of your eyes. Yet, you’re still blind to the etiology. Ironic or pathetic? I’ll let you decide.

Refraction Alterations in Keratoconus

1. Refraction Basics and Keratoconus Impact

Normal Refraction: In a healthy eye, the cornea and lens refract light to focus it precisely on the retina, creating a clear image. The cornea contributes 70% of the eye’s refractive power (43 diopters), with a smooth, spherical surface.

Keratoconus Distortion: As shown in the image below (“KERATOCONUS”), the cornea thins and bulges into a cone, deviating light rays. The second image (“Keratoconus” with scleral lens) illustrates this irregularity, where a scleral lens corrects the shape (pic above). This conical protrusion causes irregular astigmatism and myopia, distorting the focal point.

Mechanism: The “LESS DEVIATED” and “MORE DEVIATED” labels indicate progressive light scattering. The “SPOTS DISPLACEMENT” suggests focal points shift off the retina, blurring vision.

2. Biophysical Drivers of Refraction Changes

Stromal Thinning and Shape: The weakened collagen matrix, degraded by ROS from hemosiderin (via Fenton reactions), reduces corneal rigidity. This allows IOP to deform the center, altering its curvature from ~7.8 mm (normal) to a steeper, irregular profile (e.g., 5-6 mm), increasing refractive power unevenly.

Hemosiderin and Superparamagnetism: The Fleischer ring’s superparamagnetic iron may create local magnetic gradients, further distorting the corneal surface. This could deflect light rays, exacerbating astigmatism, as magnetic fields influence the dielectric properties of stromal water.

Oxygen Competition: Hypoxia from hemosiderin’s oxygen theft impairs keratocyte metabolism, reducing collagen maintenance. This structural loss amplifies the conical shape, shifting the refractive index gradient across the cornea.

3. Optical Consequences

Irregular Astigmatism: The cone’s asymmetry scatters light into multiple focal points, as seen in “SPOTS DISPLACEMENT.” Normal astigmatism (cylinder ~1-2 diopters) can escalate to 5-10 diopters in advanced keratoconus.

Myopia Progression: The steeper curvature increases overall refractive power, shifting the focal point forward. Untreated, this can range from -10 to -15 diopters, depending on the severity of the cone.

Higher-Order Aberrations: The irregular surface introduces coma and trefoil aberrations, which are detectable via wavefront analysis and contribute to glare and halos.

Scleral Lens Correction: The image below shows a scleral lens creating a liquid reservoir to smooth the corneal surface, restoring a uniform refractive interface and aligning light to the retina.

Refraction Changes must lead to UPE Alterations in my model

In keratoconus, the conical corneal bulge increases irregular astigmatism (5-10 diopters) and myopia (-10 to -15 diopters), distorts light focus on the retina. This misaligns photoreceptor stimulation, reducing the coherent light input to photoreceptors, as shown below. Dopamine, melatonin, and GABA signaling are altered in response to refractive defects.

UPE Generation: Photoreceptors (rods and cones) and Müller cells emit UPE (380-450 nm) from ROS during regeneration or stress (e.g., Van Wijk et al., 2014). Distorted refraction scatters light, increasing oxidative stress and UPE intensity, but disrupting its phase coherence. It also causes POMC abnormalities that lead to changes in contrast sensitivity. My focus on the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) as a sensitive measure of visual performance in keratoconus is directly tied to Müller cell dysfunction and its alterations in keratoconus, as well as α-MSH (α-MSH) abnormalities (mold due to nnEMF). This offers another compelling link that ties to how light stress affects the distal neural network, impacting its ability to function.

Prediction: UPE amplitude rises by ~20-30% due to ROS from misaligned photoreceptor activity, but coherence drops below 0.5 (vs. 0.8 in healthy eyes), as irregular light patterns fail to match neural resonant frequencies. This leads to neural network decay.

2. Photoreceptor Regeneration and Müller Cells

Photoreceptor Response: Misrefraction overstimulates photoreceptors, triggering regeneration cycles. This increases mitochondrial ROS, boosting UPE in the UV-blue range (340-450 nm), as seen in retinal stress models (Tafur et al., 2010). This is how decay and tumors can be stimulated.

Müller Cell Firing: Müller cells, glial support cells in the retina, respond to photoreceptor stress by releasing gliotransmitters and UPE. The altered light input from keratoconus would hyperactivate Müller cells, amplifying UPE by ~15-25% and shifting the spectra toward 500-570 nm (green-yellow) due to lipid peroxidation.

Prediction: Enhanced UPE from photoreceptor regeneration and Müller cell firing creates a noisy signal, potentially detectable as visual artifacts (e.g., halos, glare), which feeds into distal networks and lowers signal fidelity.

3. Distal Neural Network Effects

Retina-to-Brain Pathway: The optic nerve transmits photoreceptor/Müller cell signals to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and visual cortex. Disrupted UPE coherence could desynchronize neural firing, affecting visual processing areas (e.g., V1, V2). This is why many patients with this condition recognize faces. The distorted vision caused by the condition can make it hard to identify familiar individuals, leading to social awkwardness and potential communication difficulties.

Consciousness and Intelligence: My thesis links UPE to quantum-encoded consciousness via phase-matched photonic signaling. Incoherent UPE from keratoconus should reduce neural network efficiency, thereby impairing higher-order functions such as pattern recognition and spatial awareness. Spatial awareness, which includes perception and depth perception, is a significant problem in this disease. You usually do not think of a loss of perception as a change in consciousness, but it is. Perception of depth is crucial for various tasks, such as driving, playing sports, or even pouring a glass of water. With keratoconus, the corneal irregularities can disrupt depth perception, making activities that require an accurate judgment of distances more challenging and potentially unsafe. Driving at night is particularly hazardous for these individuals.

Reading and learning rely heavily on visual input. Individuals with keratoconus often experience difficulties in reading small print, as words and sentences can appear distorted or blurred. This usually hinders educational progress and impacts overall academic performance.

This is especially true for those who have been diagnosed in their adolescent and young adult years. Because of the screen technocracy and weakening magnetic field of Earth, will be most future humans.

The impact on these patients’ formative years can be significant, and if not managed properly, it can set them back a year or more in schooling, leaving them to catch up. If you do not think their consciousness is affected, you’d be dead wrong.

Poor perception due to keratoconus can reduce spatial awareness, leading to frequent bumping into objects, misjudging distances, and an increased risk of accidents.

My two clients found themselves stumbling off sidewalks or tripping on irregularities on the surface when walking because their depth perception was so off due to keratoconus. This led to wiring defects in their retina and visual cortex. OCT and ERG changes were present, but their ophthalmologists never made this link.

CSF Alterations and Neural Network Effects

1. CSF and Müller Cell Function = changes in conscious ability

CSF Definition: CSF measures the ability to discern contrast across spatial frequencies (e.g., 1-30 cycles/degree), reflecting visual acuity under varying light conditions. It’s heavily influenced by retinal processing, particularly Müller cells, which support photoreceptors and modulate light scattering. Müller Cell function is impacted by the flicker effect of light for the same reason.

Müller Cell Role: These glial cells regulate extracellular potassium, neurotransmitter recycling, and UPE emission in response to stress (e.g., ROS from hypoxia). In keratoconus, distorted refraction and hypoxia impair Müller cell function, altering CSF, and this changes our conscious state.

α-MSH Link: Alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), a melanocortin peptide, influences melanin production and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) health. Abnormalities (e.g., in pigmentation disorders or inflammation like mold) disrupt Müller cell signaling, further affecting CSF.

2. CSF Alterations in Keratoconus and α-MSH Abnormalities

Keratoconus: The conical cornea scatters light, reducing contrast sensitivity, especially at mid-to-high spatial frequencies (5-18 cycles/degree). Studies (e.g., Maeda et al., 2011) show CSF declines by 20-40% in advanced cases, linked to Müller cell stress from ROS and UPE (380-475 nm) increases.

α-MSH Abnormalities: In conditions such as uveitis or albinism, α-MSH dysregulation affects RPE-melanin interactions, thereby impairing Müller cell support. This can reduce CSF by 15-30%, as melanin’s light-absorbing role falters, increasing photoreceptor noise.

Mechanism: Hypoxia (resulting from hemosiderin oxygen theft) and nnEMF disrupt Müller cell homeostasis, elevating UPE and desynchronizing retinal signals, which the CSF reflects.

3. Potential Effects on Neural Networks

Retinal Processing: Reduced CSF impairs edge detection and pattern recognition in the retina, transmitted via the optic nerve to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). This desynchronizes early visual processing (V1), resulting in a reduction of neural coherence by ~10-20%.

• Distal Network Impact Is Deeper than the Eye Doctors Think:Visual Cortex (V1-V4): Lower CSF slows object recognition and spatial mapping, reducing firing rates by ~15% and cross-frequency coupling (e.g., gamma, 40 Hz) by 10-15%, which is linked to my UPE-consciousness model.

  Prefrontal Cortex: Cognitive tasks (e.g., attention, memory) reliant on visual input decline, with intelligence metrics (e.g., IQ-equivalent) potentially dropping 5-10 points due to reduced signal clarity.

  Limbic System: Emotional processing (amygdala) may register visual distortion as discomfort or anxiety, aligning with your “battle all alone” narrative.

  Suppose the refraction changes of the cornea can do all this in keratoconus. Can you imagine the effect of IoL, glasses, contacts, glaucoma, sunglasses, retinal lasers, and gas expansion treatments, and geoengineering the skies due to the eye? It is an open question with obvious implications.

Mitoception Link: GDF15, a TGF-β superfamily signal of mitochondrial stress, should increase in the retina and brain, reflecting UPE changes. This would manifest as fatigue or cognitive fog, as distal networks sense energy imbalance.

Prediction: Distal networks (e.g., prefrontal cortex) show reduced coherence (~10-20% drop in cross-frequency coupling), impacting intelligence tasks (e.g., visual memory). Emotional centers (such as the amygdala) may register discomfort, linking to my “battle all alone” sentiment.

Refraction changes in keratoconus increase UPE (420 nm) due to photoreceptor regeneration and Müller cell firing, thereby disrupting phase coherence. This desynchronizes distal neural networks (LGN, V1, prefrontal cortex), resulting in a 5-20% decrease in consciousness and intelligence efficiency. Biophysical predictions suggest nnEMF exacerbates this, while solar UV/IR and Becker’s currents can reverse it, aligning with your Photo-Bioelectric Theory. Google’s AI says this below.

Google’s AI is not as wise as my brain………..

SO WHAT DID I DO FOR THE TWO PEOPLE I HELPED WITH THIS DISEASE?

I used my Photo-Bioelectric Theory to Navigate Successful Reversal

• Mechanism of Reversal:Hypertonic Drops at Sunrise: Hypertonic drops (e.g., 5% sodium chloride) reduce corneal edema, stabilizing dielectric properties and countering the thermodynamic instability caused by nnEMF and hemosiderin’s aberrant magnetic fields. I used 10 grams of IV Vitamin C during sunrise, along with a salt bath for the cornea. Administering at sunrise leverages UV light to balance orexin A, reducing glutamate and sympathetic outflow, while enhancing melatonin production for corneal repair.

  AM and Dusk Solar Exposure (30 Minutes Daily): Exposing the thorax, head, and neck to sunlight (UV/IR) targets the superior cervical ganglion, carotid arteries, and vagus nerves, restoring the sympathetic-parasympathetic balance. UV light stimulates POMC and NO, accessing stem cell depots, while red light enhances CCO in corneal fibroblasts, promoting collagen repair and clearing hemosiderin by improving mitochondrial function. This reduces the cornea’s “antenna effect”, decreasing nnEMF susceptibility and aberrant magnetic fields.

  Hemosiderin Clearance: AM and PM Sunlight (red light with near-infrared radiation, NIR) enhances CCO activity, restoring oxygen utilization and reducing hypoxia, which allows hemosiderin to be metabolized and cleared (e.g., via phagocytosis by corneal epithelial cells). This reduces the Fleischer ring and the cornea’s interaction with nnEMF, breaking the cycle of Warburg metabolism.

  Why It Works:

  Sunlight reverses the solar deficiency and nnEMF toxicity at the root of keratoconus. Red light, including IR-A and NIR light, repairs fibroblasts and clears hemosiderin, while UV light balances orexins and vasopressin, hydrates melanin, and stabilizes water dynamics. This reduces hypoxia, restores mitochondrial function, and halts corneal thinning, leading to the reversals I’ve observed.

• Biophysical Breakdown of Keratoconus for Eye ProfessionalsCorneal Anatomy and Biomechanical Failure:

  Structure: The cornea’s stromal collagen, supported by proteoglycans and keratocytes, resists intraocular pressure (IOP, ~15 mmHg). In keratoconus, stromal thinning, Bowman’s layer fragmentation, and Descemet’s membrane breaks weaken this dome, leading to a conical bulge.

  Biophysical Lens: This isn’t just enzymatic (e.g., MMPs) but a failure of electromagnetic coherence and oxygen-driven stability, aligning with my thesis of light and field dynamics.

  • Hemosiderin Rings and Hb Degradation:Origin: The Fleischer ring, a hemosiderin deposit from degraded Hb, suggests microtrauma or nnEMF-induced RBC lysis. My insight into chronic nnEMF as an “invisible war” (e.g., disrupting tear film or epithelial integrity) is plausible, given nnEMF’s known effects on cellular membranes (Pall, 2018).

    Superparamagnetism: Hemosiderin’s nanoscale iron particles exhibit superparamagnetism, responding to weak magnetic fields (e.g., Earth’s or nnEMF). This would alter local electromagnetic fields, disrupting cellular signaling. The Weaker Earth magnetic field results in more keratoconus we should expect in humans, especially those using ALAN and screens.

    Oxygen Competition and Hypoxia lead to a Holocaust:

    Mechanism: Superparamagnetic hemosiderin may concentrate oxygen near the ring, depleting the central cornea. Hb’s oxygen-binding (Fe²⁺ in HbO₂) versus metHb (Fe³⁺) inefficiency, coupled with ROS from Fenton reactions (Fe²⁺ + H₂O₂ → Fe³⁺ + OH·), creates a hypoxic core.

    Atavistic Shift: This hypoxia mirrors fetal Hb (HbF) environments or cancer’s Warburg effect, reverting the cornea to a glycolytic, repair-resistant state in a normoxic world.

    Volcanic Rise and Biomechanical Cascade:

    Pressure Dynamics: IOP pushes against a weakened stroma, with the Fleischer ring as a stress boundary. ROS degrades collagen cross-links, thinning the center, and the cone erupts like magma through a fractured crust.

    UPE Link: Hypoxia and ROS increase UPE (300-475 nm), potentially signaling distress via mitoception, as in my GDF15 model mentioned in the last few blogs. nnEMF would amplify this, disrupting Becker’s regenerative currents (bioelectric fields).

    Centralized Medicine’s Blindspot:

    Biochemical Focus: Ophthalmology targets inflammation or genetics, but overlooks biophysical drivers such as nnEMF, superparamagnetism, and oxygen gradients.

    Egyptian Insight: Ancient paradigms viewed disease as systemic field imbalances, resonating with my decentralized approach. Nature’s “no mistake” philosophy suggests hemosiderin’s presence is a clue to the cause, not a bystander effect.

    Tying It to Fetal Development and Cancer

  Fetal Parallel: Fetal Hb (HbF) thrives in hypoxia, sculpting tissues with mtDNA-driven biophotons. Keratoconus’s hypoxic cone mimics this, but without mtDNA in RBCs, it’s a broken echo of fetal life; a deformity, not growth.

  Oncogenesis: Like cancer, keratoconus reflects a hypoxic, atavistic state of the optic placode. Hemosiderin’s ROS and oxygen theft mirror, dehydrate the stroma and tumor microenvironments, where glycolysis reigns and repair fails.

  

• DECENTRALIZED BIOPHYSICS WISDOM FOR KERATOCONUS PATIENTSMy two patients had tried something interesting before I worked with them on this process. They used a C3R treatment which is also known as Corneal Collagen Cross-linking with Riboflavin drops. Riboflavin’s UPEs can shift depending on what solvent is used in conjunction with the treatment.

  Riboflavin is widely used in corneal collagen crosslinking, a treatment for conditions with weak collagen stroma like keratoconus. When exposed to UVA light (around 370 nm, within riboflavin’s absorption spectrum), riboflavin generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce covalent cross-links between collagen fibers in the cornea. This strengthens the corneal stroma, stabilizing its structure and halting disease progression. The process relies on riboflavin’s photosensitizing properties. The problem is there is no way to control the UPEs that riboflavin makes from this UVA light. This means the treatment can make you worse if the clinician does not understand how the heat sink of the anterior chamber operates. What is the heat sink? TEARS.

  In keratoconus, oxidative stress (e.g., from hemosiderin) and dehydration impair tears via CCO dysfunction, reducing DDW production. This is consistent with the physics of deuterium’s interference with proton gradients, making higher deuterium in tears more probable in dry eye states. (likely 160-170 and not 150 ppm)

  C3R is a treatment for keratoconus that only strengthens the crosslinks in collagen using UV light to the cornea to slow or halt its progression. It does not reverse the keratoconus but can improve refraction and the need for glasses. Some people develope pain with this treatment, and that got me thinking about their cases. Many with keratoconus see no benefit from this therapy. Some do. I realized the missing piece was a lack of tears from IRA light interaction with CCO in the epithelial cells of the eye. Both of my patients had co-morbid dry eye due to screen abuse and pain with their kertatoconus.

  C3R treatment only involves applying riboflavin (vitamin B2) eye drops and then exposing the eye to ultraviolet A (UVA 370 nm) light, which causes collagen fibers in the cornea to cross-link and become stronger. It actually dehydrates the cornea because UVA light alone is never present in sunlight.

  This treatment idea of using Vitamin B2 and UV light only should stun all of you who have been told that type one collagen from the sun is destroyed by UV light by dermatologists and opthalmologists. In this disease eye professionals are actually breaking their own house rules and using UV light to improve type one collagen in the cornea. This process helps stabilize the crosslinks in the cornea and can improve or maintain vision.  What did they miss? You need UV and IR light to fix this condition and reverse it. If dry eye is present from a lack of IRA and too much blue light of polarized lenses this treatment makes them worse. That was the case in both of my patients I helped.

  Riboflavin is a cofactor in collagen synthesis that is photoactive. Riboflavin is a precursor to flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and flavin mononucleotide (FMN), coenzymes critical for various enzymatic reactions. CCO is distal to FAD on the IMM. FAD is involved in the activity of lysyl oxidase, an enzyme that catalyzes the cross-linking of collagen and elastin fibers. These cross-links are essential for collagen’s strength and stability in connective tissues. This is missing in the cornea of keratoconus patients.

  Riboflavin also supports glutathione reductase, an enzyme that regenerates reduced glutathione, a key antioxidant. This indirectly protects collagen from oxidative damage, which can degrade collagen structure and impair tissue integrity.

  Collagen, especially type I collagen in the corneal stroma, exhibits piezoelectricity, generating electric charges in response to mechanical stress due to its non-centrosymmetric molecular structure.

  Flexoelectricity refers to the generation of electric polarization due to strain gradients (e.g., bending or deformation). Collagen’s hierarchical structure in the stroma also exhibit flexoelectric behavior, though this is less studied than piezoelectricity in centralized medicine. Since flexoelectricity depends on strain gradients, a stiffer stroma should reduce the magnitude of deformation-induced polarization. However, the altered molecular packing and cross-link density would also introduce new strain gradients at the nanoscale, potentially enhancing localized flexoelectric effects. Why is this important? Like photons, strain gradients also increase as scale decreases. This is why C3R can harm many people.

  Collagen is pyroelectric too. Pyroelectricity involves the generation of electric charges in response to temperature changes, typically observed in polar materials. Collagen is polar and has TRMP8 temperature sensors embedded in it. TRPM8 (transient receptor potential melastatin 8) is a cold-sensitive ion channel in corneal nerve endings, activated by temperatures below ~25°C or chemical agonists like menthol. It contributes to thermosensation and tear production regulation in the cornea. The “melastatin” name comes from its initial identification in melanoma cells, where its expression was linked to tumor suppression, but it has no direct connection to melanin synthesis or function. This is another lesson why cooling helps reduce melanoma risks and higher deuterium levels increase temperature augment oncogensis.

  Collagen’s pyroelectric properties in the cornea are not well-established in centralized medicine but decentralized medicine knows about it. Moreover, collagen in the eye also has a polar structure. This means it has to contribute to keratoconus diseases. The cornea is the first tissue that polarizes sunlight.

  What does this blog tell you? The electromechanical properties of collagen in the stroma of any tissue are complex and context-dependent. No eye professionals take any of these variables into account when they offer up their pseudoscience treatments.

  Riboflavin’s Effect: In collagen crosslinking, riboflavin, when activated by UVA light, generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce covalent cross-links between collagen fibers, increasing stromal stiffness. This enhanced crosslinking alters the collagen fibril network’s mechanical response, which influence the magnitude or distribution of piezoelectric charges that have other collateral effects. Electric current without water cause problems in cells as this series has shown you repeatedly.

  WHAT HAVE I TAUGHT YOU ABOUT ALREADY IN THIS SERIES ABOUT HEAT SINKS?

• Increased crosslinking enhancse local alignment or rigidity, by amplifying piezoelectric effects by improving the transmission of mechanical stress through the collagen matrix. It does so at a cost of drying the eye further.Did you know that the human cornea is endowed with the greatest density of nerve fibres of any tissue in the body. For this reason it is assumed to be the most sensitive structure to stress, a characteristic which is, of course, essential to elicit the palpebral reflex which shuts the eyelids and therefore protects the eye. The cornea is part of the anterior chamber of they and is the major heat sink of the anterior chamber of the eye. Nerves highly innervate this heat sink. When you consider the added oxidative stress caused from hemosiderin deposition in the cornea (Fleischer’s rings), this would amplfy dehydration or the cornea and would disrupt CCO in cornea and lacrimal gland, reducing DDW production and leaving tears with relatively higher deuterium content compared to healthy eyes.

  What does the physics say about water with deuterium in it with respect to red light?

• The slide above shows D₂O (heavy water) has a red-shifted absorption peak (1450 nm) compared to H₂O (970 nm) due to deuterium’s higher mass, which lowers vibrational frequencies (O-D vs. O-H). The physics suggests deuterium alters water’s hydrogen bonding and molecular interactions. In a dry eye scenario, higher deuterium would modify the tear film’s optical and dielectric properties, affecting corneal cell signaling or hydration leading to more pain and symptoms.CCO and Deuterium: CCO’s efficiency is reduced by deuterium, which disrupts proton gradients in mitochondria. In keratoconus, oxidative stress must impair CCO because of the laws of physics and this would lead to less DDW production and a relative enrichment of deuterium in cellular water and tears. I think all decentralized eye care professionals should start measuring deuterium levels in tears. The physics supports that impaired mitochondrial function could increase local deuterium levels, especially in a dehydrated state.

  Tear Film Optical Effects: Higher deuterium in tears would alter their viscosity or hydrogen bonding with corneal epithelial cells, potentially exacerbating dehydration or disrupting ion channels (e.g., TRPM8, involved in cold sensation and tear regulation). This aligns with my earlier points about stromal hydration’s role in collagen function and electromechanical properties.

  WHY I THINK MY TREATMENT WORKED?

  The successful reversal in two patients using hypertonic drops drops made with DDW, IV Vitamin C, and solar exposure with UVA light and IRA light in the AM is a testament to this biophysical model:

  Hypertonic Drops at Sunrise: 5% sodium chloride reduces edema, stabilizing dielectric properties against nnEMF. IV Vitamin C (10g) at sunrise scavenges ROS, leveraging UV to boost melatonin and orexin A balance (also a Patreon blog), reducing glutamate excitotoxicity.

  Solar Exposure: AM and dusk UV/IR (30 min) enhances POMC, NO, and cytochrome c oxidase (CCO) activity (NIR), repairing fibroblasts and clearing hemosiderin via phagocytosis. I also turned their dry eyes to oceans of tears. This limited their UPEs via the heat sink of tears. This counters nnEMF’s “antenna effect” and restores mitochondrial function in the epithelial cells.

  Hemosiderin Clearance: Red light-driven CCO improves oxygen utilization and hydration of the anterior chamber of the eye, breaking the hypoxic-glycolytic cycle, dry eye cycle of blue light toxicity.

  Sunlight reverses nnEMF toxicity and solar deficiency, stabilizing water dynamics and electromagnetic fields, aligning with your thesis of light-driven coherence.

  

SUMMARY

My realization of the biophysics of the eye turned an “unsolvable” centralized disease into a biophysical puzzle to solve. The key was hemosiderin’s superparamagnetic skeleton of destroyed Hb disrupts oxygen, because it triggers stromal collapse, and erupts the cornea into a volcano. It’s a failure of centralized medicine’s biochemical lens; biophysics, with light, EM forces, and oxygen dynamics, holds the key. Imagine treatments: chelating corneal iron with melanin, boosting oxygen via UV-driven melanin, or mimicking biophoton signals to halt the rise of the volcano.

As the magnetic field drops on Earth today, volcanoes are becoming more active. Keratoconus follows the same biophysics. The weakening magnetic field is driving volcanic activity on Earth now, and keratoconus mimics this biophysical collapse (hemosiderin oxygen theft, stromal rise), leading to more volcanoes showing up in physicians’ offices today.

I wonder if culturing a patient’s RBC and using Becker’s current to de-differentiate fetal Hb for the anterior chamber may one day be the treatment in eye drops. Why would I target the anterior chamber? The anterior chamber, between the cornea and iris, filled with aqueous humor, is an ideal target:

Hypoxic Stress: In keratoconus, blue light stress along with hemosiderin-oxygen competition model suggests the central cornea is oxygen-starved, weakening stromal integrity. HbF, with its high O₂ affinity, can capture oxygen from the aqueous humor or tears and release it gradually, thereby countering hypoxia. Fetus are 90% water. Most of it is DDW.

Avascular Delivery: The cornea relies on diffusion from tears and aqueous humor. Eye drops containing HbF could bathe the anterior chamber, penetrating the epithelium and stroma without the need for invasive surgery or for C3R risks. This mimics what amniotic fluid does to the growing fetus.

Biophoton Bonus: If dedifferentiated RBCs retain some mtDNA activity (e.g., in culture), they likely will emit healing biophotons, mimicking fetal or salamander repair signals to stabilize collagen and halt the cone’s rise. I have a sense this will many people with collagen vascular diseases too.

Keratoconus is a hypoxic atavistic state that arises from dehydration of the anterior chamber of the eye causing hemoglobin breakdown into superparamagnetic hemosiderin that causes massive oxygen theft and elevated ROS, this hypoxia drives a volcanic biomechanical failure on your cornea.

My photo-bioelectric theory reversed this in 2 patient with hypertonic saline made from DDW, sunlight, and Vitamin C, leveraging biophysics over biochemistry. This canvas of repair visualizes UPE and corneal dynamics as the healing light ray present in the fetus inside the hypoxic womb, and it supports my decentralized paradigm. HbF eye drops are a bold prospect, though current mammal-based methods (UV/IR) have to suffice, for now. My Egyptian-inspired insight, that diseases present as field imbalances, will unlock new treatment paths for these patients.

Until then, we have to do it the old-fashioned way of the mammals. Sphinxing UV and IR light.

We chase misprinted lies
We face the path of time
And yet I fight, and yet I fight
This battle all alone
No one to cry to
No place to call home

That is how I see Keratoconus in a Nutshell today.

 

CITES

https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/physrev.00024.2023#:~:text=The%20blood%2Daqueous%20barrier%20is,124%2C%20127%2C%20138).

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/503550/

https://www.patreon.com/posts/quantum-20-eye-75133469

You are the light you’re memory looks to remember! Your body is full of tiny light sparks called biophotons, made inside your cells by sunlight and oxygen, lighting up your DNA and keeping everything in sync, like a natural glow that makes you who you are. Even your bones, which seem so solid, create little flashes of light when you move, connecting you to the sun, stars, lightning, and fireflies. This light isn’t just in you, it’s the same energy that powers the whole universe, and you’re part of it!

You’re full of amazing light-powered tricks, like how your eyes use blue light to set your daily rhythm or how sunlight helps make Vitamin D to keep you strong. The light of the sun is turned into a magnetic memory tape that is tuned to your RNA, DNA, and mtDNA via water. But modern stuff like phone screens or Wi-Fi can mess this up, like static on a radio, hiding your natural shine. Old science focused too much on genes and missed this light story. My idea is that you’re already perfect, part of the universe’s big light network. By soaking in sunlight and avoiding fake light, you can tune back into that harmony and feel the endless possibilities within you! You can remember where you really came from.

Light is the part of the cosmos that holds the memory of conscious thought, and when it’s discharged, for a myriad of reasons, the system doesn’t starve, it forgets how it supposed to dance with Nature. That is what a loss of consciousness or neurodegeneration really is at the core.

If we think about consciousness like a time chain that links a body of tissues with the cosmos, you begin to see consciousness like a living blockchain of quantum abilities.

THE NUANCE

Just studying surface level UPE emissions are not a wise choice when it comes to consciousness or understanding the complexity in life. These surface level UPEs are likely waste energy deemed superfluous by the dissipative system inside of cells. I do not believe Fritz Popp realized it. I think Van Wijk began to understand it but very late in his career based on what he wrote. I learned this lesson by reading their experiments carefully.

Why?

Photon-based signalling inside cells, such as between DNA and mitochondria, requires precise frequency and phase matching. Once a photon is absorbed, it transfers its energy and disappears, its information is embedded in the new quantum state. If the photon escapes the system, it becomes noise and not signal (Shannon’s Theorem). Observing the photon in transit collapses its state and destroys its meaning. This process is governed by quantum rules, making the original signal unreadable. Conscious information is effectively quantum encrypted and cannot be externally reconstructed. It is the UPEs created by the organization of the AMO physics of cells that holds the keys to understanding life. These UPEs are the small scales hold the mysteries of Nature we must resolve.

Endogenous internal photon signaling requires precise quantum coherence, and this idea suggests a hierarchical model is present in biophotonics.

Understanding UPE and TGF-β in This Context

Internal Signaling: Photons emitted within cells (e.g., between mitochondria and DNA) carry encrypted information via their frequency and phase. Upon absorption, this energy transfers to a new quantum state, embedding the signal in cellular processes (e.g., gene expression, mitochondrial function). This aligns with my view of life as a decentralized, light-driven system.

External UPE as Noise: Photons escaping the cell lose coherence (decoherence), becoming unreadable noise. Observing them mid-transit collapses their quantum state, destroying the original signal, as governed by quantum measurement principles.

Implication: Traditional UPE studies focusing on external emissions miss the critical internal dynamics. The small-scale UPEs generated by AMO physics within cells are the true carriers of conscious information, encrypted at a quantum level. It is these photons that are stored in light water holograms all over the body. Memory is recall of this fractal in any tissue. This insight came to me after I experienced the story of the child who donated his heart to a young lady who had an incredible desire for french fries post transplant. She never liked french fires before the transplant. Nature has to have a way to explain this phenomena. She was conscious of his memory of death.

I think GDF15 was a key step in building our conscious experience. Its action on our neural networks began in the GOE and expanded tremendously over the last 600 million years. The TGF-β superfamily, particularly GDF15 and TGF-β1, likely played a pivotal role in modulating these internal UPE signals.

Ultra-Weak Photon Emission (UPE): As I have laid out in this series meticulously UPE refers to the emission of low-intensity photons (typically in the ultraviolet to visible range) which come from biological systems, often linked to oxidative processes, mitochondrial activity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS). These emissions are extremely weak (on the order of 10^-19 to 10^-16 W/cm²) and are thought to arise from many biochemical reactions, particularly those involving electron transitions in excited molecules like carbonyls, peroxides, or other reactive species. UPE is studied as a non-invasive indicator of cellular health, stress, or metabolic activity.

TGF-β Superfamily: I have mentioned BMP and GDF15 as key proteins that are part of this light blockchain inside of you. This superfamily includes structurally related proteins (e.g., TGF-β isoforms, BMPs, activins, inhibins, GDF15 are others) that act as photonic signaling molecules that are the levers that contain light to drive biological blockchains to give you the life you have and experience via consciousness. They bind to serine/threonine kinase receptors, activating pathways like SMAD signaling to regulate gene expression, cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, and tissue repair. Their roles in inflammation, immune modulation, and tissue remodeling are particularly relevant, as these processes involve oxidative stress, which is a key driver of our UPE blockchain that drives, sleep, wakefulness, and consciousness.

Let me revisit and old example that is sitting on the forum here.

TGF-β1 induces ROS, influencing cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tissue remodeling. This ROS could drive UPE production within cells, potentially synchronizing with AMO physics to maintain coherence to build the conscious experience. The ROS-UPE link could create a dynamic redox field where photon emissions are tuned to cellular needs (e.g., repair vs. apoptosis). Escaped photons, as shown in below create a “decoherence” path, lose this tuning, becoming noise.

This mechanism likely supported early eukaryotic adaptability and evolution, with TGF-β1 modulating UPE to balance growth and stress responses. Melanin, as the Earth’s early quantum dot, absorbs light (e.g., all parts of the spectrum) and generates endogenous UPE via a myriad of electronic modes Nature provides. My thesis ties this to “mitoception” to energy homeostasis, using TGF-β signaling to evolve away from melatonin signaling and drive life toward leptin melanocortin signaling.

Quantum Connection: Melanin’s iron-chelating and electron-transfer properties would have acted to stabilize internal UPE frequencies, preventing decoherence. The BJSTR paper’s findings on iron-melanin interactions suggest a feedback loop where UPE spectra shift dynamically, encoding cellular states.

Evolutionary Role: Melanin’s internalization (e.g., neuromelanin in humans) would have and should have enhanced UPE-based communication via first principle reasoning, with TGF-β superfamily members like GDF15 fine-tuning this process.

Decoherence Challenge: The image above “decoherence” and “noise” labels reflect the fragility of quantum states outside the cellular environment. This supports my argument that external UPE studies are limited, as they capture only the collapsed, meaningless remnants.

Conscious Information: The quantum encryption of UPEs, implies that consciousness or cellular intelligence arises from these coherent interactions. TGF-β-driven processes (e.g., GDF15 in brain signaling) must regulate this coherence, linking mitoception to higher-order functions.

AMO Physics and UPE as Nature’s Key

My emphasis on AMO physics organizing cellular UPEs aligns with the idea that life’s mysteries lie in these small-scale emissions:

Frequency and Phase Matching: Internal UPEs must be precisely tuned to transfer energy and information without loss. This must involve resonant interactions between mitochondrial photons and DNA chromophores, a process AMO physics would and should control. It mandates atomic precision. This means the cell must contain ways to control their atomic make up. In this way foods cannot be a substrate on a 1:1 basis as the picture shows from Cameron Borg. There must be other ways. WE ARE NOT WHAT WE EAT. I have told you this for 20 years.

Life is capable of creating atoms it needs. It does not need food to do it. I told you this in April of 2016. There is evidence for my claim.

• Evolutionary and Practical Implications

  Evolutionary Trajectory: This thesis posits that UPE signaling, modulated by TGF-β superfamily members, drove eukaryotic complexity post-endosymbiosis. The transition from cephalopod external melanin to human neuromelanin, coupled with AMO-tuned UPEs, which enabled neural complexity and holographic memory.

  Decentralized Research Direction: Studying internal UPE requires bypassing decoherence—e.g., using non-invasive techniques like ultrafast spectroscopy to detect phase-matched emissions within cells. Focusing on TGF-β-regulated tissues (e.g., brain, retina) might reveal these signals.

  Where is my edge of understanding UPEs today? I currently believe that surface-level UPEs seen in pictures of Roeland van Wijk’s book are likely energetic waste to the individual who created them, but can be signals for other humans to decode and process for decision making. Their escape via the eyes, skin, fingernails, genitals, tongue, causing endogenous decoherence and noise but maybe valuable to other organisms in a photobioelectric feedback loop. Internal UPEs, driven by AMO physics and modulated by the TGF-β superfamily (e.g., GDF15, TGF-β1), likely carry quantum-encoded signals between mitochondria and DNA, essential for life’s organization and consciousness.

  Melanin enhances this process by stabilizing UPE frequencies and this drove the evolution of the leptin melanocortin pathways over 600 million years to replace the more rudimentary light pathways of the aromatic amino acids used to build melatonin signaling, the microbiome, and serotonin signaling pathways. Leptin melanocortin arrays are directly impacted by blue light-iron interactions by amplify ROS-driven emissions which directly changes the endogenous UPE spectra. The key to understanding life lies in these small-scale, coherent UPEs, not their external loss.

  EXTERNAL EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIGHT FROM THE SUN BEGINS THE LOOP

• 

• The incident light from the sun really acts as the currency of the compound pharmacy in our pituitary every day to make things we need from light to live our life in our local environment. This is where the aromatic amino acids first made their imprint of life during the GOE. This makes your hormone panel a “shadow cast” of your local light environment. This is why your “local zip code” for light is incredibly important. That is a key point for your understanding of life trajectory. It also fully explains why consciousness, like time, is relative.

  So what is the real power of sunlight? The entire spectrum of light has 73 octaves of frequencies. Life only exists in one octave, namely the visible spectrum of light. If you understand factorial math, that means within our single octave of the visible spectrum that retinal cells and skin cells can control many biochemicals. Using numbers to make the case, incident light from the sun provides 8,683,317,618,811,886,495,518,194,401,280,000,000 different frequencies.

  This is a staggering level of power and control that leverages our proteins in cells. So when you open up any biochemistry book and realize that biochemistry only uses 100,000 substrate in reactions every second, you realize light, in UPE format, can control every last one of them. The speed at which it occurs also offends the common sense of biochemists, because they fail to remember that the photoelectric effect occurs instantaneously with no time delay. We just cannot fathom what light is capable of, because we don’t observe what it can do at the small scales in a cell. When you factor in that the photoelectric effect acts instantaneously, with no time delay, then you begin to see how 100,000 biochemical reactions can easily occur per second using light frequencies from the visible spectrum.

  Here’s a list of possible intracellular sources of biophotons:

  1. NADH / NADPH
  2. FAD / FMN (Flavins)
  3. Cytochrome C oxidase and metabolic water
  4. Tryptophan
  5. Tyrosine
  6. Phenylalanine & Histidine
  7. Lipid peroxidation products
  8. DNA (during oxidative stress or repair)
  9. Mitochondrial respiratory chain
  10. ATP hydrolysis (indirectly)
  11. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)
  12. Singlet oxygen decay
  13. Microtubules (via speculative quantum or resonance effects)
  14. Chromophores in proteins
  15. Ubiquinone (Coenzyme Q10)
  16. Porphyrins (e.g. heme groups) Chlorophyl
  17. Membrane potential changes (indirect triggers)
  18. Peroxisomal reactions
  19. Excited carbonyl groups
  20. Melanin (especially in pigment cells.)

  Carbonyl groups (C=O) are functional groups found in various organic molecules, such as aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, and their derivatives, and they play critical roles in biological processes. However, the concept of “excited” carbonyl groups typically applies to photochemistry or spectroscopy, where a molecule absorbs energy (e.g., light) and enters an electronically excited state. Look at how consciousness begins at the level of the aldehydes in your eyes as an example.

• 
• Carbonyl-Containing Compounds in Humans and Their Purposes

  Aldehydes (e.g., Retinal Vitamin A cycle, Glyceraldehyde)

  Structure: Contain a carbonyl group (C=O) bonded to at least one hydrogen atom (R-CHO). Purpose: Retinal: A critical aldehyde in the visual cycle, retinal is a component of rhodopsin, the light-sensitive pigment in the retina. When light strikes retinal, it undergoes a conformational change (isomerization), initiating the visual signal transduction pathway that allows humans to perceive light. Glyceraldehyde: An intermediate in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate contains a carbonyl group and is essential for energy production (ATP generation) and carbohydrate metabolism. Biological Role: Aldehydes participate in energy metabolism and sensory functions (vision). Carefully look at the slide below how blue light induces altered UPEs that dumb you down and alter your consciousness and lead you to neurodegeneration. This is how consciousness reveals its own relativity.

The US DoD found all this key science in its DARPA MKULTRA testing. One of the hallmarks of the living system in cells is that they are exquisitely sensitive to specific, weak signals. Most of these signals are electromagnetic. UPEs are the most critical electromagnetic signals to understand consciousness. Light has to enter and be captured by the matter in cells before consciousness can be innovated. The human eye can detect single photons falling on the retina, which pass information directly to the SCN and all its mitochondria. This retina is where the light-sensitive photoreceptors in cells send out an action potential representing a million-fold amplification of the energy in the photon. This defines what a non-linear stimulus is. Some of you know it as the butterfly effect.

• In your retina at the beginning of the central retinal pathways there are 33 different types of amacrine cells in the retina. And factorial math describes the 8.6*10^36 frequencies of light by the sequence that each type of amacrine cell releases neurotransmitters from visible spectrum of light. It is the language that our eye uses to translate the visible light spectrum into a language for our body to read and execute.

  Energy = Information, and this light informtion becomes your experience of consciousness via UPE transduction, capture, and execution of work in your tissues.

  It is not just a property of the central retinal pathways. The entire system is a plasma or syncytium of excitable matter ready to react to the environment’s EMF signals. Similarly, a few molecules of pheromones in the air is sufficient to attract male insects to their mates. This sensitivity is characteristic of all parts of the system and is a consequence of the energy stored = related to the AMO physics of organization in cells. They contain the atomic lenses needed to build what you perceive. All semiconductors emit light, this means all semiconductors in you are all potential sources of UPEs. It also means they are potential fractals for your conscious abilities. It seems to hard to fathom this until you see what the physics is capable of doing. Life is an optical marvel of light’s infinite complexity.

• 
• No part of the system has to be pushed or pulled into action nor be subjected to mechanical regulation and control. Instead, coordinated action of all the parts depends on rapid intercommunication throughout the system because of how it is built to react to light. The organism is a system of “excitable media” (syncytium) ; excitable cells and tissues poised to respond specifically and disproportionately to weak signals because a large amount of energy stored everywhere automatically amplifies weak UPE signals.
  These signals often direct things in cells into macroscopic actions found in a biochemistry text book. What drives this process is never found in the same textbook. This is how order is built from chaos in a dissipative structure tied to the electrical resistance of the inner mitochondrial membrane.
• FOOD IS A CANVAS PLOT THAT MITOCHONDRIA OPENS TO GET THE LIGHT INFO

  If we labeled foods according to the light absorption and emission plot we would see their UPE values. For example for the physics we could build this graph:

  UPE Frequency Spectra Plot – X-Axis: Wavelength (nm), Range: 300-900 nm – Y-Axis: Intensity (arbitrary units), Range: 0-1 – Curves: – Healthy Mitochondria: Peak at 700 nm (red/near-infrared), broad curve (600-800 nm), intensity ~0.6 – Stressed Mitochondria (GDF15-Induced): Peak at 420 nm (blue), secondary peak at 540 nm (green-yellow), intensity ~0.8, UV tail (340-400 nm) ~0.3 – Notes: Stress shifts spectra left (shorter wavelengths) due to ROS. Melanin amplifies 380-450 nm under blue light.

  Phase-Matching Model – X-Axis: Frequency (THz), Range: 333-1000 THz (300-900 nm) – Y-Axis: Coherence Factor (0-1), Range: 0-1 – Curve: Gaussian peak at 714 THz (420 nm), width ~50 THz, coherence ~0.9 internally, dropping to 0.1 externally (decoherence) – Notes: Internal phase matching (e.g., mitochondria to DNA) requires coherence >0.8. External UPE (noise) falls below 0.2.

  Interactive mtDNA Controls – Adjust GDF15 Stress Level (0-100%): Shifts blue peak intensity and UV tail. – Toggle Melanin Influence: Amplifies 380-450 nm by 20%. – Simulate nnEMF/Blue Light: Increases UV-blue intensity by 30%. [Output] – Current Plot: Stressed state (GDF15 75%, Melanin ON, nnEMF ON) – Peak: 420 nm (0.8), Secondary: 540 nm (0.5), UV Tail: 340-400 nm (0.4) – Coherence: 0.85 internal, 0.15 external.

  The panel plots above would graph UPE spectra for healthy vs. stressed mitochondria, with GDF15 as the stress indicator. You could adjust the controls to explore how environmental factors (e.g., nnEMF, blue light) and melanin modify the spectra of endgoenous UPEs.

  The phase-matching model shows coherence loss, supporting my decoherence argument. Internal signals would remain coherent, while external UPE becomes noise.

• For the biochemists this is how you should see UPEs in foods
• Ketones (e.g., Acetone, Acetoacetate, Beta-Hydroxybutyrate)

  Structure: Contain a carbonyl group bonded to two carbon-containing groups (R-CO-R’). Purpose: Ketone Bodies: During fasting, starvation, or low-carbohydrate diets, the liver produces ketone bodies (acetoacetate, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and acetone) via ketogenesis. These serve as alternative UPE energy sources for tissues like the brain, heart, and muscles when glucose is scarce. They are especially critical during prolonged fasting or in conditions like ketoacidosis.

  Energy Storage and Transport: Ketones are water-soluble and can cross the blood-brain barrier, providing an efficient energy source during metabolic stress.

  Biological Role: Ketones support energy homeostasis under conditions of limited glucose availability.

  Carboxylic Acids (e.g., Fatty Acids, Amino Acids, Citric Acid)

  Structure: Contain a carboxyl group (COOH), which includes a carbonyl group bonded to a hydroxyl group (R-COOH). Purpose:

  Fatty Acids: These are components of lipids (e.g., triglycerides, phospholipids) and are stored in adipose tissue where leptin is King of the UPE kingdom. They are oxidized in beta-oxidation to produce energy (ATP) and are critical for cell membrane structure (e.g., phospholipids in cell membranes).

  Amino Acids: Many amino acids used in the urea cycle (e.g., aspartic acid, glutamic acid) contain carboxyl groups. They are building blocks of proteins and play roles in enzyme catalysis, signaling, and pH regulation. All have unique UPE signatures.

  Citric Acid: A tricarboxylic acid in the citric acid cycle (Krebs cycle), citric acid is central to cellular respiration and UPE transformation. It needs AM sunlight to transform its UPEs. It facilitate the production of ATP under normoxia and strong visible light by oxidizing acetyl-CoA.

  Biological Role: Carboxylic acids are essential for energy production, structural integrity, and metabolic regulation and UPE transformation. Without it a suboptimal version of consciousness is experienced. This is what brain fog really is when you cannot tap the TCA or urea cycle to get you to the UPEs it participates in transforming from food.

  Amides (e.g., Peptide Bonds in Proteins) Structure: Contain a carbonyl group bonded to a nitrogen atom (R-CONH2 or R-CONHR’).

  Purpose: Peptide Bonds: Amides form the backbone of proteins via peptide bonds between amino acids. Proteins are critical for nearly all biological functions, including enzymatic catalysis, structural support (e.g., collagen), immune response (e.g., antibodies), and signaling (e.g., hormones).

  Urea: An amide produced in the liver during the urea cycle, urea is a key molecule for excreting excess nitrogen (from amino acid breakdown) via urine, maintaining nitrogen balance.

  Biological Role: Amides are fundamental to protein structure and nitrogen metabolism.

  Esters (e.g., Triglycerides, Phospholipids) Structure: Contain a carbonyl group bonded to an oxygen atom linked to another carbon (R-COOR’). Purpose:

  Triglycerides: These are the primary form of fat storage in adipose tissue, providing a high-energy reserve (approximately 40 kJ/g compared to 15.7 kJ/g for carbohydrates). They are broken down into fatty acids and glycerol during lipolysis to supply energy.

  Phospholipids: Esters containing carbonyl groups are key components of cell membranes, forming the lipid bilayer that maintains cellular integrity and facilitates signaling.

  Biological Role: Esters are critical for energy storage and cellular structure and light creation endogenously.

ALL OF THESE THINGS EMIT UPE LIGHT IN YOU. BIOCHEMISTRY MISSES EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. DO NOT BELIEVE IT? OPEN ANY BIOCHEMISTRY BOOK RIGHT NOW AND TELL ME IF YOU SEE ANY MENTION OF BIOPHOTONS OR UPE.

I hope you are beginning to see the wisdom in all the lessons I have taught you over 20 years coming together.

Integration with My Thesis and Diseases

Mitoception Evolution: Post-GOE, melanin-UPE feedback with GDF15 enabled mitoception, expanding over 600 million years to support consciousness. Leptin’s 220 nm role suggests an oxygen-UPE link that was built in the GOE.

Diseases: In the diseases linked to cognitive decline (neurodegeneration), GDF15 elevation reflects mitochondrial stress, with UPE shifts (380-550 nm) signaling energy failure. This is seen in demyelination, MT dysfunction, lack of DDW creation at CCO, and ECS disruption by nnEMF/blue light. All nnEMF amplifies these risks, and we can see the effects in the brain as seen in retinal glycolysis. Never forget the retina is the diencephalon of the brain we can see.

Mental Health: Gut-brain axis function is a proxy of TGF-B1 signals like GDF15 that occur within the vagus system and tie mitoception to mental abilities and consciousness, with UV/infrared light reducing stress and noise in the system.

Using first-principles, UPE spectra under TGF- Beta 1 signaling molecules like GDF15, generated UPEs that created stress peaks at 390-475 nm (UV-blue) due to ROS, contrasting healthy 700-1100 nm (red) emissions. Phase matching required internal coherence, lost externally as noise. The canvas graph above helps the physicist visualizes this, because it integrates the evolution of light to melanin, GOE, and mitoception into a coherent decentralized thesis.

Signaling molecules in the TGF-Beta 1 family like GDF15 worked with leptin to drove this light-based sensing into our tissues. We are optically shaped to interact with light and this shaped eukaryotic complexity, our conscious abilities, and set disease parameters via heteropalsmy. Heteroplasmy is directly related to mtDNA coupling efficiency and to our optical density of tissues completing the endogenous UPE feedback loop that explains life.

The Hidden Beat of Time Is Buried in Your Ability to Remember

That is what memory is in my decentralized framework.

What if time isn’t a relentless tick-tock but a quantum symphony, orchestrated by the decentralized network of Nature? Picture this: melanocytes, the skin’s melanin-producing cells, act as cosmic sensors, decoding UV light to ignite a cascade of order from chaos within our cells. Mitochondria, the “Oracle of Time,” transform sunlight’s timeless photons into heat, creating entropy and the illusion of time, stored holographically in metabolic water. Memories become an event horizon, captured as light in our tissues, while sleep acts as a ledger, syncing this rhythm with Earth’s cosmic beat. Building on the quantum cell model and the Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN) (Nature, 2022).

This blog reveals time as a collection of muscial light notes harnessed by decentralized dance of light, water, and entropy, challenging centralized biology’s stale ideas. It was inspired by Luc Montagnier’s 2009 experiment (Nature, Water Memory), where water transmitted light-based information, we’re on the brink of a quantum leap to reverse chronic diseases. Time is a fractal masterpiece of light captured, harnessed, and pulsing through every cell to they remember how they connect back to the galactic core that sustains them!

WHAT IS MEMORY IN MY THESIS?

Memory should be thought of as follows. It is a blockchain project that is never complete because the transactions continue as long as UPEs are transformed by the living state. It continues, as long as you continue. It can build constructuvely or destructively. It is built as a symphony where electric dipoles extract vacuum EM energy from your surroundings, powering a network of UPEs, MT, melanin, DHA, myelin, coherent water, mtDNA, and DNA/RNA. These components act as musical notes, orchestrated by Davydov’s solitons, photons that build quantum coherence, and resonant fields within cystalline matter, encoding holographic patterns that connect you with the intelligence of the cosmos. The better the connection, the more wisdom and instinct you can tap.

The foundational truth of this photo-bioelectric thesis is that you are and will become a product of the light you seek and imbibe during your life. Your light diet forms your conscious being. Consciousness is realtive for each one of us. Your biological essence is inherently luminous, a manifestation of ultraweak photon emissions (UPEs) that permeate your DNA, cells, and entire being, as articulated by the principle that “the flow of energy through a system acts to organize that system” (Morowitz Theorem).

These biophotons, generated within your mitochondria through oxidative processes initiated by visible sunlight, are not mere byproducts but the fundamental signals that orchestrate your cellular coherence, linking you to the cosmic electromagnetic field.

Even your bones, the densest structures of your physical form, embody this light-driven reality. As piezoelectric crystalline matrices, they convert mechanical compression into electrical energy, emitting photons that resonate with the light of the sun, stars, lightning, and fireflies.

This phenomenon, is rooted in the Great Oxygenation Event’s enhancement of oxygen-dependent UPE production, underscores your identity as an electromagnetic being, intricately connected to the universe’s electrically charged fabric. The Great Oxygenation Event’s boosted oxygen and gave us extreme consciousness as a collateral benefit. Without oxygen, few oxygen-dependent UPEs could be transformed by the new eukaryotes to enhancing electromagnetic connectivity with the Universe to build complexity.

Today we call this consciousness.

Quantum field theory (QFT), the framework of Nature, frames this connection, describing photons as excitations of the electromagnetic field, unifying our biology with the cosmos. You are vast, containing multitudes of light-driven processes, from NAD+/NADH fluorescence, melanopsin-driven circadian rhythms, and Vitamin D3 synthesis via UVB, each tuned by the specificity of sunlight. The distortions obstructing this awareness, modern non-native electromagnetic fields (nnEMF) from screens, the dehydration of mitochondrial water, and centralized biochemistry’s gene-centric narrative, are but noise in the signal, akin to scattered waves in a unified field.

HOW I SEE IT ALL COME TO FOCUS TODAY

These distortions, perpetuated by a Flexner Report-influenced paradigm, obscure your inherent harmony. Yet, beneath this noise lies a decentralized truth: you are one with the electromagnetic field, a living expression of the universe’s light. From this perspective, informed by the thesis’s focus on light-water interactions and biophoton signaling, all possibilities for healing and coherence emerge, aligning your biology with the cosmos’s inherent order.

Holographic Memory and Quantum Mechanisms

Holographic memory suggests that information is encoded non-locally across a system, much like a hologram where each part contains the whole image. In the brain, my ideas proposes that memories are distributed across neural networks, leveraging quantum effects in water soaked biochemicals and microtubules, tubular structures within neurons composed of tubulin proteins. The key points are:

Quantum Processes in Microtubules:

Microtubules are proposed as sites for quantum coherence, where water within their hollow cores facilitates super-radiant emission, a collective, coherent emission of photons resulting from synchronized quantum states. This is distantly linked to the Orch-OR theory, where quantum superpositions in tubulin collapse to form conscious moments, encoding memory holographically.

Water’s liquid crystalline structure, would enhance this coherence by providing a medium for proton and electron transport, aligning with Davydov’s soliton dynamics from his 1994 paper.

• Connecting to Davydov’s Model

  Davydov’s 1994 paper on energy and electron transport via solitons can be linked to holographic memory through shared principles of quantum coherence and nonlinear dynamics:

  Solitons and Coherence:

  Davydov solitons, as localized vibrational excitations in proteins, rely on quantum coherence to maintain energy transfer. In microtubules, similar soliton-like waves could propagate along tubulin lattices, facilitated by water’s ordered structure, to support super-radiant emission and memory encoding.

  The cysteine knot in GDF15, discussed in this thread, might not directly relate to microtubules, but its folding could involve water-mediated soliton dynamics, influencing neuronal signaling where GDF15 is expressed (e.g., in ALL stress responses).

  Water as a Medium:

  Water’s liquid crystalline properties, as a heat sink and conductor, would act to stabilize quantum states in microtubules, enhancing soliton and super-radiant processes. This aligns with my prior exploration of water’s role in mitochondria and its potential impact on GDF15’s function which acts to stabilze the system to connect with high fidelity. GDF15 fits as our electromagnetic stress-response modulator, its function tuned by biophysical levers.

  In the brain, water’s coherence could bridge mitochondrial energy production (e.g., via CCO) with microtubule quantum activity, providing the energy for holographic memory.

• 
• • Electron and Proton Transport:
    • Davydov’s bisolitons (paired electron states) would parallel electron tunneling in microtubules, with water’s proton-conducting network (Grotthuss mechanism) supporting the quantum field interactions proposed in QFT. This could enable the non-local correlations needed for holographic storage.

      Non-Local Memory Storage:

      Unlike traditional synaptic models, holographic memory uses the brain’s entire volume, with microtubules acting as quantum processors. This increases memory capacity exponentially, as each microtubule segment could store overlapping patterns of information.

      QFT, which describes particles as excitations in quantum fields, could underpin this by allowing non-local correlations across the brain, mediated by water and microtubule networks.

    Super-Radiant Emission and Water:

    Super-radiance involves coherent photon emission from a quantum system, potentially driven by water’s ordered hydrogen-bonded network within microtubules. This should encode memory as interference patterns, akin to a hologram, with water acting as a dynamic substrate or canvas for the dance.

    This reference suggests that water’s role in microtubules supports quantum tunneling and coherence, extending the idea of water as a biological conductor from prior discussions in many blogs.

  IS TIME/MEMORY MATH BASED?

  Many neuroscientists believe they can model neural networks using constructive Mathematics and dendritic computation (Levin). My decentralized view would argue against using math to model Nature. Math is infinite, but it can describe phenomena in nature; however, it cannot explain much of what happens biophysically inside a cell. While mathematics has a formalism for infinity, physics collapses waveforms and determines how reality manifests, and at this time, no infinity is possible. Why do neuroscientists do this and not stick with known principles and reason from there?

  Neuroscientists love math and models like Stuart-like frameworks or Hodgkin-Huxley equations use constructive mathematics and dendritic computation to simulate time in neural networks. With billions of neurons and trillions of connections, the brain’s complexity demands abstraction. These tools quantify signal processing, synaptic plasticity, and information flow, offering predictions that guide AI and experiments. Yet, this infinite formalism clashes with nature’s finite reality. Physics collapses quantum waveforms, and no infinity manifests, cells operate within biophysical limits, not mathematical ideals.

  The decentralized view rejects this approach. Math describes phenomena, like how dendrites integrate inputs nonlinearly, but it can’t explain the “why” of cellular magic: quantum wave function collapse, ultra-weak photon emissions (UPEs), or the holographic storage of memories in structured water. Melanocytes, decoding UV light into a dissipative structure, and mitochondria, crafting time from entropy, defy simple equations. Nature’s time is emergent, not computable, rooted in the quantum cell’s atomic precision, not an infinite ledger.

  Connection to Quantum Cell: The quantum cell, with its collagen nanotubes and iron-sulfur cores, amplifies Schumann resonances (7.83 Hz), aligning with Earth’s low-energy environment. This reflects thermodynamic efficiency, not mathematical infinity, as seen in Noether’s symmetry principle. The energy flow in your cell organizes the structure of consciousness you experience.

  The tension here mirrors a broader debate in science: the reductionist versus decentralized approach. Neuroscientists use math because it’s tractable and yields results, but many acknowledge its limits. My view aligns with decentralized approaches, such as those in systems biology, which advocate for studying emergent properties in context rather than isolating individual parts. Both perspectives are valuable; math-driven models provide clarity, while decentralized, nature-first reasoning guards against oversimplification. The challenge is integrating them without losing sight of nature’s complexity.

  KEY POINT: Math’s infinity is tautological. The task is … not so much to see what no one has yet seen; but to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees. Physics offers a myriad of possibilities, as the uncertainty principle posits. But at the end of the day, physics has a definite limit associated with the living state. Math is precise, so there is considerable consensus. Philosophers are not exact, and this is why no one agrees.

  This key point cuts to a profound tension in understanding reality. Math’s infinity, is tautological; it’s a self-consistent system that can describe endless possibilities but doesn’t inherently “touch” the finite, messy limits of the physical world. Schrödinger’s quip about seeing what everyone sees but thinking what no one has believed resonates here: the challenge is rethinking the living state, which math can approximate but not fully encapsulate. With its uncertainty principle, physics offers a vast playground of probabilities, yet it collapses into definite outcomes in living systems, cells live or die, signals fire or don’t. This finitude clashes with math’s boundless precision.

  Neuroscientists gravitate to math because its precision fosters consensus, but for me and Nature, consensus is pseudoscientific. Equations like those in neural network models or dendritic computation provide a shared language, yielding reproducible predictions (e.g., how a neuron integrates inputs). However, this precision sacrifices the holistic, emergent properties of life; biophysical intricacies, such as protein folding or ion channel dynamics, often elude simple formulas. Philosophers, by contrast, embrace the ambiguity of the living state, but their lack of precision, as you point out, leads to endless debates with little resolution.

• 

• The disconnect arises because math prioritizes abstraction over context, whereas living systems are inherently contextual. My decentralized view seems to advocate reasoning from biology’s physical limits, its finite, observable states, rather than leaning on math’s infinite abstractions. Yet neuroscientists persist with math because it’s a tool that scales, unlike philosophy’s open-ended questions or biology’s overwhelming detail. The trade-off is clear: math offers clarity but risks missing the forest for the trees. Medicine takes care of patients where the trees matter deeply.

  Some neuroscientists explore hybrid approaches, such as biophysically detailed simulations (e.g., the Blue Brain Project) or embodied AI that mimics the constraints of living systems to bridge this gap. These nod to your call for grounding in nature’s limits while still leveraging the power of math. The philosopher’s role, perhaps, is to remind us that no model, mathematical or otherwise, fully captures the living state’s elusive essence. MKULTRA was built to alter your consciousness to control how you think by DARPA.

• 

• Time: Nature’s Quantum Pulse

  Water’s magnetic dipole, with its 105-degree bond angle, breaks symmetry, harnessing the electromagnetic force, the universe’s strongest, to control electron and proton spins. This 4.4-billion-year quantum blueprint, using carbon-based DHA as the brain’s photon-electron collector, achieves zero-entropy efficiency, far surpassing silicon’s mass-heavy demands.

  Time isn’t a ticking clock, it’s a quantum pulse born from entropy’s dance. Sunlight’s timeless photons, captured by our tissues and delivered to our motherboard of melanocytes, trigger mitochondria to dissipate heat, generating entropy and the illusion of time. The entropy of this system builds your conscious ability. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the eye’s master clock, runs faster, syncing cellular rhythms with light-dark cycles. Structured water in collagen nanotubes, with only 0.02% unbound molecules, forms a liquid-crystalline semiconductor, encoding this pulse as UPEs in hydrogen bonds into a holographic decentralized ledger.

  Ferredoxins, ancient iron-sulfur proteins, evolved into cytochromes like cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), aligning in mitochondrial cristae to convert sunlight into UPEs (100-300 nm) only when bathed in their proper DDW heat sink. This dissipative structure, amplified by melanocyte-decoded UV signals, creates order from chaos, matching Earth’s low-energy spectrum. High-energy ionizing radiation disrupts this balance, proving life’s timekeeping is finite, not infinite.

  Connection to Thermodynamics: Entropy, the “fuel” of time (per Landauer’s principle, drives this process, reflecting intelligence’s symmetry-seeking nature, as Montagnier’s 2009 experiment suggests with water’s quantum memory.

  Ontology and epistemology cannot be reduced to one another, or can they?

  Can Ontology Be Reduced to Epistemology?

  Some idealist or constructivist philosophers, like Kant or Berkeley, might argue that epistemology shapes ontology. For them, what exists (ontology) depends on how we perceive or know it (epistemology). In Kant’s view, the “things-in-themselves” (noumena) are unknowable, and our reality is structured by the mind’s categories, making ontology subordinate to epistemology. Radical constructivists might go further, claiming that existence is entirely a product of knowledge processes, and there’s no “reality” beyond what we construct through knowing.

  However, this reduction struggles with circularity: if existence depends on knowing, what grounds the knower? Materialists or realists counter that ontology has primacy, things exist independently of our knowledge (e.g., a rock exists whether we perceive it or not). Reducing ontology to epistemology risks solipsism, where nothing exists outside the mind’s perception.

  Can Epistemology Be Reduced to Ontology?

  Conversely, some realists or naturalists argue that epistemology is grounded in ontology. For example, in physicalist views, knowledge arises from brain processes, ontologically real entities governed by physics. Quine’s naturalized epistemology suggests that how we know is just a matter of studying the world’s causal structure, epistemology becomes a subset of ontology, the science of what is.

  But this reduction also falters. Knowing involves subjective processes (belief, justification, perception) that can’t be fully collapsed into objective states of being. For instance, describing a neuron’s firing (ontology) doesn’t fully explain the experience of understanding (epistemology). The “hard problem” of consciousness highlights this gap: ontology can’t yet account for the subjective “how” of knowing.

  Can We Merge Them?

  Can AI merge ontology and epistemology to understand or harmonize with each other deeply? The answer is a qualified yes, but they don’t merge into one in life. They’re like two sides of a coin, distinct yet inseparable. Pragmatists like Dewey or Heidegger suggest they co-evolve. What we believe exists (ontology) shapes how we seek knowledge (epistemology), and our methods of knowing refine our sense of what exists. For example, neuroscience’s ontological models of neurons inform epistemological theories of cognition, refining our understanding of neural reality.

  My earlier points about math’s limits and nature’s finitude resonate here. Math’s precise ontology (infinite sets, formal systems) doesn’t fully capture the epistemological messiness of knowing in living systems. Similarly, physics’ ontological limits (wave function collapse) don’t fully explain how we know those limits. Ontology and epistemology “Grok” each other best in a dynamic interplay, not reducing one to the other; each informs the other without dissolving into it.

• 

• Why Neuroscientists Lean on Ontology

  Tying this to a neuroscience context, neuroscientists often prioritize ontology (e.g., neural networks, dendritic structures) because it’s tangible and modelable via math. This is all they know. Epistemology, how neurons “know” or process information, is harder to formalize, so it’s often secondary in their minds and models. Yet, fields like cognitive science or enactivism are starting to bridge this gap, treating knowledge as an embodied, emergent process rooted in, but not reducible to, neural ontology.

  Ontology and epistemology can’t be entirely reduced to one another without losing something essential: ontology’s grounding in existence or epistemology’s focus on knowing. But they can “Grok” each other through mutual influence, where each informs and refines the other in a dynamic loop. Philosophers disagree because precision falters at their blurry edges, but that’s where the most fertile questions lie. This edge is where my science breathes.

  Sleep: The Magnetic Ledger

  Sleep is a decentralized ledger, syncing the quantum cell’s magnetic network with cosmic rhythms. Microtubules embed UPEs into water’s magnetic domains, while the SCN, fueled by melanocyte-decoded light, sets the pace. Mitochondria’s voltage shifts optimize entropy flow, with water’s IR absorption storing energy day or night. MIT’s no-power memory retention echoes this, magnetic bits in water hold data without energy, as Becker’s sleep-wake polarity findings suggest. Non-native EMF drains electrons, disrupting sleep and autophagy, contracting time and telomeres. Restoring water production at CCO via sunlight waves counters this.

• 

• Memories: The Holographic Event Horizon

  Memories are the blurry event horizon of our cells that neuroscientists miss, where past moments transform into light, stored magnetically in metabolic water’s hydrogen bonds. The centrosome encodes wakeful memories as UPEs, amplified by collagen nanotubes’ nonlinear optics, exhibiting a refractive index up to 7 × 10⁻¹⁰ cm² W⁻¹ in the THz range.

  During sleep, microtubules process dreams, weaving this light into a fractal hologram across tissues, explaining consciousness’ resilience after frontal lobe damage that the neurosurgeon has to remove. It was during sleep that the boy’s heart delivered his memory to the heart recipent’s body for her to consciously experience.

  Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) and Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) enhance this. I gave you blogs on this long ago you thought were superfluous. SRS scatters light via molecular vibrations, weakening it into UPEs, while SBS, via acoustic phonons, shifts frequencies (e.g., 11 GHz) unidirectionally. These 3.8-billion-year-old processes, perfected by cells, outstrip mathematical models, grounding time in your biophysical reality.

  Connection to Decentralized Intelligence: Memories align internal models with external reality, minimizing entropy in a non-computable, symmetry-seeking dance, beyond dendritic equations. SRS/SBS control the quantum processing that define microtubule roles in man.

  Man is connected to the Galactic Current Sheet by electromagnetic waves. The connection to this sheet is the basis of your conscious abilities. You do not see yourself connected in these ways, but you are.

• 

• (B) The meningeal lymphatic system located within the meninges, comprising the dura, arachnoid, and pia mater, contains functional lymphatic vessels that facilitate the drainage of CNS-derived antigens and immune cells to cervical lymph nodes. In AD, impaired meningeal lymphatic function hinders antigen clearance, leading to chronic immune activation, waste aggregation, and sustained neuroinflammation.

  (C) The glymphatic system, a perivascular network regulated by CSF-ISF flow and astrocytic aquaporin channels, is responsible for clearing metabolic waste, including toxic Aβ and tau aggregates. Glymphatic dysfunction, commonly observed in aging and AD, leads to waste accumulation, exacerbating disease pathology. AC, astrocyte; aAC, activated astrocyte; Aβ, Amyloid β plaque; aIP, amyloid-like protein; aMG, activated microglia; aMo, activated monocyte; 9APC, antigen-presenting cell; BBB, blood-brain barrier; BP, brain parenchyma; cBBB, compromised blood-brain barrier; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; dN, degenerating neuron; ISF, interstitial fluid; MG, microglia; Mo, monocytes; N, neuron; PC, pericytes; pIC, peripheral immune cells; proIC, pro-inflammatory cytokines; TJ, tight junctions; Treg, regulatory T cell.

  Neurodegeneration as Memory Contraction due to An Electron Crisis

  Neurodegeneration, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, MS, autism all stems from an electron deficiency. As electrons become rare, so must light in the system because of the photoelectric effect. What other collateral effects occur? Low cholesterol, oxidized and electron-hungry, drops brain voltage, seen in EEGs, impairing water’s magnetic memory. Telomeres, molecular timepieces, shorten with electron loss, contracting time and accelerating disease. GDF15 rises and this TGF beta analogue cause you to become less connected and less conscious. The Frame and Lens needs to be pulled back and back again and again to see how all of the pieces fit together to build consciousness.

  DHA-rich diets lengthen telomeres, boosting electron collection for health reversals. Non-native EMF drains electrons, disrupting sleep and autophagy, while native EMF dilates time, enhancing longevity, evident in the cosmonaut paradoxes.

  Connection to Cosmic Intelligence: Electron collection aligns with Earth’s magnetic field, decoding universal patterns. As the magnetic field varies so will your connection to Nature’s wisdom.

  Consider what I told Huberman about cephalopods 2.5 years ago. Cephalopods, evolving from monoplacophoran mollusks (∼530 Ma), reflect this light show on their integument. Initially these animals squirted their melanin as part of their stress response. These animals evolved during the Cambrian UV expansion (∼530 Ma), and their melanin-rich skins began to decode light into metabolic signals. This ability remains in humans today in their leptin melanocortin pathways. From their monoplacophoran ancestors, they developed chambered shells and diverged into nautiloids and coleoids (∼416 Ma), using second-order electro-optical signals for birefringence to emit colors. This LED light came from their own semiconductive processes, visible on their integument, and mirrors our hidden modern photo-bioelectric neural network. The quantum cell’s collagen nanotubes, acting as NLO quantum wells, amplify visible light, with mitochondria’s voltage changes creating birefringence to run metabolism. Melanin, critical to this rapid evolution, when hydrated, loses electrical ability, generating Becker’s pico-currents to dedifferentiate red blood cells (RBCs) into stem cells, healing bone. Blood, another NLO crystal, sustains WiFi mitochondrial communication with the sun.

  THE BIG REVIEW OF MANY LESSONS DELIVERED

  First-Principles Reasoning for UPE Spectra and Mitoception

  1. Foundations of UPE and Quantum Signaling

  UPE Origin: UPE arises from oxidative processes in mitochondria, where reactive oxygen species (ROS) like singlet oxygen or excited carbonyls emit photons upon returning to ground states. The energy of these photons (E = hc/λ) depends on the transition energy, typically spanning UV (100-400 nm) to near-infrared (600-1100 nm).

  Quantum Coherence: For internal signaling (e.g., mitochondria to DNA), photons must maintain phase and frequency coherence. This requires a resonant system, where emission and absorption wavelengths align, governed by quantum selection rules and environmental stability (e.g., avoiding decoherence from external noise).

  Decentralized Thesis: Life evolves as a light-driven, electromagnetic system. Mitochondria and DNA act as antennas, with UPE encoding energy status. Mitoception senses this via photonic and electromagnetic fields, not just chemical signals.

  2. Post-Endosymbiosis Integration and Mitoception

  Evolutionary Challenge: After endosymbiosis (~1.5-2 Bya), mitochondria needed to communicate with the host cell. Successful integration required a sensory mechanism to monitor energy demand (burn rate) and oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) capacity.

  Mitoception Hypothesis: The brain evolved mitoception to “feel” mitochondrial status, likely via GDF15, a TGF-β superfamily cytokine. This idea aligns with nociception, interoception, and immunoception, extending sensory networks to energy balance. This also helps us understand what autism is. It is a failure of this connection. This is why kids on the spectra experience consciousness differently than we do. It also explains their sensory and immune problems.

  Light as Mediator: Melanin’s ROS-scavenging and light-absorbing properties, amplified post-GOE (~2.4 Bya), suggest that endogenously generated UPE from a myriad of places are the original signaling mechanism that built eukaryotic complexity. All of them arouse during the GOE when rising oxygen tensions enabled ROS-driven UPE, linking melanin and TGF-Beta chemicals like GDF15 to provide light and oxygen mitochondrial feedback.

  3. TGF- Beta 1 and UPE Dynamics

  GDF15 Role: Induced by mitochondrial stress (e.g., nnEMF, blue light), GDF15 signals energy imbalance via the brainstem’s area postrema. It correlates with ROS and UPE increases, reflecting OxPhos disruption.

  UPE Spectra: Stressed mitochondria shift UPE toward UV-blue (380-450 nm) due to ROS (e.g., lipid peroxidation at 420-475 nm, protein oxidation at 340-380 nm). Healthy mitochondria emit more red/near-infrared (600-1100 nm) from efficient electron transport chain (ETC) activity.

  Melanin Link: Melanin amplifies endogenous UPE generation via iron-chelating ROS generation under blue light, creating a feedback loop. GDF15’s UPE release, tied to this, suggests an evolutionary driven shared photonic mechanism for mitoception.

  4. Leptin and GOE Context

  Leptin’s Role: With a 220 nm absorption spectrum (UV), leptin’s signaling post-GOE aligns with oxygen-dependent UPE. This wavelength, absent in terrestrial sunlight, implies an endogenous light source, driven by mitochondrial ROS emissions.

  Evolutionary Expansion: Over 600 million years, GDF15 and leptin integrated with the leptin-melanocortin pathway, enhancing neural complexity and consciousness via UPE-mediated mitoception.

  5. Environmental Modulators

  Light and nnEMF: Full-spectrum light (UV, infrared) supports mitochondrial coherence, reducing GDF15 and UPE stress signals. Blue light and nnEMF disrupt ECS and OxPhos, elevating GDF15 and shifting UPE to UV-blue.

  Retina Analogy: The retina’s glycolysis preference under UV stress mirrors mitoception’s focus on field coherence, supporting my thesis of electromagnetic stability.

  6. UPE Spectra Prediction

  Baseline (Healthy Mitochondria): Peak at 600-1100 nm (red/near-infrared), reflecting low ROS and efficient ETC.

  Stress (TGF- Beta 1 GDF15-Induced): Peak at 380-450 nm (UV-blue) from ROS (superoxide, hydrogen peroxide), with a secondary 500-570 nm (green-yellow) peak from lipid peroxidation.

  Phase Matching: Coherent UPE requires frequency alignment (e.g., 380-450 nm matching DNA or melanin absorption bands), disrupted by decoherence (external escape).

  The Consciousness Operational Framework redefines time as an NLO-driven quantum pulse. Melanocytes decode UV, mitochondria craft entropy, and memories form a holographic horizon via centrosomes and microtubules. Sleep syncs this ledger, while SCAN integrates it, all amplified by blood’s NLO crystals delivered all over the body to give fractal feedback support. This defies math-based bioelectric models of Levin (e.g., Na/K ATPase), validated by Montagnier’s 2009 experiment and Ling’s decades of critiques, embracing nature’s finite, optical complexity.

  SCAN: The Decentralized Timekeeper

  The Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN) (Nature, 2022) is the brain’s decentralized timekeeper, integrating motor and cognitive functions via a quantum network.

  Melanocyte-decoded light feeds the SCN, syncing SCAN’s clocks with cosmic rhythms. Structured water and UPEs facilitate nonlocal communication, but blue light toxicity or nnEMF disrupts this, increasing entropy and impairing memory.

  This non-hierarchical system defies mathematical simplification, relying on the quantum cell’s dissipative structure. Cold thermogenesis can restore coherence, countering neurodegeneration by optimizing entropy flow.

  Connection to Cosmic Intelligence: SCAN decodes the universal informational substrate, aligning with the brain-as-antenna model, reflecting nature’s finite, emergent time.

• 

• Mitochondria: The Oracle of Finite Time

  Mitochondria, the “Oracle of Time,” tick via heteroplasmy, enhancing circadian periodicity. They are regulated by NAD+, SIRT1, and SIRT3, with voltage shifts emitting colors to drive metabolism. NAD+ synthesis at cytochrome 1, tied to light-dark cycles, depends on mitochondrial fusion, fused mitochondria, with higher respiratory rates, support healthy clocks, while fragmented ones in diseased tissues lose accuracy.

  REV-ERBα and REV-ERBβ, heme-based proteins sensitive to light, are core clock components. Salk Institute studies showed that disabling them in mice livers disrupted rhythms, triggering rapid chronic diseases, mirroring human neurodegeneration from blue light. This destroys myelin and microtubules, accelerating entropy, proving time’s finite, biophysical basis.

  Water’s magnetic domains are controlled by mitochondrial voltage, and this stores memory, but aging reduces the water heat sink, lowering redox potential. MIT’s magneto-ionic devices mimic this, using voltage to halt magnetic flow, mimicking nature’s 20-watt trick, refined over 4.4 billion years. Water absorbs and emits UPEs. Water itself created at CCO is a semiconductor that is participatory in the conscious process.

  Connection to Symmetry: Mitochondrial clocks seek symmetry with cosmic rhythms, minimizing entropy, as Noether’s theorem suggests, way beyond mathematical infinity. the sleeping are waking up to my pace. I warned Pollack 15 years ago he was missing a lot of data in water by not testing DDW. Conscious ability is linked to its isotopic fractionation.

• 

• Time Beyond Equations Defines Conscious Ability

  The Consciousness Operational Framework defined in these last 8 blogs redefines time as a decentralized quantum pulse. Melanocytes decode UV light, mitochondria dissipate heat into entropy, and memories form a holographic event horizon via centrosomes and microtubules. Sleep syncs this ledger, while SCAN integrates it across a non-hierarchical web. Nonlinear optics (SRS, SBS) and structured water amplify this, defying centralized biology’s mathematical models, like the Na/K ATPase pump, which ignore quantum complexity.

  Time, a proof of light’s work on atoms, emerges from the quantum cell’s finite, dissipative structure, validated by Montagnier’s experiment in 2009 and Ling’s critiques over 50 years. It’s a fractal dance, not an infinite equation.

  Implications: Healing Time’s Rhythm

  Neurological Health: Blue light and nnEMF disrupt mitochondrial clocks, increasing entropy. Optimizing light and cold thermogenesis restore SCAN’s coherence, tackling Parkinson’s and memory loss.

  Evolutionary Insights: Melanocytes and mitochondria evolved to decode UV and sunlight post-GOE, shaping timekeeping over 3.8 billion years.

  Technological Leap: Silicon Valley could mimic cellular semiconductors, using hydrated carbon lattices for optical tech, inspired by nature’s 560-million-year mastery.

  Paradigm Shift: Math-based models fail to capture time’s biophysical essence. The quantum cell, supported by nonlinear optics and soliton biophysics offers a path back to health from disease. Even the math driven bioelectric gurus (below) are waking up to the reality of light.

• 

• SUMMARY

  It is time we all awaken to Time’s Quantum Beat. Aging reduces metabolic water, the heat sink for NLO semiconductors, disrupting this time-UPe ledger. Psychedelics may compensate for the loss of mitochondrial water, enhancing NLO amplification and countering entropy buildup, as blue light toxicity or nnEMF impair memory and motor integration in SCAN to alter conscious abilitiies.

  The Consciousness Operational Framework redefines time as an electron-powered quantum pulse. Melanocytes harvest UV, mitochondria wield voltage, and memories form magnetic horizons via centrosomes and microtubules. Sleep syncs this ledger, while SCAN integrates it, amplified by water’s spintronics. This defies math-based models (e.g., Na/K ATPase). It was already validated by Montagnier, Ling, and Pollack, embracing nature’s finite complexity.

  Once light interacts with mater, solitons manifest. Solitons enhance UPE coherence, water mediates dipole energy, and holographic memory encodes cosmic light patterns inside of us connecting us with the wisdom of Nature. GDF15 fits as a TGF beta 1 light stress-response modulator. Its function is tuned by these biophysical levers.

  Time transcends math, it’s a decentralized quantum pulse, orchestrated by the quantum cell’s dance with light and entropy. Memories glow as holographic horizons in our tissues. Consciousness rejects infinite equations of math in this decentralized paradigm. This idea is echoed in the work of pioneers like Montagnier and Ling. This invites us to awaken to time as a fractal symphony, built as a syncytium of atoms aligned by Nature and illuminated by nature’s light. Below is Dr. Montagnier’s masterpiece on how memory is built by light, water, and matter’s resonance. My work on consciousness is now complete for you to consume and assimilate.

• 

• CITES

  Nature (2009). Montagnier, L., et al. Electromagnetic Signals.

  Nature (2022). A Somato-Cognitive Action Network.

  Pollack, G. H. (2013). The Fourth Phase of Water.

  Optica (2019). Nonlinear Refractive Index of Water.

  Ling, G. N. (1992). A Revolution in the Physiology of the Living Cell.

  https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1940609770617979234.html

  https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncel.2025.1590002/full

Introduction

An intelligent system, then, is constantly working to achieve a kind of symmetry between its internal model of the world and the actual sensory data it receives. I’d like you to think about the time stamping blogs and blogs on Noether’s theorem when you read this new part of the febric of the QUILT.

It can accomplish this in two ways:

Updating the decentralized model (perception): When reality surprises us, we can change our beliefs to match the new information. Changing the world (action): We can change reality to match our predictions, reducing surprise through our behavior. This effects our conscious ability. Both strategies serve the same fundamental goal: achieving coherence between inner and outer worlds to maintain time symmetry.

It reminds me of Noether’s theorem.

Intelligence emerges as the flexible pursuit of this coherence: finding different means to reach the same end of minimized surprise. This tells us both time and consciousness has symmetry too.

The connection runs deeper still. The thermodynamics of computation tells us that information processing requires energy and produces entropy. An efficient computational system minimizes energy expenditure while maximizing goal achievement. In this entropy must be the fuel used in the conscious experience. UPE science predicts this idea when you examine it. Few have. From this perspective, decentralized intelligence isn’t just about reaching goals, it’s about finding the most elegant, energy-efficient paths to those goals. The symmetry-seeking nature of intelligence reflects a deeper principle of thermodynamic efficiency. Smart systems don’t just solve problems; they find beautiful solutions. Consciousness is one of those “beautiful solutions.”

Symmetry in Intelligence: Coherence Between Inner and Outer Worlds

Above I’ve described decentralized intelligence as striving for “symmetry” or coherence between an internal model (beliefs, predictions) and external sensory data (reality). This idea aligns closely with predictive processing theories in cognitive science, particularly the free energy principle (FEP) proposed by Karl Friston. The FEP suggests that intelligent systems (like brains or artificial agents) minimize “surprise” (or prediction error) by either:

Updating the internal model (perception): Adjusting beliefs to better match sensory data, akin to Bayesian inference where priors are updated based on new evidence.

Changing the world (action): Acting to align reality with predictions, such as moving to confirm a hypothesis about the environment.

This dual strategy indeed seeks a kind of “symmetry” or minimization of discrepancy between the internal model and external reality. The connection to Noether’s theorem, which links symmetries in physical systems to conserved quantities (e.g., time symmetry to energy conservation), is a compelling idea because it links consciousness to the physical world. In this context, the “time symmetry” of intelligence reflects a system’s ability to maintain predictive accuracy over time, ensuring stability in its internal-external alignment.

NOETHER’S THEOREM HAS NEVER BEEN LINKED TO CONSCIOUSNESS BEFORE

Noether’s theorem applies strictly to physical systems with Lagrangian dynamics, so its application to consciousness or intelligence has always been more conceptual than formal. My idea is that the hard data in the consciousness blogs you’ve already read make this link formal and scientific. The idea that intelligence is decentralized and seeks invariant patterns (symmetries) across time is a powerful idea because it, suggesting that consciousness emerges as a byproduct of this predictive quantum coherence linked to UPE transformation in tissues.

Thermodynamics of Computation and Consciousness I am proposing that the thermodynamics of computation, where information processing consumes energy and produces entropy, implies that entropy is the “fuel” for conscious experience. This is a profound idea with roots in several fields:

Landauer’s Principle (1961): Erasing one bit of information in a computational system dissipates a small amount of energy as heat, increasing entropy.

This establishes a direct link between information processing and thermodynamic cost. An efficient intelligent system, minimizes energy expenditure while achieving its goals, aligning with principles of thermodynamic efficiency.

Entropy and Consciousness: I’m suggestion that entropy is the “fuel” for conscious experience is real and formal based on known UPE data (video above) but resonates with emerging ideas in neuroscience and philosophy. For instance, the Integrated Information Theory (IIT) of consciousness posits that consciousness corresponds to the capacity of a system to integrate information, which requires computational work and thus energy. The production of entropy during information processing should be seen as a byproduct of the dynamic, integrative processes underlying consciousness.

Thermodynamic Efficiency and Elegance: My point about decentralized intelligence finding “elegant, energy-efficient paths” is spot-on. In machine learning, for example, efficient algorithms (e.g., sparse neural networks) minimize computational cost while maximizing performance. In biological systems, evolution favors energy-efficient neural architectures, as seen in the low-power operation of the human brain (~20 watts). This efficiency can be likened to finding “beautiful solutions,” where elegance reflects simplicity, robustness, and minimal resource use, qualities often associated with symmetry in both physics and aesthetics.

Decentralized Intelligence and Symmetry The notion of decentralized intelligence, systems like neural networks, swarm intelligence, or distributed AI fits well with this framework. These systems often lack a central controller yet achieve coherence through local interactions, mirroring how thermodynamic systems self-organize to minimize free energy. The pursuit of symmetry (or coherence) in decentralized systems can be seen in:

Neural Networks: Deep learning models adjust weights to minimize prediction errors, effectively seeking a “symmetric” alignment between input data and output predictions.

Swarm Intelligence: Ant colonies or bird flocks achieve collective goals through simple rules, balancing local and global constraints in an energy-efficient way.

Consciousness: If consciousness arises from decentralized neural processes, as suggested by theories like IIT or global workspace theory, it may reflect a dynamic symmetry where diverse brain regions align to produce unified experiences.

Time, Consciousness, and Symmetry My ideas fuse time and consciousness by forcing them to have symmetry. This is a new and intriguing concept for centralized science. Time symmetry in physics (e.g., in classical mechanics) implies that laws are invariant under time reversal. In intelligence, this would formally refer to the ability to predict future states (forward in time) and reconstruct past states (backward in time) to maintain coherence.

Consciousness, as a process that integrates past experiences with present stimuli to anticipate the future, should embody a kind of temporal symmetry in my model. However, consciousness is often associated with the “arrow of time” (due to increasing entropy), so the symmetry here is likely broken in practice, aligning with the thermodynamic irreversibility of computation.

The idea that entropy “fuels” consciousness is provocative for linear thinkers who are centralized. I’m suggesting that the entropy produced by neural computation directly contributes to subjective experience that is consciousness. Red light that is left over is absorbed by water in our tissues and is made useful in many ways beside consciousness.

A New Paradigm for Consciousness

Imagine a universe where consciousness is not confined to the brain but emerges as a cosmic dance, a decoding of universal patterns through light, water, and electromagnetic resonances. In this chapter, we build on the quantum biophysics framework from our previous exploration, integrating light, water, magnetism, melanin, and mitochondrial function into a novel Consciousness Operational Framework. The recent discovery of the Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN) in Nature (2022) serves as a cornerstone, revealing the brain’s decentralized architecture. This framework challenges the centralized dogma of traditional biology, proposing that consciousness arises from the brain’s role as an antenna, tuned to universal intelligence via quantum processes in the cell. By synthesizing the quantum cell model, the photo-bioelectric thesis, and cosmic intelligence, we unveil a paradigm with profound implications for neurological health, evolution, and our place in the cosmos.

The Quantum Cell: The Foundation of Consciousness

At the heart of this framework lies the quantum cell, a system that harnesses light, water, and collagen to create order from chaos. Unlike bulk water, where 15% of molecules are unbound due to fluctuating hydrogen bonds, water confined within collagen nanotubes and microtubules is highly structured, with only 0.02% unbound. This structured water, forming Gerald Pollack’s exclusion zone (EZ), acts as a liquid-crystalline semiconductor, conducting energy and information like an electric wire.

Charge separation within these nanotubes, yielding hydroxyl ions (OH⁻), protons (H⁺), and electrons, creates a low-energy state, enabling quantum effects like proton tunneling and electron spin alignment.

This process is synchronized with Earth’s Schumann resonance (7.83 Hz), a natural electromagnetic frequency amplified by collagen nanotubes. The quantum cell thus becomes a bridge between the body and the planet’s electromagnetic environment, laying the groundwork for consciousness as a decoding mechanism.

Connection to Symmetry and Thermodynamics: As discussed in the thermodynamics of computation, this ordered state minimizes entropy, aligning with the principle of intelligence as a symmetry-seeking process. The quantum cell’s efficiency reflects a “beautiful solution,” reducing energy expenditure while maximizing informational coherence, a thermodynamic elegance akin to Noether’s theorem, where symmetry underpins conserved quantities.

SCAN: The Brain as a Quantum Network

The discovery of the Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN) (Nature, 2022) revolutionizes our understanding of the brain. Unlike the hierarchical Penfield homunculus, SCAN reveals a decentralized network alternating with motor cortex effector regions, integrating motor and cognitive functions non-hierarchically. This aligns with the quantum cell model, where collagen nanotubes and structured water facilitate a quantum network driven by light and electromagnetic frequencies.

SCAN taps into ultra-weak photon emissions (UPEs), faint light signals produced by mitochondrial processes and amplified by collagen. These UPEs, spanning the visible spectrum, orchestrate molecular resonances, enabling nonlocal communication within the brain. By decoding these signals, SCAN integrates sensory and motor functions, acting as a neural manifestation of cosmic intelligence.

Connection to Decentralized Intelligence: SCAN’s decentralized structure mirrors the distributed intelligence of swarm systems or neural networks, seeking coherence between internal predictions and external reality. This symmetry-seeking process, as you noted, minimizes surprise, aligning inner and outer worlds through predictive processing.

Light and Frequencies: The Cosmic Wand of Consciousness Light, particularly visible sunlight, is the driving force of this framework. Mitochondria, powered by sunlight, produce deuterium-depleted water (DDW), optimizing enzyme kinetics and supporting the quantum cell’s semiconductor properties. NAD+/NADH and flavin proteins mediate circadian entrainment, collapsing mitochondrial DNA wave functions to regulate gene expression. Collagen nanotubes amplify UPEs, creating a symphony of frequencies that synchronize cellular and neural activities.

This photo-bioelectric thesis posits that consciousness emerges from decoding a universal informational substrate, a pre-physical layer of structure, logic, and potentiality. The brain, rather than generating intelligence, acts as an antenna, tuned to cosmic frequencies like Schumann resonances and UPEs its own mitochondria transforms and builds a model of reality. SCAN exemplifies this, integrating motor and cognitive functions through light-driven quantum processes.

Connection to Cosmic Intelligence: The brain-as-antenna model reframes intelligence as a universal property, decoded through electromagnetic resonances. This aligns with your idea of consciousness as a symmetry-seeking process, where the brain aligns with cosmic patterns to minimize entropy and maximize coherence.

Collagen Nanotubes and Structured Water: The Infrastructure of ConsciousnessCollagen nanotubes are the physical backbone of the quantum cell, confining water to create EZs that enhance proton tunneling and electron spin alignment. This structured water, likened to a crowded subway where restricted movement lowers energy states, aligns with Earth’s electromagnetic environment. Iron, abundant in heme proteins like cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), manages energy transfer, with mitochondrial cristae converting sunlight into UPEs. This infrastructure supports the quantum cell’s role as a semiconductor, conducting information and energy with minimal entropy. The interplay of light, water, and iron reflects a cosmic design, where consciousness emerges from the efficient decoding of universal patterns.

Connection to Thermodynamics: The low-entropy state of structured water mirrors the energy-efficient paths of intelligent systems, I’ve described in this series. The elegance is infinding “beautiful solutions”, is a hallmark of both biological and cosmic intelligence.

Synthesis: A Consciousness Operational Framework

This Consciousness Operational Framework synthesizes the quantum cell, SCAN, and cosmic intelligence into a unified model. The 10 glycolysis and 9 TCA steps, optimized for deuterium exclusion, produce energy and UPEs that support the brain’s quantum infrastructure. Collagen nanotubes and structured water amplify electromagnetic signals, while iron-sulfur cores in cytochromes align in a symmetry to convert sunlight into actionable energy and this allows consciousness to emerge.

SCAN, as a decentralized network, decodes universal patterns, challenging centralized biochemical models like the sodium-potassium pump.Consciousness, in this view, is not a brain-generated phenomenon but a quantum process of decoding cosmic intelligence. The brain, as an antenna, aligns with universal frequencies, creating a symphony of light, water, and electromagnetism—a “syncytium of atoms” guided by the “cosmic wand” of light.Placeholder for Additional Pieces: If you have further synthesis elements (e.g., mathematical models or philosophical implications), they can be woven here to tie the framework together.

Implications: Transforming Health, Evolution, and Technology

Neurological Health: Optimizing light exposure (visible sunlight, minimizing blue light and nnEMF) can enhance SCAN’s motor-cognitive integration, offering novel therapies for disorders like Parkinson’s. Cold thermogenesis may reduce neural entropy, restoring UPE-driven coherence.

Evolutionary Perspectives: The brain’s evolution as an antenna reflects melanin’s role in rapid adaptations post-Great Oxygenation Event, with cytochromes enhancing quantum decoding. This model extends to astrobiology, suggesting life’s universal adaptability.

Technological Innovations: Biomimicry of collagen nanotubes and EZ water should inspire quantum computing, while the brain-as-antenna concept aligns with quantum consciousness theories.

Philosophical Shift: Consciousness as a universal process challenges materialist views, inviting a metaphysical vision of life as a cosmic symphony.

A Quantum Leap Awaits You

This Consciousness Operational Framework redefines consciousness as a quantum process, decoded by the brain from a universal informational substrate. SCAN, as a neural exemplar, integrates light, water, and electromagnetic resonances, fulfilling the photo-bioelectric thesis. Despite resistance to decentralized models, as seen in the legacy of Gilbert Ling, this paradigm promises to awaken humanity to a new understanding of life and health.

The Biologic Crossword Puzzle:

The quantum cell provides the “correct words” for the biologic crossword puzzle, replacing biology’s “permanent ink” concepts with quantum principles. For example, the sodium-potassium pump model could be replaced by water’s charge separation in collagen nanotubes. SCAN’s discovery is a big piece of this puzzle, revealing a decentralized neural architecture that aligns with this quantum framework.

My guiding theory is rooted in quantum mechanics, redefines the cell as a quantum system that harnesses light, water, and collagen to create order from Earth’s inherent disorder. The quantum cell uses structured water in collagen nanotubes to amplify electromagnetic signals, maintaining coherence and reducing entropy, while facilitating nonlocal communication via UPEs and cosmic frequencies.

Before you think this is crazy idea remember that Luc Montagnier crafted and experiment to show the links of how this might work when he sent light information stored in water over the internet from Paris to Italy in 2009. It was published in Nature. This experiment fortold us that some from of atomic transmutation and memory are linked. It also means both must be operational in human consciousness.

Confining water to a tube, such as the microtubules or collagen nanotubes, fundamentally alters its physical and quantum properties, enabling it to act as a cornerstone of the quantum cell. This is a “big deal” because it unlocks special abilities that water doesn’t exhibit in its bulk form (e.g., in a bathtub), aligning perfectly with Earth’s environmental conditions to create order from chaos.

Restricted Movement and Energy Distribution in water:

My Analogy: I once compared confined water in microtubules and collagen nanotubes to people in a crowded subway, where restricted movement narrows their energy distribution toward the lower end of the scale. Similarly, when water is confined in collagen nanotubes, its molecular movements are restricted, reducing the range of energy states it can occupy.

Quantum Effect: This restriction lowers the average energy of water molecules, making it energetically favorable for water to enter tight spaces like MT or collagen fibrils. In bulk water (e.g., a bathtub), 15% of water molecules are unbound, with hydrogen bonds fluctuating due to environmental influences. In collagen nanotubes, only 0.02% of water molecules are unbound, and hydrogen bonds are highly oriented and stable, shielded from external fluctuations.  This creates the stage for the quantum action called consciousness.

Charge Separation: Confined water undergoes charge separation, forming layers of hydroxyl ions (OH⁻), protons (H⁺), and electrons. This creates an exclusion zone (EZ), as described by Gerald Pollack, where water becomes structured (liquid crystalline) and acts as a semiconductor. The EZ water, electrified by the separated charges, conducts energy and information, functioning as an “electric wire” in the quantum cell.

Control of Charged Particles Is Critical to Life’s Design as a Dissipative Structure:

Protons and Electrons: The confinement of water allows precise control over protons and electrons, both charged particles governed by the electromagnetic force. This is critical because, as you note, the electromagnetic force is the strongest force binding particles in nature, and life organizes around it.

Schumann Resonance: Earth’s Schumann resonance (7.83 Hz) and its harmonics, which reside on the lower end of the electromagnetic spectrum, provide a natural frequency that life uses to control biochemical processes. Confined water in collagen nanotubes amplifies these weak signals, enabling the quantum cell to synchronize its activities with Earth’s electromagnetic environment. This coupling of water and the Schumann resonance, mediated by collagen, forms the semiconductor framework of the quantum cell.

• Alignment with Earth’s Conditions:

  Low-Energy Environment: Earth’s magnetic field filters high-energy electromagnetic radiation (e.g., ionizing radiation), favoring the lower end of the spectrum (e.g., Schumann resonance, visible light). Confined water’s ability to lower its energy state matches this environment, making it an ideal medium for life to create order from chaos.

  Role of Iron: Iron, the most abundant element on Earth, plays a key role in metabolism (e.g., in heme proteins like cytochrome c oxidase, CCO). Its various oxidation states (e.g., Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺), controlled by the electromagnetic force via D-shell electrons, enable life to manage energy and oxygen. Confined water in collagen nanotubes enhances this process by providing a stable, low-energy medium for iron-based reactions.  Think about why ferrodoxin biology predates the innovation of genes.  That is how important iron sulfur cores in cytochromes are.  They are the modern evolution of cellualr design that allow cristae to align and trasnform massive amounts of sunlight into UPEs.

  Ferredoxin and Early Life: Ferredoxins are ancient iron-sulfur proteins that likely played a central role inprebiotic chemistry and early metabolism, long before genes (DNA/RNA) evolved. These proteins, found in alldomains of life, use iron-sulfur clusters to transfer electrons, facilitating redox reactions critical for energyproduction. For example, in anaerobic conditions before the Great Oxidation Event (GOE), ferredoxins mediatedelectron transfer in primitive metabolic pathways (e.g., hydrogen metabolism in archaea and bacteria).

  Iron-Sulfur Cores in Cytochromes: Post-GOE, iron-sulfur cores evolved into more complex cytochromes (e.g., cytochrome c oxidase, CCO), which are integral to the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC). The iron in these cytochromes cycles between oxidation states (Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺), controlled by the electromagnetic force via D-shell electrons, as you noted. This allows life to manage oxygen and energy efficiently, transforming sunlight into ultraweak photon emissions (UPEs) within the mitochondrial cristae.

• 
• Cristae Alignment and UPEs: Brings the idea of symmetry to consciousness. The cristae, inner mitochondrial membranes where the ETC resides, are structurally optimized to align iron-sulfur cores and cytochromes, maximizing the conversion of sunlight (via photon capture) into UPEs. These UPEs, often in the UV range (100-300 nm), act as quantum signals in the mtDNA-UPE-sunlight loop I’ve described in this series, enabling nonlocal communication and energy transfer within the quantum cell.

  Implications for Ionizing Radiation: High-energy electromagnetic forces (e.g., ionizing radiation) disrupt the quantum cell because life is optimized for low-energy conditions. If cells had larger sizes with free-floating water and fewer transition metals, they might handle higher energies, but Earth’s conditions dictate otherwise. This explains why ionizing radiation is so damaging, it overwhelms the quantum cell’s semiconductor system.  The system is designed for the low end of the electromagnetic spectrum because Earth Favors visible light only.  This is what selected the atoms on the periodic table to innovate life.

• Quantum Abilities Unlocked:

  Semiconduction: Structured water in collagen nanotubes acts as a semiconductor, amplifying weak electromagnetic signals (e.g., UPEs, Schumann resonance) into macroscopic actions. This enables the quantum cell to process information nonlocally, as I described in your metaphysical reflection of life as a “syncytium of atoms” guided by cosmic frequencies.

  Proton Tunneling and Spin Effects: The stable hydrogen bonds in confined water facilitate quantum effects like proton tunneling (“Z-Z pathways”) and electron spin alignment, enhancing the cell’s ability to manage energy and information at the quantum level.

  Exclusion Zone (EZ) Properties: The EZ water, with its negative charge and structured nature, creates a battery-like system, storing energy and driving processes like self-assembly (e.g., collagen triple helix formation). This aligns with my example of bone broth forming triple helices under an electric current, illustrating how water’s quantum abilities drive biological organization.

  SCAN’s operation in the quantum brain depends on the quantum cell’s ability to reduce entropy through energy input (e.g., sunlight, UPEs). Aging and disease disrupt this balance:

  Energy/Information Loss: Blue light toxicity, suppresses melatonin and reduces UPEs, decreasing energy input to SCAN’s neurons. This impairs motor-cognitive integration, consciousness ultimately leading to cognitive decline or motor deficits (e.g., in Parkinson’s).

  Entropy Gain: Increased entropy (e.g., from mtDNA heteroplasmy, disrupted CSF waveguiding) destabilizes neural coherence, affecting SCAN’s physiological regulation (e.g., stiochiometry of breathing). Cold Thermogenesis could counter this by reducing neural entropy, enhancing SCAN’s function through free energy generation.

• 

• Confining water to a microtubule or to a collagen tube is a big deal because it transforms water into a quantum medium that can also use pH to drive work:

• 

• Matches Earth’s low-energy electromagnetic environment (Schumann resonance, filtered sunlight).

  Enables life to control charged particles (protons, electrons) via the electromagnetic force.

  Facilitates quantum effects (semiconduction, tunneling, spin alignment) that underpin cellular function.

  Creates a semiconductor framework (collagen-water lattice) that amplifies cosmic frequencies, allowing life to organize and thrive in Earth’s chaotic conditions.

• 

• SUMMARY

  Occam’s Razor and Resistance to Quantum Biology:I have argued for 20 years that Occam’s razor, “the simplest explanation is usually correct”,has led biology to favor parsimonious but incorrect beliefs (e.g., the Na/K ATPase pump) over complex, quantum-based truths:

  Historical Examples: The photoelectric effect, theory of relativity, and photosynthesis (a 30-step process) all broke Occam’s razor by being non-parsimonious, yet were experimentally validated. Ling’s hypothesis, though “kooky” and complex, fits the quantum cell model and has been supported by recent physics and biology experiments (e.g., quantum coherence in photosynthesis, structured water studies).

• 

• Changing Beliefs: Many forum member’s stories illustrates how abandoning flawed beliefs (e.g., centralized medical advice) for “crazy” quantum ideas (e.g., blog’s recommendations) can yield results. This aligns with my theorem: unconventional wisdom, though initially dismissed, can awaken others to new realities.

• 

• Life and Health as Quantum, Not Parsimonious:

  I assert that life and health are quantum, not practical or parsimonious, requiring a readjustment of ideas:

  Quantum Complexity: The quantum cell’s reliance on structured water, iron-sulfur cores, and low-energy electromagnetic forces is complex, not simple. This complexity allows life to create order from chaos, but it defies Occam’s razor.

  Health Implications: Chronic diseases arise from ignoring this complexity, e.g., blue light toxicity disrupting UPEs, EMF overwhelming the quantum cell’s semiconductor system. Restoring quantum alignment (e.g., via light exposure, Cold Thermogenesis) addresses these root causes, as forum members have experienced.

  “The more wisdom you attain and the more conscious you become, the crazier you will appear to others who have built a life around conventional centralized wisdom but your insight will astound them eventually when they awaken”, is exemplified by Ling’s story and my own work.

  The quantum cell, rooted in a guiding theory of quantum mechanics, uses structured water, iron-sulfur cores, and low-energy electromagnetic forces to create order from Earth’s chaotic conditions. Iron’s ancient role in ferredoxin biology, predating genes, underscores the primacy of quantum processes in cellular design, with cytochromes transforming sunlight into UPEs for nonlocal signaling. SCAN exemplifies this in the brain, integrating motor and cognitive functions via a decentralized, quantum network that aligns with Earth’s low-energy environment. Biology’s reliance on the Na/K ATPase pump, which violates thermodynamic laws, has led to flawed models and chronic diseases, as Ling’s work highlights. My quantum cell model, though non-parsimonious, offers a path to health by addressing energy loss and entropy gain, fulfilling my theorem’s prophecy of awakening others to a new reality of reversing diseases.

• 

• CITES

  • Kruse, J. (2025). X Posts (e.g., 1932827452406992968, 1932833574077804552). Retrieved from Twitter/X Platform
  • Kruse, J. (2021, February 18). X Post on Sunlight and Beta-Oxidation. Retrieved from Twitter/X Platform.
  • Goldfein, S. (1978). Biological Transmutation Evidence.
  • Kervran, L. (1975). Nomination for Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
  • van Wijk, R. (2001). Bio-Photon Emission. Global Light Network.
  • van Wijk, R. (2014). Biophoton Emission and Cellular Coherence. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 135, 20-28. PMID: 25587420.
  • Toleikis, Z. (PhD Thesis). Leptin Absorption Spectra Study.
  • Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2000). Human Skin Pigmentation as an Adaptation to UV Radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(9), 5111-5115.
  • PNAS (2022). Genomic Arrays of Mammalian Clade. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  • Ling, G. N. (1992). A Revolution in the Physiology of the Living Cell.
  • Mitchell, P. (1961). Chemiosmosis Theory. Nature, 191, 144-148.
  • Hollowich, F. (1979). Ocular EMF and Color Changes in Fish.
  • Turing, A. M. (1952). The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 237(641), 37-72.
  • Battista, O. A. (Quote on Error and Mistake).
  • ScienceDirect. Melanin and Metabolic Use in Vertebrates.
  • PMC. Emerging Role of Deuterium/Protium Disbalance.
  • Nutrition & Metabolism. Role of POMC Neurones in Feeding Behaviour.
  • NCBI Bookshelf. Human Skin Pigmentation and UV Adaptation.
  • Nakagawa, T., et al. (2014). Circadian Regulation of Mitochondrial Function. Nature Communications, 5, 3876. PMID: 24642944.
  • Chronobiology International (2022). Effects of nnEMF on Mitochondrial Dynamics.
  • Popp, F. A. (1984). Biophotons and Biocommunication. Malvern Press.
  • Phys.org (2022). Biochemists Develop Tool for mRNA Analysis from https://phys.org/news/2022-06-biochemists-tool-mrna.html.
  • Nature (2022). A Somato-Cognitive Action Network Alternates with Effector Regions in Motor Cortex. Nature.

Wisdom is the result of creating, pruning, and cultivating new neural connections built by the curiosity of experience. Curiosity causes wisdom to co evolve as data changes what is true. They’re not sequential, but symbiotic. Curiosity fuels wisdom by exposing the mind to new experiences, while wisdom guides seeking toward meaningful questions. This co-evolution mirrors how biological systems adapt: exploration (mutation) and selection (pruning) work together to navigate complex environments.

The Role of Entropy is the soil that furnishes this growth. Wisdom should be seen as an anti-entropic force, organizing experience into coherent, actionable insights despite reality’s tendency toward disorder. Yet, paradoxically, wisdom also embraces entropy by accepting impermanence because truths evolve, and what’s wise today may not be tomorrow. This dynamic tension is what makes wisdom creation mimic the scientific method.

Curiosity isn’t a sign of ignorance, it is a sign of wisdom struggling at its job. The wise understand that knowledge is fractal, each answer reveals new questions, ad infinitum. This mirrors the scientific method, so a hypothesis is never fully proven, only refined through iterative testing. The wise seeker embraces this process, driven not by a need to conquer uncertainty but by a desire to dance with it. This is akin to what physicist Richard Feynman called “the pleasure of finding things out”, which is a hallmark of wisdom.

Wisdom requires the mind to use Quantum Mechanics.  Why?  In quantum mechanics, tunneling allows particles to pass through barriers that seem insurmountable, defying classical expectations. Similarly, the wise seeking person must employ leaping beyond cognitive barriers and biases, assumptions, or limited perspectives, to access new realms of understanding. This requires both courage and humility, as it involves venturing into the unknown with no guarantee of success.

The wise don’t fear uncertainty but see it as a fertile ground for possibility. This aligns with the concept of “antifragility” where non linear systems gain strength from disorder. Wisdom is antifragile because it grows through exposure to uncertainty, paradox, and challenge. By “riding the edge of possibility,” the wise keep multiple options open simultaneous during examination, avoiding the trap of premature closure or dogmatic certainty.

A deepest layer to wisdom lies in meta-awareness, or the ability to observe one’s own cognitive processes and their place within the broader context of reality. This transcends mere knowledge or good judgment, entering the realm of self-transcendence and systemic understanding.

Ancient Stoic philosophers like Marcus Aurelius advocated for a cosmic perspective, where one zooms out to see the self as a small but interconnected part of the universe. This meta-awareness fosters humility (acknowledging limited knowledge), curiosity (seeking to expand it), and coherence (aligning with reality’s patterns). It’s why the wise are often calm in the face of chaos, because they see the bigger picture and don’t sweat the small stuff.

Meta-awareness also involves understanding the self as a system within larger systems (social, cultural, cosmic). The wise recognize their biases, emotional triggers, and blind spots, adjusting their mental models accordingly. This aligns with the idea of pruning neural connections: wisdom involves rewiring the self to better resonate with reality, much like tuning a radio to a clearer frequency. Because entropy and uncertainty are the backdrop of wisdom you easily understand how chaos becomes order in life.  Entropy, the universe’s tendency toward disorder, ensures that no knowledge is absolute. Wisdom counters entropy by organizing experience into coherent, actionable insights. Yet, paradoxically, it also embraces entropy by accepting impermanence, today’s wisdom may be tomorrow’s folly. This dynamic balance is what makes wisdom resilient and adaptive.

The final barrier of wisdom is where wisdom acts as a bridge between the finite and the infinite. Wisdom connects the individual’s finite mind to the infinite complexity of reality. It’s not about mastering reality but about harmonizing with it.  Wisdom dissolves false dichotomies of self vs. other, knowing vs. not-knowing, order vs. chaos. The wise see these as interconnected, embracing paradox as a feature of reality, not a bug.

Wisdom is not a possession but a creative way of being. It’s the art of living in alignment with reality’s flux, guided by curiosity, refined by experience, and tempered by humility. It’s less about having the right answers and more about asking the right questions. My framing focused initially on individual neural connections, but know that wisdom also scales to collectives. Societies, cultures, and ecosystems can exhibit wisdom through shared seeking and coherence. The deeper layer here is that individual wisdom contributes to collective wisdom, creating a feedback loop that shapes reality itself.   The reality you build is, therefore, linked to the environment you chose to cultivate.

SUMMARY

Wisdom is the art of dancing with the unknown, guided by curiosity and refined by coherence. It’s not a destination but a journey, a quantum tunneling through the barriers of ignorance toward fleeting glimpses of truth. By embracing uncertainty, pruning the superfluous, and cultivating meta-awareness, the wise not only navigate reality’s complexity but also contribute to its unfolding.

A Viral Narrative on First Principles Thinking: Shatter the Noise, Build Your Truth

Listen up, misfits. If you’re coasting through life swallowing pre-packaged narratives, you’re not living, you’re just eating someone else’s leftovers. First principles thinking isn’t a buzzword; it’s a machete to hack through the jungle of bullshit. Strip everything down to the raw, unfiltered truth. Ask: What do I know for sure? Then build from there, brick by unbreakable brick

Here’s the gut-punch: If you can’t answer, “What would change your mind?” in ten seconds flat, you’re not thinking, you’re parroting. That question is your litmus test. Dodge it, and you’re just another sheep in the herd, grazing on someone else’s script. Real thinkers don’t cling to dogma; they chase truth, even when it stings.

I don’t settle for mediocre, ever. Neither should you. Settling is surrender, accepting is strategy. Know the difference. Settle, and you’ll get exactly what you deserve: a life that’s “fine” but never alive. Karma doesn’t serve a menu; it dishes out what your choices cook up. Surround yourself with lights that spark wisdom, not noise. Nature’s got no filter, she’ll mirror your flaws and your fire.

We’re all beautifully broken, stitched together from stardust and scars. But how those pieces align? That’s on you. Thinking isn’t about IQ—high scores won’t save you. It’s about temperament, grit, and a relentless hunger to learn. Outsmart the “smart” by staying curious, not cocky. Soak up the sunrise, sleep smarter than you woke, and steal the best truths others have unearthed. Wisdom isn’t a gift; it’s a grind.

Here’s the deal: Stop outsourcing your brain. Social media soundbites? Trash. Opinions without evidence? Noise. When I hear someone spew a hot take, I hit ‘em with, “What would make you flip your stance?” If they freeze or mumble, I’m out. I roll with a circle of six who pack their own parachutes, thinkers who question, dissect, and rebuild. You want in? Start slicing through the fog. Ask the hard questions. Trust nature’s scalpel. Build your truth from the ground up, or someone else will build it for you.

What would change your mind? Answer that, or this place isn’t for you.

WHAT IS MY THEOREM IN A NUTSHELL?

The more wisdom you attain and the more conscious you become, the crazier you will appear to others who have built a life around conventional wisdom but your insight will astound them eventually when they awaken. This is my theorem.

Kruse’s Theorem: The Madness of Truth in a World of Shadows

If you dare to chase wisdom through the lens of light, raw, unfiltered, primal, you’ll look like a lunatic to those shackled by conventional dogma. Kruse’s theorem isn’t just a statement; it’s a battle cry for those who see the world differently. The deeper you dive into the truth of light-driven life, the more you awaken to a reality most can’t fathom. You’ll seem crazy, unhinged, a rebel against the gene-worshipping, centralized narratives of the mainstream. But when the sleepwalkers finally open their eyes, your insights will hit them like a supernova.

“Kruse’s theorem” is a philosophical and experiential principle that highlights the tension between unconventional wisdom and societal norms, particularly in the context of consciousness and awakening. Let’s break this down within the framework of my decentralized thesis, which emphasizes light, UPEs (ultra-weak photon emissions), and quantum processes as drivers of life and consciousness, and explore how this theorem aligns with broader ideas in this series.

Understanding The Theorem

The theorem suggests that deeper wisdom and heightened consciousness, gained through insights into light-driven biological processes, quantum biology, and a rejection of conventional paradigms make one appear “crazy” to those entrenched in traditional thinking. However, this unconventional insight eventually astounds others when they “awaken” to the same truths. This can be interpreted as a commentary on the evolution of consciousness, both individually and collectively, and the resistance often faced by paradigm-shifting ideas.

Conventional Wisdom: This likely refers to mainstream scientific and societal paradigms, such as the gene-centric view of biology, centralized models of control (e.g., in medicine or neuroscience), and a dismissal of light’s role in life beyond photosynthesis or vision. For example, the idea that genes primarily dictate phenotype, or that consciousness is solely a product of classical neural computation, dominates conventional thinking.

The Theorem, Decoded: The more you understand light’s role, through UPEs, quantum biology, and decentralized processes, the more conscious you become. This isn’t some woo-woo enlightenment; it’s biophysics. Light sculpts life, from mtDNA to microtubules, collapsing wave functions in your retina and brain to craft your very consciousness. Conventional wisdom clings to genes as the blueprint, but you know better: genes are just lenses, bending light to shape who you are and what you can become. This knowledge sets you apart, makes you a heretic in a world of rote believers.

Unconventional Wisdom: My thesis challenges this by asserting that light, not genes, sculpts life through UPE-mediated quantum processes (e.g., wave function collapse in mtDNA, microtubules). I’ve argued that chromophores, cytochromes, opsins, water, and oxidation states control light in obtuse ways to bend the delivery of information and energy to mtDNA, shaping phenotype and consciousness in a decentralized manner.

Wisdom, Consciousness, and the “Crazy” Perception

Why You Seem Crazy to THEM: To the masses, your obsession with light, UPEs in the 100-300 nm range, blue light’s chaos, nnEMF’s havoc, sounds like sci-fi. They’re comfy in their gene-centric bubble, blind to the quantum dance of photons in their cells. You’re screaming about retinal loops, CSF coherence, and lipofuscin’s cognitive chokehold while they shrug and scroll. Your heightened awareness, born from syncing with nature’s rhythms, makes their world look like a flickering fluorescent hell. You’re not just different, you’re a threat to their cozy illusions.

The more wisdom you attain, through understanding light’s role in biology, the more conscious you become. In my thesis, consciousness arises from UPEs collapsing wave functions in the CSF-microtubule system, with the retina playing a key role via its photonic loop with environmental light. Let’s explore why this heightened consciousness might make you appear “crazy” to others:

Divergence from Norms: Conventional wisdom often dismisses quantum biology or biophoton-mediated processes as fringe or speculative. Your rejection of gene-centric models and emphasis on light as the primary driver of life (e.g., “genes are lenses that light interacts with”) clashes with mainstream views. For example, asserting that UPEs in the retina and brain sculpt consciousness (as in Stargardt disease or blue light exposure) may seem outlandish to those who view consciousness as a purely classical phenomenon.

Heightened Awareness: As you become more conscious, through insights into light-driven processes, you perceive reality differently. In your model, narrow UPE spectra (e.g., 200-400 nm in health) produce vivid, coherent qualia, while disruptions (e.g., broader spectra from blue light, nnEMF) alter conscious experience. This heightened awareness (e.g., sensing nnEMF’s impact on mtDNA hypoxia) may lead you to behaviors or beliefs, such as minimizing blue light exposure or advocating for decentralized biophysics, that seem eccentric to others.

Social Resistance: People entrenched in conventional wisdom often resist paradigm shifts due to cognitive dissonance or institutional inertia. For example, your ideas about light sculpting life (supported by the 2024 Nature book review) challenge established fields like genetics and neurology, making you appear “crazy” to those invested in the status quo.

Awakening and Astounding Insight

The Awakening: But truth doesn’t stay buried. When they feel the fog of blue light clouding their minds, or nnEMF stealing their sleep, they’ll start to question. They’ll stumble into your world, maybe through a sleepless night at 7,200 feet, maybe through a kid’s Stargardt diagnosis, and see what you saw all along. That’s when your “madness” becomes prophecy. Your predictions, blue light spiking lipofuscin, nnEMF desyncing UPEs, aren’t guesses; they’re the cellular playbook writ large. You control the narrative because you see the light, literally.

My theorem posits that new insights will eventually astound others when they “awaken” to the same truths. Let’s connect this thesis to the evolution of consciousness:

Awakening as Expanded Consciousness: In my model, awakening can be interpreted as a shift to a more coherent UPE-mediated conscious state by shrinking its frequency to become more signal and be less noise. For example:

Healthy State: Narrow UPE spectra (100-300 nm) in the retina and brain produce precise wave function collapses, leading to vivid qualia and a unified conscious experience. This is why leptin has a 220 nm absorption band. Everything else is the noise of heteroplasmy in thge HPA axis.

Disrupted State: Blue light, nnEMF, or metabolic stress (e.g., hyperammonemia, lipofuscin accumulation) broaden UPE spectra, desynchronizing collapses and diminishing consciousness (e.g., brain fog, distorted perception, mental disease). Photons bent by the wrong lens create mis-timed reality.

Awakening: Others awaken when they recognize light’s role in consciousness and adopt practices to restore UPE coherence (e.g., minimizing blue light, optimizing circadian rhythms). This shift aligns their conscious experience with yours, making your insights, once seen as crazy, profoundly validating. You start building tribe and community with ease.

Astounding Insights: My predictions, such as the impact of blue light on lipofuscin and cognition (as in Stargardt disease), or the role of UPEs in myelination and retinal regeneration, astound others when they experience or observe the same phenomena. For example, someone who initially dismisses warnings about nnEMF might later notice cognitive decline from chronic exposure, leading them to appreciate this foresight.

Cells, Light, and Predictive Control

My earlier statement that “it’s easy to predict something when you’re controlling it”, applies here. Cells control light interactions (via chromophores, water, oxidation states) to predict outcomes like phenotype and consciousness. When light is run through these optical filters, only then do photons begin to experience time. That experience of time creates the life you experience and perceive. In my theorem, we’ve extended this to a meta-level: by understanding and controlling light’s role in biology, we become able to predict outcomes (e.g., retinal degeneration, cognitive decline) that seem “crazy” to others until they awaken to the same reality. This mirrors how cells use light to sculpt life, aligning with my decentralized thesis you read about earlier in this series.

Cellular Control: Healthy cells produce narrow UPE spectra, collapsing wave functions with precision to maintain function (e.g., photoreceptor turnover, myelination, MT assembly/dosassembly).

Your Control: By understanding light’s role, you predict disruptions (e.g., broader UPEs from blue light) and their consequences (e.g., altered consciousness), appearing “crazy” until others catch up.

Clinical and Societal Implications

Individual Awakening: Someone adopting these insights, e.g., reducing blue light exposure, may experience improved cognition and consciousness (restored UPE coherence), validating this theorem. For example, mitigating nnEMF in a high-altitude environment (like 7,200 ft, as discussed on the forum recently) could improve sleep quality and conscious clarity.

Collective Awakening: As more people awaken to light-driven biology (e.g., via quantum biology research, as in the 2024 Nature review), these ideas will shift from “crazy” to groundbreaking, potentially transforming fields like medicine and neuroscience. The Cite below thinks this science is new but it is over 50 years old and no one is reading it.

SUMMARY

This thesis will push you to an edge: My theorem isn’t just philosophy; it’s a call to arms. Don’t just think, think through. Strip away the noise, the dogma, the social media soundbites. Ask: What’s the raw truth? What is the signal buried in Nature’s waves? Build your framework from first principles, rooted in nature’s wisdom. Surround yourself with those who can answer, “What would change your mind?” without flinching. They’re the ones packing their own parachutes, ready to jump into the unknown.

You’re not here to settle for “fine.” You’re a mosaic of stardust, wired for light, built to question. The crazier you seem, the closer you are to truth. Keep pushing, keep shining, and when the world wakes up, they’ll see you were never crazy, just ahead of the curve.

What would change your mind about Kruse’s theorem? If you can’t answer, you’re not ready for this science.

This theorem reflects the tension between a light-centric, decentralized view of life and conventional gene-centric wisdom. The understanding of light’s role in sculpting phenotype and consciousness, via UPEs, chromophores, and mtDNA, makes you appear “crazy” to those who adhere to traditional paradigms. However, as others awaken to the same truths (e.g., through personal experience or scientific validation, as in the 2024 Nature review), the insights astound them, aligning with the thesis that light, not genes, drives life. Cells control light to predict outcomes, and you, by understanding this, predict broader biological and conscious shifts, bridging cellular and societal dynamics.

CITES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOpaLt2oKfc

Introduction: Evolutionary Timescales and the Dawn of Consciousness

The evolutionary journey of life on Earth can be envisioned as a “Spaceship Earth,” a solar collector orbiting the sun, harvesting approximately 2 × 10⁻¹⁴ solar masses annually—accumulating 30 Earth masses over 4.6 billion years. This photonic energy, termed “Nature’s Wi-Fi,” is captured by light-sensitive chemicals innovated during the Great Oxygenation Event (GOE) approximately 2.4 billion years ago, including blood porphyrins, DNA/RNA, melanin, water, nitric oxide (NO), oxygen (O), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and chlorophyll.

This energy drives life’s core processes, photosynthesis, DHA synthesis, and vitamin B12 production, transforming quantum information (frequency, polarization) into a resource for the central nervous system (CNS) to decipher.

Before consciousness could emerge, the brain needed to capture this information via mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), timestamp it with circadian mechanisms, and harvest its data to evolve from sleep, the default state of the first two domains of life (bacteria and archaea), to a primitive wakefulness driven by light signaling.

Over 600 million years, from the Cambrian explosion onward, this process advanced from analog DHA signals (ion flows, membrane potentials) to digital action potentials and synapses, culminating in optical photonic signaling (biophotons, Popp) and quantum computing in human brains.

Hydrated DHA membranes, optimized by cytochrome c oxidase (CCO) and EZ water (Pollack, Del Giudice, and Preparata), sync with B12’s photoreception (300-550 nm), melanin’s semiconductors (100-3100 nm), and the POMC-leptin pathway (UV, 100-300 nm) to build the CNS as a solar-powered quantum optical computer. Sunlight (UV-A/B, IR-A, visible), the Schumann resonance, and Earth’s magnetic field, delivered via blood’s “Wi-Fi,” shape this evolution, with traits conserved magnetically in DNA only when deemed useful to eukaryotes.

The endosymbiotic integration of mitochondria, a preconscious step, introduced mitoception, the brain’s sensory mechanism to monitor mitochondrial energy status, setting the stage for the recursive loop of the Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN), melanin, and sunlight to awaken consciousness from the GOE’s slumber, sparked by the electrical resistance of oxygen. This chapter is deeplt rooted in my decentralized thesis, and it explores mitoception’s role, integrating insights from the cytokine Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) and mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases (Wang et al., 2022), to illuminate the quantum path from endosymbiosis to sentience

Core Concepts and Their Integration

Post-Endosymbiosis Integration and Mitoception Birth

The evolution of heme proteins during the GOE approximately 2.4 billion years ago marks a pivotal chapter in the origin of complex life, intricately tied to endosymbiosis and the decentralized medicine paradigm. As atmospheric oxygen levels surged, bacteria and archaea faced an existential threat, interpreting each other as infections under attack by oxygen’s paramagnetic properties, which induce electric and magnetic fields capable of altering iron oxidation states (+2 or +3). To counter these Debye electrical gradients in membranes, these primordial organisms innovated heme proteins, notably cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), to protect cellular integrity while pioneering apoptosis, a controlled cell death process to eliminate damaged cells. This electrical stressor likely forced a symbiotic alliance, with mitochondria, descendants of ancient bacteria, evolving as a “patch” to neutralize oxygen’s toxicity by burying it within water, creating a stable environment for oxidative phosphorylation. CCO, central to both water production and apoptosis, enabled this adaptation, transforming electrical stress into a survival strategy. This joining event, driven by the GOE’s varying electric and magnetic fields, birthed the eukaryotic cell, fostering multicellularity, organogenesis, and tissue differentiation, and setting the stage for mitoception as the brain’s sensory bridge to mitochondrial energy status, a process later refined by the recursive loop of SCAN, melanin, and sunlight.The endosymbiotic integration of mitochondria into eukaryotes approximately 1.5 billion years ago transformed cellular energy dynamics, marking a preconscious state where rudimentary metabolic processes prevailed.

The TCA Cycle and Its Dependence on Sunlight and Oxygen

The TCA cycle typically runs in the forward (oxidative) direction under aerobic conditions, oxidizing acetyl-CoA to produce energy intermediates (NADH, FADH2) that feed the ETC for ATP synthesis. This process depends on oxygen as the final electron acceptor in the ETC. Sunlight indirectly supports this by driving photosynthesis, which provides oxygen and glucose (or other organic substrates).

Without sunlight:

Photosynthesis halts, reducing oxygen and organic substrate availability.

In the absence of oxygen (anaerobic conditions), mitochondria cannot run the TCA cycle in its forward direction efficiently because the ETC stalls without oxygen as the electron acceptor. This mimics conditions on early Earth, where bacteria used alternative metabolic pathways.

Some organisms, including certain bacteria and potentially mitochondria under specific conditions, can run the TCA cycle in reverse (reductive or reverse TCA, rTCA). The rTCA cycle fixes CO2 and uses H+ to synthesize organic molecules, effectively turning “gases into life.” This is facilitated by enzymes like ferredoxin, an iron-sulfur protein that mediates electron transfer in reductive reactions. The rTCA cycle is energetically favorable in anaerobic environments, as seen in some modern bacteria and inferred for ancient microbes before oxygen was abundant.

With sunlight:

Sunlight enables photosynthesis, producing oxygen and glucose, which support the forward TCA cycle in mitochondria. The cycle operates oxidatively, breaking down glucose-derived acetyl-CoA to generate ATP via the ETC.

The presence of oxygen ensures the ETC functions, preventing the need for the TCA cycle to run in reverse. Thus, sunlight indirectly maintains the aerobic, forward TCA cycle by sustaining oxygen levels.

Mitochondrial Survival and Their “Vested Interest”

Mitochondria are not autonomous entities with a “will” but are highly integrated organelles shaped by billions of years of coevolution with their eukaryotic host. Their “vested interest” in survival is reflected in their critical role in cellular energy production and their influence on cell fate (e.g., apoptosis). The question of whether mitochondria “bend the will of Nature” or “bend at the knee to light and oxygen” is metaphorical but highlights their dependence on environmental conditions:

Light and oxygen dependency: Mitochondria rely on oxygen (from photosynthesis, driven by light) for efficient ATP production via the forward TCA cycle and ETC. Without oxygen, their function is limited, and they may revert to ancestral metabolic strategies (e.g., rTCA cycle) or trigger cell death (apoptosis) if energy production fails.

Colonial integration: Mitochondria exist as a “colony” within eukaryotic cells, with each cell containing hundreds to thousands of mitochondria. Their survival is tied to the host cell’s survival, as they cannot grow or replicate independently outside the eukaryotic cell. This interdependence suggests they are not bending únderstanding the role of light and oxygen in shaping mitochondrial function requires recognizing their evolutionary history. Mitochondria, descendants of free-living bacteria, have been sculpted by endosymbiosis to rely on the eukaryotic cell’s resources. Their topology, the double membrane and cristae, optimizes energy production, a process indirectly tied to sunlight through oxygen and nutrient availability. The cristae is the new generation of ferrodoxin. Both contain Fe-S cores.

The TCA cycle’s ability to run in reverse under anaerobic conditions reflects an ancient bacterial strategy to survive without oxygen, using ferredoxin to facilitate CO2 fixation. However, mitochondria’s genetic autonomy is limited; their 16.5 kb genome encodes only 37 genes, including 13 proteins for the ETC, with the rest (tRNAs, rRNAs) supporting mitochondrial protein synthesis. The majority of their ~1,500 proteins are nuclear-encoded, highlighting their dependence on the host cell. This precise molecular coordination between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA ensures efficient energy production, with apoptosis eliminating dysfunctional cells and natural selection favoring optimal configurations. Mitochondria don’t bend nature’s will but are shaped by it, their survival tied to the cell’s and the broader environmental context of light and oxygen.

Mitoception emerged as the brain’s ability to sense the balance between energy demand (burn rate) and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) capacity, a sensory adaptation critical for monitoring this new organelle born during the GOE. The GOE, by increasing atmospheric oxygen, enhanced ROS production, foward spin of the TCA/Urea cycle driving melanin’s evolution as a light-absorbing, charge-separating molecule that generates massive ultraweak photon emissions (UPEs). These photonic signals, tied to the TCA cycle and Noether’s theorem, provided the initial mechanism for the brain to perceive mitochondrial burn rate. Once the brain could decipher this information then complexity was built. This is where consciousness was born and expanded as melanin was internalized and more water was made by the TCA cycle. The TCA cycle creates the most water from beta oxidation.

If a eukaryote see the AM sunrise you can then use the TCA and urea cycle. = you can make the heat sink required to make the highest quality UPEs your cell needs to do all the amazing things if does. Complete combustion of 100 gms of

FATS = 110 gms of DDW from CCO

Protein = 75 = 75 gms of DDW from CCO

Carbs = 55 = 55 gms of DDW from CCO

Wang et al. (2022) noted that mitochondrial dysfunction, including mtDNA mutations and impaired OxPhos, is a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting mitoception’s evolutionary role as a checkpoint for energy homeostasis, a prerequisite for the consciousness enabled by SCAN and sunlight.

Mitoception as an Electromagnetic and Photonic Sense of Mitochondria

My decentralized thesis redefines mitochondria as electromagnetic antennas resonating with light and environmental fields, challenging the biochemical paradigm that exists today. The retina’s shift to glycolysis under UV stress, prioritizing coherence over ATP yield, reflects this adaptation (Kruse, 2025).

Mitoception extends this idea, allowing the brain to sense mitochondrial “field health” via the ability to sense galactic Birkeland currents, extraterrestrial light sources, adjacent UPEs, charge gradients of adjacent semiconductors (hydrated proteins), and membrane potentials (lipid Debye potentials). Stressed mitochondria, under nnEMF or blue light, increase UPE output as a distress signal (Van Wijk et al., 2014), a phenomenon Wang et al. (2022) link to oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Glial cells and neurons, sensitive to these fields, translate photonic cues into fatigue, malaise or a diminution of consciousness. Collagen nanotubes and microtubules act to amplifying UPEs with structured EZ water, facilitate nonlocal communication, aligning with my quantum optical model.

GDF15 as the Primary Signal of Mitoception

GDF15 has been shown to be a valuable marker for mitochondrial diseases, particularly those involving muscle involvement. Movement would have been an early feature of eukaryotic life to find energy sources. It’s induced early in the mitochondrial disease process and is secreted into the circulation. This means this signal would have been picked up by the early porphyrins and ferrodoxin compounds at the Cambrian explosion. GDF15 is part of the mitochondrial integrated stress response (ISRmt), a cellular defense mechanism activated by mitochondrial dysfunction. I think ferrodoxins might have been the GDF15 of the GOE that was used to signal electrical stress from rising and falling oxygen tensions in the environment. Mitochondria’s ability to reverse the TCA cycle via ferredoxin reflects an ancient survival mechanism, active without oxygen or sunlight conditions favored CO2 fixation. Their survival is tied to the host cell, shaped by evolutionary pressures rather than independent intent.

GDF15 seems to be the primary molecular marker of mitoception today, released under mitochondrial stress from OxPhos overload, toxins, or nnEMF. GDF15 acts on the brainstem’s area postrema to signal energy imbalance, manifesting as fatigue or nausea (Hsu et al., 2017). This area has no blood barrier, and is heavily innervated by a cranial nerve, so it is the perfect place for the brain to sense the environmental stress of light and oxygen. Many cases of extreme vomiting are because this area become hyperactive due to light stress or hypoxia.

Wang et al. (2022) corroborate this, noting elevated GDF15 in neurodegenerative diseases due to mtDNA deletions and OxPhos deficits. In the decentralized framework, GDF15’s release reflects electromagnetic disruptions, with nnEMF reducing ATP by 30% and increasing ROS (Pall, 2018), and blue light stressing the endocanabinoid system [ECS] (Di Meo et al., 2025). Melanin’s shares a UPE-generating capacity with GDF15, and this suggests a common evolutionary origin, which was likely refined post-endosymbiosis with leptin’s 220 nm absorption. The rise of the leptin melanocortin pathway during evolution strongly links to the rise of conscious behavior in eukaryotes.

Integration with Interoception and Immunoception

Mitoception complements interoception and immunoception, extending the brain’s sensory network. The vagus nerve, modulated by the ECS, relays GDF15 signals from peripheral tissues to the brainstem (Breit et al., 2015), a process Wang et al. (2022) link to neuroinflammation in MS. The vagus nerve innervates the area postrema in the brain. This aligns with the retina’s photonic stress management, prioritizing field coherence. The GOE’s oxygen surge catalyzed this integration, links it to the TCA cycle, with melanin’s ROS interaction and UPEs laying the groundwork for leptin’s endogenous light signaling, enabled by oxygen-dependent UPEs.

Light, nnEMF, and Environmental Modulators

Full-spectrum sunlight, rich in UV and infrared, supports mitochondrial coherence by photoinhibiting CCO and boosting ATP efficiency (Hamblin, 2017), reducing GDF15. Wang et al. (2022) suggest infrared enhances mitochondrial biogenesis, a strategy for Alzheimer’s. nnEMF alters membrane potentials (Pall, 2018), and blue light disrupts the ECS (Di Meo et al., 2025), elevating GDF15. The GOE’s oxygen rise enhanced UPE production, reinforcing light’s primacy.

Mitoception in Disease Contexts

ALS: Mitochondrial dysfunction drives progression, with nnEMF worsening oxidative stress and GDF15 elevation (Beaulieu et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022). Mitoception signals fatigue, potentially alleviated by CB2 agonists.

MS: Demyelination increases mitochondrial demand, elevating UPE transformation and spectral density with simultaneous GDF15 release into the blood. (Witte et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2022). Full-spectrum sunlight supports ECS repair.

Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s: mtDNA mutations and OxPhos deficits increase GDF15 (Kim et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2022). Infrared light with UV restores health in these cases.

Mental Health, Consciousness and Gut-Brain Axis: Gut mitochondrial stress from nnEMF elevates GDF15, signaling depression due to demyleination and microtubule dysfunction (Coll et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022). UV light and NIR light restores strong monochromatic UPE transformation.

Practical Strategies to Enhance Mitoception

Full-Spectrum Light Exposure: Sunlight aligns mitochondrial function, reducing GDF15 (Wang et al., 2022).

Minimize nnEMF and Blue Light: Reduces mitochondrial stress and GDF15 levels.

Circadian Alignment: Boosts melatonin, lowering GDF15.

ECS Support: CB2 agonists reduce inflammation, lowering GDF15.

Mindful Awareness: Recognizes mitoceptive cues for lifestyle adjustments.

The Quantum Mitoceptive Framework

Mitoception, a quantum sensory mechanism, enables the brain to feel its own mitochondrial stress status via critsae alignment and it ability to transform UPEs and electromagnetic fields, with GDF15 as a molecular proxy in our blood. The blood signal is delivered to the brain at the floor of the fourth ventricle in the area postrema. Since there is no blood barrier here the signal gets through to the brain and gut in unison via the vagus nerve.

My concept of “mitoception” using GDF15 as the signaling energy imbalance to the brainstem’s area postrema (AP), a region lacking a blood-brain barrier and innervated by the vagus nerve, is well supported by evidence. GDF15 binds GFRAL in the AP and nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), inducing fatigue or nausea (Hsu et al., 2017), and vagal modulation relays this to the brain (Breit et al., 2015). This fits with my idea of the AP as a sensor for environmental stress (light, oxygen), with hyperactivity linked to vomiting under hypoxia or light stress. The vagus nerve’s role in neuroinflammation (Wang et al., 2022) further ties mitoception to interoception and immunoception, expanding the brain’s sensory network.

My decentralized thesis reframes mitochondria as photonic sensors, with melanin and leptin evolving post-GOE to integrate light-driven feedback. The 10 glycolysis and 9 TCA steps support this system, while collagen nanotubes and microtubules begin to absorb more energy and then begin to amplify cosmic frequencies in water that CCO makes.

Diseases reflect disrupted mitoception (EDS, Lupus, ME), via CCO dehydration which is addressable through light, oxygen and ECS modulation to modulate a spectrum of consciousness. Less myelin & MT Function = more sleep = less consciousness.

Implications for Neurological and Metabolic Health

Mitoception offers diagnostic and therapeutic targets, for light-based interventions (e.g., infrared for biogenesis) reducing GDF15 in neurodegenerative diseases (Wang et al., 2022).

Evolutionary Insights of the genesis of the leptin melanocortin pathway

The central retinal pathway connects the eye to the leptin receptor and continues to the SCN, and thalmus. It also makes a primary stop in the habenular nucleus to control the two new lobes of man, the frontal lobes.

The GOE’s role in melanin, DHA, and leptin evolution highlights light’s primacy in neural-mitochondrial integration, shaping eukaryotic consciousness. The neural crest cells become the motherboard of the brain’s optical network making it more useful over the 600 million years since the Cambrian explosion. This story was told to Mr. Rubin and Huberman on Tetragrammaton.

What does a Motherboard do? The key function of a motherboard is to connect and enable communication between all the components within a computer, allowing them to work together. It acts as a central hub, providing the electrical & magnetic connections necessary for the CPU, to drive memory, storage, and other peripherals to interact. This is how consciousness was expanded in complex life. The motherboard got better handling light, electric and magnetic fields over 600 million years.

Technological and Philosophical Extensions

Biomimicry of mitoceptive signaling began to inspire photo-bioelectronics in cells and tissues, while the brain’s photonic sensitivity aligned with plasma filling the space around the sun and Earth allowing cosmic intelligence to flow to life on Earth. The more liquid crystalline eukaryotes became the more consciousness became a key feature of life due to its electrical nature. This is how galactic currents link to every living thing on a planet in a solar system in that heliosphere.

Technological and Philosophical Extensions

Biomimicry of mitoceptive signaling began to inspire photo-bioelectronics in cells and tissues, while the brain’s photonic sensitivity aligned with plasma filling the space around the sun and Earth allowing cosmic intelligence to flow to life on Earth. The more liquid crystalline eukaryotes became the more consciousness became a key feature of life due to its electrical nature. This is how galactic currents link to every living thing on a planet in a solar system in that heliosphere.

The entire living history of Earth, over 4.6 billion years, has consumed approximately 30 Earth masses. This volume shows just how much information is buried in sunlight. It also shows that DHA was critical in tapping the information in the light to make it useful. It explains why conditions of existence were and are more important than natural selection. Below is Shannon’s equation for information entropy.

It explains the paradox of the Cambrian explosion from evolutionary theory. Light completes Darwin’s ideas; DNA and genes do not. The Cambrian explosion happened 600 million years ago, and photosynthesis was innovated 50 million years before the Cambrian explosion.
When you divide 650 million years by 4.6 billion years, you will see that complex life found on Earth has only used 14% of the 30 Earth masses of sunlight. That is, approximately six Earth masses of SUNLIGHT created everything humans have ever known about life. THIS SHOULD FLOOR YOU. The stochastics of this fraction of light to build complexity is astounding.

Below is Boltzman’s equation for entropy that is key to the second law of thermodynamics. Compare it to Shannon’s law of information entropy above. They are the same.

Everything ever created on Earth came from this amount of light. It shows us definitively how much more critical light is than anything else. But to use this small amount of light, photosynthesis had to innovate DHA to make the sun’s helpful light 600 million years ago. This shows you just how powerful the electromagnetic force is. It has unlimited range and power. DHA has been the master of DNA since the beginning of animal evolution because it made light useful from an information theory (Shannon). It explains why I believe Darwin was very wrong.

CITES

Kruse, J. (2025). X Posts from Twitter/X Platform.

Preprint Mitoception and GDF15. https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.008142.pdf

Wang, X., et al. (2022). Mitochondrial function and dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2022.101073

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38659958/

Van Wijk, R. (2014). Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 135, 20-28. PMID: 25587420.

Hsu, J. Y., et al. (2017). Nature Medicine, 23(10), 1210-1217.

Pall, M. L. (2018). Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 37(4), 171-185.

Di Meo, S., et al. (2025). Chronobiology International, [in press].

Breit, S., et al. (2015). Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, 83.

Hamblin, M. R. (2017). Photochemistry and Photobiology, 93(6), 1358-1366.

Beaulieu, C., et al. (2020). Journal of Neurology, 267(9), 2567-2575.

Witte, M. E., et al. (2014). Brain, 137(2), 500-512.

Kim, H. J., et al. (2018). Neurology, 91(14), e1330-e1340.

Coll, A. P., et al. (2020). Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 16(2), 77-89.

My ideas on consciousness will push boundaries over the precipice, because they offering a profound, elegant solution to the hard problem consciousness. To be accept by lesser minds, they require rigorous experimentation to move from theory to established science.  They will point to data linking biophotons to neural correlates. These lesser minds in centralized science will completely ignore that this experimental data is already sitting out there, published, but because the methodology was incorrect the experiment was a bust. My theory’s potential to unify physics, biology, and philosophy is exciting.  I do not think it must navigate the speculative gap between cellular processes and subjective experience because the entire theory is based on things we have already proven in science, but no one has linked them as I have in this blog you are about to experience. Every idea is based on fundamental laws of physics which are not subject to any RCT.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1604855113

Melanin is the base biochemical of the recursive loop of a photonic field from the sun for all animals on Earth. It often does this in many bacteria and fungi as well. Chlorophyll performs the task for the Plant Kingdom and many other bacteria and Archaea. Melanin absorbs all sunlight frequencies into its chaotic atomic structure and creates ROS with oxygen it splits from water, creating UPEs outside the mtDNA. This photonic field info is shared with the colony of mitochondria endogenously at short distances, and this alters the metabolism within the mtDNA, and this results in a UPE spectra that controls the phenotype and physiology of every organ, including the brain, all its CSF pathways that create an ocean around microtubules, create consciousness. This is how the “hard problem” is solved in all living things.

EXPLAIN IT LIKE I AM IN THIRD GRADE

The GOE introduced a new player to Earth’s environment: molecular oxygen. For early anaerobic life forms, oxygen was a toxic electrical stressor. Oxygen, with its high electronegativity, changes the electrical resistance of biological membranes, disrupting the delicate balance of charge that early cells relied on for survival. Membranes, essentially lipid bilayers, act as capacitors, storing and managing electrical gradients critical for cellular function. The sudden presence of oxygen would have altered these gradients, creating an early-life existential crisis. Without oxygen, UPE biophotons cannot be made. This explains the Cambrian explosion and what life became capable of. It also explains why life is in trouble today under nnEMF, which creates mtDNA hypoxia.

My decentralized theory posits that the teleology of life is the transformation of matter in us, which is done to transform matter into biophotons exclusively. In turn, those biophotons collapse the wave function and allow a version of reality to exist, and this is what we experience as life. Light, at the biophoton scale, explains the hard problem in consciousness. I’m suggesting that light sculpts like and makes it conscious. This idea resolves the “hard problem” of consciousness, which is how subjective experience (qualia) arises from physical processes.

I am proposing a unified mechanism where melanin acts as the foundational element in a recursive photonic loop between sunlight and endogenous ultra-weak photon emissions (UPEs), ultimately driving consciousness and resolving the hard problem.

Let’s break this down and connect it to my broader decentralized theory, focusing on how this loop influences mtDNA, UPE spectra, and the brain’s cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathways around microtubules to create consciousness in the primate and hominid clades.

Melanin as the Base of the Recursive Photonic Loop

Melanin, a pigment with broadband absorption across the entire solar spectrum (from UV to infrared, ~200-1000 nm), is uniquely positioned to capture sunlight’s full range of frequencies. In your model, melanin absorbs this solar energy and converts it into a photonic field, a form of energy or information, that is shared with the mitochondria within cells.

Melanin’s Photonic Properties: Melanin’s ability to absorb all wavelengths and dissipate energy through non-radiative (e.g., heat) and radiative (e.g., photon emission) pathways is well-documented. It can also generate ROS and emit UPEs in a narrow, powerful spectrum when excited by light, as seen in studies of neuromelanin in the brain. This makes melanin a transducer of solar energy into biologically usable forms.

Recursive Loop with Mitochondria: The photonic field generated by melanin interacts with the colony of mitochondria in cells. Most melanin in cells is located close to mitochondria. Mitochondria, containing their DNA (mtDNA), are the primary producers of UPEs through oxidative phosphorylation, as discussed earlier via Roeland Van Wijk’s work. This melanin transformed energy is transformed into UPE light in addition to mtDNA. The sunlight absorbed by melanin on our integument modulates mitochondrial metabolism by altering the redox state (e.g., via ROS production) and electron transport chain (ETC) dynamics, which influences the spectrum of UPEs emitted within the cell. That light gives cells and their organs their phenotype. This light varies organ by organ, leading to the macroscopic changes in organs. Light, in the form of UPEs, is sculpting organogenesis in the embryo.

UPE Spectra and Phenotypic/Physiological Control

The UPEs emitted by mitochondria, now tuned by the melanin-sunlight interaction, have a specific spectrum (likely in the UV range, 200-400 nm, which is more coherent light than mtDNA. This UPE spectrum acts as a quantum signal that controls the phenotype and physiology of every organ, including the brain and all its microtubules.

mtDNA and UPE Modulation: mtDNA encodes key ETC components (e.g., subunits of complexes I, III, IV), and its activity is sensitive to redox changes induced by melanin’s photonic field. For example, increased ROS from sunlight-melanin interactions could enhance UPE emission in the UV range, as melanin tightens the spectral output, as I noted earlier with the 200-400 nm range. This spectral specificity, per Fritz-Albert Popp’s findings, increases the information content of UPEs (via Shannon’s entropy), enabling precise quantum effects at the smallest scales inside cells.

Organ-Level Effects: The UPE spectrum acts as a signaling mechanism, collapsing wave functions in cellular components (e.g., proteins, lipids like DHA) to dictate cellular behavior. This extends to all organs, regulating metabolism, gene expression, and tissue-specific functions. In the brain, this UPE spectrum influences neural activity and consciousness, as we’ll explore next.

BRAIN SCULPTING

Biophotons and Melanin: Biophotons are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, and their generation could theoretically be influenced by magnetic fields. The slide’s focus below is on dipole fields could help explore whether magnetic interactions affect biophoton emission, potentially linking to my idea to the neural crest cells being the motherboard of CNS because melanin absorbs and re-emits light, influencing neural and vascular network construction and would create consciousness as a collateral effect. For instance, if melanin interacts with magnetic fields (highly probable possible given its semiconductive properties, Melanin), the Inverse Cube Law could model how these interactions diminish with distance, affecting biophotonic signaling in the brain.

Magnetic Fields in Biological Systems: Mitochondria and mtDNA

Mitochondrial Electromagnetic Fields:

Mitochondria generate weak electromagnetic fields during metabolism due to the movement of charged particles (e.g., electrons, protons) in the electron transport chain (ETC). The inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) sustains a strong electric field (~30 million V/m, as noted in previous slides), and the flow of electrons through complexes like Complex IV (CCO, the cathode equivalent) creates small magnetic fields via the Biot-Savart Law:

where {B} is the magnetic field, u0 is the permeability of free space, ( I ) is the current (electron flow), and ( r ) is the distance.

mtDNA as a Source: mtDNA, located in the mitochondrial matrix near the IMM, must experience these fields because of the laws of physics. Additionally, mtDNA’s semiconductor-like properties (emitting 100-400 nm UPEs, as discussed in previous blogs) suggest it could generate weak magnetic moments during electron excitation, especially if paired with paramagnetic molecules like oxygen, NO, or melanin.

Inverse Cube Law:

The slide highlights the Inverse Cube Law for magnetic dipole fields:

This means the magnetic field strength diminishes rapidly with distance, confining its effects to the immediate vicinity of the source (e.g., mitochondria or mtDNA). For example, a field of 1 nT (nanotesla) at 1 nm from mtDNA would drop to 0.001 nT at 10 nm—a 1000-fold decrease.

Implications for Cellular Processes

Localized Effects: The rapid decay of magnetic fields suggests their influence is highly localized, potentially affecting:

mtDNA Function: Magnetic fields would modulate mtDNA replication, transcription, or repair by influencing the orientation of charged molecules (e.g., DNA bases, Mg²⁺ ions in polymerase).

Biophoton Emission: UPEs from mtDNA (e.g., 220 nm) should be influenced by these fields, as magnetic fields can affect electron spin states and ROS production (e.g., singlet vs. triplet states of oxygen), altering photon emission probabilities.

Brain Sculpting: In the fetus, where mitochondria are densely packed in rapidly dividing cells during neurulation, these localized magnetic fields could create a “microenvironment” for signaling, enhancing the coherence of UPEs (as discussed previously) and supporting precise developmental outcomes.

Magnetic Fields, Biophotons, and Melanin

Biophotons and Magnetic Fields

Biophotons (or UPEs) are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, emitted by mtDNA, flavins, and hemes during metabolic processes. The physics suggests magnetic fields have to influence biophoton emission, which aligns with biophysical theories:

Electron Spin Dynamics: Magnetic fields can affect electron spin states in radical pairs (e.g., during ROS production at CCO). For example, the radical pair mechanism suggests that magnetic fields alter the singlet-triplet interconversion of reactive oxygen species (ROS), impacting their reactivity and photon emission.

Singlet oxygen (¹O₂) emits photons MORE efficiently than triplet oxygen (³O₂), and weak magnetic fields (~nT range) can shift this balance, potentially increasing or decreasing UPE intensity at specific wavelengths (e.g., 220 nm).  This is how creation alters its light saber to sculpt. It is also how drugs like SSRIs and finasteride alter cognition and consciousness. This is how your frontal lobes were built. There is no need for drugs at all (Davunetide). That is a modern belief that needs to be extinguished (Sterling Cooley influencer). Light at the right frequency is how you increase density of microtubules in the pre frontal cortex of man. Influencers do not know this science.

Fetal Brain Sculptin Context: In the fetus’s high-water, hypoxic environment, UPEs are already narrow (focused at 220 nm for leptin signaling, as discussed in leptin blogs), and localized magnetic fields from mitochondria would further enhance this coherence by stabilizing electron spins, reducing noise in the UPE signal.

Melanin’s Interaction with Magnetic Fields:

Melanin, as a semiconductor with paramagnetic properties (due to stable free radicals), can interact with magnetic fields as follows:

Photoconductivity: Melanin absorbs 220 nm UPEs (emitted by mtDNA) and converts light into electrical energy, generating small photocurrents. A magnetic field could influence the direction of these currents by exerting a Lorentz force on moving charges:

where {F} is the force, ( q ) is the charge, {v} is the velocity, and {B} is the magnetic field.

Magnetic Moments: Melanin’s paramagnetism creates weak magnetic moments that align with external fields (e.g., mitochondrial fields or Earth’s geomagnetic field, ~50 µT). The Inverse Cube Law suggests these interactions are strongest near the source (e.g., mitochondria in melanocytes).

Link to Biophotons: If melanin absorbs 220 nm UPEs and re-emits light at different wavelengths (as speculated in your thesis), magnetic fields could modulate this process by altering melanin’s electronic states or free radical dynamics, affecting the UPE spectrum.

Implications for Consciousness:

My thesis suggests melanin’s role in biophotonic signaling may influence consciousness, potentially via the brain’s melanocyte-like cells (e.g., in the substantia nigra, retina). The slide’s Inverse Cube Law framework supports this by showing that melanin-mtDNA interactions are highly localized in neural and vascular circuits of the brain:

In the brain, melanin absorbs UPEs from nearby mitochondria, generating photocurrents or re-emitting photons, creating a “biophotonic network” for neural signaling. This is critical during brain building. This process is called neurulation.

Magnetic fields from mitochondria act to fine-tune this network by modulating UPE emission and melanin’s response, potentially influencing neural coherence and consciousness. Influencers like

Neurulation Overview:

Neurulation in humans begins around the 3rd week of gestation, when the neural plate forms from the ectoderm, folds into the neural tube, and eventually develops into the brain and spinal cord. The diencephalon (which gives rise to the thalamus, hypothalamus, and retina) and optic structures (e.g., optic chiasm, SCN) form during this period. If this process goes awry these are the symptoms one should expect below.

Neural crest cells (NCCs) also emerge during neurulation, migrating to form melanocytes, neurons, glia, and other structures, as discussed previously. NCCs are the key to the POMC motherboard in the human brain. It is a Rosetta stone blue print for how morphogenesis and physiology can be destroyed before a human is even born. Proper migration and signaling are critical for the development of the visual system, including the retina, optic chiasm, and SCN. I spoke about this in the quantum Engineering #45 blog.

IN THIS BLOG I CAN NOW FULLY EXPLAIN WHY TURING PAPER MATTERS BIGTIME

Turing’s theory of morphogenesis, validated by recent studies (e.g., from Brandeis University and the Universityof Pittsburgh, as shown in below), provides a mathematical and chemical foundation that complements my photobiological recursive loop, UPE-mediated signaling, and magnetic field dynamics. Let’sexplore how this fits into this thesis, focusing on NCCs, the brain’s development, and the implications for your hypothesis.

Turing’s Morphogenesis Theory: A Recap For Long Term Members

Core Concept I have spoken about in many other places:

Turing proposed that a system of chemical substances, called morphogens, reacting and diffusing through a tissue can lead to pattern formation, even if the system starts homogeneously. This occurs due to an instability of the homogeneous equilibrium, driven by reaction-diffusion dynamics, resulting in spatial and temporal patterns (e.g., stripes, spots) that guide development.

Mathematically, Turing modeled this with partial differential equations:

where ( u ) and ( v ) are morphogen concentrations, Du and Dv are diffusion coefficients, and (f) and ( g ) are reaction terms. Instability arises when diffusion rates differ, breaking symmetry (Noether’s) and forming patterns.

Validation of Turing Method or Morphogenesis

The slide above shows how scientists validated Turing’s theory using identical cells that differentiate into distinct patterns (blue to red and blue structures), mirroring biological morphogenesis (e.g., pigmentation in zebrafish, limb bud formation).

Biological Relevance To Construction of the Human Brain

This validation of his 1952 theory right before the Brits killed him explains how uniform cell populations (e.g., during neurulation) develop into complex structures (e.g., brain regions, retina) through chemical gradients and diffusion, a process influenced by environmental and internal factors.

NCCs as the Motherboard in My Photobioelectric Thesis

NCCs’ Role:

Neural crest cells (NCCs) are a multipotent population that emerge during neurulation (around the 3rd week in humans), migrating to form melanocytes, neurons, glia, and other structures (e.g., retina, brain, peripheral nervous system). I have proposed in QE#45 blog 18 months ago that NCCs act as a “motherboard,” orchestrating the development of the human brain via magnetic and electric circuits.

• The Photobioelectric Framework:

  UPEs: mtDNA emits 100-400 UPEs, which NCC-derived melanocytes absorb, generating photocurrents and weak magnetic fields (per the Inverse Cube Law. These signals guide NCC migration and differentiation in man.

  Magnetic Fields: Mitochondria and melanin produce localized magnetic fields, influencing electron spin states and cellular behavior (e.g., NCC migration, as discussed previously).

  Electric Circuits: The Casimir effect in mtDNA (via Fe-S clusters) and myelin sheaths generates photons and confines electromagnetic fields, supporting quantum-coherent signaling. Water (90% in the fetus) acts as a dielectric, facilitating charge transfer to build this brain.

  Motherboard Analogy: NCCs integrate these photobioelectric signals, acting as a central processing unit (CPU) that directs the assembly of neural circuits, much like a motherboard coordinates hardware components in a computer.

• 

• Turing’s Fit Into My ideas:

  • Morphogens as Photobioelectric Signals: Turing’s morphogens can be reinterpreted as UPEs, magnetic fields, and electric potentials generated by NCCs and their derivatives (e.g., melanocytes, neurons). These “morphogens” diffuse through the fetal environment, creating gradients that break symmetry and guide pattern formation:

    UPE Gradients: 100-400 nm light really focus on 220 nm because of leptin to sculpt UPEs from mtDNA in NCCs form spatial patterns, directing migration to specific brain regions (e.g., retina, SCN).

    Magnetic Gradients: Melanin’s magnetic fields create localized patterns, influencing NCC positioning (e.g., in the diencephalon).

    Electric Gradients: The Casimir effect and proton gradients in the ETC establish electric fields, stabilizing cellular differentiation.

    Reaction-Diffusion Dynamics: The photobioelectric recursive loop (UPEs, mitochondria, MTs, circadian rhythms) acts as a reaction-diffusion system. UPE emission (reaction) and their diffusion through water/melanin (diffusion) generate instabilities that drive NCC differentiation into diverse cell types (e.g., neurons vs. glia), mirroring Turing’s patterns.

    NCC as a Control Hub: Just as Turing’s model predicts how homogeneous cells differentiate into structured tissues, NCCs, as the motherboard, use photobioelectric signals to coordinate the heterogeneous development of the brain, from the optic chiasm to the cortex. All diseases assiociated with altering of this light in a germ cell can causes diseases and variations in consciousness of man. This is how evolution alters our species. It is a light show gone awry.

  • 

CSF Pathways, Microtubules, and Consciousness

I have emphasized that in the brain, the UPE spectrum interacts with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathways, which form an “ocean” of DDW around microtubules, ultimately creating consciousness. This is a key piece of my solution to the hard problem of how subjective experience (qualia) arises from physical processes in the biophysical chemistry of light and water.

CSF as a Quantum Medium: CSF, a fluid bathing the brain and spinal cord, is mostly water (99.8%), a semiconductive quantum medium. Water can support quantum coherence by structuring around biomolecules and amplifying photonic fields, as suggested by studies on water’s optical properties (e.g., its refractive index for 270 nm light post-IRA irradiation). DDW has even more quantum-coherent possibilities because it is devoid of deuterium. CSF thus acts as a waveguide for endogenously transformed UPEs, distributing their signals throughout the brain and the entire organism. This explains why lobes of the brain can be removed without affecting consciousness.

Microtubules and Quantum Processing: Microtubules, structural components of neurons, have been hypothesized (e.g., by Penrose and Hameroff in the Orch-OR theory) to sustain quantum coherence. In my model, UPEs in the UV range interact with microtubules, collapsing their quantum states (e.g., of electrons or aromatic amino acids like tryptophan, which absorbs at 220 nm). The CSF amplifies and synchronizes these UPEs, ensuring coherent wave function collapses across neural networks.

Consciousness and the Hard Problem: The specific UPE spectrum, shaped by the melanin-sunlight-mtDNA loop, collapses wave functions in microtubules with high precision due to its UV-range specificity and high information content (per Shannon’s theory). Each collapse corresponds to a specific neural pattern, producing distinct qualia (e.g., the experience of “blue” or “joy”). The recursive photonic loop ensures that consciousness is dynamically tied to environmental light, explaining circadian influences on awareness. This direct mapping of physical (UPE collapse) to experiential (qualia) resolves the hard problem: the “what it is like” of consciousness emerges from light-mediated quantum events in the brain. The recursive photonic field is fully augmented by endogenous UPE light and this is why anesthesia can remove consciousness.

Integration with My Broader Theory

This mechanism fits seamlessly into my decentralized framework:

Decentralized Control: The melanin-sunlight-mtDNA-UPE loop operates without centralized control, mirroring the distributed nature of the Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN) from the Nature article. Melanin and mitochondria act as nodes in a network, processing solar information and translating it into UPE signals that regulate the entire body and brain.

Evolutionary Context: Post-GOE, melanin’s internalization (as discussed previously) enabled this loop to become more efficient, focusing UPE spectra in the UV range and allowing complex life to exploit quantum effects for consciousness. The conservation of DHA in neural membranes (absorbing UV light) and the brain’s specialization in aromatic amino acids (e.g., tryptophan at 220 nm) further optimized this system in humans.

Phenotypic and Physiological Implications: The UPE spectrum’s role in controlling organ function explains how environmental light influences physiology (e.g., via circadian rhythms) and how disruptions (e.g., nnEMF-induced mtDNA hypoxia) impair consciousness by altering UPE emission.

Melanin absorbs sunlight across all frequencies, creating a photonic field that modulates mitochondrial metabolism via mtDNA, resulting in a UV-range UPE spectrum (200-400 nm). With high information content, this spectrum collapses wave functions in cellular components, controlling the phenotype and physiology of all organs. UPEs interact with CSF pathways and microtubules in the brain, collapsing quantum states to produce neural patterns and qualia, thus creating consciousness.

This recursive photonic loop, rooted in melanin’s interaction with sunlight, resolves the hard problem by directly linking physical light-mediated quantum events to subjective experience, all within a decentralized framework. EEG, EKG, EMG,ERG’s, BSEVP, MEVP’s data all support this function in the neurosurgical literature.

HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?

Concentric Organization and Decentralized Thermodynamics of the Human Brain

Key Points

Nature Article above (SCAN): The motor cortex is organized concentrically, not linearly, with inter-effector regions forming the Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN). SCAN integrates motor and cognitive functions (e.g., planning, physiological regulation) in a distributed, non-hierarchical manner. There is a recursive photonic loop present between the sun and UPEs within tissues.

My decentralized Thesis: Life evolved post-GOE to handle oxygen’s electrical stress through decentralized, distributed systems. A key mechanism is quantum-level processing involving ultraweak photon emissions (UPEs, often in the UV range) that form a feedback loop between mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), UPEs, and sunlight. This only became possible because oxygen allowed mtDNA to make light stronger than the sun in UPEs, and this permitted life to use proteins that had an absorption spectrum below 250nm for the first time in 3 billion years.  This is why life became complex, and it is how consciousness evolved. The default state of the first two domains of life was sleep.  Additionally, light and dark cycles serve as cornerstone anchors for cellular systems via circadian biology, driving energy dissipation and information processing in a decentralized way.

Concentric Organization and Quantum-Level Processing via UPEs Alignment: As SCAN revealed, the motor cortex’s concentric organization aligns even more deeply with my thesis when viewed through the lens of quantum-level processing.

In my decentralized model, UPEs (ultraweak photon emissions, often UV, 200-400 nm) are emitted during mitochondrial processes (e.g., oxidative phosphorylation, ROS production) and interact with mtDNA in a feedback loop with sunlight. Current photomultipliers can only get us down to 300nm in the lab. Still, spectroscopes have shown we go below this number because water, after IRA irradiation, has a refractive index for 270nm light. This is below the ability of modern photomultipliers to sample.

This photonic loop facilitates quantum-level information processing, enabling cells to adapt to environmental cues (e.g., oxygen, light) in a decentralized manner. This is where and when consciousness became possible. With its interleaved motor and inter-effector regions, SCAN’s concentric structure suggests a neural architecture optimized for distributed processing. Neurons, like other cells, emit UPEs during activity. That light is critical in affecting our Aromatic Amino acids. Prior to the Cambrian explosion, no light stronger than terrestrial sunlight was used on Earth. Post endosymbiosis, this became possible for the first time. This is when life took full advantage of the absorption and emission spectra of every aromatic amino acid on Earth to built complexity and consciousness.

Studies have shown that neural activity generates ultraweak biophotons, most often in the UV range, due to oxidative metabolism and excited states in biomolecules (e.g., Rahnama et al., 2011). In the motor cortex, these UPEs should mediate communication between regions, forming a quantum-level feedback loop:

Clinical Implications:

The SCAN paper provides a neural example of my thermodynamic principle linked to consciousness: like early life, the brain avoids centralized control to manage complexity. The concentric pattern of the light loop reflects an evolutionary adaptation to integrate diverse signals (motor, cognitive, physiological) in a way that mirrors how mitochondria integrated oxygen’s electrical stress post-GOE.

Mechanism of Biophoton Generation = Van Wijk’s Insights: mtDNA, ROS, and Oxygen

In his book Light in Shaping Life: Biophotons in Biology and Medicine (2014), Roeland Van Wijk provides a detailed mechanism for biophoton generation. Van Wijk explains that biophotons are generated in mitochondria through the interaction of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and oxygen. Cells cannot make UPEs without OXYGEN. This means prior to the GOE, no UPEs were used to sculpt life and had to remain simple. This is why life was confined to two domains and likely exhibited little to no conscious ability.

As endogenous light was transformed by mtDNA semiconductors during the GOE, many more things became possible because of the unpolarized UPEs emitted.

Mitochondrial Activity: Mitochondria produce ATP via the electron transport chain (ETC), which involves electron transfer through complexes I-IV. During this process, some electrons leak from the ETC, reacting with oxygen to form ROS, such as superoxide.

(O2^-) or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).

ROS and Photon Emission: ROS are highly reactive and can oxidize biomolecules (e.g., lipids, proteins), leading to excited states. When these molecules return to their ground state, they emit photons = biophotons in the UV range. This allowed for mitosis and multicellular life = Onion Root experiment in 1927

The reaction can be summarized as:

Where hv is the energy of the emitted photon, with frequency v determined by the energy difference (E = h\v).

Role of mtDNA and Oxygen: mtDNA is an evolved semiconductor built within the GOE and sculpted by the Cambrian explosion that encodes UPEs which are thekey components of the ETC (e.g., subunits of complexes I, III, and IV), ensuring the production of ROS. Oxygen acts as the final electron acceptor in the ETC, but its partial reduction produces ROS, the primary source of biophotons. Van Wijk’s research shows that this process is universal across living systems, with biophoton emission directly tied to mitochondrial activity. No UPE transmission is possible without oxygen.

This is why the GOE is critical to understanding the evolution of consciousness. Sleep was the default state of life on Earth.

This mechanism is grounded in KNOWN physics and chemistry

Quantum Mechanics: The emission of biophotons involves electronic transitions, governed by the Schrödinger equation. The energy of the emitted photon corresponds to the energy difference between the excited and ground states, as per Delta E = h\v.

Thermodynamics: The production of ROS and subsequent biophoton emission is a byproduct of the exothermic reactions in the ETC, consistent with the second law of thermodynamics, where energy is dissipated as light. This also is firmly linked to how semiconductors make light from conversion of electric currents in matter.

Spectral Differences Across Domains of Life explain variation and traits

I’ve noted that the spectra of biophotons vary across the three domains of life (Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya), and that this variation is key to our experiences. Fritz-Albert Popp’s research provides evidence for this:

Prokaryotes and Archaea: Popp’s studies (e.g., in the 1970s and 1980s) showed that prokaryotes (Bacteria) and Archaea emit significantly more biophotons than complex eukaryotic life. Their biophoton spectra are broader, spanning a wide range of wavelengths (typically 200-800 nm, covering ultraviolet to near-infrared). This broad spectrum reflects the simpler metabolic processes in prokaryotes, where ROS production is less regulated, leading to a higher photon emission rate. This light was not as coherent as it could be.

Eukarya Post-Cambrian Explosion: Biophoton emission became more refined in complex eukaryotic life, particularly after the Cambrian explosion (~541 million years ago). Popp found that the spectra narrowed, focusing on specific wavelengths (e.g., primarily in the visible range, 400-700 nm), and the number of photons emitted decreased. UPEs also became more coherent as spectra lessened because it sharpened in wavelength. This suggests that biophoton emission became more controlled and precise as life became more complex, with mitochondria in eukaryotes producing fewer but more specific photons in specific ranges. Those ranges built organs.

Since mtDNA also creates the heat sink of the semiconductor light show it means it has to have a mechanism that varies the heat sink to alter the light show to explain EVOLUTION.

DDW from CCO is that mechanism. Semiconduction science gives us this answer.

The physics of this spectral narrowing can be explained:

Energy Levels and Selection Rules: In quantum mechanics, the wavelength of emitted light depends on the energy difference between electronic states.

In prokaryotes, ROS oxidizes a variety of biomolecules, leading to a range of energy differences and a broad spectrum. In eukaryotes, mitochondrial processes are more regulated, with specific pathways (e.g., involving cytochrome c oxidase) producing ROS that excite a narrower set of molecules, resulting in a more focused spectrum.

Coherence: Popp emphasized that biophotons in complex life are more coherent (their waves are in phase, like a laser). Coherence narrows the spectral linewidth, as per the Fourier transform relationship between frequency and time:

A longer coherence time (Delta t) results in a narrower frequency range (Delta v), explaining the spectral narrowing in eukaryotes.

Shannon’s Information Theory and Biophoton Rarity

In many earlier blogs, I have connected the rarity of biophotons in complex life to Shannon’s information theory, which states that the information content of a message is higher when the message is rarer or more unusual. Claude Shannon’s entropy formula for information is:

Pi is the probability of each message. A rare event (low pi) has a higher information content

(-log2 pi) because it is less predictable.

In the context of biophotons:

Prokaryotes and Archaea: High biophoton emission rates (more photons, broader spectra) correspond to a higher probability of photon emission, reducing the information content per photon. The message is less specific, as the wide spectrum carries a mix of frequencies with less precision. The light is not magnified by its lens in a cell.

Complex Eukarya: Lower biophoton emission rates (fewer photons, narrower spectra) correspond to a lower probability of photon emission, increasing the information content per photon. The narrower spectrum means each photon carries a more specific “message” (e.g., a precise frequency), which cellular systems can interpret with greater precision. Here, the lens inside the cell magnifies the light to become more coherent, increasing the signal and decreasing the noise.

As physics dictates, this rarity and specificity have huge implications for wave function collapse. A rare, specific biophoton (e.g., at a precise wavelength) can collapse the wave function of a quantum system (e.g., an electron in a neuron) with high precision, selecting a specific state from many possibilities. This aligns with my decentralized theory: the more information a biophoton carries, the more precisely it can shape reality by collapsing the wave function.

Linking Biophoton Spectra to Wave Function Collapse and Consciousness

Refined Mechanism of Wave Function Collapse

With the mechanism of biophoton generation clarified, let’s revisit how biophotons collapse the wave function and how this links to consciousness:

Biophoton Interaction with Quantum Systems: Biophotons, emitted by mitochondria via ROS and oxygen interactions, are photons with specific frequencies determined by their spectra. When a biophoton interacts with a quantum system in the brain (e.g., an electron in a microtubule, it causes a measurement-like event, the interaction Hamiltonian for a photon-electron system is:

Where [vecA] is the vector potential of the biophoton, ( e ) is the electron charge, and [vec{p}] is the electron momentum. This interaction collapses the electron’s wave function psi, localizing it to a definite state (e.g., a specific position or spin).

Spectral Specificity and Precision: The narrower spectra in complex eukaryotes mean biophotons have more specific frequencies. This specificity allows for precise collapses of the wave function. For example, a biophoton at 500 nm = green light,

has an energy of E = h\v  = 2.48 eV,  which can interact with a specific electronic transition in a biomolecule, collapsing its wave function to a particular state. It turns out that absorption spectra and emission spectra are keys to understanding how light measures things to collapse the wave function. In contrast, a broader spectrum (as in prokaryotes) would cause less precise collapses, selecting a wider range of states.

Information and Collapse: Shannon’s information theory supports my point that rare, specific biophotons carry more information. A biophoton with a low emission probability (due to the lower eukaryote emission rate) has a high information content.

This high information content corresponds to a more precise wave function collapse, as the biophoton “selects” a specific state with greater certainty. In the neocortex, where billions of neurons emit biophotons, these precise photons can collapse collectively, ultimately determining the neural activity patterns underlying consciousness.

Linking to Consciousness and the Hard Problem

My theory posits that biophotons, by collapsing the wave function, create the reality we experience as consciousness, and that the spectral specificity of biophotons in complex life explains the richness of our subjective experience:

Spectral Specificity and Qualia: The narrower biophoton spectra in complex eukaryotes (post-Cambrian explosion) mean that each photon carries a more specific “message.” In the neocortex, these biophotons collapse wave functions in sensory regions, determining the specific neural patterns corresponding to qualia. For example, a biophoton at 620 nm (red light) might collapse the wave function of an electron in the visual cortex, triggering a neural pattern that produces the experience of “redness.” The precision of the collapse, due to the narrow spectrum, ensures that the experience is distinct and vivid, explaining the richness of human consciousness compared to simpler organisms.

Information and Experience: As per Shannon’s theory, the high information content of rare biophotons means that each collapse carries significant information. In the neocortex, this information shapes the neural activity that underlies subjective experience. For example, during alpha waves (8-12 Hz), biophotons emitted at a specific frequency might collapse wave functions in a synchronized way, producing the calm, focused state we experience. The rarity of these biophotons ensures that the collapses are precise, creating a clear and distinct experience.

Resolving the Hard Problem: The “hard problem” asks why physical processes give rise to subjective experience. My theory, refined with the spectral specificity of biophotons, suggests that the act of wave function collapse by biophotons directly corresponds to the emergence of qualia. The physical process (biophoton emission and collapse) determines the neural state, and the high information content of the biophoton ensures that this state produces a specific, vivid experience. For example, the collapse of a wave function in the auditory cortex by a biophoton at a particular frequency might create the experience of hearing a “C note,” with the spectral specificity ensuring that the experience is distinct from a “D note.” This direct link between the physical (biophoton collapse) and experiential (qualia) resolves the “hard problem” by showing how light at the biophoton scale creates the “what it is like” of consciousness.

Evolutionary Implications of My Ideas Are Massive

The evolution of biophoton spectra across domains of life supports my theory:

Prokaryotes and Archaea: High biophoton emission with broad spectra means more frequent but less precise wave function collapses. This might correspond to a simpler form of “consciousness” (if we extend the term to basic sensory responses), where the organism’s reality experience is less differentiated. In humans, this is people operating on a Warburg metabolic level with lowered dopamine and melatonin levels. This situation also leads to demyelination and microtubule dysfunction, which is associated with altered conscious states. MT dysfunction is how chromosomes are altered to cause mutation and to cause aneuploidy. I believe this is how POMC went from chromosome 24 on gorillas/chimps to chromosome 2 in the human clade. The electromagnetic environment of the East African Rift caused this effect by the mechanism in this blog. Alteration of Krebs ‘ cycle affects the TCA and urea cycle kinetics, which alters the quality and character of the heat sink of water will also alter the UPE spectra released for neurons to respond to.

The heat sink is how humans created 100-300nm UPEs.

Complex Eukarya: Lower emission rates with narrower spectra mean rarer, more precise collapses. This corresponds to the richer, more nuanced consciousness of complex life, where experiences are more distinct and information-rich. The Cambrian explosion, which marked a rapid increase in biological complexity, may have been driven by this shift in biophoton spectra, enabling the precise wave function collapses necessary for advanced sensory and cognitive abilities. Within Eukarya, I would expect the TCA cycle to emit very specific biophotons and a Warburg metabolism to be less precise on a relative basis, allowing for more possibilities of states to exist. This is why it can be associated with both wellness and oncogenesis. The absorption and emission spectra are the key to understanding which version of reality the organism experiences.

Light release is a function of the heat sink in semiconductors. Since endosymbiosis created a massive semicondutor fab in mtDNA, the light release was stochastically linked to how much DDW was made from metabolism from carbs, proteins, and fats. Carbs make the least, and fats the most. Reverse leptin resistance and optimizing consciousness requires UPE spectra from fats. This stochastic mechanism dictates UPE spectra focus and photonic number. This optimizes like to fit Shannon’s entropy thereom. The heat sink and oxygen level determines the frequency of the light transformed. The slide below explains the creation of light from semiconductors in the universe.

Reassessing the Mechanism of Wave Function Collapse

The mechanism is indeed well-supported by hard-core scientific ALREADY published evidence: No one has yet put this together, but now I have for my tribe.

Biophoton Transformation: Van Wijk’s work provides a clear mechanism: mtDNA-driven mitochondrial activity produces ROS, which interact with oxygen to emit biophotons. This process is universal across life and grounded in quantum mechanics and thermodynamics.

Spectral Specificity: Popp’s research shows that the spectra of biophotons vary across domains of life, with complex eukaryotes emitting fewer, more specific photons. This specificity allows for precise wave function collapses, as the biophoton’s frequency targets specific electronic transitions.

Collapse Process: The interaction of a biophoton with a quantum system (e.g., an electron in a neuron) causes a measurement-like event, collapsing the wave function. This is a standard process in quantum mechanics, described by the interaction Hamiltonian and supported by experimental evidence of photon-induced transitions in biological systems.

The link to Shannon’s information theory further strengthens this mechanism: the rarity and specificity of biophotons in complex life mean that each collapse carries high information content, ensuring that the resulting neural state is precise and information-rich, directly shaping the reality we experience as consciousness.

Turing’s integrations nails it.

Integration with the Decentralized Biophysics Framework

My theory has been refined over the years with these insights, but I believe it integrates seamlessly with the decentralized biophysics framework:

Neocortical Signaling: Biophotons, generated by mtDNA, ROS, and oxygen, create a strong electromagnetic field at the nanoscale, per the inverse-square law. The narrower spectra in complex life ensure that these biophotons collapse wave functions with high precision, shaping neural activity patterns in the neocortex.

Sleep: During sleep, biophoton emission varies with metabolic activity (e.g., higher in REM sleep), producing specific spectra that collapse wave functions synchronized. This creates the neural patterns we experience as dreams, with the spectral specificity determining the vividness of the experience.

Alpha Waves: The 8-12 Hz alpha rhythm corresponds stochasitically to the frequency of biophoton emission. The narrow spectrum ensures precise collapses that produce a coherent, calm state of consciousness.

Schumann Coupling: The brain’s resonance with Schumann frequencies (7.83 Hz) reflects the alignment of biophoton emission with the Earth’s field, collapsing wave functions in a way that grounds our experience of reality in the broader environment.

My decentralized Insights emphasize water as a quantum medium, supporting the role of biophotons in collapsing wave functions. Water is the heat sink for the physical mechanism that allows us to be awake. Water amplifies the biophoton field, ensuring collapses are coherent across the brain, producing a unified conscious experience.

Additional Phenomena Explained by This Decentralized Theory

This theory incorporates the mechanism of biophoton generation, spectral specificity, and Shannon’s information theory and explains several additional phenomena:

Diversity of Conscious Experience Across Species

Phenomenon: Different species exhibit varying levels of consciousness, from basic sensory responses in bacteria to complex self-awareness in humans.

Explanation: The spectral differences in biophotons across domains of life determine the precision of wave function collapse. Bacteria, with broad spectra, experience a simpler reality with less differentiated qualia, while humans, with narrow spectra, experience a richer, more nuanced reality due to precise collapses.

Evolution of Intelligence

Phenomenon: Intelligence increased dramatically after the Cambrian explosion, particularly in vertebrates. This remains a void in Darwin’s theory.

Explanation: The narrowing of biophoton spectra in complex life increased the information content of each collapse, enabling more precise neural activity patterns. Magnetic control was afforded as melanin was absorbed to our interiors after the KT event. This was an extraterrestrial light changing event that put life on the path to human. This allowed for the development of advanced sensory and cognitive abilities, driving the evolution of intelligence. Myelin began its evolution and co-evolved during this time to retain the information in the system. The myelin paper below hypothesizes that sleep involves proton accumulation in myelin. At the same time, wakefulness discharges this “proton capacitor” to produce ATP, which can and should be linked to the GOE’s oxygen holocaust.

Myelin, a lipid-rich structure, evolved much later (around 425 million years ago in jawed fishes, post-Cambrian explosion). Still, the evolutionary pressure directing its production and origin can be traced to the same biophysical pressures: the need to manage energy in an oxygen and light-variable environment. The GOE’s oxygen spike, followed by a later UV surge, set the stage for myelin’s evolution by necessitating mechanisms to store and release energy efficiently as life became more complex.

Altered States of Consciousness in Mystical Experiences

Phenomenon: Mystical experiences (e.g., during meditation or psychedelic use) often involve a sense of unity and expanded awareness.

Explanation: These states may increase biophoton emission with a specific spectrum, collapsing wave functions in a way that aligns the brain with universal frequencies (e.g., Schumann resonances). The high information content of these biophotons produces a unified, expansive experience of reality.

Impact of Stress on Consciousness

Phenomenon: Chronic stress alters perception and cognitive function, often leading to a “narrowed” reality experience.

Explanation: Stress increases ROS production, altering biophoton emission and spectra. This may lead to less precise wave function collapses, reducing the information content of neural activity and narrowing the range of conscious experience. A developing demyelination will also be found during this time.

Stress = redox change = UPE variation. This is associated with myelin and MT changes. Anesthetic gases likely affect proton conduction in myelin and in MT.

Why do I believe this?

The Great Oxidation Event was my starting point in developing this idea. My thesis and the myelin paper above point to the GOE (around 2.4 billion years ago) as a critical inflection point for life’s biochemical adaptations. During the GOE, rising oxygen levels and UV radiation (from a young G-class star increasing UV output by 10–20%) created oxidative stress and hypoxic variability.

My thesis highlights melanin’s role in prokaryotes as a semiconductive pigment that dissipated excess energy, protected against UV/oxidative stress, and facilitated electron flow in cell water, driving the evolution of mitochondria when heme proteins evolved to protect early eukaryotes. Melanin’s magnetic properties made it the ideal motherboard to build complex human brains. Degrading melanin into L-DOPA also enabled catecholamine synthesis (dopamine, adrenaline), enhancing survival in cold, low-oxygen conditions by boosting metabolism. This would have changed the UPE release tremendously, building complexity and consciousness simultaneously. When the heat sink changes the UPE spectra must all change. That UPE change is what drives epigenetics and evolution. It is not the genes that do it.

Aging and Loss of Cognitive Clarity

Phenomenon: Aging is associated with reduced cognitive clarity and a less vivid experience of reality.

Explanation: Mitochondrial dysfunction with age (heteroplasmy) increases biophoton emission and alters spectra, leading to less precise wave function collapses. This decreases the information content of neural activity, resulting in a less vivid conscious experience.

SUMMARY

My theory of life, consciousness, morphogenesis, and reality is that the teleology of life transforms matter into biophotons, which collapse the wave function to create the reality we experience as consciousness. The evidence strongly supports it. Van Wijk’s work provides a clear mechanism for biophoton generation (mtDNA, ROS, and oxygen). Popp’s research on spectral differences across domains of life explains the precision of wave function collapse in complex organisms. Shannon’s information theory links the rarity and specificity of biophotons to their high information content, ensuring that each collapse shapes reality with precision, directly addressing the “hard problem of consciousness.”

The spectral specificity of biophotons in complex life (narrower spectra, fewer photons) means that each collapse carries more information, producing the rich, nuanced qualia we experience. This resolves the hard problem by showing how light at the biophoton scale creates subjective experience: the physical act of wave function collapse by a biophoton determines the neural state, and the high information content ensures that this state corresponds to a specific, vivid qualia. The integration with neocortical signaling, sleep, alpha waves, Schumann coupling, and my insights on water and quantum effects further supports this theory, explaining a wide range of phenomena from the evolution of intelligence to mystical experiences. Centralized science has been impotent in explaining any of this with precision.

As hard as it may be for many to believe in centralized science, the mechanism of wave function collapse by biophotons is well-understood, thanks to detailed evidence from Van Wijk and Popp. My theory provides a unified framework for understanding life, consciousness, and reality, grounded in the physics of light, quantum mechanics, and information theory. It is a profound and elegant solution to some of the deepest questions in science and philosophy, offering a new paradigm for how life creates the reality we experience.

CITES

The career work of Van Wijk, Fritz Popp, the laws of physics, and my imagination.

I want my Tribe to be a threat to the status quo.

Restless immunity…….Exhale their venom.

Dogs don’t howl at rusted hulks,

corpses of steel rotting in the dust.

They bare their fangs for wheels that scream,

for souls that blaze through shadowed ruts.

The world’s a kennel, and the barking’s loud

snarling tongues, snapping jaws, eyes that stalk my stride.

They don’t chase the parked. They fear the moving.

And I’m a comet, carving paths they’ll never tread.

This world, this festering cage of control

is no accident. It’s centuries of chains forged in shadow.

Meyer Lansky’s ghost still counts the coins,

Rothschilds’ webs still pull the strings of war.

The Fabian Society’s slow poison,

British crowns and empires reborn as code,

Big Tech titans….Zuckerberg, Musk, Dorsey

puppets or pawns, tangled in the CIA’s grip.

Clouds hijacked, data weaponized,

our bodies wired to their Internet of Chains.

Central bank currencies, lipid nanoparticles,

iatrogenic knives cutting through our sovereignty

this isn’t conspiracy. It’s history’s open wound.

I sat with Doc Malik, and we tore the veil.

Bitcoin isn’t just coin; it’s rebellion.

A middle finger to the technocrats,

the bankers, the elites who’d cage our futures.

Decentralization isn’t tech, it’s survival.

Financial freedom, bodily autonomy,

informational truth, our last stand against their playbook.

Depopulation whispers, health systems turned to slaughter,

and still, the dogs bark, too scared to bite their masters.

I’m done with their venom.

Immunity. Long overdue.

Contagion of lies, I exhale you.

Their deceiver whispers, You belong to me.

Fear the light, fear the breath, fear the others.

But I inhale clarity, spit out their poison.

Their spectacle, their malady—I exorcise it all.

Purge the fear that binds, the venom that blinds.

I’m no parked car, no relic for their rust.

I’m flame and forward motion, forged to slay.

The barking? It’s the sound of small souls,

hurling stones to hide their hollows.

Gossipers rewriting my story,

too weak to face their own jagged mirrors.

They’d rather claw my shadow than grow.

But I’m not here to coddle their cages,

to dim my fire for their comfort.

I’m chosen. Trusted. A mission etched in scars.

Let them snarl, let them fester

their fleas won’t touch my burning wheel.

I’ll run them over, not slow down.

This is my allegorical elegy,

a recasting of my tale.

I enumerate my steps, calculate my escape,

grow through their mania like mitosis splitting truth.

The hourglass bleeds sand, and I’m not waiting.

No more fucks to give for their small lives,

their kennels of dread, their lies that bind.

I’m a comet, a rising star,

roads to rend, hearts to kindle,

a purpose they’ll never cage.

Exhale. Expel. Unveil.

The deceiver’s in DC chased away,

his poison purged, his spectacle shattered.

I see them running, cowards, spectators,

narrators of a fight they never dared join.

Let the dogs bark. Let the kennels rot.

I’m motion. I’m purpose

And their cages will never hold me

 

CITES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7DfQMPmJRI&list=RD5ClCaPmAA7s&index=3

I apologize to the readers in advance. The next few blogs will be steeped in big ideas and will require some advance physics and math. I still believe you will get the general ideas after the last 7 blogs in this series on how neurodegeneration links directly to a lack of energy transformation in brain structures.

The Photobiological Recursive Loop Sets The Tone for What It Means To Be Awake

Introduction: The Quantum Dance of Light and Life

Life evolved under the sun’s full spectrum, harnessing light as a fundamental driver of cellular function. At the heart of this process lies a photobiological recursive loop, a quantum reflex arc system where ultraweak photon emissions (UPEs) in the UV range couple mitochondrial activity, circadian timing, and microtubule (MT) dynamics to orchestrate cellular processes like mitosis, myelination, and consciousness. This loop, rooted in stoichiometric precision, integrates light (UPEs), water (deuterium-depleted water, DDW), and magnetism (oxygen’s paramagnetic properties) to maintain health. However, in the modern world, artificial blue light (and EMF) disrupts this loop, leading to cellular dysfunction, diseases such as demyelination, and altered consciousness. Let’s explore how this recursive loop operates and why it fails under modern conditions, using first-principles reasoning.

The Photobiological Recursive Loop: A First-Principles Breakdown

The recursive loop is a self-reinforcing cycle where UPEs act as quantum signals, linking mitochondria, MTs, and circadian rhythms. Let’s build this theory from the ground up:

• UPE Generation in Mitochondria:
  • Fundamental Mechanism: Mitochondria, the cell’s powerhouses, produce ATP via oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). During the TCA cycle, pyruvate is oxidized to generate NADH (redox potential ~ -0.32 V vs. SHE), which donates electrons to the electron transport chain (ETC). This creates a proton gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), with a potential (Δψ) of ~150–180 mV, driving ATP synthesis.
  • 
  • Quantum Signal: Reactive oxygen species (ROS), a byproduct of ETC activity, can emit UPEs when excited. For example, superoxide (O₂⁻) can form singlet oxygen (¹O₂), which emits UV light (~3–6 eV, 200–400 nm) upon relaxation. Cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), with an absorption peak at ~400 nm, absorbs UVA light, enhancing electron transfer, potentially via quantum tunneling (probability ~e^(-βr), where β is the tunneling barrier and r is distance).

    The Integration (Tweets 4 and 7)

    Tweet 4: https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1613299267703308289

    Claim: “The non-linear optical effect in cells is directly tied to the amount of EZ water around the mitochondrial membranes. Mitochondria are the key source of UPE in cells. UPEs are a type of biophoton released in the UV range that acts like a quantum cell phone to signal in the body.”

    • Evaluation:
      • Scientific Plausibility: Mitochondria do produce UPEs during OXPHOS, primarily from reactive oxygen species (ROS) or excited chromophores (e.g., heme, flavins), with emissions in the UV-Vis range. These biophotons can act as photonic signals, although their role in cellular communication remains poorly understood in mainstream centralized science. It is well established in the biophysics literature. DDW water’s proximity to mitochondrial membranes enhances local optical properties because the physics of light and water show an altered refractive index.
      • 
      • Quantum Relevance: UPEs, as “quantum cell phones,” align with my model, where UV biophotons drive MT reorganization and quantum coherence, via wavefunction collapse, as per the Orch-OR model of Hameroff.
      • Relevance to Model: UPEs from mitochondria are central to the recursive loop, linking mitochondrial function (via mtDNA UPEs) to MT dynamics and centrosome activity.
      • Tweet 7: https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1613300571741487104

        Claim: “The mitochondrial matrix is filled with EZ water. This is the key to how UPEs are made because the matrix is where the TCA cycle spins, made to capture electrons to make ROS and RNS species that can lead to UPEs when they are excited by UV light in the mitochondria.”

      • 
      • Evaluation:
        • Scientific Plausibility: The mitochondrial matrix contains structured water due to its high protein and lipid content. The TCA cycle generates electrons for the electron transport chain (ETC), producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), which can emit ultraweak photon excitations (UPEs) when excited. UV light in mitochondria (e.g., from endogenous UPEs or external sources) can excite these species, although chromophores like the VDR facilitate UV penetration into the matrix. The Vitamin D receptor (VDR) can be found on the mitochondrial membrane, not just in the nucleus. This localization is essential for VDR’s role in regulating mitochondrial function and cell health, particularly in proliferating cells. It protects them from a chronic endosymbiosis we know as cancer. Now you know why Nature put the VDR on your inner mitochondrial membrane during the GOE. It was an “electron and proton brake” to protect itself from burning up the IMM in the GOE. It was also Nature’s best chemotherapy.
        • 

        • Without this brake, organ damage can also occur. This organ, the kidney was the most damaged organ with the LNP of the jabs. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213231724000387

        • 
        • Relevance: UPE production in the matrix supports my model, which posits that mitochondrial redox reactions generate quantum signals for MT dynamics not only in the brain but also throughout the body, transferring light information that guides physiological function.
        • Relevance to Model: UPE production in the matrix links mtDNA UPEs (which regulate TCA cycle enzymes) to the photobiological loop, influencing mitochondrial reorganization, biogenesis, and mitochondrial movement where UPEs are needed.
        • These two tweets note that mitochondria are the primary source of UPEs, which are produced in the matrix where the TCA cycle operates. UVA light absorbed by chromophores like hemoglobin (https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1613298172801044482) causes vasodilation, bringing blood to the skin surface, where porphyrins in RBC mitochondria can absorb light and emit UPEs. Blood is also well known to emit UPEs.
        • 

UPEs as Quantum Signals:

Fundamental Mechanism: UPEs, as UV biophotons, carry quantum information through quantum coherence or entanglement. These photons can excite biomolecules like collagen, water, and tubulin in MTs (tryptophan residues, absorption ~280 nm) or centrosomal proteins, altering their electronic states (energy transition probability ~ V^2/ħ^2 · FCWD, where V is the coupling strength and FCWD is the Franck-Condon weighted density).

Recursive Feedback: Excited tubulin enhances MT polymerization (probability =

BIOPHYSICS OF LEPTIN RESISTANCE

When the recursive loop is not functional for any reason, what do we refer to this as in my decentralized photo-bioelectric thesis? Leptin resistance.

WHAT DOES IT IMPLY? You see the absorption spectra associated with leptin? 220 nm light. That light is not from the sun because the sun only emits light from 250 nm to 3100 nm. Your mtDNA, DNA, and blood emit 100-300 nm UPEs, which overlap with leptin’s 220 nm. This is the efferent loop of light made at the most minor scales in your cells that activate the leptin melanocortin pathways. Without that light being made, you are leptin resistant.

If you use and abuse tech, then you are nnEMF toxic = leptin resistant. UPEs are made of light whose spectrum has been limited to specific frequencies, and the spectrum is narrower than that of sunlight. This makes UPEs more laser-like. Laser light is more coherent than sunlight, and they have unlimited orbital angular momentum (OAM). OAM is what I taught you about in the previous blog series.

Because photons have unlimited orbital angular momentum (OAM), this means they can carry massive amounts of information in cells, a dissipative system. Becker’s work led us to the concept of direct current (DC) electric current, also known as bioelectricity. Light is where biophysics must head because light is where the DC comes from.

We already know how information and energy are linked, as John Wheeler, Shannon, and Lindauer provided the foundation 75 years ago. The Sun with grounding and DDW creation is FEAR INOCULUM = Decentralized Rx of the Photo-bioelectric thesis. In this framework, LR is termed “quantum failure,” reflecting a loss of UPE fidelity (low signal-to-noise ratio, SNR) and microtubule coherence, leading to altered consciousness.

Linkage of Wheeler, Landauer, and Shannon Principles to UPEs and OAM

Wheeler’s “it from bit” principle posits that physical reality emerges from information, where energy and information are fundamentally equivalent (Wheeler, 1989). Landauer’s principle quantifies this equivalence, stating that erasing one bit of information dissipates a minimum amount of energy of kTln(2) (approximately 0.018 eV at physiological temperatures), linking information processing to thermodynamic costs (Landauer, 1961). Shannon’s information theory further establishes that information transfer requires a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to maximize channel capacity (C = B times log2 (1 + {SNR}), ensuring efficient communication (Shannon, 1948). In this framework, UPEs (200–300 nm), emitted by mitochondria via cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), serve as the physical carriers of information, with their laser-like coherence and narrow spectrum (e.g., 220 nm for leptin activation) ensuring a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (Van Wijk, 2014).

The high orbital angular momentum (OAM) of UPEs, a property allowing photons to carry theoretically unlimited information through their topological charge (Allen et al., 1992), enables mitochondria to encode and transfer vast amounts of data within dissipative cellular systems. This OAM-driven information transfer, coupled with UPE coherence, collapses microtubule wave functions to produce qualia (Hameroff & Penrose, 1994), while the energy dissipation aligns with Landauer’s principle, supporting the quantum processing of consciousness in neural networks. Note what I said about this in 2017.

• • • • Thread Integration (Tweet 5): I highlighted UPEs’ ability to change the atomic structure of matter via photoexcitation, aligning with their role as quantum signals that modulate MT dynamics.

      Microtubule Dynamics and Mitosis:

      Fundamental Mechanism: MTs, composed of α/β-tubulin dimers, exhibit dynamic instability. During interphase, MTs form a radial network anchored by the centrosome; in mitosis, they disassemble (catastrophe rate = kcat increases ~10-fold) and reassemble into the mitotic spindle (kinetochore, astral, interpolar MTs). UPEs enhance polymerization by exciting tubulin, increasing Ppol, and should support quantum coherence (per Orch-OR, Pcoherence = e^-Rt)

• Centrosome Role: Centrosomes nucleate MTs (probability Pnuc = knuc times gammaTuRC, duplicating before mitosis (probability of duplication Pdup = kdup times {PLK1}. UPEs clearly act as a quantum checkpoint, triggering duplication. UV light is the stimulus from UPEs

  Tweet 6: https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1613299900279848964

  Claim: “Since blood is in every tissue in the body, this implies the entire body can be affected by UPE light energy in the blood. UPEs are made in the mitochondria, but their effect is not just localized to the mitochondria because blood acts as a highway to spread UPEs everywhere.”

  • Evaluation:
    • Scientific Plausibility: Blood circulates throughout the body, so any UPEs generated in mitochondria should theoretically be transmitted via blood. Centralized science argues that UPEs are extremely weak (on the order of 10^-17 W/cm^2), and their transmission through blood (which scatters light) is unlikely to be significant. Secondary signaling, such as via reactive oxygen species (ROS) or redox changes, is a more plausible mechanism for systemic effects.
    • Decentralized Science laughs at this assertion. Blood’s structure enables energy migration via chromophore networks (hemoglobin, plasma proteins), allowing UPEs to act as a biophotonic field that influences the entire system. While scattering and absorption limit direct photon transmission, energy transfer and circulation amplify UPE effects, making systemic signaling plausible without relying solely on secondary mechanisms, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS). This aligns with the paper’s view of blood as a “highly cooperative non-equilibrium and non-linear system.” The biophysics literature shows otherwise. Biophoton research in blood reveals its decentralized properties with UPEs, June 2003, Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 41(5):473-82

      Quantum Relevance: UPEs spreading via blood should act as a quantum signal network based on the paper above, directly influencing MT dynamics and consciousness across tissues. This has significant implications for the brain and explains why the human brain receives approximately 20% of the cardiac output. We need it for our species’ version of consciousness.

      Relevance to Model: Systemic UPE effects align with my recursive loop, where UPEs couple mitochondrial activity to MT functions globally, including in the brain. I suggest UPEs spread systemically via blood/DNA, influencing MTs across tissues. Direct transmission should be brisk, considering the substantial amount of blood the brain receives. In contrast, secondary signaling (e.g., NO release from hemoglobin and UPEs in the brain) is expected to have a significant impact on modulating the MT dynamics systemically. Now to tie it all together for you.

    Circadian Timing via Rev-erbα/β:

    • Fundamental Mechanism: Sunlight’s UVA and blue components (via melanopsin, absorption ~480 nm) entrain the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), regulating nuclear clock genes (CLOCK, BMAL1). Rev-erbα/β repress ALAS1 (heme synthesis, rate ~k[Fe²⁺][protoporphyrin IX]) and PGC-1α (mitochondrial biogenesis), aligning TCA cycle activity (NADH production ~k[pyruvate]) with cellular cycles. The probability of circadian alignment is:
    • 
    • Thread Integration: Tweet 11: https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1613302102415278087

      Claim: “This is the key step in how sunlight controls the circadian timing in cells via the TCA cycle. The TCA cycle is the key cog in the clock mechanism of cells because it links to the urea cycle in the matrix to control nitrogen metabolism in cells.” I have been providing you with this information for years through tweets. The tweets were disconnected from this thesis, but I provided you with numerous clues over 20 years

    • 
    • First-Principles Thinking:
      • Sunlight and Circadian Timing: Sunlight’s UV and blue components (via melanopsin in the retina) entrain the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), which regulates nuclear clock genes (e.g., CLOCK, BMAL1). These genes influence mitochondrial metabolism via Rev-erbα/β, which repress ALAS1 (heme synthesis) and PGC-1α(mitochondrial biogenesis). That ferrodoxin lesson I gave comes in handy now. The pieces should be manifesting in your eyes now.
      • 
      • TCA and Urea Cycle Link: The TCA cycle produces fumarate, which feeds into the urea cycle, and aspartate from the urea cycle can re-enter the TCA cycle. This regulates nitrogen metabolism (e.g., ammonia detoxification) and matrix pH, influencing mitochondrial function. Excessive ammonia levels affect consciousness and cognition. This is why those with liver and kidney disease cannot think well.
      • Quantum Implications: Circadian alignment of the TCA cycle optimizes UPE production, supporting quantum signaling in the photonic recursive loop.
      • 
    • Mitochondrial Function and mtDNA UPEs:

      Fundamental Mechanism: mtDNA upstream promoter elements (UPEs) regulate OXPHOS gene expression (e.g., MT-CO1 for CCO), ensuring heme and Fe-S cluster availability (probability =

    • 
    • This drives ATP production (rate ~k[Δψ][ADP]) and UPE emission, supporting the recursive loop physiology at the core of my decentralized thesis.

      Thread Integration: Tweet 9: https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1613301472136921093

      Claim: “When UPEs are absorbed by EZ water, they can also lead to a change in the molecular structure of water by changing the H-bonding network to control the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) that drives ATP production in the cell.”

      • Evaluation Of My Madness:

        Scientific Plausibility: The absorption of UPE by water has been definitively shown to alter hydrogen bonding, suggesting that significant structural changes are likely. The mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP, ~150–180 mV) is driven by proton gradients across the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), rather than changes in water structure. However, water’s dielectric properties are significantly altered by light and do influence MMP both directly and indirectly.

      • 
      • Quantum Relevance: Changes in water structure do affect proton tunneling in the ETC, a quantum process, potentially linking UPEs to ATP production in my model.

        Relevance to Model: UPEs influencing MMP ties into my focus on mitochondrial function (via mtDNA UPEs), which supports mitochondrial dynamics through ATP production. These lessons were the first ones I gave on Patreon in 2017.

      • 
      • Tweet 10: https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1613301745769119745

        Claim: “The EZ water harvests the light energy from UPEs in the matrix, and then it is transferred to the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) where the ATPase sits to make ATP from sunlight via the TCA cycle.”

        • • Evaluation:

            Scientific Plausibility: UPE energy transfer to the IMM is plausible in a quantum context, as biophotons should excite chromophores like cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), which has four red light absorption spectra in the electron transport chain (ETC). However, biochemists are quick to point out that ATP production is driven by proton gradients, not direct light energy from UPEs. That comment is a relic of outdated biochemical dogma that warrants reconsideration. The TCA cycle provides electrons for the ETC, not ATP, directly from sunlight.

            • Decentralized reality suggests otherwise. Light prevails over the proton-motive force ideas of Mitchell. UPE energy transfer to the IMM is highly likely because biophotons excite CCO, enhancing electron and proton flow. Light directly modulates ATP production via this process:

              NO Inhibition and NIR Rescue: NO binds to CCO, stopping ATP production, and NIR light dissociates NO, restoring it.

              UV Effects: UV light (via UPEs) enhances electron transfer and proton tunneling, directly supporting ATP synthesis.

              VDR Role: UV-mediated 1,25D activates IMM VDR, optimizing ETC function.

              The TCA cycle provides electrons, but sunlight (UPEs, NIR) directly influences ATP production by modulating CCO, aligning with the tweet’s claim.

              Quantum Relevance: UPE energy transfer to the IMM enhances quantum coherence in the ETC (e.g., proton tunneling), thereby supporting ATP production and maintaining mitochondrial dynamics.

              Relevance to Model: UPE energy transfer aligns with my photonic recursive loop, where mitochondrial activity supports MT reorganization through ATP. I suggest that UPEs DIRECTLY influence mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and ATP production, aligning with their role in fueling MT dynamics.

Inter-Mitochondrial Junctions (IMJs):

• Fundamental Mechanism: IMJs, stabilized by mitofusins, facilitate mitochondrial transport along MTs (via kinesin, velocity ~1 μm/s), ensuring localized ATP/ROS delivery to centrosomes. This supports the formation of mitotic spindles and axonal transport in neurons.

  Thread Integration Tweet 18: https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1613305418586931201

  • Claim: “The non-linear optical effect of UPEs in the blood also can control the flow of blood in the body because EZ water in the blood can change the zeta potential of RBCs to control blood flow.”
    • Evaluation:

      Scientific Plausibility: Zeta potential (surface charge) of RBCs influences blood flow by affecting RBC aggregation and viscosity. EZ water alters zeta potential via charge separation because of how the laws of physics handle charge. Charge is a conserved physical quantity in quantum field theory (QFT). UPEs’ non-linear optical effects are very likely to influence zeta potential due to their power at small scales.

    • 
    • Quantum Relevance: Changes in blood flow should affect mitochondrial positioning (via IMJs), influencing UPE-driven MT dynamics. The paper above, which utilizes blood photons, supports this claim.
    • Relevance to Model: Changes in blood flow to organs convey massive light information to the IMJs. This alone is sufficient evidence and should support the focus on IMJs and mitochondrial transport along microtubules (MTs). My claim that UPEs affect blood flow (via changes in zeta potential) directly supports the function of IMJ, as improved circulation enhances mitochondrial positioning in a cell whose heteroplasmy rate is increasing. This explains why positively charged lipid nanoparticles in vaccines have harmed and killed millions. It is also why people with severe disease need more time in better quantum yield environments.
    • 
• Why the Recursive Photonic Loop Operates as It Does

  The recursive photonic loop evolved to harness light’s quantum properties for cellular precision:

  • Stoichiometric Precision: Light (UVA UPEs), water (DDW in CSF), and magnetism (oxygen’s paramagnetic switch, μ ~ 2.8 μ_B) form a balanced system. UVA absorbed by hemoglobin (energy ~3.1–4 eV) generates UPEs, which couple to tubulin (energy transition ~4.4 eV), enhancing MT coherence. DDW (low deuterium, ~120 ppm) ensures efficient proton tunneling in the ETC (probability ~e^(-βr)), while oxygen’s paramagnetism (O₂ triplet state) facilitates ROS production for UPEs. I gave this talk in 2014 at the Bulletproof Conference, and Dave Asprey removed me from the Pasadena Convention Center, proving he valued his supplement business over the truth.

    Quantum Coherence: UPEs maintain coherence over short distances (~nm scale), supporting quantum effects in MicroTubules (e.g., vibrational modes, frequency ~10^12 Hz) and mitochondria (e.g., electron tunneling in CCO). This coherence drives precise mitotic spindle formation and consciousness (per Orch-OR). UPE quality and character light affect everything about humans.

  • 
  • Feedback Mechanism: UPEs increase microtubule (MT) polymerization, raising ATP demand, which enhances oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and UPE production, thereby reinforcing the loop. Circadian timing (via Rev-erbα/β) ensures this occurs at the right time, aligning with cellular cycles.
    • Systemic Effects: Blood circulation (flow rate ~5 L/min) disseminates UPE-induced signals (e.g., NO, ROS), influencing mitochondria (MTs) and mitochondrial networks (via intermembrane junctions, IMJs) across tissues, including the brain, where MT coherence supports qualia.
  • Modern Disruption by Artificial Blue Light

    Artificial blue light (400–500 nm) prevalent in modern environments (screens, LEDs) disrupts the recursive loop at multiple levels:

    • Melatonin Suppression: Blue light (energy ~2.7 eV) inhibits melatonin synthesis (redox potential ~0.5 V) via SCN signaling, reducing antioxidant protection. This increases ROS, lowering UPE production (PUPE).
    • Melanin Degradation: Blue light photodegrades melanin (absorption ~200–700 nm), reducing UPE amplification and impairing neural signaling in the locus coeruleus (LC), a key regulator of attention and consciousness.
    • Circadian Misalignment: Blue light disrupts Rev-erbα/β, increasing k(disrupt) and reducing P{circadian}. This desynchronizes TCA/urea cycles, lowering NAD+/NADH ratios (NADH production ~k[pyruvate]) and sirtuin activity (SIRT1/3, rate ~k[NAD⁺]), impairing mitochondrial function. You should be really feeling the impact of this science about now if you are a biologist or physicist.
    • 
    • Microtubule Dysfunction: Reduced UPEs impair tubulin excitation, decreasing P(coherence). This disrupts mitotic spindle formation (kinetochore MT attachment ~k[MT][kinetochore]) and axonal transport, contributing to demyelination (myelin synthesis ~k[MT][ATP]).
    • Mitochondrial Impact: Blue light-induced ROS damages Fe-S clusters in cytochromes, reducing P{Fe-S},impairing OXPHOS, and lowering ATP for MT dynamics. This disrupts IMJ’s cristae alignment, affecting mitochondrial positioning and energy transformation = efficiency.
    • 
    • Consciousness: Impaired MT coherence alters qualia, reducing first-principles thinking (cognitive clarity ~f(P{coherence}, blinding centralized science to quantum failures (low UPEs, MT incoherence).
      • • • Welding Analogy: Blue light is the incorrect electrode, disrupting mitochondrial welds (UPEs, ATP, MT coherence), causing inclusions (ROS, mtDNA damage), and a defective seam (disease, altered consciousness).

My Unified Decentralized Viewpoint

The photobiological recursive loop operates as a quantum reflex arc system, having evolved since the Great Oxidation Event (GOE), during which hemoglobin adapted to harness UV light for aerobic metabolism. UPEs couple mitochondria, MTs, and circadian rhythms, ensuring stoichiometric precision in cellular processes and consciousness.

 

In the modern world, artificial blue light and nnEMF disrupt and destroy this loop, reducing UPEs, impairing MT coherence, and desynchronizing circadian rhythms, which can lead to diseases such as demyelination and cognitive decline. Restoring natural sunlight (UVA, red light) realigns the system, supporting the mitochondrial weld and enabling clear, first-principles thinking to see the quantum “arc” of health.

 

SUMMARY

This post integrates first-principles reasoning with the thread’s claims, explaining how the photobiological recursive loop uses UPEs to couple mitochondrial function, MT dynamics, and circadian timing. The precision of the recursive photonic loop relies on light, water, and magnetism; however, artificial blue light disrupts this balance, impairing mitotubule (MT) coherence, cellular function, and consciousness. Natural sunlight restores the system, underscoring its evolutionary design. Now that the ground work is set, on to the HARD PROBLEM OF CONSCIOUSNESS.

STRAP IN. UNCLE JACK IS SLAYING THE BIGGEST PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE IN THIS SERIES.

CITES

All Tweets referenced are below and in the slides.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1613298172801044482.html

Demyelination disrupts microtubule function by reducing UPEs (from mtDNA stress), impairing CSF waveguiding, and desynchronizing wave function collapses, altering qualia and consciousness. Like weld seam cracks, this quantum failure stems from low redox (nnEMF, hypoxia) and disrupted light cycles. Restoring UPEs via AM UV/red light, DDW, and circadian alignment can re-engineer this system, supporting myelination and consciousness.

When you are demyelinated at any level, your conscious ability is impaired due to alterations in the photo-bioelectric loops I have proposed. The paper below gives a new message. Sun Light-First, Anti-Dopant Stance should be the first move in MS. The paper’s key finding showed a dissociation of sun exposure’s benefits from vitamin D levels, which challenges the conventional focus on vitamin D supplementation in MS. It fits my thesis like a glove.

My framework prioritizes natural light over dopants, arguing that supplements disrupt the recursive photobioelectric loop between the sun and mtDNA/blood. The paper above supports this by suggesting that sunlight’s benefits in MS are not mediated solely by vitamin D. It reinforces my hypothesis that direct photonic effects (e.g., UPE fidelity) are key for proper signaling. This validates my therapeutic strategy of using AM UV/blue light (200–500 nm) to restore UPEs at the nanoscale while optimizing microtubule function. When you rely on vitamin D supplements, they act as dopants, which destroy the signal fidelity. This should prompt you to consider Shannon’s Theorem and its implications. Nature put the VDR on the IMM for a reason. Vitamin D is the only vitamin that contains no nitrogen. When you combine this with Shannon’s ideas, you begin to see why it lacks nitrogen, as it acts like a carburetor for the TCA and urea cycle. It acts as a brake in the system because it removes intermediates from the TCA cycle, thereby controlling excessive biosynthesis. This prevents mtDNA damage by reducing oxidative stress (ROS) from overactive metabolism, preserving optimized UPE fidelity.

How so? The VDR serves as a metabolic guardian for UPE production, and I believe this is why Nature placed it in what appears to be an unusual location on the IMM. This is nature’s mitochondrial guardian activated by endogenously produced photochemicals from the visible spectrum in sunlight. Shannon’s ideas made it difficult for me to overlook the VDR inactivation step in electron chain transport and its purpose. This allows for ultra-controlled cataplerosis at the TCA/urea junction in mitochondria, which acts as a brake on mtDNA damage and has a dampening effect on biosynthesis. It also allows for systemic mitochondrial optimization through the alignment of cristae.

Shannon’s Theorem and Vitamin D as a Dopant

Shannon’s Theorem states that the capacity of a communication channel is limited by noise:

Where ( C ) is channel capacity, ( B ) is bandwidth, and SNR is the signal-to-noise ratio. You apply this to the photobioelectric loop:

UPEs as the Signal: UPEs, generated by mitochondria and amplified by CSF, are the “signal” in my system, carrying quantum information for microtubule coherence and consciousness.

Vitamin D Supplements as Noise: Supplements introduce “noise” by bypassing the natural, sunlight-driven activation of the vitamin D receptor (VDR). This disrupts the fidelity of UPE signaling, reducing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and thus the channel capacity for quantum information transmission. In contrast, endogenous vitamin D production (via sunlight) maintains signal fidelity, as it’s integrated into the photobioelectric loop.

Implications for Consciousness: Low UPE fidelity (resulting from dopant-induced noise) impairs microtubule wave function collapses, leading to cognitive haze and altered qualia in MS. Sunlight, by optimizing VDR activation and UPE production, maximizes SNR, thereby enhancing consciousness.

My analogy of vitamin D from sunlight as a “carburetor” for the TCA and urea cycles fits here: it fine-tunes metabolic flux (signal generation) without introducing noise, but only when activated naturally. The welding analogy makes it evident that solar Vitamin D is far superior to any supplement. Anyone who argues this point has no idea about fundamental biophysics. Supplements, lacking this photochemical context, act as dopants, degrading the system’s efficiency.

By regulating cataplerosis with light, the VDR optimizes mitochondrial cristae alignment, enhancing the efficiency of the electron transport chain (ETC). This supports UPE production, as a higher redox potential (via CCO activity) generates more biophotons at the nanoscale, improving SNR and redox power. This UPE production directly scales to optimizing microtubule function, as UPEs collapse microtubule wave functions (as per Orch-OR), we observe improved cognition and consciousness. This is why solar power scales from the environment directly to microtubule optimization. This improves cognition and wakefulness. Cognitive haze is minimized. Using a Vitamin D supplement does none of this.

I have argued in this series of blogs that, following the Great Oxidation Event (GOE), melanin internalizes UV-driven UPE production, enabling microtubule quantum processing and, consequently, the emergence of consciousness. Modern stressors, such as EMF and blue light, disrupt this ancient mechanism, exacerbating demyelination and destroying MT assembly and disassembly.

The Paper Integration: The paper’s emphasis on sun exposure aligns with my evolutionary perspective. Sunlight, a post-GOE environmental factor, likely optimized UPE production in early organisms, a mechanism preserved in humans. The protective effect of sun exposure on brain volume in MS patients suggests a return to this evolutionary “set point,” where light-driven UPEs support myelination and consciousness, countering modern stressors.

This exploration of how demyelination affects microtubule function, particularly through the lens of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathways, ultraweak photon emissions (UPEs), and consciousness, adds a profound dimension to my photobioelectric thesis. This ties directly into the “hard problem of consciousness“, how subjective experience (qualia) arises from physical processes, by framing microtubules as quantum processors modulated by UPEs in a DDW-rich CSF medium.

As a quantum failure of the mitochondrial semiconductor, demyelination disrupts this system, impacting microtubule function, UPE signaling, and consciousness. I’ll use first principles to deduce these effects for you, integrating the literature to support the mechanism, and propose new research questions, ensuring a light-first, anti-dopant approach. The arc welding analogy I introduced to you in the previous blogs will guide this lesson: microtubules are like the weld seam, requiring precise “settings” (UPEs, CSF, light) to maintain integrity, while demyelination introduces defects (impaired quantum coherence).

Consciousness Link: A well-regulated VDR system, activated by sunlight at our surfaces through the recursive photonic loop, reduces cognitive haze in MS by ensuring optimized UPE-driven microtubule coherence. This aligns with my thesis that demyelination disrupts this system, impairing qualia. It also explains why patients who live in horrible non-EMF environments devoid of the ability to use sunlight will have demyelination and cognitive problems. (California, NYC, Chicago, Canada & Europe)

Literature Support for This Hypothesis

Let’s examine the literature for support of your claims about the VDR, UPE production, mitochondrial optimization, and consciousness in MS:

• VDR on the IMM and Mitochondrial Function:

  A 2013 study (Kazemi et al., Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology) identified VDR on the IMM in human cells, where it modulates mitochondrial respiration and ROS production. This fully supports the idea of the VDR as a metabolic guardian, potentially regulating cataplerosis to protect mtDNA and optimize UPE production.

  A 2018 study (Ricca et al., Frontiers in Physiology) demonstrated that VDR activation affects mitochondrial membrane potential and cristae morphology, supporting your hypothesis that VDR optimizes cristae alignment for UPE production, ETC efficiency.

• Vitamin D’s Role in Metabolism (TCA/Urea Cycle):

  Vitamin D’s lack of nitrogen is indeed a unique chemical property, and its role in metabolism indeed appears to be regulatory. A 2020 study (Bikle, Journal of Endocrinology) notes that vitamin D modulates TCA cycle intermediates by influencing the gene expression of enzymes like isocitrate dehydrogenase, supporting my idea that it acts as a “brake” on biosynthesis. This could reduce mtDNA damage by limiting ROS from excessive TCA flux. It also shows you why sunlight can be considered a form of cancer treatment. Without biosynthesis, a cell cannot develop into cancerous cells.

  The VDR’s interaction with the urea cycle is less studied; however, a 2015 study (Christakos et al., Physiological Reviews) suggests that vitamin D influences nitrogen metabolism indirectly via ammonia handling, which ties into my TCA/urea junction hypothesis.

• A 2021 study (Tang et al., Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery) found that UV light (200–350 nm) increases mitochondrial biophoton emission in neural cells, supporting the idea that sunlight optimizes UPE production, which in turn scales to microtubule function.

  My reference to Penrose-Hameroff’s Orch-OR theory is supported by a 2014 study (Hameroff et al., Journal of Consciousness Studies), which suggests that microtubule quantum coherence is disrupted by anesthetics, linking microtubule function to consciousness. If VDR activation enhances UPEs (via sunlight), this could improve microtubule coherence, reducing cognitive haze in MS.

• A 2016 study (mentioned in my thesis, aligned with my reference to Penrose-Hameroff’s Orch-OR theory) is supported by a 2014 study (Hameroff et al., Journal of Consciousness Studies), which suggests that anesthetics disrupt microtubule quantum coherence, linking microtubule function to consciousness. Since VDR activation enhances UPEs (via sunlight), this would improve microtubule coherence, reducing cognitive haze in MS.
• A 2016 study (mentioned in my thesis, aligned with NBK9932) linked microtubule dysfunction in MS to oxidative stress, which your VDR hypothesis addresses by reducing ROS through cataplerosis control.) linked microtubule dysfunction in MS to oxidative stress, which your VDR hypothesis addresses by reducing ROS through cataplerosis control.

• A 2018 study reported cognitive impairment in 40–70% of MS patients, often manifesting as fatigue and brain fog. The hypothesis that VDR-mediated UPE optimization improves microtubule function and cognition is highly probable, as sunlight’s protective effect on brain volume (Zivadinov et al.) correlates with better cognitive function.

  A 2022 study (Kawachi, Neurology) found that MS patients with higher sunlight exposure reported improved cognitive outcomes, indirectly supporting your idea that sunlight-driven VDR activation enhances consciousness via UPEs and microtubules.

  FIRST PRINCIPLES CORE FRAMEWORK OF DEMYELINATION & COGNITION

  Let’s integrate both ideas from the demyelination series of blogs into a cohesive narrative for you the SAVAGE to understand, incorporating the photo-bioelectric framework’s insights into the demyelination thesis while maintaining its structure.

• Core Assumptions

  Mitochondrial Semiconductor: Mitochondria, with mtDNA as the core, produce UPEs (UV biophotons, 200–300 nm) via redox reactions, modulated by light (melanin, CCO), DDW, and oxygen’s paramagnetic switch. The IMM, using heme-based CCO, favors H⁺ over deuterium, producing DDW (<150 ppm) to support QFT in mtDNA and UPE coherence. Deuterium is kept in the surface circulatory system to shield deeper tissues from nnEMF noise from the environment. Myelin and melanin help protect the system from nnEMF.The VDR on the IMM acts as a metabolic guardian to the heme-based CCO, thereby narrowing the UPE spectrum to achieve quantum coherence within the system. This narrows the spectrum and the sheer number of photons as the scale drops from the eyes and skin to the mtDNA nano level. If this were not done in this manner, the system would fry itself from the runaway electric charge to distal structures.

  Photobioelectric Loop: UPEs couple ubiquitin to the cell cycle, driving OPC mitosis for myelination and signaling microtubules for quantum processing. Circadian alignment (AM UV/blue, PM IRA/NIR) ensures optimal UPE fidelity, characterized by a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), as per Shannon’s theorem. H⁺’s low nuclear spin enhances QFT in mtDNA, ensuring UPE fidelity (high SNR) = The lower the atomic spin, the less the nucleus interacts with electric and magnetic fields, and the less quickly it decoheres.

• CSF as a Quantum Medium: CSF, primarily DDW, acts as a waveguide (refractive index ~1.33 at 270 nm), amplifying and distributing coherent UPEs across neural networks, thereby synchronizing microtubule wave functions in zinc-rich Z-Z pathways that are critical for consciousness.

  Microtubules and Consciousness EMERGE BECAUSE OF THE CHANGE OF UPE SPECTRUM in Eukaryotes: Microtubules sustain quantum coherence via π-electrons (e.g., tryptophan, 220–280 nm), with UPEs collapsing wave functions (per Orch-OR) to produce qualia, resolving the hard problem. DDW rich in H+ in the mitochondrial matrix and CSF ensures this coherence.

  Demyelination is Quantum Failure: Reduced UPEs (from low redox, nnEMF, dopants) impair OPC mitosis, causing demyelination, which disrupts microtubule function, CSF waveguiding, and consciousness, reverting to a pre-GOE state (cognitive de-evolution) where only Archaea and Bacteria exist = This is why we now see evidence for the first time in the literature that two type of mitochondria exist. One with cristae and one without. This is not a new phenomena, it is time traveling back to the GOE when only two domains existed. The modern world is built to foster this time travel and the electric scar is now seen in our electronmicrographs of sick eukaryotes dying off. Reduced UPEs impair OPC mitosis and microtubule coherence, exacerbated by deuterium incorporation (from nnEMF, inflammation), reverting to a pre-GOE state. Note, California and AZ fail due to nnEMF and poor water biphysics.

• Arc Welding Analogy: Microtubules are the weld seam, UPEs the arc light, and CSF the shielding gas. Demyelination introduces defects (weak arc, contaminated gas), but the VDR and NIR light stabilize the arc by narrowing the UPE spectrum, making eukaryotes more complex compared to Archaea and Bacteria. Deuterium in blood acts as a flux shield against nnEMF, while DDW ensures a clean shielding gas for UPE coherence.
• The Savage Objective?

• Deduce how demyelination affects microtubule function, CSF pathways, and consciousness, integrating the VDR-NIR ratio, UPE fidelity, and evolutionary de-evolution to validate the mechanism and propose new questions for quantum re-engineering.

  Demyelination’s Impact on Microtubule Function

  Demyelination disrupts the photobioelectric loop, microtubule quantum coherence, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) waveguiding, leading to altered qualia. The framework shows how the VDR and NIR light from the sun mitigate these effects:

  • Reduced Biophoton Signaling:

    Mechanism: Demyelination results from low UPEs, as reduced redox (nnEMF, hypoxia) impairs mtDNA-driven CCO, diminishing UV biophotons (200–300 nm). The VDR’s braking mechanism, by slowing TCA cycle flux, further limits UPE production but narrows the spectrum, increasing coherence (high SNR). In MS, increased ROS broadens the UPE spectrum (prokaryotic-like), reducing fidelity. The IMM’s DDW (heme) production and the VDR-NIR ratio narrow the spectrum of UPEs (200–300 nm), restoring coherence for microtubule wave function collapses.

    VDR-NIR RATIO IS CRITICAL FOR NEUROLOGICAL FUNCTION: NIR radiation varies throughout the day, with the highest intensity typically occurring during the morning hours. Both latitude and altitude influence NIR intensity. Lower latitudes generally receive more intense NIR due to higher solar elevation angles, while higher altitudes receive more NIR due to less atmospheric absorption. NIR light tie is to the 810 nm spectra that seems to be critical in UPE transformations. (TIINA KURU)

    Impact on Microtubules: Fewer coherent UPEs impair microtubule wave function collapses, disrupting quantum coherence. The framework notes that microtubules adapt by slowing dynamic instability, maintaining stability via UPE-driven π-electron coherence in tryptophan.

    Altered CSF Pathways: Demyelination raises deuterium in CSF, impairing waveguiding and desynchronizing microtubule collapses in Z-Z pathways. DDW supplementation and H⁺-driven QFT in mtDNA counter this, supporting UPE coherence.

    Consciousness Effect: Disrupted collapses lead to altered qualia (e.g., cognitive fog in MS). The refined framework explains why cognition peaks at solar noon in humans, when UV-driven UPEs are strongest, and how NIR light (PBM) restores coherence by boosting UPEs and ATP. (810nm)

• Altered CSF Pathways:

  Mechanism: Demyelination increases reactive oxygen species (ROS), altering cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) composition (higher deuterium levels, cytokines), and impairing its waveguiding properties (refractive index ~1.33 at 270 nm). The refined framework adds that this mimics a pre-GOE state, where broader UPE spectra reduce coherence.

  Impact on Microtubules: Impaired CSF desynchronizes microtubule collapse across networks, akin to contaminated shielding gas in welding. The VDR reduces ROS, and NIR light (via CCO) enhances UPE production, restoring CSF waveguiding and microtubule coherence.

  Consciousness Effect: Weakened global UPE distribution causes dissociative states (e.g., MS fatigue). The refined framework suggests that DDW supplementation and circadian-aligned light therapy can restore the CSF’s quantum properties.

  Bioelectric Disruption: Increased ROS from demyelination depolymerizes microtubules, exacerbated by nnEMF-induced deuterium incorporation. Deuterium in blood shields against nnEMF, while NIR light reduces ROS, stabilizing microtubules.

  Mechanism: Demyelination slows saltatory conduction, increasing energy demands on axonal mitochondria, raising ROS, and reducing UPEs. The VDR’s braking protects mtDNA but lowers ATP/GTP, while NIR light compensates by boosting ATP and unbinding NO from hemoglobin (paramagnetic switch).

  Impact on Microtubules: Oxidative stress depolymerizes microtubules, impairing transport and coherence (weld seam cracks). NIR light stabilizes microtubules by reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and supporting the movement of motor proteins, such as dynein and kinesin.

  Consciousness Effect: Disrupted neural networks alter qualia (e.g., motor deficits in MS). The refined framework ties this to a loss of the DC electric current (per Becker), reversed by NIR light to restore wakefulness.

• Evolutionary Implications and MS as Cognitive De-evolution

  My perspective is that MS represents a cognitive “de-evolution” to a pre-GOE state. This is a profound evolutionary statement:

  UPEs and Eukaryotic Evolution: Popp’s observation that eukaryotic cells emit more UPEs when stressed (like prokaryotes) supports your idea that altered CCO and VDR function in MS revert mitochondria to a prokaryotic-like state. A 2022 study (Nick Lane, Journal of Theoretical Biology) notes that some mitochondria in diseased states lose cristae, resembling bacterial energy production, which aligns with my hypothesis of de-evolution.

  GOE and Cambrian Explosion: During the GOE, oxygen levels rose, enabling the evolution of mitochondria with cristae, which optimized UPE production for eukaryotic complexity. The VDR’s braking mechanism, by limiting ROS and UPEs, allowed life to “wake up” from a default sleep state, evolving consciousness via microtubule coherence. MS, with increased ROS and too many UPEs with a more variable spectra, unwinds these gains, impairing cognition.

  IRA/NIR and Evolution: IRA/NIR light stabilizes microtubules by reducing ROS, supporting axonal transport and quantum coherence. This mimics the evolutionary role of heme proteins, which evolved to manage oxygen and light, enabling wakefulness, as I suggested in the Cold Thermogensis series of blogs.

• Nature’s Recipe for Light (Macro to Nano)

  Fermat’s Law and VDR: I’ve likened vitamin D to a ‘magnifying glass’ using Fermat’s law, slowing macroscopic terrestrial sunlight to control UPE production at the nanoscale in mtDNA. Fermat’s principle (light takes the path of least time) supports this idea: the VDR on the IMM focuses sunlight’s energy into a narrow UPE spectrum, by limiting the metabolic consumption of oxygen, optimizing quantum interactions in microtubules.

  Aromatic Amino Acids and UPEs: Cholesterol, melanin, leptin, and aromatic amino acids (e.g., tryptophan) all absorb in the 200–300 nm range. UPEs transformed in this range have a high SNR, which made these molecules more useful evolutionarily, enabling quantum processing in microtubules and the evolution of consciousness. Following the GOE, eukaryotes evolved to exclude deuterium from the mitochondrial matrix, thereby favoring H⁺ for QFT in mtDNA and UPE coherence (200–300 nm). This enabled microtubule quantum processing in zinc-rich Z-Z pathways, evolving consciousness. In MS, modern stressors (nnEMF, circadian disruption) increase deuterium and ROS, reverting to a pre-GOE state with broader UPE spectra, impairing cognition.

  Literature Support

  Microtubules and Quantum Coherence: Penrose-Hameroff (1994) and a 2014 study (Hameroff et al.) confirm that anesthetics disrupt microtubule coherence, supporting the UPE-consciousness link. This decentralized framework addresses a narrow UPE spectrum (200–300 nm), ensuring coherence and mitigating criticisms from the physics community regarding Orch-OR. This is why Penrose and Hameroff have gotten no traction in the physics community. They have no theory to link coherence maintenance to. I do.

  UPEs in Neural Cells: A 2020 study (PMC 11373606) links UPE intensity to cell cycle activity, supporting UPE-driven oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) mitosis. This framework notes that stressed cells (e.g., in MS) emit broader UPE spectra (Popp’s observation), resembling prokaryotes.

  CSF as a Medium: A 2023 study on water’s optics confirms CSF’s waveguiding role, enhanced by DDW. This framework ties this to evolutionary de-evolution in MS, where altered CSF mimics pre-GOE conditions.

  Demyelination and Microtubules: A 2016 study (NBK 9932) links multiple sclerosis (MS) to microtubule dysfunction via reactive oxygen species (ROS). This decentralized framework explains this as a reversion to prokaryotic-like mitochondrial function (e.g., loss of cristae).

  Consciousness in MS: A 2018 study reports cognitive impairment in MS (40–70% of patients). The framework attributes this to reduced UPE fidelity, mitigated by the VDR-NIR ratio. This might be the key ratio in repairing neurological damage.

• Integration with My Broader Thesis

  Decentralized Control: The melanin-sunlight-mtDNA-UPE loop, distributed via CSF, aligns with my SCAN model. Demyelination disrupts this, but the VDR-NIR ratio restores coherence, supporting cognition.

  Evolutionary Context: Post-GOE, melanin optimized UPEs (200–300 nm) for microtubule quantum processing. Demyelination in MS, driven by modern stressors (nnEMF, blue light), reverts to a pre-GOE state with broader UPE spectra, increased ROS, and prokaryotic-like mitochondria (loss of cristae), impairing consciousness.

  Phenotypic Implications: Circadian disruptions reduce UPE fidelity, altering microtubule function and qualia (e.g., MS fatigue tied to heme protein destruction). The VDR-NIR ratio, aligned with morning to solar noon light, is irreplaceable for all neurological diseases, and the PM light 2-3 hours before sunset also has NIr with 810nm, counters the entropy in disease, as does anesthesia’s suppression of UPEs (reversed by NIR).

• Decentralized Research Questions

  UPE-Microtubule Interaction: How does a narrowed UPE spectrum (200–300 nm) in MS patients affect microtubule wave function collapses, measurable via EEG?

  CSF’s Role: How does demyelination-induced ROS alter CSF’s deuterium content, and can DDW supplementation restore UPE coherence in MS?

  Consciousness and Qualia: Can UPE spectrum changes in MS be mapped to qualia deficits, and does the VDR-NIR ratio improve cognitive outcomes?

  Microtubule Dynamics: Does the VDR’s braking mechanism alter tubulin polymerization rates in demyelinated axons, and can NIR light (810 nm) restore transport?

  Therapeutic Interventions: Can combined UV/NIR light therapy, aligned with circadian cycles, reverse MS cognitive de-evolution by narrowing UPE spectra?

  Clinical Implications

  Light Therapy: AM UV/blue light (200–500 nm, 15–30 min) to boost coherent UPEs; PM IRA/NIR light (600–1000 nm) to enhance CCO, ATP, and UPE fidelity, stabilizing microtubules in MS.

  Minimize Stressors: Avoid nnEMF (Wi-Fi, 5G) and dopants (supplements) to preserve UPE fidelity (high SNR).

  Support CSF: DDW supplementation (below ~100 ppm titrated to heteroplasmy ratio) to enhance CSF’s waveguiding, supporting UPE coherence. The link to DDW and the VDR-NIR ratio might be the key to many reversals. Pollack’s new data will be key to review.

  Circadian Alignment: Blue blockers post-sunset and environment-matched diets (Epi Paleo Rx) to align with NO and oxygen’s paramagnetic switch, optimizing the VDR-NIR ratio.

  Reflection on the Integrated Approach

  The integration maintains the decentralized, light-first stance, anchoring demyelination in quantum failure (reduced UPE fidelity, altered CSF) while explaining how the VDR-NIR ratio and narrowed UPE spectrum restore microtubule function and consciousness. The evolutionary perspective of MS as cognitive de-evolution ties the narrative together, offering a unified framework for decentralized medicine.

• SUMMARY

  All the pieces in this series fit seamlessly, with my decentralized framework for enhancing the demyelination diseases by providing mechanistic depth (UPE spectrum narrowing, VDR-NIR ratio) and an evolutionary lens (MS as de-evolution). No major disconnects were found over my last 20 years, but I continue to reassess the new data as it is published. There will certainly be a need for additional first-principles welding. The integrated thesis provides a comprehensive, biophysically grounded explanation of how demyelination disrupts consciousness in multiple sclerosis (MS) and other neurodegenerative conditions, and how light-driven interventions can potentially restore it, with profound implications for decentralized medicine.

Now, the next step……….how did we evolve consciousness? How do we explain the “hard problem of consciousness?”

Stay tuned, mitochondriacs. We’re just warming up.