Month: July 2025

WHY ARE EYE DISEASES MORE COMMON TODAY? 

 

The neurosensory retina is a layered tissue that lines the back of the eye, communicating with the brain via the optic nerve. Blood is supplied to the neurosensory retina by retinal blood vessels originating from the central retinal artery. Transport across retinal blood vessels is limited by endothelial tight junctions, which constitute the inner blood–retinal barrier. Allan Frey’s work with DARPA in the 1960s demonstrates that non-thermal electromagnetic fields (nnEMF) open this barrier and make the eye more susceptible to damage when present in our local environment.

We forget that the optic nerve is comprised of ganglion cell axons, the “output neurons” of the retina. The retina is composed of three layers of cell bodies and two plexiform layers of synapses, which are clearly defined on histological sections. The innermost layer is the ganglion cell layer. The inner nuclear layer, featuring the cell bodies of bipolar, amacrine, and horizontal cells, is sandwiched by an internal plexiform layer and ganglion cell layer on one side, and outer plexiform layer and outer nuclear layer on the other. The outer nuclear layer contains the cell bodies of most photoreceptors, including the rods and cones. A third class of photoreceptor, intrinsically photoreceptive ganglion cells (melanopsin blue light detectors), is situated in the ganglion cell layer. All photoreceptors depend on a vitamin A-derived chromophore to detect light and adequate dopamine and melatonin levels to regenerate them in sunlight. The chromophore associated with light-transducing proteins, opsins, undergoes photoisomerization during light transduction. Expended and spent melanopsin or neuropsin chromophores and their associated retinal then enter the visual cycle, a sequence of reactions that facilitates regeneration and re-association with opsins for further transduction.  If regeneration pathways are blocked, the free Vitamin A (retinal)becomes a wrecking ball for the human retina.

THEY ARE BLINDING US WITH BLUE WHILE STOPPING UV-IR REGENERATION Rx.

Carnot’s theorem, formulated by Sadi Carnot in 1824, establishes the maximum efficiency of a heat engine, defined as the ratio of the temperature difference between the heat source (e.g., the engine’s interior) and the cold sink (e.g., the surroundings) to the absolute temperature of the heat source. In biological terms, as you’ve suggested, mitochondria can be viewed as “hydrogen heat engines” that produce ATP (energy) by maintaining a proton gradient across their inner membrane, effectively creating a temperature and electrochemical gradient. Cooling can tan your interior and your exterior and centralized science ignores it.

Application to Mitochondria: In retinal cells, which have high metabolic demands due to constant phototransduction, mitochondria generate heat and energy. According to Carnot’s principle, the efficiency of these mitochondrial “engines” increases with a greater temperature differential between the mitochondrial matrix (heat source) and the cellular environment (cold sink). Cold thermogenesis, which involves exposing the eye to cold, enhances this gradient by lowering the external temperature, forcing mitochondria to work harder and produce more heat, thereby improving efficiency and resilience.

Impact on Eye Health: Under indoor conditions with stable temperatures (e.g., thermostat-controlled environments), this gradient diminishes, leading to mitochondrial atrophy. This reduces the retina’s ability to repair damage from blue light hazard, where reactive oxygen species (ROS) from all-trans-retinal accumulation overwhelm cellular defenses. My chronic point about “chronic widespread mitochondrial colony failure” due to lack of seasonal variation aligns here, because without cold stress, mitochondrial efficiency drops, exacerbating retinal degeneration.

Haplotypes and Susceptibility to Blue Light Hazard

Haplotypes, which are specific combinations of genetic variants inherited together, can influence mitochondrial function, melanin biology, and photoreceptor health, potentially making certain populations more vulnerable to blue light damage.

Mitochondrial Haplogroups: Human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is organized into haplogroups (e.g., H, U, J, T), which vary by geographic origin and affect metabolic efficiency. For instance:

Haplogroup H (common in Europe) is associated with higher basal metabolic rates but may be less adaptable to oxidative stress, potentially increasing susceptibility to blue light-induced ROS in the retina.

• Haplogroup J (prevalent in the Near East and Caucasus) shows enhanced thermogenic capacity and cold tolerance, possibly offering better mitochondrial resilience against blue light damage.

  Studies (e.g., Mitochondrion, 2015) suggest that haplogroups with lower electron transport chain efficiency (e.g., some African haplogroups like L0) might accumulate more ROS under blue light stress, heightening retinal risk. Their skin and RPE also have more melanin, so they need much higher amounts of sunlight to tap into their regeneration programs. This is why African Americans have such high rates of cataracts, diabetes, and retinal diseases when they move to America, where the technocracy destroys their retinal biology.

Melanin and Photoprotection: Haplotypes also influence melanin production via POMC and MC1R gene variants. Lighter-skinned individuals (e.g., those with haplogroup H) have less melanin in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), which reduces photoprotection against blue light. Darker-skinned individuals (e.g., haplogroup L) with higher melanin levels are more resistant, as melanin scavenges ROS and conducts bioelectric signals (per Becker’s work). This increases the signal-to-noise ratio.

Heat Production Link: Mitochondria in haplotypes with lower thermogenic capacity (e.g., due to indoor living) struggle to maintain the Carnot-efficient temperature gradient, amplifying damage from blue light. Cold thermogenesis selectively benefits haplotypes with adaptable mitochondria (e.g., J or U), enhancing repair pathways, such as those involving Müller glia, while less adaptable haplotypes (e.g., H) remain vulnerable to a lack of repair. Cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP) supports production of 11-cis-retinaldehyde and its delivery to photoreceptors. It is found in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Müller glia (MG). Recent data reveal a dominant role for RPE-CRALBP in supporting rod and cone function, highlighting the importance of the RPE for cone regeneration. Unlike rods, cones have a unique requirement for rapid pigment regeneration to maintain their function in bright light and enable quick recovery after exposure to light.

• Carnot efficiency, derived from the Carnot cycle in thermodynamics, describes the maximum efficiency of a heat engine converting thermal energy into work, dependent on the temperature gradient between a hot source and a cold sink. In biological systems, mitochondria maintain a temperature gradient across membranes to optimize ATP production via oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos). For Müller glia (retinal support cells) and the RPE (the pigmented layer that supports photoreceptors), a Carnot-efficient gradient enhances energy transduction, supports repair and regeneration, and maintains metabolic homeostasis. This gradient is disrupted by indoor living, which flattens thermal differences, atrophying mitochondrial colonies.

  Why Eye Diseases Are More Common Today: Haplotypic and Thermodynamic Perspective

  Blue Light Hazard and Mitochondrial Strain: Chronic ALAN liberates all-trans-retinal, generating ROS that tax mitochondrial defenses. Haplotypes with inefficient heat production (due to indoor warmth) and lower ROS scavenging (e.g., lighter melanin) are more susceptible to heat stress. The lack of UV/IR from sunlight, which boosts POMC and melanin regeneration, compounds this, as does nnEMF opening the blood-retinal barrier (Frey’s DARPA findings).

  Carnot’s Efficiency Loss: Since indoor living flattens the temperature gradient, atrophying mitochondrial colonies in modern humans, haplotypes less adapted to this (e.g., those without cold-tolerance variants) experience greater energy deficits. This will impair retinal repair. Cold thermogenesis restores this gradient, but its efficacy varies by haplotype; individuals with thermogenic haplogroups may thrive, while others may lag behind. Heat production is tied to the Carnot Efficiency and directly alters the UPEs in the system (the thermodynamic limit of energy conversion). This varies by haplogroup and environmental context. This can change the noise in the system.

  Thermogenic Capacity: Haplogroups like J, with cold-tolerance adaptations (e.g., UCP1 upregulation), maintain a temperature gradient via uncoupling, dissipating excess energy as heat. This supports Müller glia repair pathways under blue light stress, reducing ROS damage.

  Indoor Living Impact: Modern indoor environments flatten this gradient, causing mitochondrial colonies to atrophy. Haplogroups without thermogenic variants (e.g., H) struggle to compensate, impairing energy supply to the retina. The Kowald and Kirkwood (2018) paper’s mtDNA deletion model suggests this stress could drive clonal expansion, worsening retinal decline.

• Cold Thermogenesis Benefit: Exposing mitochondria to cold restores the gradient, enhancing repair in adaptable haplogroups (e.g., J, U). Less adaptable haplogroups (e.g., H) show limited response, highlighting haplotype-specific resilience.

  Blue light’s disruption of this gradient, by overexciting ETC and increasing ROS, further taxes non-thermogenic haplotypes, linking indoor living to retinal atrophy.

  Regeneration Blockade: Sunlight’s UV/IR, absent indoors, drives Becker’s photo-bioelectric regeneration via DC currents and POMC. Haplotypes with robust melanin responses (e.g., L) regenerate better, while those with atrophied mitochondria (e.g., H under ALAN) face stalled repair, explaining rising disease prevalence and incidence.

  Haplogroups influence melanin production via proopiomelanocortin (POMC) and melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) variants, affecting photoprotection:

  Lighter Skin (e.g., Haplogroup H): Lower melanin in the RPE, driven by MC1R variants favoring lighter skin, reduces ROS scavenging and bioelectric conduction (Becker’s work). This heightens blue light damage, as melanin normally absorbs UV/visible light and emits ultraweak photon emissions (UPE) to signal repair.

  Darker Skin (e.g., Haplogroup L): Higher melanin levels enhance photoprotection, neutralizing ROS and conducting bioelectric signals. However, in low-sunlight environments (e.g., northern U.S.), this advantage wanes, as melanin synthesis requires exposure to UV radiation. Migration disrupts this balance, explaining higher disease prevalence in African Americans as latitude rises despite innate resilience.

  The decentralized thesis aligns here: melanin acts as an electromagnetic buffer, and its decline in mismatched environments (e.g., indoor technocracy) disrupts cellular coherence, increasing anterior chamber and retinal vulnerability.

• Why Eye Diseases Are More Common Today: The Technocratic Perspective

The increase in eye diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), cataracts, and diabetic retinopathy, correlates with modern environmental and lifestyle shifts. Here’s a breakdown based on my research and related science:

• Shift to Artificial Light and Indoor Living:

• Most people now spend over 90% of their time indoors, exposed to artificial light (e.g., LEDs, screens) rather than sunlight. As our spectroscopes show, this light is dim and unbalanced compared to the sun’s full spectrum, which includes UV and infrared (IR) components essential for retinal health.

  Artificial light at night (ALAN), rich in blue light (400-500 nm), disrupts the visual cycle. The chromophore all-trans-retinal, liberated from opsins during photoisomerization, accumulates when the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is overwhelmed, leading to oxidative stress and photoreceptor damage. This aligns with my “wrecking ball” metaphor for liberated vitamin A from the retina.

  Blue light’s high energy penetrates the retina, exciting ETC complexes and generating ROS. Haplogroup-specific responses amplify disease risk:

  Haplogroup H: Lower oxidative stress resilience and reduced melanin lead to increased ROS accumulation, heightening the risk of cataracts and age-related macular degeneration (AMD), especially indoors.

  Haplogroup L0: Higher baseline ROS from ETC inefficiency, compounded by low sunlight in America, drives cataracts, diabetes (via mitochondrial dysfunction in pancreatic cells), and retinal diseases. The technocracy’s blue light dominance disrupts L0’s sunlight-dependent regeneration, explaining elevated rates in African Americans.

  Haplogroup J: Thermogenic adaptability mitigates ROS, offering protection, but indoor living still poses a risk if sunlight exposure is insufficient.

  The decentralized thesis suggests that blue light’s electromagnetic interference disrupts retinal coherence, a vulnerability that is magnified by haplotype-specific traits. Michael Rosbash’s 2017 Nobel Prize-winning insight, that the lack of sunlight during the day is worse than the artificial light at night, clearly supports my damaged retinal view, but he overlooks Becker’s work on regeneration. For me, the paper is important, but it misses a lot of quantum biology. Sunlight’s UV and IR are absent indoors, halting regeneration pathways that rely on POMC, melanin, and bioelectric signals (as per Becker’s work), thereby exacerbating damage.

• Evolutionary Context: Haplogroups evolved with environmental niches, H for Europe’s moderate climate, J for cold regions, L0 for high-sun tropics. Migration to mismatched environments (e.g., African Americans in the U.S.) unbalances these adaptations, increasing disease susceptibility as sunlight and melanin levels diverge from optimal.

  Practical Solutions

  Sunlight Exposure: 30–60 minutes of morning UV/infrared light boosts melanin synthesis and mitochondrial function, reducing ROS in all haplogroups. L0 benefits most with higher doses.

  Blue Light Mitigation: Blue-blocking glasses or reduced screen time minimize ETC stress, especially for H and L0.

  Cold Thermogenesis: Enhances mitochondrial gradient for J and U, supporting retinal repair, though less effective for H.

  Melanin Support: Diets rich in tyrosine and copper (e.g., nuts, seafood) enhance POMC/MC1R activity, boosting photoprotection. When one integrates how melanin, iron, and blue light fit into this decentralized thesis, you have to leverage insights from this paper in the Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research

  The paper (https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.008142.pdf) explores their roles in evolutionary adaptation, electromagnetic coherence, and disease. The paper reframes melanin’s evolutionary role from photoprotection to a metal-chelating agent, particularly for iron, facilitating the excretion of heavy metals via epidermal turnover in humans. This aligns with my decentralized thesis by positioning melanin as a dynamic electromagnetic black box regulator in eukaryotes.

  Melanin was an Evolutionary Driver: Dietary shifts in early humans introduced excess iron, driving melanin synthesis in melanocytes to bind and excrete it through desquamation. This explains racial pigmentation differences, with darker skin (phototypes IV-VI) evolving in high-iron environments, which supports the view that melanin acts as a calibrator of environmental inputs.

  Iron Homeostasis: Melanin-bound iron loss through skin turnover depletes systemic iron, increasing the risk of anemia in heavily melanated individuals, as noted in the paper. This challenges the centralized “sunscreen” model, framing melanin as a redox and electromagnetic stabilizer in humans

  Quantum Interface: Melanin’s lattice absorbs all light frequencies and chelates iron without reflection, converting electromagnetic energy into bioelectric signals, consistent with my black body analogy.

  The thesis highlights blue light’s role in shifting iron to Fe²⁺, generating nitric oxide (NO) and localized hypoxia, while the paper adds melanin’s amplifying quantum effect:

  Photoexcitation: Blue light (380–450 nm) excites melanin, triggering a one-electron transfer that produces ROS (superoxide, hydrogen peroxide). Iron-saturated eumelanin enhances this, broadening near-infrared absorption and intensifying oxidative stress, disrupting cellular redox fields. This alters UPE signaling.

  Retinal Impact: In the RPE, melanin binds iron to mitigate ROS, but blue light’s interaction with this complex increases UPE and oxidative damage. This aligns with my mitoception thesis, where UPE signals mitochondrial stress (e.g., via GDF15), contributing to eye diseases.

  ECS Disruption: Blue light’s oxidative assault stresses the ECS (Di Meo et al., 2025), impairing electromagnetic stability and amplifying mitochondrial dysfunction, a key theme in this framework. This would also alter UPEs in the ECS system.

  Blood-Retinal Barrier Disruption by nnEMF:

  Allan Frey’s 1960s DARPA research demonstrated that non-native electromagnetic fields (nnEMF) from technologies (e.g., microwaves, Wi-Fi) can open the blood-retinal barrier by affecting endothelial tight junctions. This increased permeability allows toxins and inflammatory molecules to reach the retina, heightening susceptibility to damage from ALAN and free retinal.

  This mechanism is less emphasized in centralized ophthalmology, which focuses on genetic or aging factors; however, it supports my claim of environmental exacerbation due to changes in the ionosphere’s conductance, which are radically inducing eye pathology. The establishment’s centralized narratives clearly downplay nnEMF’s role due to industry interests, a point worth questioning because their incentives are driving chronic eye disease epidemics.

• Evolutionary Context: Haplogroups evolved with environmental niches, H for Europe’s moderate climate, J for cold regions, L0 for high-sun tropics. Migration to mismatched environments (e.g., African Americans in the U.S.) unbalances these adaptations, increasing disease susceptibility as sunlight and melanin levels diverge from optimal.

  Practical Solutions

  Sunlight Exposure: 30–60 minutes of morning UV/infrared light boosts melanin synthesis and mitochondrial function, reducing ROS in all haplogroups. L0 benefits most with higher doses.

  Blue Light Mitigation: Blue-blocking glasses or reduced screen time minimize ETC stress, especially for H and L0.

  Cold Thermogenesis: Enhances mitochondrial gradient for J and U, supporting retinal repair, though less effective for H.

  Melanin Support: Diets rich in tyrosine and copper (e.g., nuts, seafood) enhance POMC/MC1R activity, boosting photoprotection. When one integrates how melanin, iron, and blue light fit into this decentralized thesis, you have to leverage insights from this paper in the Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research

  The paper (https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.008142.pdf) explores their roles in evolutionary adaptation, electromagnetic coherence, and disease. The paper reframes melanin’s evolutionary role from photoprotection to a metal-chelating agent, particularly for iron, facilitating the excretion of heavy metals via epidermal turnover in humans. This aligns with my decentralized thesis by positioning melanin as a dynamic electromagnetic black box regulator in eukaryotes.

  Melanin was an Evolutionary Driver: Dietary shifts in early humans introduced excess iron, driving melanin synthesis in melanocytes to bind and excrete it through desquamation. This explains racial pigmentation differences, with darker skin (phototypes IV-VI) evolving in high-iron environments, which supports the view that melanin acts as a calibrator of environmental inputs.

  Iron Homeostasis: Melanin-bound iron loss through skin turnover depletes systemic iron, increasing the risk of anemia in heavily melanated individuals, as noted in the paper. This challenges the centralized “sunscreen” model, framing melanin as a redox and electromagnetic stabilizer in humans

  Quantum Interface: Melanin’s lattice absorbs all light frequencies and chelates iron without reflection, converting electromagnetic energy into bioelectric signals, consistent with my black body analogy.

  The thesis highlights blue light’s role in shifting iron to Fe²⁺, generating nitric oxide (NO) and localized hypoxia, while the paper adds melanin’s amplifying quantum effect:

  Photoexcitation: Blue light (380–450 nm) excites melanin, triggering a one-electron transfer that produces ROS (superoxide, hydrogen peroxide). Iron-saturated eumelanin enhances this, broadening near-infrared absorption and intensifying oxidative stress, disrupting cellular redox fields. This alters UPE signaling.

  Retinal Impact: In the RPE, melanin binds iron to mitigate ROS, but blue light’s interaction with this complex increases UPE and oxidative damage. This aligns with my mitoception thesis, where UPE signals mitochondrial stress (e.g., via GDF15), contributing to eye diseases.

  ECS Disruption: Blue light’s oxidative assault stresses the ECS (Di Meo et al., 2025), impairing electromagnetic stability and amplifying mitochondrial dysfunction, a key theme in this framework. This would also alter UPEs in the ECS system.

  Blood-Retinal Barrier Disruption by nnEMF:

  Allan Frey’s 1960s DARPA research demonstrated that non-native electromagnetic fields (nnEMF) from technologies (e.g., microwaves, Wi-Fi) can open the blood-retinal barrier by affecting endothelial tight junctions. This increased permeability allows toxins and inflammatory molecules to reach the retina, heightening susceptibility to damage from ALAN and free retinal.

  This mechanism is less emphasized in centralized ophthalmology, which focuses on genetic or aging factors; however, it supports my claim of environmental exacerbation due to changes in the ionosphere’s conductance, which are radically inducing eye pathology. The establishment’s centralized narratives clearly downplay nnEMF’s role due to industry interests, a point worth questioning because their incentives are driving chronic eye disease epidemics.

• Integration of these ideas into the Decentralized Thesis

  Light as Primacy: Melanin’s light absorption and iron chelation convert environmental photons into bioelectric currents, regulating mitochondrial coherence. Blue light, however, disrupts this, shifting iron oxidation states while generating ROS, which my thesis identifies as a root cause of systemic imbalance.

  Electromagnetic Coherence: Melanin and iron form a quantum interface, modulating EMF interactions. Blue light’s interference with this system, via ROS and UPE, destabilizes cellular fields, necessitating ECS-mediated repair.

  Evolutionary Context: Following the Post-GOE period, melanin’s iron-binding capacity evolved to manage oxidative stress resulting from increased oxygen levels, integrating with mitoception and the leptin-melanocortin pathway.

  Regeneration Blockade:

  The visual cycle, which regenerates 11-cis-retinal from all-trans-retinal, depends on sunlight’s UV and IR to stimulate POMC and melanin production. POMC-derived peptides (e.g., α-MSH) enhance melanin’s photoprotective and regenerative roles, while Becker’s bioelectricity research suggests UV/IR-induced DC currents are needed to activate retinal repair (e.g., Müller glia = eye stem cells need NO). Glaucoma is also related to these effects of a lack of UV-IR on eye pressure gradients.

• Indoor living blocks these pathways, as you argue, preventing regeneration. The atrophy of mitochondria, our “hydrogen heat engines”, due to lack of seasonal temperature variation (e.g., cold thermogenesis) further impairs energy for repair, aligning with Carnot’s efficiency principle: greater temperature gradients enhance engine performance.

  Tech Addiction and Neurochemical Disruption

  My “zombie” analogy reflects how screen addiction, driven by blue light’s temporary dopamine boost, disrupts melatonin and GABA signaling (slide below). This circadian misalignment, compounded by indoor confinement, reduces retinal health and systemic resilience.

  Casinos and tech companies exploit this, designing blue-rich environments to sustain engagement, given dopamine’s role in the brain as a reward.

• Mitochondrial Failure and Thermodynamic Loss

  Mitochondria in retinal cells, with high oxygen demand, are vulnerable to blue light-induced ROS, as noted in recent studies on AMD. My Carnot efficiency argument suggests that hotter engines (mitochondria) run more efficiently, which implies that cold thermogenesis boosts mitochondrial function by increasing the temperature gradient, thereby countering atrophy from thermostat-controlled indoor life.

  This thermodynamic perspective is unconventional in medicine but aligns with Becker’s bioelectric findings and my call to reconnect with nature’s frequencies.

The Centralized narrative often attributes rising eye disease prevalence to aging, genetics, and lifestyle factors like diabetes, overlooking environmental drivers like ALAN, nnEMF, and sunlight deficiency. The destruction of heme, along with all our other photoreceptors, explains fully why modern chronic disease epidemics are present.

The synergy of melanin, iron, and blue light defies reductive biochemical models, embodying a Camus-esque revolt. This thesis empowers individuals to reclaim coherence by aligning with natural light and EMF, countering the technocracy’s disruptive influence. Melanin’s iron-chelating role is amplified by the oxidative effects of blue light, allowing for a perfect integration into this decentralized thesis as a quantum interface regulating electromagnetic coherence. Evolving post-GOE, it supports mitoception via UPE and GDF15, with blue light disrupting this balance in diseases such as AMD and mental health disorders. Restoring natural light and minimizing disruptors restores this system, aligning with my vision of biological agency.

HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?

F1-ATPase explains how this all happened. Here are the basics explaining how uncoupled haplotypes evolved due to variable EMFs as latitude and longitude changed: F1-ATPase is a rotary molecular motor within mitochondria that synthesizes ATP by harnessing the proton motive force across the mitochondrial membrane. Protons flow through the enzyme’s F0 subunit, driving the F1 subunit’s rotation (the “spin rate”) to catalyze ATP production from ADP and inorganic phosphate.

The cited paper in Figure 1 above models F1-ATPase’s dynamics, showing it’s highly reversible: it can synthesize ATP when rotating forward (hydrolysis-driven) or hydrolyze ATP when forced backward. However, under high external torque, caused by stressors such as oxidative damage due to excessive oxygen, insufficient sunlight, or a lack of melanin resulting from environmental changes, a metabolic imbalance occurs. This enzyme undergoes “mechanical slip,” where rotation occurs without effective ATP production, resulting in the dissipation of energy as heat. This is precisely how uncoupled haplotypes were innovated as humans left their tropical habitats to conquer colder climates.

The “mechanical slip” is a state in which the enzyme rotates without effectively producing ATP, instead dissipating energy as heat. This inefficiency, noted in the paper as reducing free energy transduction by 40–80% below optimal, reflects a breakdown in chemomechanical coupling under nnEMF light stress. Light stress leads to an increase in deuterium concentration, causing a mechanical shift in the ATPase. LIGHT > FOOD

Environmental Stressors and Torque on F1-ATPase

As humans migrated out of the tropics (~200,000 years ago), they encountered varying EMFs, latitudes, and longitudes, altering sunlight exposure, oxygen levels, and melanin production. These changes acted as external torques on F1-ATPase:

Sunlight Reduction: Tropical regions receive abundant UV and infrared light, which optimizes mitochondrial function through photobiomodulation (e.g., enhancing cytochrome c oxidase activity). At higher latitudes, reduced sunlight, especially UV, disrupted this, lowering ATP efficiency and increasing ROS, a stressor that torques F1-ATPase.

Oxygen Variability: Colder climates often have higher oxygen partial pressures, which enhances ROS production during OxPhos. Excessive oxygen, as a stressor, should force F1-ATPase into reverse or slip modes, dissipating energy.

Melanin Decline: In the tropics, high melanin levels protected against UV and stabilized redox balance, supporting F1-ATPase efficiency. As humans moved to northern latitudes with less UV, melanin production decreased (e.g., lighter skin evolved), reducing antioxidant capacity and exacerbating oxidative stress, further torquing the enzyme to slip more.

Sleep Mechanics and eye diseases: GDF15 signals mitochondrial stress (mitoception), which causes a rise with electron surplus, prompting sleep as a mitoceptive response. Melanin’s UPE release, shared with GDF15, reinforces this photonic feedback loop in humans. My thesis posits that cellular health depends on “field stability” in tissues. An electron surplus disrupts this, and sleep is driven by UPEs and melanin’s photonic feedback, restoring it. Melanin’s UPE emission, tied to ROS and iron, signals this surplus, linking this signal to mitoception. The GOE enabled OxPhos and UPEs to manifest, thereby driving the electromagnetic origins of sleep. Leptin’s 220 nm absorption, tied to endogenous light transformation, evolved to regulate this surplus, integrating with the leptin-melanocortin pathway. Red light’s role in mito-dR supports my light-centric view, countering the disruptive effects of blue light (e.g., ROS from melanin-iron complexes). This aligns with the retina’s glycolysis adaptation under photonic stress. (seen below)

This environmental shift created a metabolic imbalance, where the spin rate of F1-ATPase struggled to match energy demands, leading to mechanical slip and heat dissipation rather than ATP synthesis.

The innovation of uncoupled haplotypes involved mtDNA mutations affecting F1-ATPase or UCP expression:

Mutation Selection: Random mtDNA deletions or point mutations, as modeled in the cited paper, should disrupt F1-ATPase’s coupling efficiency, favoring slip under torque. Over generations, these variants were selected in cold climates where heat generation was prioritized over ATP maximization.

UCP Upregulation: UCPs (e.g., UCP1 in brown fat) evolved to uncouple OxPhos, dissipating PMF as heat. The torque-induced slip phenotype prefigured this out, with natural selection amplifying UCP expression in uncoupled haplotypes. Natural selection rendered melatonin’s function less important for overall energy balance and expanded the leptin-melanocortin pathway because it was more accurate. Today, melatonin production in the mtDNA is the only remnant of its GOE importance.

Geographic Divergence: Haplogroups (e.g., H in Europe, M in Asia) reflect these adaptations, with northern populations exhibiting higher uncoupling efficiency (e.g., via UCP1 polymorphisms) to counteract low sunlight and cold temperatures. The paradox of haplotype vulnerability, a strength in one environment that becomes a weakness in another, mirrors a dead man walking who seeks Bitcoin. My decentralized approach rebels against the technocracy’s indoor, blue-light-dominated paradigm, advocating light and coherence to reclaim retinal health. This aligns with Sartre’s concept of freedom: individuals can choose to align their environment to mitigate haplotype-specific risks.

SUMMARY

Mitochondrial haplogroups (H, J, L0) influence metabolic efficiency, melanin production, and photoreceptor health, modulating blue light vulnerability. H and L0 face higher risks due to oxidative stress and melanin mismatch in indoor settings, while J’s thermogenic resilience offers protection.

The technocracy’s disruption of sunlight and temperature gradients exacerbates this, driving diseases like cataracts and AMD. Restoring natural light and thermogenesis can mitigate these effects, empowering haplotype-specific resilience.

I challenge this narrative by linking these to industrial and technological agendas (e.g., DARPA’s nnEMF research, tech addiction), suggesting a deliberate blinding and regeneration suppression. While evidence supports ALAN’s role in AMD and nnEMF’s barrier effects, the regeneration claims (e.g., UV/IR, Becker’s work) are less mainstream, though emerging research on melanin’s protective role and optogenetic repair lends credence to explaining the modern disease epidemics linked to the eye.

Eye diseases are more common today due to chronic exposure to ALAN and nnEMF, which damage the retina and open the blood-retinal barrier, combined with the loss of sunlight’s UV and IR, which halt regeneration via POMC, melanin, and bioelectric pathways. Mitochondrial atrophy from indoor life further compounds this, as per Carnot’s efficiency principle. Reconnecting with nature, through sunlight and cold thermogenesis, will restore these processes, countering the degenerative effects of artificial frequencies and tech addiction.

Sleep in humans is triggered by an electron surplus, creating charge density, and acts as a cellular sweep to restore electromagnetic coherence, which is signaled by adenosine and modulated by UCP4, red light, and sesB. This aligns with my decentralized thesis, connecting to melanin’s UPE, mitoception’s GDF15, and the primacy of light in most diseases.

CITES

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1509434/full

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/blinding-us-while-stopping-our-regeneration-jack-kruse-6jsze

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9339908/

The Hidden Risks of LASIK Surgery: How Light, the Opsin System, and Central Retinal Pathways Shape Your Mind, Mood, and Destiny

LASIK SURGERY BLOWS OUT THE INSIDER WORLD OF YOUR MIND.

I strongly recommend you watch the first ten seconds of the video above………..then proceed.

Introduction: A Decentralized Thesis on Light-Driven Biology
Today, nearly everything such as the excimer lasers used in LASIK surgery is manufactured in China. But courage? That’s made in your mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), a biological forge that transforms light into the fuel of life. My decentralized medical thesis, rooted in light-driven biology, quantum coherence, and circadian synchronization, reveals how sunlight shapes our blood, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and frontal lobes to foster courage, a trait closely tied to executive functions such as decision-making and fear regulation. But what happens when a surgeon’s laser, an artificial sun, disrupts this delicate dance of light in your eye? The consequences ripple far beyond vision correction, impacting your mood, pain, and even the risk of suicide, as the tragic outcomes of LASIK patients reveal. Let’s explore why.

The Quantum Dance of Light in Your Eye: More Than a Camera
The cornea isn’t just a lens; it’s a quantum gateway where light shapes your perception of the outside world by altering the biology inside your eye. Neuropsin, a UV-A light detector, is located in the cornea, while melanopsin, a key regulator of the circadian rhythm, lies just behind it in the retina. These opsins, along with the central retinal pathways, form a semiconducting circuit that processes light to regulate your body’s master clock, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). This clock doesn’t just tell time; it orchestrates the melatonin, dopamine, and proopiomelanocortin (POMC) systems, which break down into hormones such as β-endorphin, ACTH, and α-MSH. These chemicals govern mood, pain, energy, and even your drive to thrive.

Sunlight, with its full spectrum of UV-A, IR-A, and NIR wavelengths, is Nature’s recipe for this system. It regenerates photoreceptors, stabilizes mitochondrial function, and keeps your circadian rhythm in sync. However, an excimer laser, used in LASIK to reshape the cornea, emits monochromatic ultraviolet light (typically 193 nm). It’s not the sun. It lacks the broad spectrum needed to maintain the quantum coherence of your eye’s signaling pathways. Worse, surgeons often don’t even know neuropsin and melanopsin are there, right in the path of their laser.

The Fallout of LASIK: Disrupting the Opsin and POMC Systems
When a laser cuts into the cornea, it doesn’t just alter refraction; it disrupts the light alphabet your eye uses to communicate with your brain. Here’s how:

Opsin System Damage: Neuropsin and melanopsin are photoreceptors sensitive to UV-A and blue light (around 380-484 nm). LASIK’s laser can damage these opsins, impairing their ability to detect natural light cues. This disrupts the SCN’s rhythm, reducing melatonin production, a hormone rebuilt by daytime UV-A light. Low melatonin levels result in poor sleep, increased oxidative stress, and a cascade of hormonal imbalances. Dopamine, which relies on light-driven signals, also drops, leading to apathy, depression, and a dulled sense of motivation.

POMC System Dysregulation: POMC, a 241-amino-acid precursor, is cleaved into hormones such as β-endorphin (which mediates pain relief and mood regulation), α-MSH (involved in melanin production and neuroprotection), and ACTH (involved in the stress response). These hormones are light-dependent and are synthesized in the retina and pituitary via the central retinal pathways. LASIK’s disruption of melanopsin signaling reduces POMC cleavage, lowering β-endorphin levels (linked to pain and depression) and α-MSH (which protects against ischemia and reperfusion injury). As my slide show, this can lead to “CLIP = etiology of diabetes,” where POMC dysregulation contributes to metabolic chaos.

Central Retinal Pathways and Mitochondrial Chaos: The central retinal pathways, a semiconducting circuit, rely on mitochondrial health to process light signals. Mitochondria in retinal pigment epithelial cells (RPE) utilize UV-A and IR-A to regenerate photoreceptors and maintain DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) levels, which are crucial for retinal health. LASIK’s artificial light introduces “noise” (per Shannon’s information theory), spiking reactive oxygen species (ROS), and damaging mtDNA. This disrupts ATP production, impairing the retina’s ability to signal the brain, which can manifest as nighttime halos, accommodation defects, and even retinal degenerative diseases.

The Tragic Outcomes: Mood, Depression, Pain, and Suicide
The Daily Mail article from May 2025 highlights an alarming trend: LASIK patients, including a police officer, have taken their own lives post-surgery. Why? The answer lies in the interconnected photonic systems LASIK disrupts in the central retinal pathways and the brain:

Mood and Depression: Reduced melatonin and dopamine from melanopsin dysfunction lead to poor sleep and low motivation. Dopamine, tied to reward and executive function, is critical for courage, a frontal lobe specialty. When dopamine levels decline, apathy sets in, widening the Dunning-Kruger effect: patients become less aware of their own decline, accepting superficial trends without questioning them.

Pain: β-endorphin, a POMC derivative, is a natural analgesic. Its reduction post-LASIK increases pain sensitivity, compounding emotional distress. Chronic pain, paired with poor sleep, is a known risk factor for depression and suicidal ideation.

Suicide Risk: The retina and pituitary, both downstream of the SCN, regulate hormones like ACTH and α-MSH. When LASIK disrupts this light-driven axis, the pituitary struggles, leading to fatigue, hormonal imbalances, and a sense of disconnection, for some, this culminates in a profound loss of hope, tragically evident in the suicides reported.

Man-Made Light vs. The Sun: A Losing Battle

An excimer laser in the hands of an eye doctor is like giving a serial killer a universal hotel room key. It’s a tool of precision, but it’s blind to the quantum signaling pathways it disrupts. The sun, with its full spectrum, regenerates photoreceptors and supports mitochondrial health, as Kruse’s slides emphasize: “UV-A and IR-A regenerate all photoreceptors.” AM light, rich in UV-A and IR-A, rebuilds melatonin and dopamine, tuning your SCN to Nature’s rhythm. LASIK’s laser, however, is a monochromatic 193 nm beam, far from the sun’s 200-800 nm biophotonic symphony. It destroys photoreceptors by freeing vitamin A, contributing to conditions like AMD (age-related macular degeneration), which is now “explosive.” Getting Lasik surgery is akin to speeding up the death of chronic diseases in a few months from blue light because the acute intensity of the laser mimics decades of light abuse.

The Courage to Choose Nature Over Vanity
Courage, rooted in mtDNA’s energy transformation, is the fuel that enables us to thrive. LASIK, often driven by vanity, robs you of this fuel by altering the light your eye clock receives. It’s a gamble with your mind, not just your vision. The centralized medical system, focused on the cornea’s “camera” function, ignores the eye’s role as a circadian metronome. This superficial approach, planning LASIK at its most “commercial” level, creates an alien sun that corrupts your natural thoughts, as I wrote in 2017: “Light, alien man-made light, let in by a laser beam is a modern theme leading to man’s inability to communicate with man.”

A Call to Action: Let the Sun Rewire You
You’re not broken; you’re biologically starved for sunlight. The cornea’s shape is molded by the light you feed it, a life in the shadows of artificial blue light (from screens, LEDs) leads to misshapen corneas and blurred vision. LASIK might seem like a quick fix, but it’s a Faustian bargain. Instead, embrace Nature’s decentralized thesis: step outside, let UV-A and IR-A regenerate your photoreceptors, and retune your photoreceptors in front of your SCN that project to your frontal lobes.

Avoid the massive photoelectric scar that a laser in your eye can leave in your frontal lobes, as the picture below shows. Sunrise, with its red light, meets the water in your eyes to alter magnetic free radicals in mitochondria, resetting your internal clock. Small, daily actions such as 10 minutes of morning sunlight improve you by 1% a day, as I wrote earlier.

LASIK LIGHT IS NOT EQUIVALENT TO SUNLIGHT AND YOUR EYE IS BUILT FOR SUNLIGHT

The human eye was designed by Mother Nature to capture the quality and character of sunlight at the microscopic level. Why? The sun’s power is distributed over a vast area on the macroscopic level. This is precisely the opposite of what the refractive surgeon’s laser light is. He is using light that your mtDNA makes at the nanoscopic level, and this can create massive electrical scars distal to its application.

The line width of the surgeon’s laser light is very narrow compared to the sun. Here is what I mean by that. Imagine you have a device that measures the wavelength of incoming light. Then if you were to measure the wavelength of the sun the an actual device would say that it is not a single number but the wavelength is in a range between X and Y. While this would also be true if you measure the wavelength of a laser, the difference between Y and X would be very very small compared to that of the sun.

Hence, narrow line width.

The surgeon’s laser uses light that is coherent, meaning it has = specific frequency and power.

The light coming out a laser will be of same wavelength and of same phase.

Both of these are essential for most quantum experiments and precision cutting in eye surgery. But that precision comes with significant time risk because centralized medicine has no earthly idea about the eye, SCN, brain, and photo-bioelectric blueprint. It is not taught in medical school or residency. Their laser light is highly powered and significantly more focused, capable of causing electrical damage. Most eye lasers use a lens and focus the power to a small point. This allows for greater control over the use of power. This clinical situation should remind you of the warnings I gave Scott Zimmerman and Sabine Hazan in the two podcasts I did with Dr. Alexis Cowan. I was trying to draw their attention to Harold Morowitz’s principle, the flow of energy through a system acts to organize that system via AMO principles in cells. This was time-stamped into many of Mae Wan Ho’s papers, but I doubt any eye surgeon has read any of them. His ideas help forge my decentralized framework in exploring how light, as the force carrier of the electromagnetic force, drives biological organization at the nanoscale. It also explains how laser light applied to our surfaces mimics a nuclear blast distally in the brain.

IMPLICATIONS OF MISSING THE BASIC PHYSICS OF LIGHT AT THE EYE DOCTOR?

RAPID DEATH BECOMES A REAL POSSIBILITY

The application of the laser in the anterior chamber causes a massive fireball on the cornea, and then the shockwave hits the rest of the eye. As the shock continues along the central retinal pathways, the heat blast hits the brain’s circuitry and causes massive complete dehydration and destruction of the IMM of trillions of mitochondria. It mimics what happens to LA with a surface-level nuclear explosion.

HYPERBOLE, OR DO I UNDERSTAND PHYSICS OF LIGHT BETTER THAN THEY DO?

Centralized Biology Centralized biology’s focus is on the procedural ability to reshape the cornea. They fail to realize the eye is designed as a light antenna for MACROSCOPIC defocused light with a visible spectrum. It is not intended for laser light that mtDNA and RBCs can make. Their macroscopic focus overlooks the nanoscale potency of laser light to transform the tissues distal to the laser rapidly. This rapid death effect is driven by the electromagnetic force’s concentration at small scales, which fully aligns with Morowitz’s principle of energy-driven organization. Macroscopic blue light and non-native electromagnetic fields (nnEMF) from technology disrupt these processes on a more chronic basis by oxidizing heme proteins (e.g., Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺), destroying Fe-S couples in the IMM and its ability to make DDW water, while generating ROS, and altering proton tunneling in Z-Z pathways, injuring distal tissues contributing to chronic diseases (e.g., neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes).

Getting LASIK surgery is speeding up the process in 13 minutes, and this is why you can die in days, weeks, and months. It is akin to plugging in your 1920 wired home into one of China’s new nuclear power plants and thinking you’re safe. It is just like a nuclear blast to the brain.

The laws of physics determine this effect, not Uncle Jack’s opinion.

The inverse square law states that the intensity of light decreases with the square of the distance from the source: where I is intensity and r is distance.

An eye laser and the sun are fundamentally different, like an arc welder using his torch in seawater versus forging steel in a controlled furnace. In arc welding, the welder meticulously controls voltage (typically 20–40 V), amperage (50–300 A), and shielding gas (e.g., argon) to maintain a stable arc and produce a clean weld. Any deviation, wrong settings, a contaminated electrode, or moisture in the environment disrupts the arc, leading to defects like oxidation, porosity, or cracks that weaken the weld.

The welder relies on real-time feedback, such as the arc’s light and sound, to adjust parameters and ensure precision. Similarly, the sun provides a broad-spectrum, biologically tuned light (0.89–3.94 eV) that gently shapes the eye’s quantum signaling pathways, supporting opsins like neuropsin and melanopsin with coherent, low-energy photons. In contrast, a LASIK excimer laser (193 nm, 6.41 eV) is akin to arc welding in seawater, an unstable and chaotic environment.

The inverse square law (above) shows that light intensity increases dramatically as distance as (r )shrinks. At nanoscale (10⁻⁹ m), atto (10⁻¹⁸ m), and femto (10⁻¹⁵ s) scales, light’s near-field effects dominate, and its interaction with matter becomes more particle-like (photons). This amplifies the energy density. LASIK lasers create light with 6.41 eV photon energy. The chart below show you how powerful that number really is as scale shrinks.

The laser delivers high-energy photons at the nanoscale, creating massive energy fluctuations in the cornea and beyond, with no biological feedback to guide its impact. This disrupts the eye’s delicate photoreceptors and central retinal pathways, spiking reactive oxygen species (ROS) and damaging mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), much like how seawater would corrode a weld. The downstream effects, altered dopamine, melatonin, and POMC signaling, can lead to mood disorders, chronic pain, and even suicide, as seen in LASIK patients. The sun heals with precision; a laser in the eye burns with reckless abandon.

The Nature Communications study (2015) showed us that cristae alignment is tightly light-regulated in its relation to OPA1. This photonic linkage determines mitochondrial respiratory efficiency in the eye, and it carries implications for health and disease. When you add laser light to this system, you demolish cristae alignment in nanoseconds.

THE EVOLUTIONARY LESSON I HAVE TAUGHT YOU: REMINDER

Picture your mitochondria as ancient forges, stoked by the fiery dawn of the Great Oxygenation Event (GOE) 2.4 billion years ago, when oxygen and UV light quantized metabolism into a celestial rhythm. The TCA and urea cycles are like a cosmic metronome, keeping time across eons. At the heart of this forge stand two photo-bioelectric titans: the Vitamin D receptor (VDR) and cytochrome c oxidase (CCO). Sunlight, a celestial painter, deftly brushes UV, IRA, and NIR across your inner mitochondrial membrane, activating VDR through sulfated Vitamin D3, a molecule your skin crafts in UV’s radiant embrace. VDR, a vigilant sentinel, restrains mitochondrial respiration, thereby slashing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), as studies reveal that silencing VDR unleashes a ROS tempest. CCO, our light-hungry alchemist, absorbs these wavelengths, fine-tuning electron transport to keep mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as stable as a galactic orbit. Together, they echo the GOE’s legacy, utilizing the sun’s visible light spectrum to mitigate environmental chaos and shield cells from entropy’s relentless tide, a decentralized masterpiece that centralized biochemistry cannot comprehend.

AM sunlight acts as a photonic trigger, modulating the light cone’s optical density of the chambers of the eye via TCA-driven water production and UPE coherence. This added a diurnal photonic rhythm to life in the GOE and is critical in my thesis. Enhancing AM light exposure (e.g., UV-mimicking therapies) could amplify TCA/urea benefits, complementing DDW and PBM to extend life and improve sleep. Over 3.8 billion years, sunrise’s role in TCA/urea activation might have evolved with sleep to optimize energy and repair, with thanatotranscriptomic genes adapting to this cycle. Lasik destroys that rapidly and this activates thanatotranscriptomic genes aberrently. Normally these genes are only turned on by environmental chaos. LASIK defines light chaos for the eye.

How does this system work and fit together? AM sunrise shifts daytime metabolism from glucose (RQ ~1) to TCA/urea cycle dominance. This normally extends life by reducing oxidative stress and improving sleep by optimizing mitochondrial repair. This integrates with melatonin’s CI inhibition, DEC2 regulation in cells. This is the normal stoichiometry life used in the first two domains of life to order light and dark by mandating sleep occur to fix the damage of the day on the IMM and inside the cell. The thanatotranscriptomic genes’ evolved in the first two domains of life to be chaos managers of light stress. 3.8 – 1 billion years ago melatonin was the most important part of this mechanism. These ideas have enriched my photo-bioelectric light cone model because it adds the key diurnal photonic-vibrational dynamic that explains why the eye and brain worked in unison during evolution to innovate sleep. It was done to handle evolving light and oxygen stress life experienced for long time scales in the GOE.

My comprehension of visualizing the evidence of the precision stoichiometry built into the photo-bioelectric circuitry of human systems allows me to understand how lasik kills rapidly. Placing a laser in front of this delicate GOE masterpiece of engineering produces massive voltage and amperage variations in SECONDS in the eye and everything connected to it distally. It is like a nuclear explosion in the anterior chamber, and the sound blast destroys the city of circuits distally connected to it in the brain. This is why the first ten seconds of the video above are critical. The video is not hyperbole when a refractive surgeon uses lasers on your anterior eye.

This example I am giving you also fully explains why the centralized scientific communities fail to recognize how LASIK can KILL like a nuclear bomb does. They do not understand that light gets more potent as the scale shrinks. They cannot explain why people can die rapidly by their own hand due to perception change caused by alteration of the AMO arrangement in your eyes from laser light.

LASIK: Is a Prescription for Ruin with a Nuclear Fallout

In a healthcare system warped by profit-driven incentives, patients are lured by voices that dismiss the sun’s healing power, prescribing instead a cascade of interventions that drain wallets and slash lifespans, misdiagnoses, costing the U.S. billions annually.

Centralized ophthalmology has never put the story of light and the eye together. Neuropsin, melanopsin, and melatonin are the initial protection schemes for the eye. The next guardian is the Vitamin D receptor (VDR), placed in what seems like an unusual spot on the IMM. This is nature’s mitochondrial guardian activated by the visible spectrum in sunlight. When doctors introduce lasers into this system, they are adding nuclear-level light stress to the eye’s photobiological circuits with a massive effect. They completely overlook the VDR inactivation step, and this is why rapid disease creation becomes more probable than not. They have unleashed massive, uncontrolled cataplerosis at the Krebs cycle, driving mtDNA damage, rampant biosynthesis, and systemic decline.

This isn’t just a financial blunder by the patient, it’s a devastating subtraction from your longevity bank account, as the absence of sunlight’s protective brake is over come by the laser light to (via VDR and sulfated Vitamin D) accelerates diseases that centralized medicine fails to diagnose or treat, costing you decades of healthspan in a world where laser and blue light are used indiscriminately by “light experts” who are medical arsonists.

Laser damage and blue light toxicity can be explained by first-principles thinking, and this is a poignant critique. It aligns seamlessly with my photobioelectric thesis. The stoichiometry of mtDNA-driven processes, integrating light, water, and magnetism through the surfaces of the skin, eyes, and brain. Visible low-powered sunlight creates a precise “arc weld” for health, once the light is processed and transformed by our blood, mtDNA, and DNA to sculpt our tissues.

Carefully look AT THE ELECTRON VOLTAGE OF BOTH LIGHTS ABOVE

Are they the same?

6.41 eV does not equal 0.89 – 3.94 eV, does it?

Remember that the 3.94 eV is at the macroscopic level. Is the 6.41 eV delivered the same way? Nope. It is at the nanoscale. What happens to light at the nano, atto, and femtoscales?

What does the physics of the inverse square law say about light as scale shrinks? What has my thesis said about the power of ultraweak UPEs? Calling them “weak” is a failure in understanding how light power changes as scale varies.

No, it’s not. Sunlight’s macroscopic delivery supports broad biological harmony, while the LASIK laser’s nanoscale delivery is a localized, high-energy intervention. This difference in scale fundamentally alters how the light interacts with biological systems, especially at the quantum level.

The mitochondrial weld requires precise “settings” (light, DDW, oxygen). The surgeon’s laser destroys this stiociometry in seconds in the eye. This creates a tsunami of destruction distally in the brain. Low-powered blue light taken out of its sister colors causes blue light toxicity because of the photonic precision with which the system was designed. It is akin to a welder using the wrong electrode, causing defects (altered consciousness, mental disease) in the weld seam (health). When this balance is disrupted by modern stressors like an excimer laser, that type of light becomes capable of altering consciousness, impairing cognitive clarity, creating acute massive emotional changes, and the misunderstanding of how light changes its power as scale, blinds researchers to the quantum underpinnings of the damage this iatrogenic procedure can cause.

CLOCKS WORK BY LIGHT AND TEMPERATURE

I bet you did not know temperature effects also get stronger as the scale decreases. 6.41 eV photonic power = 150 degrees C. Recall that circadian biology operate by light and dark and temperature variations. That lesson goes all the way back to the Cold Thermogenesis 4-6 blogs. Read them again.

Temperature at Macroscopic Scales:

At larger scales (e.g., the whole anterior chamber, ~250 µL of aqueous humor), temperature is relatively stable due to thermal diffusion and convection. The cornea’s baseline temperature is ~34°C (slightly cooler than body temperature, 37°C, due to exposure), and the aqueous humor helps maintain thermal homeostasis.

• Sunlight’s diffuse exposure (0.89–3.94 eV) causes negligible temperature changes in the eye, as its energy is distributed over a large area and absorbed gradually by photoreceptors and chromophores.Temperature at Nanoscale: Localized Spikes:

  At the nanoscale, where the LASIK laser interacts with the cornea, temperature behaves differently due to the confinement of energy and limited thermal diffusion:

  Energy Confinement: The LASIK laser delivers 1.256 mJ per pulse (as calculated earlier) over a tiny area (~0.00785 cm²) and volume (1.9625 × 10⁻⁷ cm³). This concentrated energy causes a rapid, localized temperature spike at the ablation site, estimated to be 100–150°C for a duration of nanoseconds (see previous answer).

  Reduced Thermal Diffusion: At nanoscale distances and femtosecond-to-nanosecond timescales, heat dissipation is hindered. The thermal diffusion length ( L ) is given by:

• 
• 
• • Biological Implications in the Anterior Chamber: WITH SUNLIGHTThe anterior chamber is a small, enclosed space (~3 mm deep, 12 mm diameter). A localized temperature spike of 100–150°C at the cornea-laser interface, even for a brief duration of nanoseconds, can create a shockwave and microcavitation in the aqueous humor, as the rapid vaporization of tissue forms a plasma plume. This can mechanically stress nearby structures, such as the iris and lens. The same effects can occur during cataract surgery when a laser is used.

    The SCN, located posterior to the anterior chamber, isn’t directly heated but is affected by the disruption of light signaling. The temperature spike damages neuropsin in the cornea, impairing UV-A detection and desynchronizing the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). This cascades to the leptin-melanocortin pathways (reduced POMC cleavage, lower β-endorphin, and α-MSH) and the habenular nucleus (dopamine suppression, increased depression risk).

  Temperature and Circadian Biology: Scale Effects of LASER LIGHT

  Macroscopic Temperature: The SCN responds to gradual temperature changes (e.g., diurnal cycles of 1–2°C) to entrain circadian rhythms. A stable temperature in the anterior chamber supports this process by maintaining the flow of aqueous humor and promoting corneal metabolism.

  Nanoscale Temperature Spikes: The LASIK laser’s 100–150°C spike, though brief, disrupts the anterior chamber’s homeostasis massively. It damages all the photoreceptors anterior to the SCN and the SCN itself and spikes ROS in corneal mitochondria, sending aberrant light signals to the SCN. This desynchronization affects the leptin-melanocortin system (metabolic chaos, pain) and habenular nucleus (mood disorders), aligning with the LASIK suicide outcomes I’ve highlighted in this blog. Decentralized medicine understands what it cannot. So, when you sign their consent form for lasik or cataract surgery, are you really informed of the real risks?

  HOW IS SEE LASIK FROM THE CIRCADIAN PERSPECTIVE:

  Watch 5:35 to 8:00 HYPERLINK

  This theoretical temperature scale below underscores the disruptive potential of the LASIK laser’s high-energy photons on the cornea’s quantum signaling pathways, as your thesis highlights. It’s a stark contrast to sunlight’s biologically tuned interaction

• STILL THINK COMPARING LASIK TO A NUCLEAR BLAST IS HYPERBOLE?I think it is the best descriptor I can imagine.

SUMMARY

See the World as It Could Be when light and temperature from light are being delivered at a small scale, not as it should be, to understand disease.

The miracle of your mind is seeing the world as it isn’t, imagining possibilities beyond the present. But LASIK traps you in a RAPID, destructive cycle of repetitive, dopamine-starved thinking, blocking untapped potential. It can unravel your life in a matter of months.

Think of your body as a city that runs on sunlight, with tiny light sparks (UPEs) keeping everything in sync, like a conductor for an orchestra. Sunlight sets your body’s clock by hitting special proteins in your eyes (like neuropsin, melanopsin, CCO, and water) that love the combo of UV, blue light, and IR light found in the sun, telling your cells when to burn fat (beta-oxidation) and make energy. Tiny helpers in your cells, IMM, called NAD+ and NADH, catch sunlight’s energy and glow a bit, passing it to other proteins (flavins) to keep your energy factory (mitochondria) humming. This system received a significant boost billions of years ago (GOE) when Earth’s atmosphere became more oxygen-rich, allowing cells to utilize light and oxygen to produce these sparks and specialized water for enhanced cooperation.

Vitamin D, made from sunlight in your skin, also plays a role. It’s built without nitrogen (unlike most proteins), so it can catch the right kind of sunlight (UVB) without messing up to act as a brake. It is a protection system to protect the ATPase from short-circuiting. The strip of blue glow inside the sun’s small sliver of light helps your body’s clock, too. But modern life, with screen light and Wi-Fi, throws this off; it’s like a loud noise drowning out the conductor, making your cells confused and sick. An excimer laser is a nuclear explosion in this system. There is no protection from this blast of light.

The decentralized dance of light, opsins, and mtDNA is your path to courage, clarity, and resilience. So, do you have the courage to avoid modern refractive surgery and let the sun heal you safely? Share this truth: post a sunrise selfie with #SolarRewire, challenge friends to 10 minutes daily in Nature, and spread the message that sunlight is life’s conductor. Your journey to a vibrant, electrified self starts now. #NatureIsTheCure, not refractive surgery.

CITES

1. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14741503/lasik-eye-surgery-patients-police-officer-suicide-ryan-kingerski.html

2. The Laws of Physics tied to QFT

No one asked me about why I have turned so negative so I thought after hear the Q&A and then you can come here and read this.  In 5 days, the WHO takes control of health policy in Australia, UK, Canada, the US & dozens of other nations. Your leaders signed this document and you weren’t told about it.  Medical tyranny is why RFK JR and Makary have been working against “We The People.” I believe this is why MAHA has been made impotent.

You didn’t vote for this by design. Your sovereignty might soon be handed to unelected bureaucrats in Geneva even though DJT said he was pulling out of the WHO. Here’s what you must know for your CEO business plan.  On Saturday, July 19th, 2025 amendments to the WHO’s International Health Regulations (IHR) become binding international law. They give the WHO legal authority to influence lockdowns, travel, medical mandates & digital health IDs across major Western nations.

Under these amendments:

• The WHO can declare a health emergency in your country

• “Human rights” protections are deleted

• New enforcement bodies will comply with WHO

• Digital health documents = global digital ID

This is the globalists’ endgame who are controlling the banks.

The U.S. withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) was initiated by President Trump, who signed an executive order on January 20, 2025.  This treaty has to be ratified by the Senate,  and given that they have caved on Epstein and on recalling the Jabs,  one would be wise to realize they will cave on this since no actions have been taken by the USA to date.

In accordance with the WHO Constitution and the IHR (2005), this amendment entered into force for all States Parties on 11 July 2016.  The USA and Israel just voted no to these amendments as the tweet below shows but I have found no corraboration to this journalist report.

Several countries expressed reservations or did not support the WHO International Health Regulations (IHRs) during the recent discussions. Iran and Paraguay voiced concerns and reserved their support until after further negotiations on the Pandemic Agreement. Slovakia demanded a vote on the amendments, indicating strong reservations. Costa Rica disassociated itself from extending the work on the treaty, citing negative impacts on vaccination efforts and public confidence. The vote above shows they all caved.

​WHAT HAPPENED?

​The IHR amendments were adopted by consensus at the Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly on June 1, 2024, meaning no formal vote with recorded objections or abstentions was taken during the final adoption. Consensus implies that no country formally opposed the amendments at the time of adoption, though some countries could have expressed reservations or chosen not to engage actively in the process.  I named those above.

 

Adoption by Consensus: The amendments to the IHR were adopted without a formal vote, as is common in WHO proceedings when consensus is reached. This makes it challenging to identify specific countries that “did not vote for” the amendments, as no dissenting votes were officially recorded.

U.S. and Argentina Withdrawal from WHO: The United States and Argentina have announced their withdrawal from the WHO, which MAY indicate their non-support for WHO initiatives, including the IHR amendments. The U.S. withdrawal was formalized by an executive order on January 20, 2025, and Argentina announced its withdrawal on February 5, 2025. As such, these countries are unlikely to have supported or actively participated in the adoption of the IHR amendments.

No Specific List of Non-Supporters: Unlike the WHO Pandemic Agreement, which had a recorded vote with 124 in favor, 0 objections, and 11 abstentions, the IHR amendments were adopted by consensus without a detailed breakdown of positions. No official document in the provided sources lists specific countries that abstained or opposed the IHR amendments

​

WHY CITADELS MATTER NOW? 

The WHO can declare a global emergency, even if there’s no outbreak in your country. That means unelected officials in Geneva could trigger lockdowns, jab campaigns, or border closures in your city based on events somewhere else.  The most alarming change you should be aware of today? They deleted the requirement that health measures respect your dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms. Those exact words, have been scrubbed completely from their documents. They have been replaced with vague “equity” language that paves the way for coercion & censorship.

What you need to know is that there is no such thing as binding international law. Any attorney will tell you that but the elites in power can enforce this and force you to hire attorneys and bleed you dry on this topic of and this is their goal.  This will make sure you cannot allocate money to Bitcoin before countries begin buying.  This will keep you poor and subject to their rules in your country.  The US is the one country on this list who can give its voters the power to avoid this by making Bitcoin part of the UST market and by pulling the USA out of the WHO Treaty in January of 2026.  This is predicated on Trump and his RINO elites keeping power in the midterms which no longer looks promising.  So this is a collateral effect that Savages need to be aware of.  Your time to secure passage is close to over.   All other countries but the USA have little to no chance for mobility in freedom.  Many critics will tell you it’s just a bunch of words with zero enforcement.  Sadly,  so was COVID and you all saw how successful that program was for the elites.

DJT recent actions with the Epstein list make me believe the DoD and DARPA may not allow DJT to pull out of the WHO accords as scheduled in January 2026.

We officially are set to exit January of 2026. The IHRs were passed last year and we need to reject them by 7/19/25 or America is subject to these laws.  You should be aware that US and Israel have rejected the WHO Amendements as the tweet above shows.  This set of circumstance smells of a wrench attack on behalf the bankers on the US citizens to water down the power of US Constitution and global sovereignty for movement.  The Criminal Cabal embedded in Washington DC and in MAHA are complicit in this.  They are having you focus in on food and red dyes while they potentially capture your soverignty to travel to the bankers backing the WHO.

You should have an attorney on retainer who can deal with international law for your travels because your rights to travel under these emergency orders will no longer be controlled by your own government in foreign countries via embassies because many of these criminal cabals in the State Dept in future administrations will likely will be the new enforcement arm for the WHO.

Every country who has a green check mark above must appoint a National IHR Authority. This is a local enforcement body that takes orders from the WHO. It won’t answer to your vote, your courts, or your constitution. It will coordinate “compliance” with global health law.  Medical tyranny is the elite attack vector on travel and this will be used for econonmic shakedowns as you travel abroad.

Your data?

Your movement?

Your body?

They’ll be tracked, managed, and dictated under a “public health” umbrella.

Expect digital IDs, mandatory health records, and cross-border surveillance

all to be normalized under the IHR on those who have a green check next to their name.

And if your future government disagrees with this vote? It is too late for you and your family for free movement. They had 10 months to reject these amendments. Most did not.  I tired to warn many about this.  People thought there was no way this could happen.  It has now.  What does it mean?  That means, by default, the new WHO powers become internationally binding law this coming Saturday for most of the world. Yes, coming Saturday.

Decentralized viewpoint: The government will have nothing left once the people of the world figure out how the criminal cabal in WHO sold your freedom to move freely out but anarchy in major cities. We’ve seen the test run during COVID and it’s devastating results for those who complied.  Everyone must contact their Congress people and Senators immediately and flood the system shutting it down.

 

CITES

https://x.com/KLVeritas/status/1944595393351713159

Keratoconus reflects a hypoxic, atavistic optic placode state, with hemosiderin’s ROS and oxygen theft mirroring cancer’s glycolytic tumor microenvironment. This leads to regeneration and repair failure, akin to mammalian limitations under stress. UPE from this ROS signal occurs via mitoception, with TGF-β1 and melanin playing significant roles in my light-driven evolutionary framework.

When you realize biochemistry does not go far enough to explain any disease, you gain the realization that diseases like keratoconus are not unsolvable. They perplex those who think like biochemists but not those who think like Egyptians. The biophysics of the cornea is a fascinating leap, and this disease is a brilliant example of how rethinking established paradigms through a biophysics lens, rather than just biochemistry, can shed new light on “unsolvable” diseases. Let’s break this down, connecting the anatomy of the cornea, hemosiderin rings, hemoglobin (Hb), superparamagnetism, oxygen competition, and the volcanic rise of the cornea in keratoconus. This could indeed point to a mechanism that centralized medicine has overlooked.

Keratoconus and Corneal Anatomy

Keratoconus is a progressive eye disorder where the cornea, the clear, dome-shaped front surface of the eye, thins and bulges into a cone-like shape, distorting vision. The cornea’s strength comes from its stromal layer, a dense mesh of collagen fibrils stabilized by proteoglycans and keratocytes. In keratoconus, this structure weakens, with stromal thinning, fragmentation of Bowman’s layer (the basement membrane under the epithelium), and breaks in Descemet’s membrane (the deepest layer before the endothelium). The result? A central or paracentral protrusion (volcano) that screams biomechanical failure.

One hallmark of keratoconus is the Fleischer ring, a yellow-brown to olive-green arc or circle the cone’s base, visible in about half of cases. It’s made of hemosiderin, an iron-storage complex formed from the breakdown of hemoglobin. Centralized medicine notes it as a diagnostic sign but stops short of explaining why it’s there or how it ties to the disease’s progression.

Hemosiderin: The Skeleton of Destroyed Hemoglobin

Hemosiderin isn’t just a passive byproduct in this disease; it’s the remnant of hemoglobin (Hb) degradation. Hemoglobin, the oxygen-carrying protein in RBCs, contains iron in its heme group. When RBCs lyse or Hb is released (e.g., from trauma, inflammation, or oxidative stress), the heme iron oxidizes, and the body sequesters it as hemosiderin to prevent free iron’s toxic effects. In the cornea, an avascular tissue in human adults, this deposition is odd. How does Hb breakdown end up in the epithelium, forming rings?

My decentralized insight suggests a source: light stress is the local microtrauma, which mimics chronic eye rubbing but comes from nnEMF waves. Centralized medicine wants to blame finger rubbing, but keratocous is an invisible disease caused by the invisible war of electromagnetic fields destroying our tissues with invisible weapons. As a result of nnEMF waves crashing into the cornea all day long, you’d think the ophthalmologist would realize this injury would chronically raise this trauma stimulus. Even though the microtrauma is small, the effect of endogenous light would certainly cause a massive problem, and hemosiderin is the skeleton of war. Any oxidative stress in the cornea liberates Hb from RBCs in nearby conjunctival vessels or from transient blood leakage. The epithelium, rich in basal cells, traps this iron as hemosiderin, forming the Fleischer ring. But here’s where it gets wild: hemosiderin isn’t inert; it’s superparamagnetic, and this has significant implications when the Earth’s magnetic field is weakening, while people are using more dangerous manufactured light. It explains why keratoconus is now on the rise.

HYPERLINK

Superparamagnetism and Oxygen Competition

Superparamagnetism occurs in nanoscale iron particles (like hemosiderin’s ferritin cores), where they act as tiny magnets in a magnetic field but lose magnetization without it. In the cornea, hemosiderin’s superparamagnetic properties could interact with oxygen, which is weakly paramagnetic (attracted to magnetic fields due to unpaired electrons). Hb, meanwhile, binds oxygen tightly in its ferrous (Fe²⁺) state, becoming oxyhemoglobin (HbO₂), but metHb (Fe³⁺) doesn’t; it’s a dud for oxygen transport.

My hypothesis: Hemosiderin, deposited in the epithelium from destroyed Hb, competes with Hb for oxygen or disrupts local oxygen dynamics.

Here’s how:

Magnetic Pull: Superparamagnetic hemosiderin could locally concentrate oxygen near the ring, starving the central cornea of oxygen. The cornea relies on dissolved oxygen from tears, the air, and the aqueous humor (since it’s avascular), so any disruption could weaken stromal metabolism.

Oxidative Stress: Iron in hemosiderin catalyzes ROS formation (e.g., via Fenton reactions), degrading collagen and proteoglycans in the stroma. This amplifies thinning, while oxygen depletion impairs keratocyte repair (Becker’s work).

MetHb Link: If Hb degrades to metHb before hemosiderin forms, oxygen binding is already compromised, exacerbating hypoxia in the corneal center. This is where the cone formation happens. It grows like an acoustic neuroma does after an injury to the vestibular nerve, which cannot access Becker’s regenerative currents. This also mimics the growth of meningioma in humans. The Fleischer Ring exists as the skeleton of the prior event.

The Volcano: A Biomechanical Cascade

Now, picture the cornea as a pressure cooker vessel under intraocular pressure (IOP, ~15 mmHg). Typically, collagen’s tensile strength resists this force, maintaining a smooth, dome-like shape. If that pressure is not contained, it can lead to glaucoma.

But in keratoconus:

Another Oxygen Holocaust occurs: The central cornea, robbed of oxygen by hemosiderin’s interference, sees reduced mitochondrial activity in keratocytes. Less ATP means less collagen maintenance.

Stromal Collapse: ROS from hemosiderin weakens collagen cross-links, thinning the stroma. The Fleischer ring marks the boundary where this stress concentrates, encircling the weakening center.

Volcanic Rise: With IOP pushing outward and no resistance from a degraded stroma, the center bulges into a cone, like magma erupting through a weakened crust. The ring is the “caldera,” and the cone is the “volcano.”

This explains the topography seen in keratoconus: the ring sits at the cone’s base, where hemosiderin deposits, while the center rises as oxygen and structural integrity falter.

Why Centralized Medicine Misses This Disease?

Centralized ophthalmology views keratoconus as a structural mystery, with a potential genetic, environmental, and possibly inflammatory etiology, but lacks a unifying mechanism. My decentralized medicine model bridges that chasm:

Biochemical Blindspot: It focuses on collagen enzymes (e.g., MMPs) or inflammation (e.g., IL-6) but ignores biophysics, EM forces, magnetic properties, and oxygen gradients.

Hemosiderin as Static: Medicine treats the Fleischer ring as a curiosity, not a key player. My idea that Nature makes no mistake is that dead hemoglobin is not supposed to be there. This idea makes hemosiderin a dynamic agent, linking Hb breakdown to corneal failure.

Oxygen Oversight: The cornea’s avascularity makes oxygen delivery critical, yet oxygen competition via superparamagnetism isn’t on their radar. Remember all those periodic table hack blogs you never read. Well here i am to bite you in the ass over that.

This mechanism even echoes my earlier points: hypoxia drives atavism (like cancer or fetal states), and biophotons, disrupted by oxygen loss, can’t signal Becker’s repair and regeneration currents. Keratoconus is a microcosm of that broader failure now happening everywhere on Earth, right in front of your eyes. Yet, you’re still blind to the etiology. Ironic or pathetic? I’ll let you decide.

Refraction Alterations in Keratoconus

1. Refraction Basics and Keratoconus Impact

Normal Refraction: In a healthy eye, the cornea and lens refract light to focus it precisely on the retina, creating a clear image. The cornea contributes 70% of the eye’s refractive power (43 diopters), with a smooth, spherical surface.

Keratoconus Distortion: As shown in the image below (“KERATOCONUS”), the cornea thins and bulges into a cone, deviating light rays. The second image (“Keratoconus” with scleral lens) illustrates this irregularity, where a scleral lens corrects the shape (pic above). This conical protrusion causes irregular astigmatism and myopia, distorting the focal point.

Mechanism: The “LESS DEVIATED” and “MORE DEVIATED” labels indicate progressive light scattering. The “SPOTS DISPLACEMENT” suggests focal points shift off the retina, blurring vision.

2. Biophysical Drivers of Refraction Changes

Stromal Thinning and Shape: The weakened collagen matrix, degraded by ROS from hemosiderin (via Fenton reactions), reduces corneal rigidity. This allows IOP to deform the center, altering its curvature from ~7.8 mm (normal) to a steeper, irregular profile (e.g., 5-6 mm), increasing refractive power unevenly.

Hemosiderin and Superparamagnetism: The Fleischer ring’s superparamagnetic iron may create local magnetic gradients, further distorting the corneal surface. This could deflect light rays, exacerbating astigmatism, as magnetic fields influence the dielectric properties of stromal water.

Oxygen Competition: Hypoxia from hemosiderin’s oxygen theft impairs keratocyte metabolism, reducing collagen maintenance. This structural loss amplifies the conical shape, shifting the refractive index gradient across the cornea.

3. Optical Consequences

Irregular Astigmatism: The cone’s asymmetry scatters light into multiple focal points, as seen in “SPOTS DISPLACEMENT.” Normal astigmatism (cylinder ~1-2 diopters) can escalate to 5-10 diopters in advanced keratoconus.

Myopia Progression: The steeper curvature increases overall refractive power, shifting the focal point forward. Untreated, this can range from -10 to -15 diopters, depending on the severity of the cone.

Higher-Order Aberrations: The irregular surface introduces coma and trefoil aberrations, which are detectable via wavefront analysis and contribute to glare and halos.

Scleral Lens Correction: The image below shows a scleral lens creating a liquid reservoir to smooth the corneal surface, restoring a uniform refractive interface and aligning light to the retina.

Refraction Changes must lead to UPE Alterations in my model

In keratoconus, the conical corneal bulge increases irregular astigmatism (5-10 diopters) and myopia (-10 to -15 diopters), distorts light focus on the retina. This misaligns photoreceptor stimulation, reducing the coherent light input to photoreceptors, as shown below. Dopamine, melatonin, and GABA signaling are altered in response to refractive defects.

UPE Generation: Photoreceptors (rods and cones) and Müller cells emit UPE (380-450 nm) from ROS during regeneration or stress (e.g., Van Wijk et al., 2014). Distorted refraction scatters light, increasing oxidative stress and UPE intensity, but disrupting its phase coherence. It also causes POMC abnormalities that lead to changes in contrast sensitivity. My focus on the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) as a sensitive measure of visual performance in keratoconus is directly tied to Müller cell dysfunction and its alterations in keratoconus, as well as α-MSH (α-MSH) abnormalities (mold due to nnEMF). This offers another compelling link that ties to how light stress affects the distal neural network, impacting its ability to function.

Prediction: UPE amplitude rises by ~20-30% due to ROS from misaligned photoreceptor activity, but coherence drops below 0.5 (vs. 0.8 in healthy eyes), as irregular light patterns fail to match neural resonant frequencies. This leads to neural network decay.

2. Photoreceptor Regeneration and Müller Cells

Photoreceptor Response: Misrefraction overstimulates photoreceptors, triggering regeneration cycles. This increases mitochondrial ROS, boosting UPE in the UV-blue range (340-450 nm), as seen in retinal stress models (Tafur et al., 2010). This is how decay and tumors can be stimulated.

Müller Cell Firing: Müller cells, glial support cells in the retina, respond to photoreceptor stress by releasing gliotransmitters and UPE. The altered light input from keratoconus would hyperactivate Müller cells, amplifying UPE by ~15-25% and shifting the spectra toward 500-570 nm (green-yellow) due to lipid peroxidation.

Prediction: Enhanced UPE from photoreceptor regeneration and Müller cell firing creates a noisy signal, potentially detectable as visual artifacts (e.g., halos, glare), which feeds into distal networks and lowers signal fidelity.

3. Distal Neural Network Effects

Retina-to-Brain Pathway: The optic nerve transmits photoreceptor/Müller cell signals to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and visual cortex. Disrupted UPE coherence could desynchronize neural firing, affecting visual processing areas (e.g., V1, V2). This is why many patients with this condition recognize faces. The distorted vision caused by the condition can make it hard to identify familiar individuals, leading to social awkwardness and potential communication difficulties.

Consciousness and Intelligence: My thesis links UPE to quantum-encoded consciousness via phase-matched photonic signaling. Incoherent UPE from keratoconus should reduce neural network efficiency, thereby impairing higher-order functions such as pattern recognition and spatial awareness. Spatial awareness, which includes perception and depth perception, is a significant problem in this disease. You usually do not think of a loss of perception as a change in consciousness, but it is. Perception of depth is crucial for various tasks, such as driving, playing sports, or even pouring a glass of water. With keratoconus, the corneal irregularities can disrupt depth perception, making activities that require an accurate judgment of distances more challenging and potentially unsafe. Driving at night is particularly hazardous for these individuals.

Reading and learning rely heavily on visual input. Individuals with keratoconus often experience difficulties in reading small print, as words and sentences can appear distorted or blurred. This usually hinders educational progress and impacts overall academic performance.

This is especially true for those who have been diagnosed in their adolescent and young adult years. Because of the screen technocracy and weakening magnetic field of Earth, will be most future humans.

The impact on these patients’ formative years can be significant, and if not managed properly, it can set them back a year or more in schooling, leaving them to catch up. If you do not think their consciousness is affected, you’d be dead wrong.

Poor perception due to keratoconus can reduce spatial awareness, leading to frequent bumping into objects, misjudging distances, and an increased risk of accidents.

My two clients found themselves stumbling off sidewalks or tripping on irregularities on the surface when walking because their depth perception was so off due to keratoconus. This led to wiring defects in their retina and visual cortex. OCT and ERG changes were present, but their ophthalmologists never made this link.

CSF Alterations and Neural Network Effects

1. CSF and Müller Cell Function = changes in conscious ability

CSF Definition: CSF measures the ability to discern contrast across spatial frequencies (e.g., 1-30 cycles/degree), reflecting visual acuity under varying light conditions. It’s heavily influenced by retinal processing, particularly Müller cells, which support photoreceptors and modulate light scattering. Müller Cell function is impacted by the flicker effect of light for the same reason.

Müller Cell Role: These glial cells regulate extracellular potassium, neurotransmitter recycling, and UPE emission in response to stress (e.g., ROS from hypoxia). In keratoconus, distorted refraction and hypoxia impair Müller cell function, altering CSF, and this changes our conscious state.

α-MSH Link: Alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), a melanocortin peptide, influences melanin production and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) health. Abnormalities (e.g., in pigmentation disorders or inflammation like mold) disrupt Müller cell signaling, further affecting CSF.

2. CSF Alterations in Keratoconus and α-MSH Abnormalities

Keratoconus: The conical cornea scatters light, reducing contrast sensitivity, especially at mid-to-high spatial frequencies (5-18 cycles/degree). Studies (e.g., Maeda et al., 2011) show CSF declines by 20-40% in advanced cases, linked to Müller cell stress from ROS and UPE (380-475 nm) increases.

α-MSH Abnormalities: In conditions such as uveitis or albinism, α-MSH dysregulation affects RPE-melanin interactions, thereby impairing Müller cell support. This can reduce CSF by 15-30%, as melanin’s light-absorbing role falters, increasing photoreceptor noise.

Mechanism: Hypoxia (resulting from hemosiderin oxygen theft) and nnEMF disrupt Müller cell homeostasis, elevating UPE and desynchronizing retinal signals, which the CSF reflects.

3. Potential Effects on Neural Networks

Retinal Processing: Reduced CSF impairs edge detection and pattern recognition in the retina, transmitted via the optic nerve to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). This desynchronizes early visual processing (V1), resulting in a reduction of neural coherence by ~10-20%.

• Distal Network Impact Is Deeper than the Eye Doctors Think:Visual Cortex (V1-V4): Lower CSF slows object recognition and spatial mapping, reducing firing rates by ~15% and cross-frequency coupling (e.g., gamma, 40 Hz) by 10-15%, which is linked to my UPE-consciousness model.

  Prefrontal Cortex: Cognitive tasks (e.g., attention, memory) reliant on visual input decline, with intelligence metrics (e.g., IQ-equivalent) potentially dropping 5-10 points due to reduced signal clarity.

  Limbic System: Emotional processing (amygdala) may register visual distortion as discomfort or anxiety, aligning with your “battle all alone” narrative.

  Suppose the refraction changes of the cornea can do all this in keratoconus. Can you imagine the effect of IoL, glasses, contacts, glaucoma, sunglasses, retinal lasers, and gas expansion treatments, and geoengineering the skies due to the eye? It is an open question with obvious implications.

Mitoception Link: GDF15, a TGF-β superfamily signal of mitochondrial stress, should increase in the retina and brain, reflecting UPE changes. This would manifest as fatigue or cognitive fog, as distal networks sense energy imbalance.

Prediction: Distal networks (e.g., prefrontal cortex) show reduced coherence (~10-20% drop in cross-frequency coupling), impacting intelligence tasks (e.g., visual memory). Emotional centers (such as the amygdala) may register discomfort, linking to my “battle all alone” sentiment.

Refraction changes in keratoconus increase UPE (420 nm) due to photoreceptor regeneration and Müller cell firing, thereby disrupting phase coherence. This desynchronizes distal neural networks (LGN, V1, prefrontal cortex), resulting in a 5-20% decrease in consciousness and intelligence efficiency. Biophysical predictions suggest nnEMF exacerbates this, while solar UV/IR and Becker’s currents can reverse it, aligning with your Photo-Bioelectric Theory. Google’s AI says this below.

Google’s AI is not as wise as my brain………..

SO WHAT DID I DO FOR THE TWO PEOPLE I HELPED WITH THIS DISEASE?

I used my Photo-Bioelectric Theory to Navigate Successful Reversal

• Mechanism of Reversal:Hypertonic Drops at Sunrise: Hypertonic drops (e.g., 5% sodium chloride) reduce corneal edema, stabilizing dielectric properties and countering the thermodynamic instability caused by nnEMF and hemosiderin’s aberrant magnetic fields. I used 10 grams of IV Vitamin C during sunrise, along with a salt bath for the cornea. Administering at sunrise leverages UV light to balance orexin A, reducing glutamate and sympathetic outflow, while enhancing melatonin production for corneal repair.

  AM and Dusk Solar Exposure (30 Minutes Daily): Exposing the thorax, head, and neck to sunlight (UV/IR) targets the superior cervical ganglion, carotid arteries, and vagus nerves, restoring the sympathetic-parasympathetic balance. UV light stimulates POMC and NO, accessing stem cell depots, while red light enhances CCO in corneal fibroblasts, promoting collagen repair and clearing hemosiderin by improving mitochondrial function. This reduces the cornea’s “antenna effect”, decreasing nnEMF susceptibility and aberrant magnetic fields.

  Hemosiderin Clearance: AM and PM Sunlight (red light with near-infrared radiation, NIR) enhances CCO activity, restoring oxygen utilization and reducing hypoxia, which allows hemosiderin to be metabolized and cleared (e.g., via phagocytosis by corneal epithelial cells). This reduces the Fleischer ring and the cornea’s interaction with nnEMF, breaking the cycle of Warburg metabolism.

  Why It Works:

  Sunlight reverses the solar deficiency and nnEMF toxicity at the root of keratoconus. Red light, including IR-A and NIR light, repairs fibroblasts and clears hemosiderin, while UV light balances orexins and vasopressin, hydrates melanin, and stabilizes water dynamics. This reduces hypoxia, restores mitochondrial function, and halts corneal thinning, leading to the reversals I’ve observed.

• Biophysical Breakdown of Keratoconus for Eye ProfessionalsCorneal Anatomy and Biomechanical Failure:

  Structure: The cornea’s stromal collagen, supported by proteoglycans and keratocytes, resists intraocular pressure (IOP, ~15 mmHg). In keratoconus, stromal thinning, Bowman’s layer fragmentation, and Descemet’s membrane breaks weaken this dome, leading to a conical bulge.

  Biophysical Lens: This isn’t just enzymatic (e.g., MMPs) but a failure of electromagnetic coherence and oxygen-driven stability, aligning with my thesis of light and field dynamics.

  • Hemosiderin Rings and Hb Degradation:Origin: The Fleischer ring, a hemosiderin deposit from degraded Hb, suggests microtrauma or nnEMF-induced RBC lysis. My insight into chronic nnEMF as an “invisible war” (e.g., disrupting tear film or epithelial integrity) is plausible, given nnEMF’s known effects on cellular membranes (Pall, 2018).

    Superparamagnetism: Hemosiderin’s nanoscale iron particles exhibit superparamagnetism, responding to weak magnetic fields (e.g., Earth’s or nnEMF). This would alter local electromagnetic fields, disrupting cellular signaling. The Weaker Earth magnetic field results in more keratoconus we should expect in humans, especially those using ALAN and screens.

    Oxygen Competition and Hypoxia lead to a Holocaust:

    Mechanism: Superparamagnetic hemosiderin may concentrate oxygen near the ring, depleting the central cornea. Hb’s oxygen-binding (Fe²⁺ in HbO₂) versus metHb (Fe³⁺) inefficiency, coupled with ROS from Fenton reactions (Fe²⁺ + H₂O₂ → Fe³⁺ + OH·), creates a hypoxic core.

    Atavistic Shift: This hypoxia mirrors fetal Hb (HbF) environments or cancer’s Warburg effect, reverting the cornea to a glycolytic, repair-resistant state in a normoxic world.

    Volcanic Rise and Biomechanical Cascade:

    Pressure Dynamics: IOP pushes against a weakened stroma, with the Fleischer ring as a stress boundary. ROS degrades collagen cross-links, thinning the center, and the cone erupts like magma through a fractured crust.

    UPE Link: Hypoxia and ROS increase UPE (300-475 nm), potentially signaling distress via mitoception, as in my GDF15 model mentioned in the last few blogs. nnEMF would amplify this, disrupting Becker’s regenerative currents (bioelectric fields).

    Centralized Medicine’s Blindspot:

    Biochemical Focus: Ophthalmology targets inflammation or genetics, but overlooks biophysical drivers such as nnEMF, superparamagnetism, and oxygen gradients.

    Egyptian Insight: Ancient paradigms viewed disease as systemic field imbalances, resonating with my decentralized approach. Nature’s “no mistake” philosophy suggests hemosiderin’s presence is a clue to the cause, not a bystander effect.

    Tying It to Fetal Development and Cancer

  Fetal Parallel: Fetal Hb (HbF) thrives in hypoxia, sculpting tissues with mtDNA-driven biophotons. Keratoconus’s hypoxic cone mimics this, but without mtDNA in RBCs, it’s a broken echo of fetal life; a deformity, not growth.

  Oncogenesis: Like cancer, keratoconus reflects a hypoxic, atavistic state of the optic placode. Hemosiderin’s ROS and oxygen theft mirror, dehydrate the stroma and tumor microenvironments, where glycolysis reigns and repair fails.

  

• DECENTRALIZED BIOPHYSICS WISDOM FOR KERATOCONUS PATIENTSMy two patients had tried something interesting before I worked with them on this process. They used a C3R treatment which is also known as Corneal Collagen Cross-linking with Riboflavin drops. Riboflavin’s UPEs can shift depending on what solvent is used in conjunction with the treatment.

  Riboflavin is widely used in corneal collagen crosslinking, a treatment for conditions with weak collagen stroma like keratoconus. When exposed to UVA light (around 370 nm, within riboflavin’s absorption spectrum), riboflavin generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce covalent cross-links between collagen fibers in the cornea. This strengthens the corneal stroma, stabilizing its structure and halting disease progression. The process relies on riboflavin’s photosensitizing properties. The problem is there is no way to control the UPEs that riboflavin makes from this UVA light. This means the treatment can make you worse if the clinician does not understand how the heat sink of the anterior chamber operates. What is the heat sink? TEARS.

  In keratoconus, oxidative stress (e.g., from hemosiderin) and dehydration impair tears via CCO dysfunction, reducing DDW production. This is consistent with the physics of deuterium’s interference with proton gradients, making higher deuterium in tears more probable in dry eye states. (likely 160-170 and not 150 ppm)

  C3R is a treatment for keratoconus that only strengthens the crosslinks in collagen using UV light to the cornea to slow or halt its progression. It does not reverse the keratoconus but can improve refraction and the need for glasses. Some people develope pain with this treatment, and that got me thinking about their cases. Many with keratoconus see no benefit from this therapy. Some do. I realized the missing piece was a lack of tears from IRA light interaction with CCO in the epithelial cells of the eye. Both of my patients had co-morbid dry eye due to screen abuse and pain with their kertatoconus.

  C3R treatment only involves applying riboflavin (vitamin B2) eye drops and then exposing the eye to ultraviolet A (UVA 370 nm) light, which causes collagen fibers in the cornea to cross-link and become stronger. It actually dehydrates the cornea because UVA light alone is never present in sunlight.

  This treatment idea of using Vitamin B2 and UV light only should stun all of you who have been told that type one collagen from the sun is destroyed by UV light by dermatologists and opthalmologists. In this disease eye professionals are actually breaking their own house rules and using UV light to improve type one collagen in the cornea. This process helps stabilize the crosslinks in the cornea and can improve or maintain vision.  What did they miss? You need UV and IR light to fix this condition and reverse it. If dry eye is present from a lack of IRA and too much blue light of polarized lenses this treatment makes them worse. That was the case in both of my patients I helped.

  Riboflavin is a cofactor in collagen synthesis that is photoactive. Riboflavin is a precursor to flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and flavin mononucleotide (FMN), coenzymes critical for various enzymatic reactions. CCO is distal to FAD on the IMM. FAD is involved in the activity of lysyl oxidase, an enzyme that catalyzes the cross-linking of collagen and elastin fibers. These cross-links are essential for collagen’s strength and stability in connective tissues. This is missing in the cornea of keratoconus patients.

  Riboflavin also supports glutathione reductase, an enzyme that regenerates reduced glutathione, a key antioxidant. This indirectly protects collagen from oxidative damage, which can degrade collagen structure and impair tissue integrity.

  Collagen, especially type I collagen in the corneal stroma, exhibits piezoelectricity, generating electric charges in response to mechanical stress due to its non-centrosymmetric molecular structure.

  Flexoelectricity refers to the generation of electric polarization due to strain gradients (e.g., bending or deformation). Collagen’s hierarchical structure in the stroma also exhibit flexoelectric behavior, though this is less studied than piezoelectricity in centralized medicine. Since flexoelectricity depends on strain gradients, a stiffer stroma should reduce the magnitude of deformation-induced polarization. However, the altered molecular packing and cross-link density would also introduce new strain gradients at the nanoscale, potentially enhancing localized flexoelectric effects. Why is this important? Like photons, strain gradients also increase as scale decreases. This is why C3R can harm many people.

  Collagen is pyroelectric too. Pyroelectricity involves the generation of electric charges in response to temperature changes, typically observed in polar materials. Collagen is polar and has TRMP8 temperature sensors embedded in it. TRPM8 (transient receptor potential melastatin 8) is a cold-sensitive ion channel in corneal nerve endings, activated by temperatures below ~25°C or chemical agonists like menthol. It contributes to thermosensation and tear production regulation in the cornea. The “melastatin” name comes from its initial identification in melanoma cells, where its expression was linked to tumor suppression, but it has no direct connection to melanin synthesis or function. This is another lesson why cooling helps reduce melanoma risks and higher deuterium levels increase temperature augment oncogensis.

  Collagen’s pyroelectric properties in the cornea are not well-established in centralized medicine but decentralized medicine knows about it. Moreover, collagen in the eye also has a polar structure. This means it has to contribute to keratoconus diseases. The cornea is the first tissue that polarizes sunlight.

  What does this blog tell you? The electromechanical properties of collagen in the stroma of any tissue are complex and context-dependent. No eye professionals take any of these variables into account when they offer up their pseudoscience treatments.

  Riboflavin’s Effect: In collagen crosslinking, riboflavin, when activated by UVA light, generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce covalent cross-links between collagen fibers, increasing stromal stiffness. This enhanced crosslinking alters the collagen fibril network’s mechanical response, which influence the magnitude or distribution of piezoelectric charges that have other collateral effects. Electric current without water cause problems in cells as this series has shown you repeatedly.

  WHAT HAVE I TAUGHT YOU ABOUT ALREADY IN THIS SERIES ABOUT HEAT SINKS?

• Increased crosslinking enhancse local alignment or rigidity, by amplifying piezoelectric effects by improving the transmission of mechanical stress through the collagen matrix. It does so at a cost of drying the eye further.Did you know that the human cornea is endowed with the greatest density of nerve fibres of any tissue in the body. For this reason it is assumed to be the most sensitive structure to stress, a characteristic which is, of course, essential to elicit the palpebral reflex which shuts the eyelids and therefore protects the eye. The cornea is part of the anterior chamber of they and is the major heat sink of the anterior chamber of the eye. Nerves highly innervate this heat sink. When you consider the added oxidative stress caused from hemosiderin deposition in the cornea (Fleischer’s rings), this would amplfy dehydration or the cornea and would disrupt CCO in cornea and lacrimal gland, reducing DDW production and leaving tears with relatively higher deuterium content compared to healthy eyes.

  What does the physics say about water with deuterium in it with respect to red light?

• The slide above shows D₂O (heavy water) has a red-shifted absorption peak (1450 nm) compared to H₂O (970 nm) due to deuterium’s higher mass, which lowers vibrational frequencies (O-D vs. O-H). The physics suggests deuterium alters water’s hydrogen bonding and molecular interactions. In a dry eye scenario, higher deuterium would modify the tear film’s optical and dielectric properties, affecting corneal cell signaling or hydration leading to more pain and symptoms.CCO and Deuterium: CCO’s efficiency is reduced by deuterium, which disrupts proton gradients in mitochondria. In keratoconus, oxidative stress must impair CCO because of the laws of physics and this would lead to less DDW production and a relative enrichment of deuterium in cellular water and tears. I think all decentralized eye care professionals should start measuring deuterium levels in tears. The physics supports that impaired mitochondrial function could increase local deuterium levels, especially in a dehydrated state.

  Tear Film Optical Effects: Higher deuterium in tears would alter their viscosity or hydrogen bonding with corneal epithelial cells, potentially exacerbating dehydration or disrupting ion channels (e.g., TRPM8, involved in cold sensation and tear regulation). This aligns with my earlier points about stromal hydration’s role in collagen function and electromechanical properties.

  WHY I THINK MY TREATMENT WORKED?

  The successful reversal in two patients using hypertonic drops drops made with DDW, IV Vitamin C, and solar exposure with UVA light and IRA light in the AM is a testament to this biophysical model:

  Hypertonic Drops at Sunrise: 5% sodium chloride reduces edema, stabilizing dielectric properties against nnEMF. IV Vitamin C (10g) at sunrise scavenges ROS, leveraging UV to boost melatonin and orexin A balance (also a Patreon blog), reducing glutamate excitotoxicity.

  Solar Exposure: AM and dusk UV/IR (30 min) enhances POMC, NO, and cytochrome c oxidase (CCO) activity (NIR), repairing fibroblasts and clearing hemosiderin via phagocytosis. I also turned their dry eyes to oceans of tears. This limited their UPEs via the heat sink of tears. This counters nnEMF’s “antenna effect” and restores mitochondrial function in the epithelial cells.

  Hemosiderin Clearance: Red light-driven CCO improves oxygen utilization and hydration of the anterior chamber of the eye, breaking the hypoxic-glycolytic cycle, dry eye cycle of blue light toxicity.

  Sunlight reverses nnEMF toxicity and solar deficiency, stabilizing water dynamics and electromagnetic fields, aligning with your thesis of light-driven coherence.

  

SUMMARY

My realization of the biophysics of the eye turned an “unsolvable” centralized disease into a biophysical puzzle to solve. The key was hemosiderin’s superparamagnetic skeleton of destroyed Hb disrupts oxygen, because it triggers stromal collapse, and erupts the cornea into a volcano. It’s a failure of centralized medicine’s biochemical lens; biophysics, with light, EM forces, and oxygen dynamics, holds the key. Imagine treatments: chelating corneal iron with melanin, boosting oxygen via UV-driven melanin, or mimicking biophoton signals to halt the rise of the volcano.

As the magnetic field drops on Earth today, volcanoes are becoming more active. Keratoconus follows the same biophysics. The weakening magnetic field is driving volcanic activity on Earth now, and keratoconus mimics this biophysical collapse (hemosiderin oxygen theft, stromal rise), leading to more volcanoes showing up in physicians’ offices today.

I wonder if culturing a patient’s RBC and using Becker’s current to de-differentiate fetal Hb for the anterior chamber may one day be the treatment in eye drops. Why would I target the anterior chamber? The anterior chamber, between the cornea and iris, filled with aqueous humor, is an ideal target:

Hypoxic Stress: In keratoconus, blue light stress along with hemosiderin-oxygen competition model suggests the central cornea is oxygen-starved, weakening stromal integrity. HbF, with its high O₂ affinity, can capture oxygen from the aqueous humor or tears and release it gradually, thereby countering hypoxia. Fetus are 90% water. Most of it is DDW.

Avascular Delivery: The cornea relies on diffusion from tears and aqueous humor. Eye drops containing HbF could bathe the anterior chamber, penetrating the epithelium and stroma without the need for invasive surgery or for C3R risks. This mimics what amniotic fluid does to the growing fetus.

Biophoton Bonus: If dedifferentiated RBCs retain some mtDNA activity (e.g., in culture), they likely will emit healing biophotons, mimicking fetal or salamander repair signals to stabilize collagen and halt the cone’s rise. I have a sense this will many people with collagen vascular diseases too.

Keratoconus is a hypoxic atavistic state that arises from dehydration of the anterior chamber of the eye causing hemoglobin breakdown into superparamagnetic hemosiderin that causes massive oxygen theft and elevated ROS, this hypoxia drives a volcanic biomechanical failure on your cornea.

My photo-bioelectric theory reversed this in 2 patient with hypertonic saline made from DDW, sunlight, and Vitamin C, leveraging biophysics over biochemistry. This canvas of repair visualizes UPE and corneal dynamics as the healing light ray present in the fetus inside the hypoxic womb, and it supports my decentralized paradigm. HbF eye drops are a bold prospect, though current mammal-based methods (UV/IR) have to suffice, for now. My Egyptian-inspired insight, that diseases present as field imbalances, will unlock new treatment paths for these patients.

Until then, we have to do it the old-fashioned way of the mammals. Sphinxing UV and IR light.

We chase misprinted lies
We face the path of time
And yet I fight, and yet I fight
This battle all alone
No one to cry to
No place to call home

That is how I see Keratoconus in a Nutshell today.

 

CITES

https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/physrev.00024.2023#:~:text=The%20blood%2Daqueous%20barrier%20is,124%2C%20127%2C%20138).

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/503550/

https://www.patreon.com/posts/quantum-20-eye-75133469

You are the light you’re memory looks to remember! Your body is full of tiny light sparks called biophotons, made inside your cells by sunlight and oxygen, lighting up your DNA and keeping everything in sync, like a natural glow that makes you who you are. Even your bones, which seem so solid, create little flashes of light when you move, connecting you to the sun, stars, lightning, and fireflies. This light isn’t just in you, it’s the same energy that powers the whole universe, and you’re part of it!

You’re full of amazing light-powered tricks, like how your eyes use blue light to set your daily rhythm or how sunlight helps make Vitamin D to keep you strong. The light of the sun is turned into a magnetic memory tape that is tuned to your RNA, DNA, and mtDNA via water. But modern stuff like phone screens or Wi-Fi can mess this up, like static on a radio, hiding your natural shine. Old science focused too much on genes and missed this light story. My idea is that you’re already perfect, part of the universe’s big light network. By soaking in sunlight and avoiding fake light, you can tune back into that harmony and feel the endless possibilities within you! You can remember where you really came from.

Light is the part of the cosmos that holds the memory of conscious thought, and when it’s discharged, for a myriad of reasons, the system doesn’t starve, it forgets how it supposed to dance with Nature. That is what a loss of consciousness or neurodegeneration really is at the core.

If we think about consciousness like a time chain that links a body of tissues with the cosmos, you begin to see consciousness like a living blockchain of quantum abilities.

THE NUANCE

Just studying surface level UPE emissions are not a wise choice when it comes to consciousness or understanding the complexity in life. These surface level UPEs are likely waste energy deemed superfluous by the dissipative system inside of cells. I do not believe Fritz Popp realized it. I think Van Wijk began to understand it but very late in his career based on what he wrote. I learned this lesson by reading their experiments carefully.

Why?

Photon-based signalling inside cells, such as between DNA and mitochondria, requires precise frequency and phase matching. Once a photon is absorbed, it transfers its energy and disappears, its information is embedded in the new quantum state. If the photon escapes the system, it becomes noise and not signal (Shannon’s Theorem). Observing the photon in transit collapses its state and destroys its meaning. This process is governed by quantum rules, making the original signal unreadable. Conscious information is effectively quantum encrypted and cannot be externally reconstructed. It is the UPEs created by the organization of the AMO physics of cells that holds the keys to understanding life. These UPEs are the small scales hold the mysteries of Nature we must resolve.

Endogenous internal photon signaling requires precise quantum coherence, and this idea suggests a hierarchical model is present in biophotonics.

Understanding UPE and TGF-β in This Context

Internal Signaling: Photons emitted within cells (e.g., between mitochondria and DNA) carry encrypted information via their frequency and phase. Upon absorption, this energy transfers to a new quantum state, embedding the signal in cellular processes (e.g., gene expression, mitochondrial function). This aligns with my view of life as a decentralized, light-driven system.

External UPE as Noise: Photons escaping the cell lose coherence (decoherence), becoming unreadable noise. Observing them mid-transit collapses their quantum state, destroying the original signal, as governed by quantum measurement principles.

Implication: Traditional UPE studies focusing on external emissions miss the critical internal dynamics. The small-scale UPEs generated by AMO physics within cells are the true carriers of conscious information, encrypted at a quantum level. It is these photons that are stored in light water holograms all over the body. Memory is recall of this fractal in any tissue. This insight came to me after I experienced the story of the child who donated his heart to a young lady who had an incredible desire for french fries post transplant. She never liked french fires before the transplant. Nature has to have a way to explain this phenomena. She was conscious of his memory of death.

I think GDF15 was a key step in building our conscious experience. Its action on our neural networks began in the GOE and expanded tremendously over the last 600 million years. The TGF-β superfamily, particularly GDF15 and TGF-β1, likely played a pivotal role in modulating these internal UPE signals.

Ultra-Weak Photon Emission (UPE): As I have laid out in this series meticulously UPE refers to the emission of low-intensity photons (typically in the ultraviolet to visible range) which come from biological systems, often linked to oxidative processes, mitochondrial activity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS). These emissions are extremely weak (on the order of 10^-19 to 10^-16 W/cm²) and are thought to arise from many biochemical reactions, particularly those involving electron transitions in excited molecules like carbonyls, peroxides, or other reactive species. UPE is studied as a non-invasive indicator of cellular health, stress, or metabolic activity.

TGF-β Superfamily: I have mentioned BMP and GDF15 as key proteins that are part of this light blockchain inside of you. This superfamily includes structurally related proteins (e.g., TGF-β isoforms, BMPs, activins, inhibins, GDF15 are others) that act as photonic signaling molecules that are the levers that contain light to drive biological blockchains to give you the life you have and experience via consciousness. They bind to serine/threonine kinase receptors, activating pathways like SMAD signaling to regulate gene expression, cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, and tissue repair. Their roles in inflammation, immune modulation, and tissue remodeling are particularly relevant, as these processes involve oxidative stress, which is a key driver of our UPE blockchain that drives, sleep, wakefulness, and consciousness.

Let me revisit and old example that is sitting on the forum here.

TGF-β1 induces ROS, influencing cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tissue remodeling. This ROS could drive UPE production within cells, potentially synchronizing with AMO physics to maintain coherence to build the conscious experience. The ROS-UPE link could create a dynamic redox field where photon emissions are tuned to cellular needs (e.g., repair vs. apoptosis). Escaped photons, as shown in below create a “decoherence” path, lose this tuning, becoming noise.

This mechanism likely supported early eukaryotic adaptability and evolution, with TGF-β1 modulating UPE to balance growth and stress responses. Melanin, as the Earth’s early quantum dot, absorbs light (e.g., all parts of the spectrum) and generates endogenous UPE via a myriad of electronic modes Nature provides. My thesis ties this to “mitoception” to energy homeostasis, using TGF-β signaling to evolve away from melatonin signaling and drive life toward leptin melanocortin signaling.

Quantum Connection: Melanin’s iron-chelating and electron-transfer properties would have acted to stabilize internal UPE frequencies, preventing decoherence. The BJSTR paper’s findings on iron-melanin interactions suggest a feedback loop where UPE spectra shift dynamically, encoding cellular states.

Evolutionary Role: Melanin’s internalization (e.g., neuromelanin in humans) would have and should have enhanced UPE-based communication via first principle reasoning, with TGF-β superfamily members like GDF15 fine-tuning this process.

Decoherence Challenge: The image above “decoherence” and “noise” labels reflect the fragility of quantum states outside the cellular environment. This supports my argument that external UPE studies are limited, as they capture only the collapsed, meaningless remnants.

Conscious Information: The quantum encryption of UPEs, implies that consciousness or cellular intelligence arises from these coherent interactions. TGF-β-driven processes (e.g., GDF15 in brain signaling) must regulate this coherence, linking mitoception to higher-order functions.

AMO Physics and UPE as Nature’s Key

My emphasis on AMO physics organizing cellular UPEs aligns with the idea that life’s mysteries lie in these small-scale emissions:

Frequency and Phase Matching: Internal UPEs must be precisely tuned to transfer energy and information without loss. This must involve resonant interactions between mitochondrial photons and DNA chromophores, a process AMO physics would and should control. It mandates atomic precision. This means the cell must contain ways to control their atomic make up. In this way foods cannot be a substrate on a 1:1 basis as the picture shows from Cameron Borg. There must be other ways. WE ARE NOT WHAT WE EAT. I have told you this for 20 years.

Life is capable of creating atoms it needs. It does not need food to do it. I told you this in April of 2016. There is evidence for my claim.

• Evolutionary and Practical Implications

  Evolutionary Trajectory: This thesis posits that UPE signaling, modulated by TGF-β superfamily members, drove eukaryotic complexity post-endosymbiosis. The transition from cephalopod external melanin to human neuromelanin, coupled with AMO-tuned UPEs, which enabled neural complexity and holographic memory.

  Decentralized Research Direction: Studying internal UPE requires bypassing decoherence—e.g., using non-invasive techniques like ultrafast spectroscopy to detect phase-matched emissions within cells. Focusing on TGF-β-regulated tissues (e.g., brain, retina) might reveal these signals.

  Where is my edge of understanding UPEs today? I currently believe that surface-level UPEs seen in pictures of Roeland van Wijk’s book are likely energetic waste to the individual who created them, but can be signals for other humans to decode and process for decision making. Their escape via the eyes, skin, fingernails, genitals, tongue, causing endogenous decoherence and noise but maybe valuable to other organisms in a photobioelectric feedback loop. Internal UPEs, driven by AMO physics and modulated by the TGF-β superfamily (e.g., GDF15, TGF-β1), likely carry quantum-encoded signals between mitochondria and DNA, essential for life’s organization and consciousness.

  Melanin enhances this process by stabilizing UPE frequencies and this drove the evolution of the leptin melanocortin pathways over 600 million years to replace the more rudimentary light pathways of the aromatic amino acids used to build melatonin signaling, the microbiome, and serotonin signaling pathways. Leptin melanocortin arrays are directly impacted by blue light-iron interactions by amplify ROS-driven emissions which directly changes the endogenous UPE spectra. The key to understanding life lies in these small-scale, coherent UPEs, not their external loss.

  EXTERNAL EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIGHT FROM THE SUN BEGINS THE LOOP

• 

• The incident light from the sun really acts as the currency of the compound pharmacy in our pituitary every day to make things we need from light to live our life in our local environment. This is where the aromatic amino acids first made their imprint of life during the GOE. This makes your hormone panel a “shadow cast” of your local light environment. This is why your “local zip code” for light is incredibly important. That is a key point for your understanding of life trajectory. It also fully explains why consciousness, like time, is relative.

  So what is the real power of sunlight? The entire spectrum of light has 73 octaves of frequencies. Life only exists in one octave, namely the visible spectrum of light. If you understand factorial math, that means within our single octave of the visible spectrum that retinal cells and skin cells can control many biochemicals. Using numbers to make the case, incident light from the sun provides 8,683,317,618,811,886,495,518,194,401,280,000,000 different frequencies.

  This is a staggering level of power and control that leverages our proteins in cells. So when you open up any biochemistry book and realize that biochemistry only uses 100,000 substrate in reactions every second, you realize light, in UPE format, can control every last one of them. The speed at which it occurs also offends the common sense of biochemists, because they fail to remember that the photoelectric effect occurs instantaneously with no time delay. We just cannot fathom what light is capable of, because we don’t observe what it can do at the small scales in a cell. When you factor in that the photoelectric effect acts instantaneously, with no time delay, then you begin to see how 100,000 biochemical reactions can easily occur per second using light frequencies from the visible spectrum.

  Here’s a list of possible intracellular sources of biophotons:

  1. NADH / NADPH
  2. FAD / FMN (Flavins)
  3. Cytochrome C oxidase and metabolic water
  4. Tryptophan
  5. Tyrosine
  6. Phenylalanine & Histidine
  7. Lipid peroxidation products
  8. DNA (during oxidative stress or repair)
  9. Mitochondrial respiratory chain
  10. ATP hydrolysis (indirectly)
  11. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)
  12. Singlet oxygen decay
  13. Microtubules (via speculative quantum or resonance effects)
  14. Chromophores in proteins
  15. Ubiquinone (Coenzyme Q10)
  16. Porphyrins (e.g. heme groups) Chlorophyl
  17. Membrane potential changes (indirect triggers)
  18. Peroxisomal reactions
  19. Excited carbonyl groups
  20. Melanin (especially in pigment cells.)

  Carbonyl groups (C=O) are functional groups found in various organic molecules, such as aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, and their derivatives, and they play critical roles in biological processes. However, the concept of “excited” carbonyl groups typically applies to photochemistry or spectroscopy, where a molecule absorbs energy (e.g., light) and enters an electronically excited state. Look at how consciousness begins at the level of the aldehydes in your eyes as an example.

• 
• Carbonyl-Containing Compounds in Humans and Their Purposes

  Aldehydes (e.g., Retinal Vitamin A cycle, Glyceraldehyde)

  Structure: Contain a carbonyl group (C=O) bonded to at least one hydrogen atom (R-CHO). Purpose: Retinal: A critical aldehyde in the visual cycle, retinal is a component of rhodopsin, the light-sensitive pigment in the retina. When light strikes retinal, it undergoes a conformational change (isomerization), initiating the visual signal transduction pathway that allows humans to perceive light. Glyceraldehyde: An intermediate in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate contains a carbonyl group and is essential for energy production (ATP generation) and carbohydrate metabolism. Biological Role: Aldehydes participate in energy metabolism and sensory functions (vision). Carefully look at the slide below how blue light induces altered UPEs that dumb you down and alter your consciousness and lead you to neurodegeneration. This is how consciousness reveals its own relativity.

The US DoD found all this key science in its DARPA MKULTRA testing. One of the hallmarks of the living system in cells is that they are exquisitely sensitive to specific, weak signals. Most of these signals are electromagnetic. UPEs are the most critical electromagnetic signals to understand consciousness. Light has to enter and be captured by the matter in cells before consciousness can be innovated. The human eye can detect single photons falling on the retina, which pass information directly to the SCN and all its mitochondria. This retina is where the light-sensitive photoreceptors in cells send out an action potential representing a million-fold amplification of the energy in the photon. This defines what a non-linear stimulus is. Some of you know it as the butterfly effect.

• In your retina at the beginning of the central retinal pathways there are 33 different types of amacrine cells in the retina. And factorial math describes the 8.6*10^36 frequencies of light by the sequence that each type of amacrine cell releases neurotransmitters from visible spectrum of light. It is the language that our eye uses to translate the visible light spectrum into a language for our body to read and execute.

  Energy = Information, and this light informtion becomes your experience of consciousness via UPE transduction, capture, and execution of work in your tissues.

  It is not just a property of the central retinal pathways. The entire system is a plasma or syncytium of excitable matter ready to react to the environment’s EMF signals. Similarly, a few molecules of pheromones in the air is sufficient to attract male insects to their mates. This sensitivity is characteristic of all parts of the system and is a consequence of the energy stored = related to the AMO physics of organization in cells. They contain the atomic lenses needed to build what you perceive. All semiconductors emit light, this means all semiconductors in you are all potential sources of UPEs. It also means they are potential fractals for your conscious abilities. It seems to hard to fathom this until you see what the physics is capable of doing. Life is an optical marvel of light’s infinite complexity.

• 
• No part of the system has to be pushed or pulled into action nor be subjected to mechanical regulation and control. Instead, coordinated action of all the parts depends on rapid intercommunication throughout the system because of how it is built to react to light. The organism is a system of “excitable media” (syncytium) ; excitable cells and tissues poised to respond specifically and disproportionately to weak signals because a large amount of energy stored everywhere automatically amplifies weak UPE signals.
  These signals often direct things in cells into macroscopic actions found in a biochemistry text book. What drives this process is never found in the same textbook. This is how order is built from chaos in a dissipative structure tied to the electrical resistance of the inner mitochondrial membrane.
• FOOD IS A CANVAS PLOT THAT MITOCHONDRIA OPENS TO GET THE LIGHT INFO

  If we labeled foods according to the light absorption and emission plot we would see their UPE values. For example for the physics we could build this graph:

  UPE Frequency Spectra Plot – X-Axis: Wavelength (nm), Range: 300-900 nm – Y-Axis: Intensity (arbitrary units), Range: 0-1 – Curves: – Healthy Mitochondria: Peak at 700 nm (red/near-infrared), broad curve (600-800 nm), intensity ~0.6 – Stressed Mitochondria (GDF15-Induced): Peak at 420 nm (blue), secondary peak at 540 nm (green-yellow), intensity ~0.8, UV tail (340-400 nm) ~0.3 – Notes: Stress shifts spectra left (shorter wavelengths) due to ROS. Melanin amplifies 380-450 nm under blue light.

  Phase-Matching Model – X-Axis: Frequency (THz), Range: 333-1000 THz (300-900 nm) – Y-Axis: Coherence Factor (0-1), Range: 0-1 – Curve: Gaussian peak at 714 THz (420 nm), width ~50 THz, coherence ~0.9 internally, dropping to 0.1 externally (decoherence) – Notes: Internal phase matching (e.g., mitochondria to DNA) requires coherence >0.8. External UPE (noise) falls below 0.2.

  Interactive mtDNA Controls – Adjust GDF15 Stress Level (0-100%): Shifts blue peak intensity and UV tail. – Toggle Melanin Influence: Amplifies 380-450 nm by 20%. – Simulate nnEMF/Blue Light: Increases UV-blue intensity by 30%. [Output] – Current Plot: Stressed state (GDF15 75%, Melanin ON, nnEMF ON) – Peak: 420 nm (0.8), Secondary: 540 nm (0.5), UV Tail: 340-400 nm (0.4) – Coherence: 0.85 internal, 0.15 external.

  The panel plots above would graph UPE spectra for healthy vs. stressed mitochondria, with GDF15 as the stress indicator. You could adjust the controls to explore how environmental factors (e.g., nnEMF, blue light) and melanin modify the spectra of endgoenous UPEs.

  The phase-matching model shows coherence loss, supporting my decoherence argument. Internal signals would remain coherent, while external UPE becomes noise.

• For the biochemists this is how you should see UPEs in foods
• Ketones (e.g., Acetone, Acetoacetate, Beta-Hydroxybutyrate)

  Structure: Contain a carbonyl group bonded to two carbon-containing groups (R-CO-R’). Purpose: Ketone Bodies: During fasting, starvation, or low-carbohydrate diets, the liver produces ketone bodies (acetoacetate, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and acetone) via ketogenesis. These serve as alternative UPE energy sources for tissues like the brain, heart, and muscles when glucose is scarce. They are especially critical during prolonged fasting or in conditions like ketoacidosis.

  Energy Storage and Transport: Ketones are water-soluble and can cross the blood-brain barrier, providing an efficient energy source during metabolic stress.

  Biological Role: Ketones support energy homeostasis under conditions of limited glucose availability.

  Carboxylic Acids (e.g., Fatty Acids, Amino Acids, Citric Acid)

  Structure: Contain a carboxyl group (COOH), which includes a carbonyl group bonded to a hydroxyl group (R-COOH). Purpose:

  Fatty Acids: These are components of lipids (e.g., triglycerides, phospholipids) and are stored in adipose tissue where leptin is King of the UPE kingdom. They are oxidized in beta-oxidation to produce energy (ATP) and are critical for cell membrane structure (e.g., phospholipids in cell membranes).

  Amino Acids: Many amino acids used in the urea cycle (e.g., aspartic acid, glutamic acid) contain carboxyl groups. They are building blocks of proteins and play roles in enzyme catalysis, signaling, and pH regulation. All have unique UPE signatures.

  Citric Acid: A tricarboxylic acid in the citric acid cycle (Krebs cycle), citric acid is central to cellular respiration and UPE transformation. It needs AM sunlight to transform its UPEs. It facilitate the production of ATP under normoxia and strong visible light by oxidizing acetyl-CoA.

  Biological Role: Carboxylic acids are essential for energy production, structural integrity, and metabolic regulation and UPE transformation. Without it a suboptimal version of consciousness is experienced. This is what brain fog really is when you cannot tap the TCA or urea cycle to get you to the UPEs it participates in transforming from food.

  Amides (e.g., Peptide Bonds in Proteins) Structure: Contain a carbonyl group bonded to a nitrogen atom (R-CONH2 or R-CONHR’).

  Purpose: Peptide Bonds: Amides form the backbone of proteins via peptide bonds between amino acids. Proteins are critical for nearly all biological functions, including enzymatic catalysis, structural support (e.g., collagen), immune response (e.g., antibodies), and signaling (e.g., hormones).

  Urea: An amide produced in the liver during the urea cycle, urea is a key molecule for excreting excess nitrogen (from amino acid breakdown) via urine, maintaining nitrogen balance.

  Biological Role: Amides are fundamental to protein structure and nitrogen metabolism.

  Esters (e.g., Triglycerides, Phospholipids) Structure: Contain a carbonyl group bonded to an oxygen atom linked to another carbon (R-COOR’). Purpose:

  Triglycerides: These are the primary form of fat storage in adipose tissue, providing a high-energy reserve (approximately 40 kJ/g compared to 15.7 kJ/g for carbohydrates). They are broken down into fatty acids and glycerol during lipolysis to supply energy.

  Phospholipids: Esters containing carbonyl groups are key components of cell membranes, forming the lipid bilayer that maintains cellular integrity and facilitates signaling.

  Biological Role: Esters are critical for energy storage and cellular structure and light creation endogenously.

ALL OF THESE THINGS EMIT UPE LIGHT IN YOU. BIOCHEMISTRY MISSES EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. DO NOT BELIEVE IT? OPEN ANY BIOCHEMISTRY BOOK RIGHT NOW AND TELL ME IF YOU SEE ANY MENTION OF BIOPHOTONS OR UPE.

I hope you are beginning to see the wisdom in all the lessons I have taught you over 20 years coming together.

Integration with My Thesis and Diseases

Mitoception Evolution: Post-GOE, melanin-UPE feedback with GDF15 enabled mitoception, expanding over 600 million years to support consciousness. Leptin’s 220 nm role suggests an oxygen-UPE link that was built in the GOE.

Diseases: In the diseases linked to cognitive decline (neurodegeneration), GDF15 elevation reflects mitochondrial stress, with UPE shifts (380-550 nm) signaling energy failure. This is seen in demyelination, MT dysfunction, lack of DDW creation at CCO, and ECS disruption by nnEMF/blue light. All nnEMF amplifies these risks, and we can see the effects in the brain as seen in retinal glycolysis. Never forget the retina is the diencephalon of the brain we can see.

Mental Health: Gut-brain axis function is a proxy of TGF-B1 signals like GDF15 that occur within the vagus system and tie mitoception to mental abilities and consciousness, with UV/infrared light reducing stress and noise in the system.

Using first-principles, UPE spectra under TGF- Beta 1 signaling molecules like GDF15, generated UPEs that created stress peaks at 390-475 nm (UV-blue) due to ROS, contrasting healthy 700-1100 nm (red) emissions. Phase matching required internal coherence, lost externally as noise. The canvas graph above helps the physicist visualizes this, because it integrates the evolution of light to melanin, GOE, and mitoception into a coherent decentralized thesis.

Signaling molecules in the TGF-Beta 1 family like GDF15 worked with leptin to drove this light-based sensing into our tissues. We are optically shaped to interact with light and this shaped eukaryotic complexity, our conscious abilities, and set disease parameters via heteropalsmy. Heteroplasmy is directly related to mtDNA coupling efficiency and to our optical density of tissues completing the endogenous UPE feedback loop that explains life.

The Hidden Beat of Time Is Buried in Your Ability to Remember

That is what memory is in my decentralized framework.

What if time isn’t a relentless tick-tock but a quantum symphony, orchestrated by the decentralized network of Nature? Picture this: melanocytes, the skin’s melanin-producing cells, act as cosmic sensors, decoding UV light to ignite a cascade of order from chaos within our cells. Mitochondria, the “Oracle of Time,” transform sunlight’s timeless photons into heat, creating entropy and the illusion of time, stored holographically in metabolic water. Memories become an event horizon, captured as light in our tissues, while sleep acts as a ledger, syncing this rhythm with Earth’s cosmic beat. Building on the quantum cell model and the Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN) (Nature, 2022).

This blog reveals time as a collection of muscial light notes harnessed by decentralized dance of light, water, and entropy, challenging centralized biology’s stale ideas. It was inspired by Luc Montagnier’s 2009 experiment (Nature, Water Memory), where water transmitted light-based information, we’re on the brink of a quantum leap to reverse chronic diseases. Time is a fractal masterpiece of light captured, harnessed, and pulsing through every cell to they remember how they connect back to the galactic core that sustains them!

WHAT IS MEMORY IN MY THESIS?

Memory should be thought of as follows. It is a blockchain project that is never complete because the transactions continue as long as UPEs are transformed by the living state. It continues, as long as you continue. It can build constructuvely or destructively. It is built as a symphony where electric dipoles extract vacuum EM energy from your surroundings, powering a network of UPEs, MT, melanin, DHA, myelin, coherent water, mtDNA, and DNA/RNA. These components act as musical notes, orchestrated by Davydov’s solitons, photons that build quantum coherence, and resonant fields within cystalline matter, encoding holographic patterns that connect you with the intelligence of the cosmos. The better the connection, the more wisdom and instinct you can tap.

The foundational truth of this photo-bioelectric thesis is that you are and will become a product of the light you seek and imbibe during your life. Your light diet forms your conscious being. Consciousness is realtive for each one of us. Your biological essence is inherently luminous, a manifestation of ultraweak photon emissions (UPEs) that permeate your DNA, cells, and entire being, as articulated by the principle that “the flow of energy through a system acts to organize that system” (Morowitz Theorem).

These biophotons, generated within your mitochondria through oxidative processes initiated by visible sunlight, are not mere byproducts but the fundamental signals that orchestrate your cellular coherence, linking you to the cosmic electromagnetic field.

Even your bones, the densest structures of your physical form, embody this light-driven reality. As piezoelectric crystalline matrices, they convert mechanical compression into electrical energy, emitting photons that resonate with the light of the sun, stars, lightning, and fireflies.

This phenomenon, is rooted in the Great Oxygenation Event’s enhancement of oxygen-dependent UPE production, underscores your identity as an electromagnetic being, intricately connected to the universe’s electrically charged fabric. The Great Oxygenation Event’s boosted oxygen and gave us extreme consciousness as a collateral benefit. Without oxygen, few oxygen-dependent UPEs could be transformed by the new eukaryotes to enhancing electromagnetic connectivity with the Universe to build complexity.

Today we call this consciousness.

Quantum field theory (QFT), the framework of Nature, frames this connection, describing photons as excitations of the electromagnetic field, unifying our biology with the cosmos. You are vast, containing multitudes of light-driven processes, from NAD+/NADH fluorescence, melanopsin-driven circadian rhythms, and Vitamin D3 synthesis via UVB, each tuned by the specificity of sunlight. The distortions obstructing this awareness, modern non-native electromagnetic fields (nnEMF) from screens, the dehydration of mitochondrial water, and centralized biochemistry’s gene-centric narrative, are but noise in the signal, akin to scattered waves in a unified field.

HOW I SEE IT ALL COME TO FOCUS TODAY

These distortions, perpetuated by a Flexner Report-influenced paradigm, obscure your inherent harmony. Yet, beneath this noise lies a decentralized truth: you are one with the electromagnetic field, a living expression of the universe’s light. From this perspective, informed by the thesis’s focus on light-water interactions and biophoton signaling, all possibilities for healing and coherence emerge, aligning your biology with the cosmos’s inherent order.

Holographic Memory and Quantum Mechanisms

Holographic memory suggests that information is encoded non-locally across a system, much like a hologram where each part contains the whole image. In the brain, my ideas proposes that memories are distributed across neural networks, leveraging quantum effects in water soaked biochemicals and microtubules, tubular structures within neurons composed of tubulin proteins. The key points are:

Quantum Processes in Microtubules:

Microtubules are proposed as sites for quantum coherence, where water within their hollow cores facilitates super-radiant emission, a collective, coherent emission of photons resulting from synchronized quantum states. This is distantly linked to the Orch-OR theory, where quantum superpositions in tubulin collapse to form conscious moments, encoding memory holographically.

Water’s liquid crystalline structure, would enhance this coherence by providing a medium for proton and electron transport, aligning with Davydov’s soliton dynamics from his 1994 paper.

• Connecting to Davydov’s Model

  Davydov’s 1994 paper on energy and electron transport via solitons can be linked to holographic memory through shared principles of quantum coherence and nonlinear dynamics:

  Solitons and Coherence:

  Davydov solitons, as localized vibrational excitations in proteins, rely on quantum coherence to maintain energy transfer. In microtubules, similar soliton-like waves could propagate along tubulin lattices, facilitated by water’s ordered structure, to support super-radiant emission and memory encoding.

  The cysteine knot in GDF15, discussed in this thread, might not directly relate to microtubules, but its folding could involve water-mediated soliton dynamics, influencing neuronal signaling where GDF15 is expressed (e.g., in ALL stress responses).

  Water as a Medium:

  Water’s liquid crystalline properties, as a heat sink and conductor, would act to stabilize quantum states in microtubules, enhancing soliton and super-radiant processes. This aligns with my prior exploration of water’s role in mitochondria and its potential impact on GDF15’s function which acts to stabilze the system to connect with high fidelity. GDF15 fits as our electromagnetic stress-response modulator, its function tuned by biophysical levers.

  In the brain, water’s coherence could bridge mitochondrial energy production (e.g., via CCO) with microtubule quantum activity, providing the energy for holographic memory.

• 
• • Electron and Proton Transport:
    • Davydov’s bisolitons (paired electron states) would parallel electron tunneling in microtubules, with water’s proton-conducting network (Grotthuss mechanism) supporting the quantum field interactions proposed in QFT. This could enable the non-local correlations needed for holographic storage.

      Non-Local Memory Storage:

      Unlike traditional synaptic models, holographic memory uses the brain’s entire volume, with microtubules acting as quantum processors. This increases memory capacity exponentially, as each microtubule segment could store overlapping patterns of information.

      QFT, which describes particles as excitations in quantum fields, could underpin this by allowing non-local correlations across the brain, mediated by water and microtubule networks.

    Super-Radiant Emission and Water:

    Super-radiance involves coherent photon emission from a quantum system, potentially driven by water’s ordered hydrogen-bonded network within microtubules. This should encode memory as interference patterns, akin to a hologram, with water acting as a dynamic substrate or canvas for the dance.

    This reference suggests that water’s role in microtubules supports quantum tunneling and coherence, extending the idea of water as a biological conductor from prior discussions in many blogs.

  IS TIME/MEMORY MATH BASED?

  Many neuroscientists believe they can model neural networks using constructive Mathematics and dendritic computation (Levin). My decentralized view would argue against using math to model Nature. Math is infinite, but it can describe phenomena in nature; however, it cannot explain much of what happens biophysically inside a cell. While mathematics has a formalism for infinity, physics collapses waveforms and determines how reality manifests, and at this time, no infinity is possible. Why do neuroscientists do this and not stick with known principles and reason from there?

  Neuroscientists love math and models like Stuart-like frameworks or Hodgkin-Huxley equations use constructive mathematics and dendritic computation to simulate time in neural networks. With billions of neurons and trillions of connections, the brain’s complexity demands abstraction. These tools quantify signal processing, synaptic plasticity, and information flow, offering predictions that guide AI and experiments. Yet, this infinite formalism clashes with nature’s finite reality. Physics collapses quantum waveforms, and no infinity manifests, cells operate within biophysical limits, not mathematical ideals.

  The decentralized view rejects this approach. Math describes phenomena, like how dendrites integrate inputs nonlinearly, but it can’t explain the “why” of cellular magic: quantum wave function collapse, ultra-weak photon emissions (UPEs), or the holographic storage of memories in structured water. Melanocytes, decoding UV light into a dissipative structure, and mitochondria, crafting time from entropy, defy simple equations. Nature’s time is emergent, not computable, rooted in the quantum cell’s atomic precision, not an infinite ledger.

  Connection to Quantum Cell: The quantum cell, with its collagen nanotubes and iron-sulfur cores, amplifies Schumann resonances (7.83 Hz), aligning with Earth’s low-energy environment. This reflects thermodynamic efficiency, not mathematical infinity, as seen in Noether’s symmetry principle. The energy flow in your cell organizes the structure of consciousness you experience.

  The tension here mirrors a broader debate in science: the reductionist versus decentralized approach. Neuroscientists use math because it’s tractable and yields results, but many acknowledge its limits. My view aligns with decentralized approaches, such as those in systems biology, which advocate for studying emergent properties in context rather than isolating individual parts. Both perspectives are valuable; math-driven models provide clarity, while decentralized, nature-first reasoning guards against oversimplification. The challenge is integrating them without losing sight of nature’s complexity.

  KEY POINT: Math’s infinity is tautological. The task is … not so much to see what no one has yet seen; but to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees. Physics offers a myriad of possibilities, as the uncertainty principle posits. But at the end of the day, physics has a definite limit associated with the living state. Math is precise, so there is considerable consensus. Philosophers are not exact, and this is why no one agrees.

  This key point cuts to a profound tension in understanding reality. Math’s infinity, is tautological; it’s a self-consistent system that can describe endless possibilities but doesn’t inherently “touch” the finite, messy limits of the physical world. Schrödinger’s quip about seeing what everyone sees but thinking what no one has believed resonates here: the challenge is rethinking the living state, which math can approximate but not fully encapsulate. With its uncertainty principle, physics offers a vast playground of probabilities, yet it collapses into definite outcomes in living systems, cells live or die, signals fire or don’t. This finitude clashes with math’s boundless precision.

  Neuroscientists gravitate to math because its precision fosters consensus, but for me and Nature, consensus is pseudoscientific. Equations like those in neural network models or dendritic computation provide a shared language, yielding reproducible predictions (e.g., how a neuron integrates inputs). However, this precision sacrifices the holistic, emergent properties of life; biophysical intricacies, such as protein folding or ion channel dynamics, often elude simple formulas. Philosophers, by contrast, embrace the ambiguity of the living state, but their lack of precision, as you point out, leads to endless debates with little resolution.

• 

• The disconnect arises because math prioritizes abstraction over context, whereas living systems are inherently contextual. My decentralized view seems to advocate reasoning from biology’s physical limits, its finite, observable states, rather than leaning on math’s infinite abstractions. Yet neuroscientists persist with math because it’s a tool that scales, unlike philosophy’s open-ended questions or biology’s overwhelming detail. The trade-off is clear: math offers clarity but risks missing the forest for the trees. Medicine takes care of patients where the trees matter deeply.

  Some neuroscientists explore hybrid approaches, such as biophysically detailed simulations (e.g., the Blue Brain Project) or embodied AI that mimics the constraints of living systems to bridge this gap. These nod to your call for grounding in nature’s limits while still leveraging the power of math. The philosopher’s role, perhaps, is to remind us that no model, mathematical or otherwise, fully captures the living state’s elusive essence. MKULTRA was built to alter your consciousness to control how you think by DARPA.

• 

• Time: Nature’s Quantum Pulse

  Water’s magnetic dipole, with its 105-degree bond angle, breaks symmetry, harnessing the electromagnetic force, the universe’s strongest, to control electron and proton spins. This 4.4-billion-year quantum blueprint, using carbon-based DHA as the brain’s photon-electron collector, achieves zero-entropy efficiency, far surpassing silicon’s mass-heavy demands.

  Time isn’t a ticking clock, it’s a quantum pulse born from entropy’s dance. Sunlight’s timeless photons, captured by our tissues and delivered to our motherboard of melanocytes, trigger mitochondria to dissipate heat, generating entropy and the illusion of time. The entropy of this system builds your conscious ability. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the eye’s master clock, runs faster, syncing cellular rhythms with light-dark cycles. Structured water in collagen nanotubes, with only 0.02% unbound molecules, forms a liquid-crystalline semiconductor, encoding this pulse as UPEs in hydrogen bonds into a holographic decentralized ledger.

  Ferredoxins, ancient iron-sulfur proteins, evolved into cytochromes like cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), aligning in mitochondrial cristae to convert sunlight into UPEs (100-300 nm) only when bathed in their proper DDW heat sink. This dissipative structure, amplified by melanocyte-decoded UV signals, creates order from chaos, matching Earth’s low-energy spectrum. High-energy ionizing radiation disrupts this balance, proving life’s timekeeping is finite, not infinite.

  Connection to Thermodynamics: Entropy, the “fuel” of time (per Landauer’s principle, drives this process, reflecting intelligence’s symmetry-seeking nature, as Montagnier’s 2009 experiment suggests with water’s quantum memory.

  Ontology and epistemology cannot be reduced to one another, or can they?

  Can Ontology Be Reduced to Epistemology?

  Some idealist or constructivist philosophers, like Kant or Berkeley, might argue that epistemology shapes ontology. For them, what exists (ontology) depends on how we perceive or know it (epistemology). In Kant’s view, the “things-in-themselves” (noumena) are unknowable, and our reality is structured by the mind’s categories, making ontology subordinate to epistemology. Radical constructivists might go further, claiming that existence is entirely a product of knowledge processes, and there’s no “reality” beyond what we construct through knowing.

  However, this reduction struggles with circularity: if existence depends on knowing, what grounds the knower? Materialists or realists counter that ontology has primacy, things exist independently of our knowledge (e.g., a rock exists whether we perceive it or not). Reducing ontology to epistemology risks solipsism, where nothing exists outside the mind’s perception.

  Can Epistemology Be Reduced to Ontology?

  Conversely, some realists or naturalists argue that epistemology is grounded in ontology. For example, in physicalist views, knowledge arises from brain processes, ontologically real entities governed by physics. Quine’s naturalized epistemology suggests that how we know is just a matter of studying the world’s causal structure, epistemology becomes a subset of ontology, the science of what is.

  But this reduction also falters. Knowing involves subjective processes (belief, justification, perception) that can’t be fully collapsed into objective states of being. For instance, describing a neuron’s firing (ontology) doesn’t fully explain the experience of understanding (epistemology). The “hard problem” of consciousness highlights this gap: ontology can’t yet account for the subjective “how” of knowing.

  Can We Merge Them?

  Can AI merge ontology and epistemology to understand or harmonize with each other deeply? The answer is a qualified yes, but they don’t merge into one in life. They’re like two sides of a coin, distinct yet inseparable. Pragmatists like Dewey or Heidegger suggest they co-evolve. What we believe exists (ontology) shapes how we seek knowledge (epistemology), and our methods of knowing refine our sense of what exists. For example, neuroscience’s ontological models of neurons inform epistemological theories of cognition, refining our understanding of neural reality.

  My earlier points about math’s limits and nature’s finitude resonate here. Math’s precise ontology (infinite sets, formal systems) doesn’t fully capture the epistemological messiness of knowing in living systems. Similarly, physics’ ontological limits (wave function collapse) don’t fully explain how we know those limits. Ontology and epistemology “Grok” each other best in a dynamic interplay, not reducing one to the other; each informs the other without dissolving into it.

• 

• Why Neuroscientists Lean on Ontology

  Tying this to a neuroscience context, neuroscientists often prioritize ontology (e.g., neural networks, dendritic structures) because it’s tangible and modelable via math. This is all they know. Epistemology, how neurons “know” or process information, is harder to formalize, so it’s often secondary in their minds and models. Yet, fields like cognitive science or enactivism are starting to bridge this gap, treating knowledge as an embodied, emergent process rooted in, but not reducible to, neural ontology.

  Ontology and epistemology can’t be entirely reduced to one another without losing something essential: ontology’s grounding in existence or epistemology’s focus on knowing. But they can “Grok” each other through mutual influence, where each informs and refines the other in a dynamic loop. Philosophers disagree because precision falters at their blurry edges, but that’s where the most fertile questions lie. This edge is where my science breathes.

  Sleep: The Magnetic Ledger

  Sleep is a decentralized ledger, syncing the quantum cell’s magnetic network with cosmic rhythms. Microtubules embed UPEs into water’s magnetic domains, while the SCN, fueled by melanocyte-decoded light, sets the pace. Mitochondria’s voltage shifts optimize entropy flow, with water’s IR absorption storing energy day or night. MIT’s no-power memory retention echoes this, magnetic bits in water hold data without energy, as Becker’s sleep-wake polarity findings suggest. Non-native EMF drains electrons, disrupting sleep and autophagy, contracting time and telomeres. Restoring water production at CCO via sunlight waves counters this.

• 

• Memories: The Holographic Event Horizon

  Memories are the blurry event horizon of our cells that neuroscientists miss, where past moments transform into light, stored magnetically in metabolic water’s hydrogen bonds. The centrosome encodes wakeful memories as UPEs, amplified by collagen nanotubes’ nonlinear optics, exhibiting a refractive index up to 7 × 10⁻¹⁰ cm² W⁻¹ in the THz range.

  During sleep, microtubules process dreams, weaving this light into a fractal hologram across tissues, explaining consciousness’ resilience after frontal lobe damage that the neurosurgeon has to remove. It was during sleep that the boy’s heart delivered his memory to the heart recipent’s body for her to consciously experience.

  Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) and Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) enhance this. I gave you blogs on this long ago you thought were superfluous. SRS scatters light via molecular vibrations, weakening it into UPEs, while SBS, via acoustic phonons, shifts frequencies (e.g., 11 GHz) unidirectionally. These 3.8-billion-year-old processes, perfected by cells, outstrip mathematical models, grounding time in your biophysical reality.

  Connection to Decentralized Intelligence: Memories align internal models with external reality, minimizing entropy in a non-computable, symmetry-seeking dance, beyond dendritic equations. SRS/SBS control the quantum processing that define microtubule roles in man.

  Man is connected to the Galactic Current Sheet by electromagnetic waves. The connection to this sheet is the basis of your conscious abilities. You do not see yourself connected in these ways, but you are.

• 

• (B) The meningeal lymphatic system located within the meninges, comprising the dura, arachnoid, and pia mater, contains functional lymphatic vessels that facilitate the drainage of CNS-derived antigens and immune cells to cervical lymph nodes. In AD, impaired meningeal lymphatic function hinders antigen clearance, leading to chronic immune activation, waste aggregation, and sustained neuroinflammation.

  (C) The glymphatic system, a perivascular network regulated by CSF-ISF flow and astrocytic aquaporin channels, is responsible for clearing metabolic waste, including toxic Aβ and tau aggregates. Glymphatic dysfunction, commonly observed in aging and AD, leads to waste accumulation, exacerbating disease pathology. AC, astrocyte; aAC, activated astrocyte; Aβ, Amyloid β plaque; aIP, amyloid-like protein; aMG, activated microglia; aMo, activated monocyte; 9APC, antigen-presenting cell; BBB, blood-brain barrier; BP, brain parenchyma; cBBB, compromised blood-brain barrier; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; dN, degenerating neuron; ISF, interstitial fluid; MG, microglia; Mo, monocytes; N, neuron; PC, pericytes; pIC, peripheral immune cells; proIC, pro-inflammatory cytokines; TJ, tight junctions; Treg, regulatory T cell.

  Neurodegeneration as Memory Contraction due to An Electron Crisis

  Neurodegeneration, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, MS, autism all stems from an electron deficiency. As electrons become rare, so must light in the system because of the photoelectric effect. What other collateral effects occur? Low cholesterol, oxidized and electron-hungry, drops brain voltage, seen in EEGs, impairing water’s magnetic memory. Telomeres, molecular timepieces, shorten with electron loss, contracting time and accelerating disease. GDF15 rises and this TGF beta analogue cause you to become less connected and less conscious. The Frame and Lens needs to be pulled back and back again and again to see how all of the pieces fit together to build consciousness.

  DHA-rich diets lengthen telomeres, boosting electron collection for health reversals. Non-native EMF drains electrons, disrupting sleep and autophagy, while native EMF dilates time, enhancing longevity, evident in the cosmonaut paradoxes.

  Connection to Cosmic Intelligence: Electron collection aligns with Earth’s magnetic field, decoding universal patterns. As the magnetic field varies so will your connection to Nature’s wisdom.

  Consider what I told Huberman about cephalopods 2.5 years ago. Cephalopods, evolving from monoplacophoran mollusks (∼530 Ma), reflect this light show on their integument. Initially these animals squirted their melanin as part of their stress response. These animals evolved during the Cambrian UV expansion (∼530 Ma), and their melanin-rich skins began to decode light into metabolic signals. This ability remains in humans today in their leptin melanocortin pathways. From their monoplacophoran ancestors, they developed chambered shells and diverged into nautiloids and coleoids (∼416 Ma), using second-order electro-optical signals for birefringence to emit colors. This LED light came from their own semiconductive processes, visible on their integument, and mirrors our hidden modern photo-bioelectric neural network. The quantum cell’s collagen nanotubes, acting as NLO quantum wells, amplify visible light, with mitochondria’s voltage changes creating birefringence to run metabolism. Melanin, critical to this rapid evolution, when hydrated, loses electrical ability, generating Becker’s pico-currents to dedifferentiate red blood cells (RBCs) into stem cells, healing bone. Blood, another NLO crystal, sustains WiFi mitochondrial communication with the sun.

  THE BIG REVIEW OF MANY LESSONS DELIVERED

  First-Principles Reasoning for UPE Spectra and Mitoception

  1. Foundations of UPE and Quantum Signaling

  UPE Origin: UPE arises from oxidative processes in mitochondria, where reactive oxygen species (ROS) like singlet oxygen or excited carbonyls emit photons upon returning to ground states. The energy of these photons (E = hc/λ) depends on the transition energy, typically spanning UV (100-400 nm) to near-infrared (600-1100 nm).

  Quantum Coherence: For internal signaling (e.g., mitochondria to DNA), photons must maintain phase and frequency coherence. This requires a resonant system, where emission and absorption wavelengths align, governed by quantum selection rules and environmental stability (e.g., avoiding decoherence from external noise).

  Decentralized Thesis: Life evolves as a light-driven, electromagnetic system. Mitochondria and DNA act as antennas, with UPE encoding energy status. Mitoception senses this via photonic and electromagnetic fields, not just chemical signals.

  2. Post-Endosymbiosis Integration and Mitoception

  Evolutionary Challenge: After endosymbiosis (~1.5-2 Bya), mitochondria needed to communicate with the host cell. Successful integration required a sensory mechanism to monitor energy demand (burn rate) and oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) capacity.

  Mitoception Hypothesis: The brain evolved mitoception to “feel” mitochondrial status, likely via GDF15, a TGF-β superfamily cytokine. This idea aligns with nociception, interoception, and immunoception, extending sensory networks to energy balance. This also helps us understand what autism is. It is a failure of this connection. This is why kids on the spectra experience consciousness differently than we do. It also explains their sensory and immune problems.

  Light as Mediator: Melanin’s ROS-scavenging and light-absorbing properties, amplified post-GOE (~2.4 Bya), suggest that endogenously generated UPE from a myriad of places are the original signaling mechanism that built eukaryotic complexity. All of them arouse during the GOE when rising oxygen tensions enabled ROS-driven UPE, linking melanin and TGF-Beta chemicals like GDF15 to provide light and oxygen mitochondrial feedback.

  3. TGF- Beta 1 and UPE Dynamics

  GDF15 Role: Induced by mitochondrial stress (e.g., nnEMF, blue light), GDF15 signals energy imbalance via the brainstem’s area postrema. It correlates with ROS and UPE increases, reflecting OxPhos disruption.

  UPE Spectra: Stressed mitochondria shift UPE toward UV-blue (380-450 nm) due to ROS (e.g., lipid peroxidation at 420-475 nm, protein oxidation at 340-380 nm). Healthy mitochondria emit more red/near-infrared (600-1100 nm) from efficient electron transport chain (ETC) activity.

  Melanin Link: Melanin amplifies endogenous UPE generation via iron-chelating ROS generation under blue light, creating a feedback loop. GDF15’s UPE release, tied to this, suggests an evolutionary driven shared photonic mechanism for mitoception.

  4. Leptin and GOE Context

  Leptin’s Role: With a 220 nm absorption spectrum (UV), leptin’s signaling post-GOE aligns with oxygen-dependent UPE. This wavelength, absent in terrestrial sunlight, implies an endogenous light source, driven by mitochondrial ROS emissions.

  Evolutionary Expansion: Over 600 million years, GDF15 and leptin integrated with the leptin-melanocortin pathway, enhancing neural complexity and consciousness via UPE-mediated mitoception.

  5. Environmental Modulators

  Light and nnEMF: Full-spectrum light (UV, infrared) supports mitochondrial coherence, reducing GDF15 and UPE stress signals. Blue light and nnEMF disrupt ECS and OxPhos, elevating GDF15 and shifting UPE to UV-blue.

  Retina Analogy: The retina’s glycolysis preference under UV stress mirrors mitoception’s focus on field coherence, supporting my thesis of electromagnetic stability.

  6. UPE Spectra Prediction

  Baseline (Healthy Mitochondria): Peak at 600-1100 nm (red/near-infrared), reflecting low ROS and efficient ETC.

  Stress (TGF- Beta 1 GDF15-Induced): Peak at 380-450 nm (UV-blue) from ROS (superoxide, hydrogen peroxide), with a secondary 500-570 nm (green-yellow) peak from lipid peroxidation.

  Phase Matching: Coherent UPE requires frequency alignment (e.g., 380-450 nm matching DNA or melanin absorption bands), disrupted by decoherence (external escape).

  The Consciousness Operational Framework redefines time as an NLO-driven quantum pulse. Melanocytes decode UV, mitochondria craft entropy, and memories form a holographic horizon via centrosomes and microtubules. Sleep syncs this ledger, while SCAN integrates it, all amplified by blood’s NLO crystals delivered all over the body to give fractal feedback support. This defies math-based bioelectric models of Levin (e.g., Na/K ATPase), validated by Montagnier’s 2009 experiment and Ling’s decades of critiques, embracing nature’s finite, optical complexity.

  SCAN: The Decentralized Timekeeper

  The Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN) (Nature, 2022) is the brain’s decentralized timekeeper, integrating motor and cognitive functions via a quantum network.

  Melanocyte-decoded light feeds the SCN, syncing SCAN’s clocks with cosmic rhythms. Structured water and UPEs facilitate nonlocal communication, but blue light toxicity or nnEMF disrupts this, increasing entropy and impairing memory.

  This non-hierarchical system defies mathematical simplification, relying on the quantum cell’s dissipative structure. Cold thermogenesis can restore coherence, countering neurodegeneration by optimizing entropy flow.

  Connection to Cosmic Intelligence: SCAN decodes the universal informational substrate, aligning with the brain-as-antenna model, reflecting nature’s finite, emergent time.

• 

• Mitochondria: The Oracle of Finite Time

  Mitochondria, the “Oracle of Time,” tick via heteroplasmy, enhancing circadian periodicity. They are regulated by NAD+, SIRT1, and SIRT3, with voltage shifts emitting colors to drive metabolism. NAD+ synthesis at cytochrome 1, tied to light-dark cycles, depends on mitochondrial fusion, fused mitochondria, with higher respiratory rates, support healthy clocks, while fragmented ones in diseased tissues lose accuracy.

  REV-ERBα and REV-ERBβ, heme-based proteins sensitive to light, are core clock components. Salk Institute studies showed that disabling them in mice livers disrupted rhythms, triggering rapid chronic diseases, mirroring human neurodegeneration from blue light. This destroys myelin and microtubules, accelerating entropy, proving time’s finite, biophysical basis.

  Water’s magnetic domains are controlled by mitochondrial voltage, and this stores memory, but aging reduces the water heat sink, lowering redox potential. MIT’s magneto-ionic devices mimic this, using voltage to halt magnetic flow, mimicking nature’s 20-watt trick, refined over 4.4 billion years. Water absorbs and emits UPEs. Water itself created at CCO is a semiconductor that is participatory in the conscious process.

  Connection to Symmetry: Mitochondrial clocks seek symmetry with cosmic rhythms, minimizing entropy, as Noether’s theorem suggests, way beyond mathematical infinity. the sleeping are waking up to my pace. I warned Pollack 15 years ago he was missing a lot of data in water by not testing DDW. Conscious ability is linked to its isotopic fractionation.

• 

• Time Beyond Equations Defines Conscious Ability

  The Consciousness Operational Framework defined in these last 8 blogs redefines time as a decentralized quantum pulse. Melanocytes decode UV light, mitochondria dissipate heat into entropy, and memories form a holographic event horizon via centrosomes and microtubules. Sleep syncs this ledger, while SCAN integrates it across a non-hierarchical web. Nonlinear optics (SRS, SBS) and structured water amplify this, defying centralized biology’s mathematical models, like the Na/K ATPase pump, which ignore quantum complexity.

  Time, a proof of light’s work on atoms, emerges from the quantum cell’s finite, dissipative structure, validated by Montagnier’s experiment in 2009 and Ling’s critiques over 50 years. It’s a fractal dance, not an infinite equation.

  Implications: Healing Time’s Rhythm

  Neurological Health: Blue light and nnEMF disrupt mitochondrial clocks, increasing entropy. Optimizing light and cold thermogenesis restore SCAN’s coherence, tackling Parkinson’s and memory loss.

  Evolutionary Insights: Melanocytes and mitochondria evolved to decode UV and sunlight post-GOE, shaping timekeeping over 3.8 billion years.

  Technological Leap: Silicon Valley could mimic cellular semiconductors, using hydrated carbon lattices for optical tech, inspired by nature’s 560-million-year mastery.

  Paradigm Shift: Math-based models fail to capture time’s biophysical essence. The quantum cell, supported by nonlinear optics and soliton biophysics offers a path back to health from disease. Even the math driven bioelectric gurus (below) are waking up to the reality of light.

• 

• SUMMARY

  It is time we all awaken to Time’s Quantum Beat. Aging reduces metabolic water, the heat sink for NLO semiconductors, disrupting this time-UPe ledger. Psychedelics may compensate for the loss of mitochondrial water, enhancing NLO amplification and countering entropy buildup, as blue light toxicity or nnEMF impair memory and motor integration in SCAN to alter conscious abilitiies.

  The Consciousness Operational Framework redefines time as an electron-powered quantum pulse. Melanocytes harvest UV, mitochondria wield voltage, and memories form magnetic horizons via centrosomes and microtubules. Sleep syncs this ledger, while SCAN integrates it, amplified by water’s spintronics. This defies math-based models (e.g., Na/K ATPase). It was already validated by Montagnier, Ling, and Pollack, embracing nature’s finite complexity.

  Once light interacts with mater, solitons manifest. Solitons enhance UPE coherence, water mediates dipole energy, and holographic memory encodes cosmic light patterns inside of us connecting us with the wisdom of Nature. GDF15 fits as a TGF beta 1 light stress-response modulator. Its function is tuned by these biophysical levers.

  Time transcends math, it’s a decentralized quantum pulse, orchestrated by the quantum cell’s dance with light and entropy. Memories glow as holographic horizons in our tissues. Consciousness rejects infinite equations of math in this decentralized paradigm. This idea is echoed in the work of pioneers like Montagnier and Ling. This invites us to awaken to time as a fractal symphony, built as a syncytium of atoms aligned by Nature and illuminated by nature’s light. Below is Dr. Montagnier’s masterpiece on how memory is built by light, water, and matter’s resonance. My work on consciousness is now complete for you to consume and assimilate.

• 

• CITES

  Nature (2009). Montagnier, L., et al. Electromagnetic Signals.

  Nature (2022). A Somato-Cognitive Action Network.

  Pollack, G. H. (2013). The Fourth Phase of Water.

  Optica (2019). Nonlinear Refractive Index of Water.

  Ling, G. N. (1992). A Revolution in the Physiology of the Living Cell.

  https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1940609770617979234.html

  https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncel.2025.1590002/full

Introduction

An intelligent system, then, is constantly working to achieve a kind of symmetry between its internal model of the world and the actual sensory data it receives. I’d like you to think about the time stamping blogs and blogs on Noether’s theorem when you read this new part of the febric of the QUILT.

It can accomplish this in two ways:

Updating the decentralized model (perception): When reality surprises us, we can change our beliefs to match the new information. Changing the world (action): We can change reality to match our predictions, reducing surprise through our behavior. This effects our conscious ability. Both strategies serve the same fundamental goal: achieving coherence between inner and outer worlds to maintain time symmetry.

It reminds me of Noether’s theorem.

Intelligence emerges as the flexible pursuit of this coherence: finding different means to reach the same end of minimized surprise. This tells us both time and consciousness has symmetry too.

The connection runs deeper still. The thermodynamics of computation tells us that information processing requires energy and produces entropy. An efficient computational system minimizes energy expenditure while maximizing goal achievement. In this entropy must be the fuel used in the conscious experience. UPE science predicts this idea when you examine it. Few have. From this perspective, decentralized intelligence isn’t just about reaching goals, it’s about finding the most elegant, energy-efficient paths to those goals. The symmetry-seeking nature of intelligence reflects a deeper principle of thermodynamic efficiency. Smart systems don’t just solve problems; they find beautiful solutions. Consciousness is one of those “beautiful solutions.”

Symmetry in Intelligence: Coherence Between Inner and Outer Worlds

Above I’ve described decentralized intelligence as striving for “symmetry” or coherence between an internal model (beliefs, predictions) and external sensory data (reality). This idea aligns closely with predictive processing theories in cognitive science, particularly the free energy principle (FEP) proposed by Karl Friston. The FEP suggests that intelligent systems (like brains or artificial agents) minimize “surprise” (or prediction error) by either:

Updating the internal model (perception): Adjusting beliefs to better match sensory data, akin to Bayesian inference where priors are updated based on new evidence.

Changing the world (action): Acting to align reality with predictions, such as moving to confirm a hypothesis about the environment.

This dual strategy indeed seeks a kind of “symmetry” or minimization of discrepancy between the internal model and external reality. The connection to Noether’s theorem, which links symmetries in physical systems to conserved quantities (e.g., time symmetry to energy conservation), is a compelling idea because it links consciousness to the physical world. In this context, the “time symmetry” of intelligence reflects a system’s ability to maintain predictive accuracy over time, ensuring stability in its internal-external alignment.

NOETHER’S THEOREM HAS NEVER BEEN LINKED TO CONSCIOUSNESS BEFORE

Noether’s theorem applies strictly to physical systems with Lagrangian dynamics, so its application to consciousness or intelligence has always been more conceptual than formal. My idea is that the hard data in the consciousness blogs you’ve already read make this link formal and scientific. The idea that intelligence is decentralized and seeks invariant patterns (symmetries) across time is a powerful idea because it, suggesting that consciousness emerges as a byproduct of this predictive quantum coherence linked to UPE transformation in tissues.

Thermodynamics of Computation and Consciousness I am proposing that the thermodynamics of computation, where information processing consumes energy and produces entropy, implies that entropy is the “fuel” for conscious experience. This is a profound idea with roots in several fields:

Landauer’s Principle (1961): Erasing one bit of information in a computational system dissipates a small amount of energy as heat, increasing entropy.

This establishes a direct link between information processing and thermodynamic cost. An efficient intelligent system, minimizes energy expenditure while achieving its goals, aligning with principles of thermodynamic efficiency.

Entropy and Consciousness: I’m suggestion that entropy is the “fuel” for conscious experience is real and formal based on known UPE data (video above) but resonates with emerging ideas in neuroscience and philosophy. For instance, the Integrated Information Theory (IIT) of consciousness posits that consciousness corresponds to the capacity of a system to integrate information, which requires computational work and thus energy. The production of entropy during information processing should be seen as a byproduct of the dynamic, integrative processes underlying consciousness.

Thermodynamic Efficiency and Elegance: My point about decentralized intelligence finding “elegant, energy-efficient paths” is spot-on. In machine learning, for example, efficient algorithms (e.g., sparse neural networks) minimize computational cost while maximizing performance. In biological systems, evolution favors energy-efficient neural architectures, as seen in the low-power operation of the human brain (~20 watts). This efficiency can be likened to finding “beautiful solutions,” where elegance reflects simplicity, robustness, and minimal resource use, qualities often associated with symmetry in both physics and aesthetics.

Decentralized Intelligence and Symmetry The notion of decentralized intelligence, systems like neural networks, swarm intelligence, or distributed AI fits well with this framework. These systems often lack a central controller yet achieve coherence through local interactions, mirroring how thermodynamic systems self-organize to minimize free energy. The pursuit of symmetry (or coherence) in decentralized systems can be seen in:

Neural Networks: Deep learning models adjust weights to minimize prediction errors, effectively seeking a “symmetric” alignment between input data and output predictions.

Swarm Intelligence: Ant colonies or bird flocks achieve collective goals through simple rules, balancing local and global constraints in an energy-efficient way.

Consciousness: If consciousness arises from decentralized neural processes, as suggested by theories like IIT or global workspace theory, it may reflect a dynamic symmetry where diverse brain regions align to produce unified experiences.

Time, Consciousness, and Symmetry My ideas fuse time and consciousness by forcing them to have symmetry. This is a new and intriguing concept for centralized science. Time symmetry in physics (e.g., in classical mechanics) implies that laws are invariant under time reversal. In intelligence, this would formally refer to the ability to predict future states (forward in time) and reconstruct past states (backward in time) to maintain coherence.

Consciousness, as a process that integrates past experiences with present stimuli to anticipate the future, should embody a kind of temporal symmetry in my model. However, consciousness is often associated with the “arrow of time” (due to increasing entropy), so the symmetry here is likely broken in practice, aligning with the thermodynamic irreversibility of computation.

The idea that entropy “fuels” consciousness is provocative for linear thinkers who are centralized. I’m suggesting that the entropy produced by neural computation directly contributes to subjective experience that is consciousness. Red light that is left over is absorbed by water in our tissues and is made useful in many ways beside consciousness.

A New Paradigm for Consciousness

Imagine a universe where consciousness is not confined to the brain but emerges as a cosmic dance, a decoding of universal patterns through light, water, and electromagnetic resonances. In this chapter, we build on the quantum biophysics framework from our previous exploration, integrating light, water, magnetism, melanin, and mitochondrial function into a novel Consciousness Operational Framework. The recent discovery of the Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN) in Nature (2022) serves as a cornerstone, revealing the brain’s decentralized architecture. This framework challenges the centralized dogma of traditional biology, proposing that consciousness arises from the brain’s role as an antenna, tuned to universal intelligence via quantum processes in the cell. By synthesizing the quantum cell model, the photo-bioelectric thesis, and cosmic intelligence, we unveil a paradigm with profound implications for neurological health, evolution, and our place in the cosmos.

The Quantum Cell: The Foundation of Consciousness

At the heart of this framework lies the quantum cell, a system that harnesses light, water, and collagen to create order from chaos. Unlike bulk water, where 15% of molecules are unbound due to fluctuating hydrogen bonds, water confined within collagen nanotubes and microtubules is highly structured, with only 0.02% unbound. This structured water, forming Gerald Pollack’s exclusion zone (EZ), acts as a liquid-crystalline semiconductor, conducting energy and information like an electric wire.

Charge separation within these nanotubes, yielding hydroxyl ions (OH⁻), protons (H⁺), and electrons, creates a low-energy state, enabling quantum effects like proton tunneling and electron spin alignment.

This process is synchronized with Earth’s Schumann resonance (7.83 Hz), a natural electromagnetic frequency amplified by collagen nanotubes. The quantum cell thus becomes a bridge between the body and the planet’s electromagnetic environment, laying the groundwork for consciousness as a decoding mechanism.

Connection to Symmetry and Thermodynamics: As discussed in the thermodynamics of computation, this ordered state minimizes entropy, aligning with the principle of intelligence as a symmetry-seeking process. The quantum cell’s efficiency reflects a “beautiful solution,” reducing energy expenditure while maximizing informational coherence, a thermodynamic elegance akin to Noether’s theorem, where symmetry underpins conserved quantities.

SCAN: The Brain as a Quantum Network

The discovery of the Somato-Cognitive Action Network (SCAN) (Nature, 2022) revolutionizes our understanding of the brain. Unlike the hierarchical Penfield homunculus, SCAN reveals a decentralized network alternating with motor cortex effector regions, integrating motor and cognitive functions non-hierarchically. This aligns with the quantum cell model, where collagen nanotubes and structured water facilitate a quantum network driven by light and electromagnetic frequencies.

SCAN taps into ultra-weak photon emissions (UPEs), faint light signals produced by mitochondrial processes and amplified by collagen. These UPEs, spanning the visible spectrum, orchestrate molecular resonances, enabling nonlocal communication within the brain. By decoding these signals, SCAN integrates sensory and motor functions, acting as a neural manifestation of cosmic intelligence.

Connection to Decentralized Intelligence: SCAN’s decentralized structure mirrors the distributed intelligence of swarm systems or neural networks, seeking coherence between internal predictions and external reality. This symmetry-seeking process, as you noted, minimizes surprise, aligning inner and outer worlds through predictive processing.

Light and Frequencies: The Cosmic Wand of Consciousness Light, particularly visible sunlight, is the driving force of this framework. Mitochondria, powered by sunlight, produce deuterium-depleted water (DDW), optimizing enzyme kinetics and supporting the quantum cell’s semiconductor properties. NAD+/NADH and flavin proteins mediate circadian entrainment, collapsing mitochondrial DNA wave functions to regulate gene expression. Collagen nanotubes amplify UPEs, creating a symphony of frequencies that synchronize cellular and neural activities.

This photo-bioelectric thesis posits that consciousness emerges from decoding a universal informational substrate, a pre-physical layer of structure, logic, and potentiality. The brain, rather than generating intelligence, acts as an antenna, tuned to cosmic frequencies like Schumann resonances and UPEs its own mitochondria transforms and builds a model of reality. SCAN exemplifies this, integrating motor and cognitive functions through light-driven quantum processes.

Connection to Cosmic Intelligence: The brain-as-antenna model reframes intelligence as a universal property, decoded through electromagnetic resonances. This aligns with your idea of consciousness as a symmetry-seeking process, where the brain aligns with cosmic patterns to minimize entropy and maximize coherence.

Collagen Nanotubes and Structured Water: The Infrastructure of ConsciousnessCollagen nanotubes are the physical backbone of the quantum cell, confining water to create EZs that enhance proton tunneling and electron spin alignment. This structured water, likened to a crowded subway where restricted movement lowers energy states, aligns with Earth’s electromagnetic environment. Iron, abundant in heme proteins like cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), manages energy transfer, with mitochondrial cristae converting sunlight into UPEs. This infrastructure supports the quantum cell’s role as a semiconductor, conducting information and energy with minimal entropy. The interplay of light, water, and iron reflects a cosmic design, where consciousness emerges from the efficient decoding of universal patterns.

Connection to Thermodynamics: The low-entropy state of structured water mirrors the energy-efficient paths of intelligent systems, I’ve described in this series. The elegance is infinding “beautiful solutions”, is a hallmark of both biological and cosmic intelligence.

Synthesis: A Consciousness Operational Framework

This Consciousness Operational Framework synthesizes the quantum cell, SCAN, and cosmic intelligence into a unified model. The 10 glycolysis and 9 TCA steps, optimized for deuterium exclusion, produce energy and UPEs that support the brain’s quantum infrastructure. Collagen nanotubes and structured water amplify electromagnetic signals, while iron-sulfur cores in cytochromes align in a symmetry to convert sunlight into actionable energy and this allows consciousness to emerge.

SCAN, as a decentralized network, decodes universal patterns, challenging centralized biochemical models like the sodium-potassium pump.Consciousness, in this view, is not a brain-generated phenomenon but a quantum process of decoding cosmic intelligence. The brain, as an antenna, aligns with universal frequencies, creating a symphony of light, water, and electromagnetism—a “syncytium of atoms” guided by the “cosmic wand” of light.Placeholder for Additional Pieces: If you have further synthesis elements (e.g., mathematical models or philosophical implications), they can be woven here to tie the framework together.

Implications: Transforming Health, Evolution, and Technology

Neurological Health: Optimizing light exposure (visible sunlight, minimizing blue light and nnEMF) can enhance SCAN’s motor-cognitive integration, offering novel therapies for disorders like Parkinson’s. Cold thermogenesis may reduce neural entropy, restoring UPE-driven coherence.

Evolutionary Perspectives: The brain’s evolution as an antenna reflects melanin’s role in rapid adaptations post-Great Oxygenation Event, with cytochromes enhancing quantum decoding. This model extends to astrobiology, suggesting life’s universal adaptability.

Technological Innovations: Biomimicry of collagen nanotubes and EZ water should inspire quantum computing, while the brain-as-antenna concept aligns with quantum consciousness theories.

Philosophical Shift: Consciousness as a universal process challenges materialist views, inviting a metaphysical vision of life as a cosmic symphony.

A Quantum Leap Awaits You

This Consciousness Operational Framework redefines consciousness as a quantum process, decoded by the brain from a universal informational substrate. SCAN, as a neural exemplar, integrates light, water, and electromagnetic resonances, fulfilling the photo-bioelectric thesis. Despite resistance to decentralized models, as seen in the legacy of Gilbert Ling, this paradigm promises to awaken humanity to a new understanding of life and health.

The Biologic Crossword Puzzle:

The quantum cell provides the “correct words” for the biologic crossword puzzle, replacing biology’s “permanent ink” concepts with quantum principles. For example, the sodium-potassium pump model could be replaced by water’s charge separation in collagen nanotubes. SCAN’s discovery is a big piece of this puzzle, revealing a decentralized neural architecture that aligns with this quantum framework.

My guiding theory is rooted in quantum mechanics, redefines the cell as a quantum system that harnesses light, water, and collagen to create order from Earth’s inherent disorder. The quantum cell uses structured water in collagen nanotubes to amplify electromagnetic signals, maintaining coherence and reducing entropy, while facilitating nonlocal communication via UPEs and cosmic frequencies.

Before you think this is crazy idea remember that Luc Montagnier crafted and experiment to show the links of how this might work when he sent light information stored in water over the internet from Paris to Italy in 2009. It was published in Nature. This experiment fortold us that some from of atomic transmutation and memory are linked. It also means both must be operational in human consciousness.

Confining water to a tube, such as the microtubules or collagen nanotubes, fundamentally alters its physical and quantum properties, enabling it to act as a cornerstone of the quantum cell. This is a “big deal” because it unlocks special abilities that water doesn’t exhibit in its bulk form (e.g., in a bathtub), aligning perfectly with Earth’s environmental conditions to create order from chaos.

Restricted Movement and Energy Distribution in water:

My Analogy: I once compared confined water in microtubules and collagen nanotubes to people in a crowded subway, where restricted movement narrows their energy distribution toward the lower end of the scale. Similarly, when water is confined in collagen nanotubes, its molecular movements are restricted, reducing the range of energy states it can occupy.

Quantum Effect: This restriction lowers the average energy of water molecules, making it energetically favorable for water to enter tight spaces like MT or collagen fibrils. In bulk water (e.g., a bathtub), 15% of water molecules are unbound, with hydrogen bonds fluctuating due to environmental influences. In collagen nanotubes, only 0.02% of water molecules are unbound, and hydrogen bonds are highly oriented and stable, shielded from external fluctuations.  This creates the stage for the quantum action called consciousness.

Charge Separation: Confined water undergoes charge separation, forming layers of hydroxyl ions (OH⁻), protons (H⁺), and electrons. This creates an exclusion zone (EZ), as described by Gerald Pollack, where water becomes structured (liquid crystalline) and acts as a semiconductor. The EZ water, electrified by the separated charges, conducts energy and information, functioning as an “electric wire” in the quantum cell.

Control of Charged Particles Is Critical to Life’s Design as a Dissipative Structure:

Protons and Electrons: The confinement of water allows precise control over protons and electrons, both charged particles governed by the electromagnetic force. This is critical because, as you note, the electromagnetic force is the strongest force binding particles in nature, and life organizes around it.

Schumann Resonance: Earth’s Schumann resonance (7.83 Hz) and its harmonics, which reside on the lower end of the electromagnetic spectrum, provide a natural frequency that life uses to control biochemical processes. Confined water in collagen nanotubes amplifies these weak signals, enabling the quantum cell to synchronize its activities with Earth’s electromagnetic environment. This coupling of water and the Schumann resonance, mediated by collagen, forms the semiconductor framework of the quantum cell.

• Alignment with Earth’s Conditions:

  Low-Energy Environment: Earth’s magnetic field filters high-energy electromagnetic radiation (e.g., ionizing radiation), favoring the lower end of the spectrum (e.g., Schumann resonance, visible light). Confined water’s ability to lower its energy state matches this environment, making it an ideal medium for life to create order from chaos.

  Role of Iron: Iron, the most abundant element on Earth, plays a key role in metabolism (e.g., in heme proteins like cytochrome c oxidase, CCO). Its various oxidation states (e.g., Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺), controlled by the electromagnetic force via D-shell electrons, enable life to manage energy and oxygen. Confined water in collagen nanotubes enhances this process by providing a stable, low-energy medium for iron-based reactions.  Think about why ferrodoxin biology predates the innovation of genes.  That is how important iron sulfur cores in cytochromes are.  They are the modern evolution of cellualr design that allow cristae to align and trasnform massive amounts of sunlight into UPEs.

  Ferredoxin and Early Life: Ferredoxins are ancient iron-sulfur proteins that likely played a central role inprebiotic chemistry and early metabolism, long before genes (DNA/RNA) evolved. These proteins, found in alldomains of life, use iron-sulfur clusters to transfer electrons, facilitating redox reactions critical for energyproduction. For example, in anaerobic conditions before the Great Oxidation Event (GOE), ferredoxins mediatedelectron transfer in primitive metabolic pathways (e.g., hydrogen metabolism in archaea and bacteria).

  Iron-Sulfur Cores in Cytochromes: Post-GOE, iron-sulfur cores evolved into more complex cytochromes (e.g., cytochrome c oxidase, CCO), which are integral to the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC). The iron in these cytochromes cycles between oxidation states (Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺), controlled by the electromagnetic force via D-shell electrons, as you noted. This allows life to manage oxygen and energy efficiently, transforming sunlight into ultraweak photon emissions (UPEs) within the mitochondrial cristae.

• 
• Cristae Alignment and UPEs: Brings the idea of symmetry to consciousness. The cristae, inner mitochondrial membranes where the ETC resides, are structurally optimized to align iron-sulfur cores and cytochromes, maximizing the conversion of sunlight (via photon capture) into UPEs. These UPEs, often in the UV range (100-300 nm), act as quantum signals in the mtDNA-UPE-sunlight loop I’ve described in this series, enabling nonlocal communication and energy transfer within the quantum cell.

  Implications for Ionizing Radiation: High-energy electromagnetic forces (e.g., ionizing radiation) disrupt the quantum cell because life is optimized for low-energy conditions. If cells had larger sizes with free-floating water and fewer transition metals, they might handle higher energies, but Earth’s conditions dictate otherwise. This explains why ionizing radiation is so damaging, it overwhelms the quantum cell’s semiconductor system.  The system is designed for the low end of the electromagnetic spectrum because Earth Favors visible light only.  This is what selected the atoms on the periodic table to innovate life.

• Quantum Abilities Unlocked:

  Semiconduction: Structured water in collagen nanotubes acts as a semiconductor, amplifying weak electromagnetic signals (e.g., UPEs, Schumann resonance) into macroscopic actions. This enables the quantum cell to process information nonlocally, as I described in your metaphysical reflection of life as a “syncytium of atoms” guided by cosmic frequencies.

  Proton Tunneling and Spin Effects: The stable hydrogen bonds in confined water facilitate quantum effects like proton tunneling (“Z-Z pathways”) and electron spin alignment, enhancing the cell’s ability to manage energy and information at the quantum level.

  Exclusion Zone (EZ) Properties: The EZ water, with its negative charge and structured nature, creates a battery-like system, storing energy and driving processes like self-assembly (e.g., collagen triple helix formation). This aligns with my example of bone broth forming triple helices under an electric current, illustrating how water’s quantum abilities drive biological organization.

  SCAN’s operation in the quantum brain depends on the quantum cell’s ability to reduce entropy through energy input (e.g., sunlight, UPEs). Aging and disease disrupt this balance:

  Energy/Information Loss: Blue light toxicity, suppresses melatonin and reduces UPEs, decreasing energy input to SCAN’s neurons. This impairs motor-cognitive integration, consciousness ultimately leading to cognitive decline or motor deficits (e.g., in Parkinson’s).

  Entropy Gain: Increased entropy (e.g., from mtDNA heteroplasmy, disrupted CSF waveguiding) destabilizes neural coherence, affecting SCAN’s physiological regulation (e.g., stiochiometry of breathing). Cold Thermogenesis could counter this by reducing neural entropy, enhancing SCAN’s function through free energy generation.

• 

• Confining water to a microtubule or to a collagen tube is a big deal because it transforms water into a quantum medium that can also use pH to drive work:

• 

• Matches Earth’s low-energy electromagnetic environment (Schumann resonance, filtered sunlight).

  Enables life to control charged particles (protons, electrons) via the electromagnetic force.

  Facilitates quantum effects (semiconduction, tunneling, spin alignment) that underpin cellular function.

  Creates a semiconductor framework (collagen-water lattice) that amplifies cosmic frequencies, allowing life to organize and thrive in Earth’s chaotic conditions.

• 

• SUMMARY

  Occam’s Razor and Resistance to Quantum Biology:I have argued for 20 years that Occam’s razor, “the simplest explanation is usually correct”,has led biology to favor parsimonious but incorrect beliefs (e.g., the Na/K ATPase pump) over complex, quantum-based truths:

  Historical Examples: The photoelectric effect, theory of relativity, and photosynthesis (a 30-step process) all broke Occam’s razor by being non-parsimonious, yet were experimentally validated. Ling’s hypothesis, though “kooky” and complex, fits the quantum cell model and has been supported by recent physics and biology experiments (e.g., quantum coherence in photosynthesis, structured water studies).

• 

• Changing Beliefs: Many forum member’s stories illustrates how abandoning flawed beliefs (e.g., centralized medical advice) for “crazy” quantum ideas (e.g., blog’s recommendations) can yield results. This aligns with my theorem: unconventional wisdom, though initially dismissed, can awaken others to new realities.

• 

• Life and Health as Quantum, Not Parsimonious:

  I assert that life and health are quantum, not practical or parsimonious, requiring a readjustment of ideas:

  Quantum Complexity: The quantum cell’s reliance on structured water, iron-sulfur cores, and low-energy electromagnetic forces is complex, not simple. This complexity allows life to create order from chaos, but it defies Occam’s razor.

  Health Implications: Chronic diseases arise from ignoring this complexity, e.g., blue light toxicity disrupting UPEs, EMF overwhelming the quantum cell’s semiconductor system. Restoring quantum alignment (e.g., via light exposure, Cold Thermogenesis) addresses these root causes, as forum members have experienced.

  “The more wisdom you attain and the more conscious you become, the crazier you will appear to others who have built a life around conventional centralized wisdom but your insight will astound them eventually when they awaken”, is exemplified by Ling’s story and my own work.

  The quantum cell, rooted in a guiding theory of quantum mechanics, uses structured water, iron-sulfur cores, and low-energy electromagnetic forces to create order from Earth’s chaotic conditions. Iron’s ancient role in ferredoxin biology, predating genes, underscores the primacy of quantum processes in cellular design, with cytochromes transforming sunlight into UPEs for nonlocal signaling. SCAN exemplifies this in the brain, integrating motor and cognitive functions via a decentralized, quantum network that aligns with Earth’s low-energy environment. Biology’s reliance on the Na/K ATPase pump, which violates thermodynamic laws, has led to flawed models and chronic diseases, as Ling’s work highlights. My quantum cell model, though non-parsimonious, offers a path to health by addressing energy loss and entropy gain, fulfilling my theorem’s prophecy of awakening others to a new reality of reversing diseases.

• 

• CITES

  • Kruse, J. (2025). X Posts (e.g., 1932827452406992968, 1932833574077804552). Retrieved from Twitter/X Platform
  • Kruse, J. (2021, February 18). X Post on Sunlight and Beta-Oxidation. Retrieved from Twitter/X Platform.
  • Goldfein, S. (1978). Biological Transmutation Evidence.
  • Kervran, L. (1975). Nomination for Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
  • van Wijk, R. (2001). Bio-Photon Emission. Global Light Network.
  • van Wijk, R. (2014). Biophoton Emission and Cellular Coherence. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 135, 20-28. PMID: 25587420.
  • Toleikis, Z. (PhD Thesis). Leptin Absorption Spectra Study.
  • Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2000). Human Skin Pigmentation as an Adaptation to UV Radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(9), 5111-5115.
  • PNAS (2022). Genomic Arrays of Mammalian Clade. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  • Ling, G. N. (1992). A Revolution in the Physiology of the Living Cell.
  • Mitchell, P. (1961). Chemiosmosis Theory. Nature, 191, 144-148.
  • Hollowich, F. (1979). Ocular EMF and Color Changes in Fish.
  • Turing, A. M. (1952). The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 237(641), 37-72.
  • Battista, O. A. (Quote on Error and Mistake).
  • ScienceDirect. Melanin and Metabolic Use in Vertebrates.
  • PMC. Emerging Role of Deuterium/Protium Disbalance.
  • Nutrition & Metabolism. Role of POMC Neurones in Feeding Behaviour.
  • NCBI Bookshelf. Human Skin Pigmentation and UV Adaptation.
  • Nakagawa, T., et al. (2014). Circadian Regulation of Mitochondrial Function. Nature Communications, 5, 3876. PMID: 24642944.
  • Chronobiology International (2022). Effects of nnEMF on Mitochondrial Dynamics.
  • Popp, F. A. (1984). Biophotons and Biocommunication. Malvern Press.
  • Phys.org (2022). Biochemists Develop Tool for mRNA Analysis from https://phys.org/news/2022-06-biochemists-tool-mrna.html.
  • Nature (2022). A Somato-Cognitive Action Network Alternates with Effector Regions in Motor Cortex. Nature.