You’re going to be retooled with knowledge and reschooled with Nature’s wisdom today. Share this decentralized wisdom with the world.
Do we need to know our “WHY“?
I think we do.
Without knowing our why I believe the attainment of Optimal will not happen.
I was getting ready for a medical talk earlier this year and I was jotting some things down about how my surgical judgement has changed from the time I left residency to the present and going over my practice patterns for the talk. It dawned on me the practice of medicine is very much like the practice we use in life to become a more imporved version of ourself. Inevitably, practice isn’t the thing you do once you’re good. It’s the thing you do that makes you good. I was surprised about the crowd of people I was asked to speak to. The mayor was in the audience and so was some the state health department officials. I had no idea who i was speaking too. I thought it was going to be mostly patients and PCP’s in my new referal base for my new job. When I saw that my audience was quite different than I anticipated I scrapped my “neurosurgery talk plan” on minimally invasive spine surgery and decided to talk about how my “what”, neurosurgery, led me into my “why”, my real passion………Quantum biology.
The response I got from yesterday’s talk even astounded me. I think I realized something about myself yesterday. When I speak from the heart I connect people with nature. That connection is the key to getting my flock well. This is the basis of becoming a mitochondriac. I realized this week that I help people find their “why” in healthcare via biophysics so their wellness manifests. Do you need some clarity on how to move your “what’s”, to the key “why’s” that will eventually move your decision making process to focus on only the things that matter in your life to keep you well? Then reach out to me and join my flock of mitochondriacs right now.
SO GIVE ME SOME EXAMPLES DOC
“The antagonistic pleiotropy (AP) theory posits that aging occurs because alleles that are detrimental in older organisms are beneficial to growth early in life and thus are maintained in populations.
Although genes of the insulin signaling pathway likely participate in AP, the insulin‐regulated cellular correlates of AP have not been identified.
Answer: young humans before full myelination in brain needs deuterium to complete growth but once myelination is complete then mitochondria need to deuterium deplete to control growth and metabolism pathways into adult life. This is the control system for the insulin signaling systems built into the placenta. The proxy for the system is salinity measures. The more salinity in the system the more UV light can be captured in the system to drive morphogenesis.
As deuterium fractions in tissues rise as we age, salinity measures lower. This means we need more sunlight to offset the risks of aging. This is why those with insulin resistance have high BUN/creat ratios and why they are more apt to have SIADH, HTN.
Sodium transporters brings Vitamin C into the brain for TCA cycle protons recycling to lower the KIE of deuterium in TCA intermediates as we age to control volume changes in the matrix. This is why SIADH is associated with cognitive decline in TBI and aging.
MORE DECENTRALIZED LESSONS?
Na also brings calcium into bone in cases of osteopenia. Low Na = low Ca and Mg = mitochondrial dysfunction. Low salinity in CSF and the body is a feature of all nnEMF exposure in environments.
The higher nnEMF in your environment the lower salinity becomes in blood and CSF and lower salinity = sleep disorders. Most people with high insulin levels due to artificial light exposure also are afflicted with sleep apnea due to deuterium rise cause by the altered Vitamin A signaling. The slide below makes this case.
BUN rises as salinity decreases because deuterium fractions are increasing. Salt from our eccrine sweat glands helps cool our body because it augments skin vasodilation ( like UVA light does).
As man made blue light exposure of skin rises, dopamine creation in the eye and brain drop and our salinity in CSF drops and obesity manifests easier due to deuterium content in the choroid of the eye and the skin and subcutaneous fat mass due to melanopsin.
The TRP receptors of melanopsin are affected negatively by deuteration by altered salinity.
What are TRP receptors?
Transient receptor potential channels, were first discovered in 1969. They are multimodal ion channels that act as sensors of photic, chemically, or physical toxic stimuli. These channels are widely distributed in various tissues and play a variety of roles. Centralized science is still yet to realize how these channels work with light. Blu elight varies with the time of the day and this system measures these changes accurately to tell time at the quantum scale.
It all makes sense when you understand bio-physics of the kinetic isotope effect (KIE) of deuterium in the mammalian system. Centralized MDs have no clue about this work. Most have no clue why PUFA’s in fake fats are really bad: they increase proton leakage in mitochondrial matrix and allows more deuterium in matrix than should be there and this raised heteroplasmy rates to cause disease.
SUMMARY
How do we link the lessons I have taught you over the years to light?
CLOCK and BMAL1 are positive regulators of circadian gene expression in humans, and PER and CRY are the negative regulators that operate under day and night cycles.
Blue light and nnEMF liberate Vitamin A and when it is free in the system it sets off a chain of events. None fo them are good for the non visual photo receptors. For examples, it becomes an aldehyde that destroys the small molecule modulators of the mammalian circadian mechanism shown in the picture above. Once the molecular clock goes awry in a tissue with poor light signaling the implications for many neolithic diseases spiral out of control. What are some of the Vitamin A proteins involved in this downward spiral?
They are called retinoic acid receptor-related orphan nuclear receptors or RORs for short. The RORs have several isoforms too called RORα-γ. These proteins are also under the transcriptional control of CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimers. This is bad news for the circadian control of PER.
SIRT1 regulates the activity of BMAL1 and CLOCK, two circadian transcription factors, which target NAMPT, an enzyme that synthesizes NAD+ in cytochrome 1. And in a curious feed-forward mechanism, CLOCK and BMAL1 enhance SIRT1 expression… genetic deletion of any of these players induces insulin resistance in humans. This is how chronic blue light exposure causes diabetes. Food does not cause it. LIGHT DOES. Food exacerbates the situation only because carbohydrates make 50% less water at CCO compared to fats.
Sunlight is a NATURAL calcium channel blocker that alters the firing rate of voltage-gated channels on cells. SUNLIGHT in the AM increases the amount of PER protein that is made in the cytoplasm to get to a critical concentration where it enters the nucleus. This alters the free radical signal in mitochondria. Recall all free radicals have one unpaired electron and this makes them magnetochemicals that contol timing decisions in the cell. They act as a logic gate to chose the proper metabolic pathway to use.
This is done in a few ways with sunlight. AM sunlight increases PER, and later in the AM UVA light shows up = nitric oxide (NO) release = lowers BP and controls stem cell depots and the blue light in sun balanced by red light also stimulates melanopsin relaxation of the arterioles in our skin as another collateral effect. This one reason why just going outside in the sun and clean air reduces depression and anxiety because sunlight slows breathing and improves oxygenation. When PER is not made by sunlight depression and suicide are more predictible. Indoor living and ALAN lead to depression and suicide because PER is not made by AM sunlight. the picture shows you the effect in the SCN. It is devasting to the signaling in the leptin melanocortin semiconductive pathway. Smash that blue hyperlink now.
Breathing indoors requires us to use suboptimal air which is not moving or mixing with the wind or interacting with the sun so its charge is lowered. This poor oxygen level = pseudohypoxia = poor PER creation in the AM —> NAD+ drops = higher heteroplasmy = you age faster = more sympathetic activation = more PVN firing = less vagal tone = you get sick quicker indoors. More than 90% of you live inside.
As a result, SIRT 1 lowers with INDOOR living = alters PER cycling in the SCN and every tissue from the cytosol day and night from the nucleus.
Why is this a big deal? When PER one cycle is off so is NAD+ at cytochrome 1 and this causes advanced aging in man due to heteroplasmy because deuterium is let into the mitchondrial matrix where it is not supposed to be!!!
NAD+ is one of the more immediate players in cytochrome 1 that is a huge driver of circadian biology in humans. It is the coenzyme called nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). It participates in a variety of redox reactions in the matrix that help generate DDW. Solar exposure and fasting work with light frequencies to slow ECT flow and this can increase the intracellular NAD/NADH ratio if the light environment is dominated by sunlight. It won’t do this with artificial light. It lowers NAD+. This is what sets off a cascade of circadian events that can destroy tissues because they involve epigenetics and the regulation of growth and metabolism of man. LIGHT DOES THIS. NOT FOOD OR FUELS.
SUN + fasting -> PER cycling is controlled by AM sunlight —> raised NAD+ -> SIRT1 -> BMAL1/CLOCK -> NAMPT -> NAD+ is increased.
You’ve now been retooled with knowledge to be reschooled with wisdom. Share this decentralized wisdom with the world.
I’ve received a ton of DMs and emails about my discussion with Dr. Alexis Cowan on our second podcast on T cells and autoimmunity, so I decided to answer them here.
How do I know that the external process on the integument controls the biochemistry process on the interior? Do you know that supplementation of Vitamin D does not work the same in those with heavily melanated exteriors compared to those with Fitzpatrick one and two skin?
According to the article above, “Doctors frequently prescribe supplemental vitamin D,” Freedman said. “However, we do not know all its effects and how they may differ between the races. The bottom line is that racial differences in calcium handling are seen, and black and white patients have differing risks for bone and heart disease. We should more clearly determine the effects of supplementing vitamin D in black patients with low levels based on existing criteria. We should not assume that the effects of supplementation will be the same between the races.” Again, this is not a racial story; it is a story of the biophysics of melanin and how POMC is only translated by UV light frequencies.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER LINES OF EVOLUTIONARY EVIDENCE THAT THESE THINGS ARE LINKED TO OUR INTEGUMENT?
YES THERE IS IN DAIRY TOLERANCE. This is food loaded with calcium. HYPERLINK
This explains this fact: 80 percent of all African Americans and Native Americans are lactose intolerant. They have more melanin in their integument. Over 90 percent of Asian Americans are lactose intolerant, and it is least common among Americans with a Northern European heritage who have Fitzpatrick one or two skin.
This important distinction must be made in El Salvador, where 95% of the population has melanated skin. This implies that supplemental Vitamin D is not a wise choice for them.
Brown & Black races generally have lower vitamin D levels than whites, partly because their darker skin pigmentation limits the amount of the vitamin produced by sunlight. This is protective in environments where melanated skin is optimized.
IMPLICATIONS OF THE SURFACE BIOPHYSICS?
Despite these lower vitamin D levels and dietary calcium ingestion, browns & blacks naturally experience lower rates of osteoporosis and have far less calcium in their arteries based on published studies. Studies further reveal that brown/black patients with diabetes have half the rate of heart attack as whites. This shows us that melanated skin may be a protective effect from blue light and nnEMF exposure. This also shows us that lower levels of calcified atherosclerotic plaque in brown & blacks are associated with a lower risk of heart disease. The irony is in the stroke and heart attack belt in the US, browns & blacks in the general community have higher rates of heart attack than whites. This implies that their circadian mismatch to a higher latitude likely explains their decreased longevity. This is why my pinned tweet exists. Vitamin D is not the best end-all story in longevity. It can be used as a good proxy for whites, but we should not assume the same for browns & blacks. Browns & blacks clearly get disease faster and more severe than whites at the same latitude. This again points to a lack of proper sunlight being the main culprit in disease creation.
Humans have CYP11A1-derived secosteroids in their epidermis and serum. What does it do?
CYP11A1 drives a novel magnetochemical pathway in the vitamin D3 (D3) and 7-dehydrocholesterol (7DHC) metabolic pathways in humans. CYP11A1 initiates it. The CYP11A1 SNP has been previously characterized in vitro papers. It has also been proven to occur in vivo in humans. The researchers in those papers analyzed samples of human serum, epidermis, and pig adrenals for the presence of intermediates and products of these pathways. What did they find, and why did it sway me that the electric state of our membranes is giving direct feedback control to metabolism below inside of cells?
In the paper linked below, the epidermal, serum and adrenal samples showed the presence of D3 hydroxy-derivatives corresponding to 20(OH)D3, 22(OH)D3, 25(OH)D3, 1,25(OH)2D3, 20,22(OH)2D3, 20,23(OH)2D3, 20,24(OH)2D3, 20,25(OH)2D3, 20,26(OH)2D3, 1,20,23(OH)3D3 and 17,20,23(OH)3D3, plus 1,20(OH)2D3 which was detectable only in the epidermis.
Serum concentrations of 20(OH)D3 and 22(OH)D3 were only 30- and 15-fold lower than 25(OH)D3, respectively, and at levels above those required for biological activity as measured in vitro.
They also detected 1,20,24(OH)3D3, 1,20,25(OH)3D3 and 1,20,26(OH)3D3 in the adrenals. Products of CYP11A1 action on 7DHC, namely 22(OH)7DHC, 20,22(OH)27DHC, and 7-dehydropregnenolone, were also detected in serum, epidermis, and the adrenal gland. Thus, research has shown that humans have novel CYP11A1-derived secosteroids in the skin, serum, and adrenal gland. This SNP likely has much to do with why we deleted the Vitamin C gene in the human genome. Moreover, as I told Dr. Cowan, based on the concentrations found in the papers, their biological activity suggests that they act as hormones in vivo.
T cells undergo positive and negative selection in the thymus through T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of peptides presented on major histocompatibility (MHC) proteins. Although the genes encoding MHC proteins are among the most polymorphic, most vertebrates express relatively few MHC alleles individually. Genes only act to alter metabolic flux, as the picture above shows. How the number of MHC alleles expressed affects thymic selection and the TCR repertoire on an individual level remains unclear to centralized science. Decentralized science has a different viewpoint. I think sunlight on the skin changes our microbiome and sculpts it to create free radicals and light changes from the microbiomes, creating a variability response in our CD4 and CD 8 cells.
SUMMARY
This is my current hypothesis. I believe sunlight creates T-cell variability in our skin and gut surfaces, as I mentioned below with Dr. Cowan. I think sunlight stimulates MHC heterozygosity, which improves immunity by reducing receptor variability in T cells. MHC heterozygosity limits T cell receptor variability in CD4 T cells. T cells are essential for recognizing infectious agents through their receptors (TCRs), which engage peptides derived from invaders or auto-antigens bound to major histocompatibility complex proteins (MHC). While much research has focused on MHC peptide specificity, the impact of MHC on the expressed TCR repertoire, especially in MHC heterozygotes, has not been well studied in centralized science. Understanding this decentralized link in medicine should guide personalized autoimmune monitoring and better predictive responses to various new treatments. Sunlight exposure to 380nm and 1280 nm light is mandatory in any autoimmune reversal. It should be from sunlight and not any manmade light.
The blog’s parting thought is about pharmaceuticals for autoimmune conditions: The human condition does not require that you take drugs that pharmaceutical companies sell. You do not have a pharmaceutical deficiency or a “chemical imbalance.” BigHarma sells these ideas to keep you believing their BS. Pharmaceutical companies demand that you consume what they sell. You can live strong and healthy without them. Learn how and do it. Decentralized medicine and healthcare teach these techniques.
Time is your most valuable asset in life and links to your choices in health span and how you use your monetary energy. Why doesn’t the “food guru” get this concept? They spend too much time under ALAN while in a gym reading flawed nutrition data and not enough time reading about the physics of organisms. The erasure of information drives entropy in cells, and this process increases over time. This is a consequence of having a ratio in our universe of 1 billion light photons to every atom. This is why LIGHT> food. All molecular clocks that control circadian biology are flow meters for this entropy measurement. This should tell the ripe mind that circadian biology’s light and dark cycles are the key to the biological ENIGMA CODE of all modern diseases, especially autoimmune conditions.
Be wise and get a job so your life’s art can be free or at least close to it. Do you. Create for yourself. Do not create for the audience. In fact, I will tell you that if you do act like the customer is always right, your life’s work will never resonate to every inch of this planet. So many creators have been miserable or given up because they were taught your creativity has to pay for your life, or you’re no good. That is an idea that had to be born in a food guru’s mind. It is devoid of wisdom and impotent.
Centralized Medicine as it practiced today is an applied science. It is not foundational science. If that offends you, good. You’re ready for this lesson. The centralized experts on act like it is foundational to Nature. Nothing can be further from the truth. Glymour and Stalker argued at the turn of the 21st century that “medicine in industrialized countries is scientific medicine.” I remember reading it and thinking this has to be the most ignorant statement I have read post training. I read it 5 years before the insights came to be in my Quilt document. It might have been my fuel to burn this idea to the ground.
Although centralized physicians’ medical practice is not itself science, it is based on a manufactured science and on training that is supposed to teach physicians to apply scientific knowledge to people in a rational way. Unfortunately that mode of dissemination has been polluted by the Oracle problem at the core of centralized medicine, namely, BigHarma and its curriculums. This distinction between understanding nature and power over nature, between pure and applied science, was first made by Francis Bacon in his Novum Organum of 1620. It appears to me centralized science has been going off the rails ever since.
Thomas Huxley pointed out in his address at the opening of Mason’s College in Birmingham, England, in 1880 that applied science is nothing but the application of pure science to particular classes of problems. No one can safely make these deductions unless he or she has a firm grasp of the principles that rule science. No one in centralized science does. Yet, the idea of the practice of clinical medicine as an art persists. What is this?
Does it amount to anything more than romantic rhetoric—a nod in the direction of modern transhumanitarianism? I think that is exactly the problem.
I was taught basic medicine using Cecil’s Textbook of Medicine.
There is a discourse on medicine as an art at the start of Cecil’s Textbook of Medicine. It focuses on the patient, a fellow human seeking help with a health-related problem. This leads to the observation that, in order to be considered medicine as an art, the human faculty must be its primary and characteristic instrument. What are the aspects of faculty that matter?
The physician, in fact, is invited to be part of the treatment process in listening, empathizing, informing, and maintaining solidarity. We wouldn’t argue with the usefulness of these properties, but they also describe moral dimensions of care-we listen because we respect people-and skills. As with technical skills, interpersonal skills can be lacking frequently. Like any practical technical skill, they can be observed, taught, tested, and their value assessed.
Medical teachers probably say much the same thing about their third mantra: attitudes. While these may be more dependent on physicians’ upbringing and personalities, attitudes can be changed with education or appropriate legislation, can be observed and scored, and can be evaluated in their contribution to patient care or diagnostic technique—at least in principle and even if these are crudely done. Part of the art of clinical medicine may lie in these areas, but not exclusively so: the art is not just practical performance. I want to suggest to you right now that the art and science of medicine are inseparable, part of a common culture. I just did a talk at the Palestra Society in El Salvador about this idea. Decentralized science requires personal participation in knowledge; knowing is an art.
In the accumulation of such knowledge, centralized physicians act just like engineers; they share experiences individually through meetings and publications. Within the community of its discipline, this intersubjectivity establishes the objectivity of science: it is knowledge that can be publicly tested using a PEER review system. Today, that system is flawed by the Oracle problem of journal editors who decide what is fit to publish and what should perish. It is how centralized science censors its best minds who have the best ideas. This approach can be summed up as a doctrine of standard empiricism in which the specific aim of inquiry is to produce objective knowledge and truth—and to provide explanations and understanding. Science as pure science is knowledge of the natural environment for its own sake, or rather, for understanding. Science as applied science or technology is the exercise of a working control over it. Such is the state of centralized medicine. The collateral effects of this are massive and the implications are larger for the public health
Centralized medicine currently believes its methods, scientific thinking should—must—be insulated from all kinds of psychologic, sociologic, economic, political, moral, and ideologic factors that tend to influence thought in life and society. Without those proscriptions, objective knowledge of truth degenerates into prejudice and ideology. And the COVID EPOCH proved that.
Centralized scientists & physicians like to bask in the reflected glory of medicine as a scientific undertaking that transcends national barriers. The industrial healthcare complex, WHO and the industrial military complex that powers it all supports a vast number of international academic meetings & international specialist societies who set down the guidelines to practice by. They are rigid and support the paradigm in power making the rule while the public health falls into the abyss of chronic disease on every continent.
DECENTRALIZING SCIENCE
Life is like a photograph; it often develops from the negative in life. I got this insight from my observations in museums as a child. It made me realize the truth is best found in our failures. So I decided to jump head first without wings into centralized medicine’s biggest failures.
I realized the human mind is a thinking machine. I then thought about its failure as our weakest link in centralized medicine. I thought to myself, “can machines think better than us?”
In 1950, Alan Turing had an answer to that question—a computer was capable of “thought” if its output was so convincing that a person interacting with it couldn’t distinguish its answers from those of a real human. The concept, known as the Turing test, has regained new prominence today as some argue that this new generation of Artificial Intelligence does in fact pass the Turing test. That is when I realized that transgenerational epigenetics, our offspring, is the HUMAN version of the Turing test.
Turing had a unique and brilliant mind. He apparently had the same thought as I did in 2005. His idea came to him in 1930.
At boarding school, a teenage Turing formed a close bond with his classmate, Christopher Morcom, over their love of science. When Morcom died unexpectedly in 1930, Turing was devastated. In letters to Morcom’s mother, he wondered whether Morcom’s mind could possibly live on without his body.
The loss changed Turing, plunging him into a philosophical, mathematical, and scientific investigation of the human mind that would last a lifetime. My day at the foot of this statue did the same thing to me. That is the day I found my way home. Back to Nature. I realized everything was decentralized in us.
I realized I had to come off my throne, and had to leave the body of my education alone. I knew I had to change. And I did.
WHAT HAPPENED ON THAT DELTA FLIGHT?
I figured out where all the modern disease epidemics began rapidly.
Most of you know by now, I am hell bent on changing the process of how centralized medicine is practiced and healthcare delivered. Right now my sphere of influence is small and I can affect my patients and family with my decentralized thoughts. Thinking about how to do this is a messy process when the end point is not well defined. I do know that it must change, but for now I am going to trust the processes Nature exhibits and transfer my knowledge to people as I move through life. Some paradigms change slowly and others happen like a Tsunami. I have decided to embrace change and try to become the change I want to see in medicine now. I realize I cannot control it, but I know I can work in harmony with it and even cultivate the vision I see for it. I used to worry about healthcare reform and how it might end up after Washington DC tried to control it, but I realized that if I could not control it neither can they. I found some solace in that.
It has allowed me to focus on what really matters, and that is decentralized health, quantum biology, and the physics that underpins evolutionary medicine to mold the future of healthcare. Patients want results and are now mandating they happens on their terms. This cannot happen. Patients need to realize how their light environment hijacks their ability to think. Purple and red light from the sun are critical in this dance, and modern lighting has subtracted both of these colors from the rainbow of modern lighting. I love this change in thought because it is fundamentally decentralized at its core. Light and dark environments control our biology. It should never have been usurped by the ideas the profiteers of BigPharma. BigPharma institutionalized their ideas like a gang member does to neighborhood. The BigPharma gang’s neighborhood is a medical school curriculum and its targets are centralized phyicians and all the patients they treat.
Centralized healthcare is simply gang warfare at scale. Moreover, it became government supported during the Vietnam War era by LBJ and NIxon and was codified in the dietary guideline of America. Politicians in Washington DC never wanted food inflation to ever be an election issue again. This is when we embrace cheap manufactured food to the American popualtion at scale. This occured at the same time we debased money, removed the gold standard and allowed the Nixon Shock to have its full effect on centralized medicine and created a powerful industial healthcare complex built to take advantage of sick care using the Cantillon effect. This endless siege of terror in healthcare continues to be funded almost exclusively through money printing and BigPharma continues to sit very close to that printer. This eefect can be seen by policy makers in Washington DC who have looked to centralized medicine further since the Food Pyramid was built by the architects of centralized destruction.
Eliminating cheap money from this system will eliminate the reliance on manufactured cheap foods. Decentralized ideas on health and money ultimately brings peace in the war on the public’s health because it stops incentivizing the problem at the core of the industrial healthcare complex. It also uncouples the link of government to science that began in the Manhattan Project under the control of General Groves. This is when the industrial military complex got the idea that marrying BigScience to industrial military contractors was a good business idea for the military. In his farewell speech to the Union, President and General Dwight D. Eisenhower tried to put the brakes on what General Groves began but was unsuccessful. He warned the American public of the coming collateral damage of such a decision but we did not heed the warning. Today, the chronic disease peidemic is a result of that mistake.
Physicians and patients who embrace decentralization in mediicne, and know that modern medicine is more centralized. The reliance on technology has ensured this. Technology and artifical anything centralizes all systems. This is fundamentally why centralized healthcare is simply gang warfare at scale for your healthspan and longevity. It has become so bad that now health influencers are replacing centralized MDs with these concepts and are now employing technology to allow them to quantify themselves against metrics they BELIEVE promote health based upon these centralized principles. They are codified in algorithms. They are trying to sell this idea to the public directly, without the Oracle problem of the centralized physician to block them. They are asking the public to reject the central dogmas in mediicne that have been developed in industrialized healthcare for the last 200 years. Ironically, the publis has no idea these people are making the same mistake as the physicians have. They are relying on a technocracy that used light incorrectly in their algorthms to spit out programs that make your health worse. This is why for 50 years every time humans have increased technology spending NHANES data shows our health gets worse. This is why we spend 4.3 trillon dollars a year on healthcare and we are the sickest nation on Earth. Our return on equity for our decisions making is horrendous because we have uncoupled the wsidom of nature from our ability to make dopamine and melatonin from sunlight we need to think well. Today people, who are sick and dying, realize that they can no longer afford to abdicate the decision process to someone else who embraces centralization. They no longer want to feel helpless. They want some degree of control back. This begins with embracing decentralized medicine. We advocate for optimizing life by advocating for effienct use of light, water, and magnetism to create dopamine and melatonin to increase the public’s ability to think and reason well to make better choices that expand healthspan and longevity and decouple from industrial healthcare process.
Central industrial medicine has left these concerns unaddressed for too long. The gap between recommendations and results is widening every day. Patients sense it and doctors feel is. This is why they are burning out and killing themselves at record rates now. We ignore it in hospitals and the centralized offices that now employ MDs and give them evidence based guidelines that fill bank accoutns and not our patients health accounts. Some of us recognize it and try things to close those gaps to remain competitive and up to date. Big companies and government will say they try to bridge these gaps with tangible action plans. Most of them are highly destructive to healthspan because of the incentives they built within the system. They are the carbon Oracle we aim to reduce in decentralized medicine. Most of the changes centralized entities have added to the system in the last 50 years have lead to incremental change that lead to spectacular declines in the public;s health under their watch. Centralizing forces in government allowed corporations to take over and this lead to regulatory capture. The people profiting from sick care now regulate the industrieds they control. More over, private equity, namely hospital systems, have bought doctors practices and turned them into employees who now have to act as their employer mandates. This make them the Oracle problem that stood between patient and doctors. We saw how spectacularly bad this was during the COVID epoch when we in a supposed pandemic and hospitals were firing the people trained to help people. They muzzled those of us who told people the right things to do because they were not good for the hospital’s profit and loss statement. Now we have data that the industrial military complex used cheap money and crooked scientists at the FDA and NAIAD to fund gain of function research that was used against the public. This system is off the rails and needs to be dismantaled. I have a plan to do just this.
The reason that success is often limited in centralized system is because they underestimate the personal behavioral aspects that often result in ultimate failure of their plans. My belief is that if we construct a decentralized paradigm of change that incorporates the tangible (costs and services) aspects of change and the best personal needs of patients needs then we will have the ability to effect change in both spheres simultaneously allowing for massive benefits that both sides of the equation. I have shared many of these ideas with politicians today.
My vision for healthcare is to focus on health promotion to allow people to adopt thoughts that immediately change their health with decentralized principles found in Nature. Organizational changes in the food agricultural complex will need to adapt with the current vertically and horizontally integrated healthcare delivery system. We need to adapt our service industry in healthcare much like the American government was able to morph our industrial complex in the 1940s to fight a World War but we must decoouple the industrial military complex from controling science or funding what should be studied in science. In WW2, that centralized campaign was successful because it allowed for change in both the tangible and intangible areas. The public and business sectors adapted for the betterment of citizens.
Today, the opposite is true. The military’s interventions into health has been a disaster for the public health. The best example of this is the botch distribution of the COVID jab by the DoD.
I believe my QUILT allows for this decentralized change in healthcare. My question is will you join me in that thought experiment? Will you become the patient or politician to help me change our current environment? We are human after all and we are perfectly capable of altering our environment are we not? My patients in my practice have been chasing change with me in this way for over 20 years. They understand that quantifying their healthcare using decentralized medicine is an experience is actually giving them the control back they seek.
TURING’s THEORY ON MORPHOGENESIS HAS NOW BEEN VALIDATED, BUT TODAY I AM UPDATING IT.
The chemical basis of morphogenesis is not the first step in life. Life begins with light. Light is transformed into electricity and all chemistry is preceded by a DC current generation in the cells of an organism. This idea has ancient origins of 3.8 billions years, as the slide below shows.
WHY DID I COME UP WITH THE IDEA TO USE YOUR CIRCLE OF SIX TO IMPROVE HEALTHSPAN?
It is suggested that a system of chemical substances, called morphogens, reacting together and diffusing through a tissue, is adequate to account for the main phenomena of morphogenesis. Such a system, although it may originally be quite homogeneous at its onset at the zygote level, may later develop a pattern or structure due to an instability of the homogeneous equilibrium, which is triggered off by random disturbances. In life’s cases, endogenous light generated by cells created an instability within your body plan soon after fertilization and this set up the dissipative state of humans. It sets the tone of what type of silly talking monkey will emerge from the placenta in 9 months.
Morphogenesis is a transgenerational epigenetic program born from light’s interaction with matter found in the parents germ lines. The human zygote is a reaction-diffusion system built around quantum computations. We should consider them each in some detail in the case of an isolated ring of cells, a mathematically convenient, though biologically unusual system because of the queerness that light contains. In quantum biology light investigates the matter contained within the germ line to give feedback on the current state of the environment. This implies that the germ cell line is chiefly concerned with the onset of instability to create the dissipative state life needs to evolve. It has been found since August 14, 1952 that there are six essentially different forms which this may take. Those six forms are the original building blocks buried at the core of the retino-hypothalamic tract that sculpts your body and your life. Turing’s idea on morphogenesis is where the circle of six idea came from in my own mind in 2005. All of these are linked to electric polarity changes that occur during morphogenesis.
Morphogenesis in biology, when you understand it is like watching a blind man try to solve a Rubik’s cube problem.
When you see embryology from two germ cells and then grow into an adult with a myriad of different cells you begin to see why timing became the key innovation for Mother Nature early on. She had to develop time crystal proteins to pulse via light waves to shorten the duration to innovate matter in living cells and then direct them how to migrate to the place of eventual function.
Truly a modern engineering problem if you think about the complexity mathematically.
The mathematical perspective for morphogenesis was given to us by Turing but the necessity for a mechanism of feedback interaction between universal structures given by Fred Hoyle in 1983 really makes sense.
Hoyle calculated the probabilities of a blind person ordering the scrambled faces of a Rubik cube. The calculations demonstrated that, due to the fact that the blind person does not know if he or she is getting closer or further to the objective on each move, the probabilities of matching the six colors on each face of the cube are on the order of 1:1 to 1: 5×10^18.
Thus, if that person was to labor at a rate of one move per second, it would take 5×10^18 seconds to complete all possibilities.
That is to say that it will take up to 158 billion years for that person to reach the goal.
Clearly, that time period not only grossly exceeds the life expectancy of the Rubik cube player, but it exceeds the lifetime of the Earth or for that matter the existence of our Universe since its estimated inception some 13.7 billion years ago. You can see Mother Nature had to solve this time problem really quickly.
So how did she do it?
Hoyle suggested some basic decision prompts.
If the blind person is given a simple piece of information, something like a “yes” or “no” prompt every time a move is made, which is every second, then the time needed to complete the Rubik cube equation is drastically reduced to two minutes.
I have a sense Mother Nature used the Aromatic amino acids in our cells to make the yes and no signal using ELF-UV pulses. The IR-A signals were used to keep the semiconductive powerplants functioning properly in the central retinal pathways to make these decisions.
This hints that our eyes hold a lot more power than we think for quantum computation.
The Retino-hypothalamic tract of the central retinal pathways is likely the root cause of 90-95% of modern diagnosed disease. This is not hyperbole, and can be actually proven by careful observation, just like the Rubik cube example above. From a neuroanatomy perspective if one lays out the entire structure and what this tract communicates with, it shows that it that allows light to touch directly or indirectly just about every tissue represented in the human brain. Moreover, the central retinal pathway is loaded woth more DHA and aromatic amino acids than any system in the human brain. This allows it to act as a semiconductive circuit that makes rapid decisions for many parts of the brain.
What does the semiconductive circuit do in the eyes?
It contains the SCN and the eye clock mechanism of the entire circadian system.
It contains 3 key semiconductors are DHA, melanin, and water.
it contains 2 semiconductors that regenerate the whole system: dopamine/melatonin
It’s also houses the root cause of your current mood and level of sleepiness.
It’s contains data on why you get hungry, your appetite/satieity and your energy status.
It controls all your pituitary outputs for hormones.
It controls all water balance in your body.
It controls endogenous melanin production in the brain
It links these two major semiconductive systems, water and melanin which generate energy and information processing in you
It is a gateway to your emotions in the frontal lobes and limbic system
It connects your new brain (frontal lobes) to the oldest parts of the brain (olfaction)
It’s also why houses the decision making apparatus that informs you, who you should listen too.
The light mediated rhodopsin system is activated by non visual red and UV light. Visible light is captured by the retina and delivered to a camera system and a vegetative system. The bookends of the visible spectrum feeds into the Rhodopsin mediated non visual, light system. A network of fiber optic cables branch from a special collagen at the start of the Rhodopsin tracts. I forget the protein name. It’s collagen that passes light the fastest The camera system allows you to see and run the clock, but the vegetative system informs the autonomic and non autonomic systems of the brain as well. Light makes this tract tick like a pure crystal with the cosmos. It defines what a quantum biology system should be. It is optical lattice clock and quantum computer working in parallel that alllows you to live life, all while being powered by a DC electric current. It houses the tissues in you, where light is FIRST polarized and the DC current modified for specific physiologic purposes of form and function. It is where the DC electric current becomes polarized for your stem cell depots to become a regenerative force in the body for every cell. This is why nothing should be worn in front of your eyes to ruin this optical signaling. This machinery allows your cells to dedifferentiate into more primitive cells to replace tissues damaged by the act of living on Earth. It is astounding what it is capable of.
The retino-hypothalmic tract is bidirectional, but during wakefulness it allows the input of photons to pass current in one direction to keep you conscious by quieting the default state of the brain in the brain stem. In DC currents the flows of electrons is from positive to negative, and this means electrons are actually moving opposite its normal direction. In this circuit, electrons flow from a scarcity region to where they become more abundant. This makes the signal unusual. Recall that electric field also form around any charged particle. The electromagnetic field environment around a DC current is very stable. The same is not true around an AC current. An AC current electromagnetic field collapses and reappears with its poles reversed every time the current changes direction. This reversal happens 60 times a second in the USA power grid. Magnetic fields around AC currents are very problematic in AC current environments. All current induces magnetic field. The AC magnetic field is variable. When this magnetic field moves in relation to the conductor, it induces a current. Any varying magnetic field, like that around tech gear or household appliances, generates stray currents in nearby conductors. Electric and magnetic field are represented by lines of forces and it is these forces that link to morphopgensis changes and physiologic abilities. Marsh and Beams experiments in planarians really elaborated these ideas in 1952. Their experiment showed that once could control the body plan of an animal via polarity changes. They should that they could control morphology by passing a current through it. Eventually this paper lead to work that showed us neuron tracts do orient themselves along a current’s flow. This told us Bernstein’s action potential hypothesis was flawed.
Consider Leduc in 1902. He used high voltage AC current to induce sleep in humans. Back then no understood why this happened but if you understand what I just said in the paragraph above you can see why it happened. Its changes the current, the charges, and the polariity of the field in the brain. This idea marries to all the experimental proof that Becker generates in his salamander regeneration experiments.
These tracts come out and take a round about route to final termination at the hypothalamus. All major brain nuclei have termination tracts from the retinohypthalmic axis. This axis contains the leptin melanocortin pathway and it innervates the entire neural territories that are adjacent to ventricular system that are loaded with CSF. CSF is a special semiconductor mostly made out of DDW and minerals to act as dopants. Even our motor function is impaired by alterations of this axis. Your motor behavior is also solar light mediated. This is why the light where you move and work out in is a critical part to get right.
It turns out you cannot do much unless you have proper variation of photonic frequencies from the visible spectrum powering the RHT. It kinda looks like the tract traces out a bow tie in our brains in 3D space and eloquently hits all 6 brain nuclei and terminates as an inversion at the hypothalamus. It’s morphologic design is a marvel of Nature. It’s morphology links to the type of electric and magnetic field incursions that occur here.
It has its own resonate frequency that travels along optical chasms and reaches every part of the body. This tract uses melanin and water semiconduction as a quantum information lattice. It uses the ration of H+ to D and the number of electrons to run its entire program of decision making. I covered those basics in the Kruse for Dummies lecture.
How might hve Mother Nature have solved this thermodynamic puzzle of life?
I looked back to the museum for clues.
Fred Hoyle, origninally was a mathematician of Cambridge University and presented his theory known as ‘supernova hypothesis‘ in the year 1946. His hypothesis was based on the principles of ‘nuclear physics’ and was described in his essay entitled ‘Nature of the Universe’. From this theory came the ideas of the Big bang and how stars made elements from exploding stars. Light was behind this trick.
There was another trick I learned about light as a boy in New York City.
The PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT.
I read a lot papers on UV light as a resident in neurosurgery and I knew a lot about UV light and aromatic amino acids in the brain. An important photochemical mechanism that occurs using the photoelectric effect in proteins involves reduction of disulfide bridges (SS) upon UV excitation of Tryptophan and Tyrosine side chains (Kerwin & Rammele, 2007, Neves-Petersen et al., 2002 & 2009a).
UV-excitation of tryptophan or tyrosine can result in their photoionization and to the generation of solvated electrons. The generated solvated electrons can subsequently undergo fast geminate recombination with their parent molecule, or they can be captured by electrophilic species like molecular oxygen (02).
Either option here could have been the yes or no answer mentioned by Hoyle’s work on how stars create matter from light.
Molecular oxygen decreases the chance of pseudohypoxia and this make formation of an exclusion zone (EZ) in water in skin cells. This leads to coherent domains within water, (at a lower pH than normal) that allows photo molecular interactions to occur between cysteine and cystines. You can go read my Energy & Epigenetics #12 blog to see where I dropped that breadcrumb long ago.
In different tissues, in the case where the electron is captured by the cysteine, the result can also be the breakage of the disulfide bridge in proteins like glutathione (Hoffman & Hayon, 1972). I’ve mentioned this in the Energy and Epigenetics 12 blog.
Here you begin to see how full spectrum UVA light and the aromatic AA begin to work to create energies and information that can modify sulfhydryl groups in proteins and lipids in different tissues to control non-linear optical gating of signals from sunlight’s frequencies to control morphogenesis. Remember, sunlight sulfates many proteins to make them water soluble so that electrons in water become useful to cells and tissues. Melanin unlocks those electrons moves freely within the retino-hypothalmic system. Melanin absorbs all light frequencies to liberate massive amounts of electrons to be used in semiconductive proteins in the systems of biochemistry. I like to think about biochemistry as a block chain and I think about the DC electric current as the PoW mechanism that powers it. The hash rate of the system is controlled by melanin’s efficiency at liberating electrons for the biochemical blockchain inside of our quantum computer. This is how we have to crack the ENIGMA CODE of biology.
Activated excited electrons from the incident UV light is where the process begins. We also know that biophoton creation in numerous locations in the cell always needs oxygen and ROS/RNS to be present for light to be made from Roeland van Wijk’s book that has an amazing bibliography of the science of endogenous biophoton creation by cells.
This is purely a photoelectric process and it used for timing processes critical in the morphogenesis of our organs. This is how life sculpts life and how it built us. Turing’s paper in 1952 gave me the idea of how the process could be described mathematically but no idea of how biology completes this task. I am attempting to do that right here and right now with my words which are sculpting these ideas.
The UV light collisions are also created thiol free radicals in this process with the amino acids with disulfide bridges. Those radicals can build or subtract the overall quantum spin state of the differentiating cell or dial in a key Orbital Angular Momentum number contained in each light photon we generate and a cell needs to sculpt a certain tissue from a homogenous stem cell in a zygote. All of this information could easily be stored magnetically in DNA. This is the basis of the ideas that are contained in the Kruse for Dummies lecture. How the Rosetta Stone works in biology was not how Darwin wrote the rules.
Never forget that light creates the matter in the universe when the light is manipulated in some way physically by matter. Timing controls how light energy controls the matter in cells. You are made of tissues that are filled with mitochondria, which generate light inside of you that control this process. They harvest parts of atoms from foods you consume, tear them apart and decipher an ancient code in them like a blockchain does. This is essentially what biochemistry is for a quantized system. Biochemistry is a blockchain factory used to make things a tissue needs using spin state and OAM alphabets in the mitochondrial code of life.
Throughout 4.5 billion years of molecular evolution, proteins have evolved in order to maintain the spatial proximity between aromatic residues (Trp, Tyr and Phe) and disulfide bridges (SS) (Petersen et al, 1999).
We might call this mechanism of how light interacts with certain aromatic amino acids and sulfur-containing amino acids how the fractal geometry of life begins.
There is a very special spatial geometric relationship that exists because the process is quantized to light frequencies that our star releases to us on Earth wirelessly. This has not been well appreciated by modern centralized healthcare. This is also why the sun’s light reduces all-cause mortality and why it can never be replaced in Big pharma healthcare. I also believe this is why solar redox is critical to having a child with great morphogenesis.
To suggest this is lunacy when you understand biophysics well.
The interaction of the most powerful part of the solar spectrum of light (UVA/B/C) measures the collisions in the aromatic amino acids and in the disulfide bridges. The aromatic amino acids location becomes the first step in determining where the position and geometry of residues to act as nanosized antennas in the protein world that can capture UV light (from ~250-298nm). This could be other yes or no binary codes cells use to build tissues in the Rubik’s cube example above. You can see why the idea of a time crystal is paramount now when you are building a life form. Think about my Vermont 2018 video now in this light!!!
The first two protein bends are always determined by nuclear DNA coding and this would save us a lot of time in morphogenesis. The last two bends are tied to the redox state which is linked to this quantum photoelectric process I am describing here now. If the timing of the yes and no’s are off the protein folding is off, and you’ll make glitches in the folding of proteins and organelles in cells and tissues.
Once excited by the incident ELF-UV light these amino acids can enter photochemical pathways likely to have harmful or beneficial effects on protein structures (yes and no again) by affecting specific bonds like disulfide bonds in cysteine/cystine. In the circadian mechanism, their effect on the PER protein that is made every AM by sunlight exposure on our body is critical in the right amount of phosphorylation in our cells to tell time.
These two amino acids are the rarest amino acids in our proteins, and as such can acts as the ideal photo-optical switch or gate for signaling because of they a relatively rare in humans.
It turns out cysteine/cystine disulfide bridges in proteins are known to be excellent quenchers of the excited state of aromatic residues by UV light in the literature. This means these disulfide residues naturally decrease the power present in UV light created in the nearby excited aromatic amino acids of the cells in a developing life form.
In this way, they contribute to protein stability and activity in tissues, thereby, stabilizing ubiquitin rates and helping drive morphogenesis via the blueprint in the OAM of DNA. I assume each species has its own molecular resonance OAM they operate with.
UV light excitation of the aromatic residues is known to trigger electron ejection from their side chains (Bent & Hayon, 1975a; Bent & Hayon, 1975b; Bent & Hayon, 1975c; Creed, 1984a; Creed, 1984b; Kerwin & Rammele, 2007, Neves-Petersen et al., 2009a).
These electrons can be captured by disulfide bridges in simple proteins with tons of disulfide bridges like glutathione, leading to the formation of a transient disulfide electron adduct radicals, which will dissociate photoelectrically, leading to the formation of free thiol groups in the protein. what you did not know until my Patreon blogs in recent years is that DDW water created by the mitochondrial matrix can increase endogenous glutathione for matter creation and organ building.
This photochemical change then leads to non-optical signaling at deeper levels in the embryo as development continues using the butterfly effect. When this process is inhibited in any way, a transgenerational disease manifests in a fetus or child. This is what autism, cancer, or a congential anomaly is at its core level. It is a blockchain that causes a hard fork in the offspring.
The irony in all these details is that UV frequencies foster the creation of matter naturally, and do not cause cancer, by these mechanisms.
More irony for centralized healthcare myopic paradigm that the sun and UV light is bad: This mechanism is now being used big pharma to develop drugs using nanotechnology and the ability of cells to make ELF-UV light in a process called LUMI.
THE KEY INSIGHT LEARNED ABOUT LIGHT HAPPENED WHEN I WAS 5th GRADE ON A SCHOOL TRIP.
I found out we had an incredible ratio of light photons compared to atoms in the Universe.
How would all this lead to logic theory based on computation? This juxtaposition might be fun and a bit shocking. You have to understand some basics about information theory to make sense of Turing was doing in his brilliant mind.
Biologic researchers are paying much more attention LATELY to mechanisms that “actively erase” and hide memory engrams in the brain.
WHY would they do this? If you cannot erase memory you cannot build a life that is based upon thousands of quantum computers working in unison to skate around the second law of thermodynamics to become the ultimate Maxwell demon.
What do I mean?
The erasure of information is what drives entropy increases over time. This is a consequence of having 1 billion light photons to one atom ratio in the universe. All molecular clocks that control circadian biology are, are flow meters for entropy. This told me circadian biology was the key to the biological ENIGMA CODE of all modern diseases.
Because of information theory the brain has to be designed to forget information on purpose to satisfy the dictims in the second law that Maxwell hinted at in his letter to a friend written about “demons”. We later called them Maxwell demons.
The first law of thermodynamics says energy is fixed in the cosmos because it cannot be created or destroyed. If energy is fixed in the universe, and the speed of light is fixed in a vacuum, what does it mean when we know there are one billion photons present in the cosmos for every atom in the known universe?
It means light is the “Jacquard card” or the Claude Shannon punch card of life inside of cells……..
Jacquard built the first computer (pre-Shannon) that used punch cards to make silk patterns using a binary pattern of open circles and closed circles using the loon. Shannon did the exact same thing for Bell Labs using the binary code.
So how did Mother nature build her first computer called a cell? She used light.
Cells are all quantum computers filled with biological semiconductors. They do not look like the objects found in your cell phone.
Well because there are one billion photons for every atom she started with light. She realized 4.6 billion years ago that light contains both energy and information at a ratio of a billion to one. Of the two she was the first to realize that information in light could be used to organize matter.
It took until Maxwell’s paper on Maxwell demons in the 1860s, for anyone else to realize this.
Light is the qu”bit” cells use to transfer information. Information is buried in Orbital Angular Momentum of photons in the Universe. They are ubiquitous. The energy in light is buried in frequency and a whole lot more of the characteristics linked to the photon. Since there are one billion photons per atom energy and information has to flow from light to atoms. It cannot flow the other way, just like a waterfall cannot flow in reverse.
A billion to one ratio is like asking a 20,000 foot waterfall to reverse its flow without adding a bit of energy to it. IMPOSSIBLE.
WHY ARE CENTRALIZED MEETINGS OF SCIENTISTS ABOUT AS USEFUL AS THE PICTURE BELOW?
DID THIS IDEA HAVE OTHER MASSIVE IMPLICATIONS?
Yep. It explains why sleep exists and why it is restorative to healthspan.
Information can create order from chaos only when we store information about light in our memory (water). What is the physical basis of this? With elapsed time, just as RAM or a hard drive becomes full, light information will fill the capacity of water’s hydrogen bonding network and fill up all the possible memory, and memory will then become a drag on function and life will decline. How did life change this phenomenon? It innovated sleep. Sleep is when we prune our memory in light and in water. Our liquid crystalline arrays have to be deleted every night. Information can only be useful on an ongoing basis if it is useful and used over and over and deemed critical, or until it is deemed useless and the memory mechanism in cells deletes information contained in light or water from our stores. When this happens it balances the second law of thermodynamics. It appears life breaks the law but she never does because she return useless information back to the environment she no longer needs to build order and the living state.
This means there really is no free lunch in living things. How did life do this? Evolution built sleep to be mandatory so it could delete data at night when light was absent. If it is not absent you cannot delete the data and your clocks timing mechanism is DEFECTIVE in this tissue. This leads to disease. This is where memory in water is being deleted diurnally so that we can continue to use the information to order our cells while we live.
SUMMARY
The erasure of information is what drives entropy increases over time. This is a consequence of having 1 billion light photons to one atom ratio in the universe. Light is turned into current easily because of this relationship by matter in cells.
We see this in the work of John von Neumann. Like Turing, he was also a mathematician.
In analog computers, changes in information are expressed in analogous changes in the magnetude or polarity of currents. A computer is used to store the varying temperatures of a furnace, the rise and fall in heat can be mimicked by a rise and fall in voltage.
Analog systems are slow and can handle simply information but they can express subtle variations very well. Digital coding, on the other hand, can transmit enormous amounts of data at high-speed, but only if the information can be reduced to a yes or no, on or off bits of information like 1 and 0.
The human nervous has been found to be a hybrid computer. We now know analog coding controls the overall activity of large groups of neurons by such actions by increasing or decreasing their sensitivity of incoming messages.
The digital system would transfer sensory and motor information, but the processing of that information-memory and recall, thinking, and consciousness would be accomplished by the synergism of both methods. Awake brain surgery proved this is exactly what goes on in the human brain when we are simultaneous checking electrical activity of the cortex in an awake and anesthetized patient.
Water carries light information in the coherent domains of water’s hydrogen bonding network of pentagrams or hexagons. This is why water has the ability to carry a memory of lights OAM fingerprint. It is codified in the coherent domains of hydrogen bonds and its increasing dielectric constant. And we are designed to sleep every night to erase part of the information stored in water that cells find superfluous on a charge basis. (Luc Montagnier)
What are the laws of Nature telling us that we are missing in centralized medicine? If you listened to my recent podcast with Dr. Cowan you heard about the silicon dioxide crystals in Cite 5. How crystals transfer information to water has been a mystery to centralized science. Below you’ll see the picture of Montagnier 2009 experiment. But in Cite 5 you’ll see the science that underpins what Montagnier did from Marcel Vogel, and IBM scientist who worked peripherally in the MKUltra program.
If you can measure it, it’s not sacred to healthspan or life. What we delete alters the balance of what is being measured. Therefore it is superfluous. This is counter to how we think about the world. That is the queerness embedded in quantum mechanics.
Water carries light information in the coherent domains of water’s hydrogen bonding network of pentagrams or hexagons. This is why water has the ability to carry a memory of lights OAM fingerprint. It is codified in the EZ hydrogen bonds and its increasing dielectric constant. And we are designed to sleep every night to erase part of the information stored in water that cells find superfluous on a charge basis. (Luc Montagnier)
How do we delete information? Have you ever heard of the Landauer’s limit, because this is how cells do it?
Landauer’s principle establishes an irreversible conversion from information to physics. This Landauer principle desribes how thermodynamic entropy is converted into information entropy at the expense of negentropy also knows as “negative entropy” in a cell. You can read about it in CITE 3 below.
This is how the journey back home to the truth began.
Culture and creativity integrate wonder and wisdom. It is at the Intersection of Art and Bio-physics
Today, what we love we have become addicted to, and it has fueled our myopia to the truth.
Today’s thought experiment: LIGHT WATER AND MAGNETISM
ARE HUMANS BEHAVING LIKE A CANCER ON EARTH because of the light they use to communicate and live???
Is the evidence found in civilization all around us?
Cancer is when a cell from the human body errs in such a way that it:
1. Starts to replicate without control
2. Invades other bodily systems without care (metastasis)
3. Spawns clones within the same tumor, and these clones compete with each other to maintain tumor dominance (intra-tumor heterogeneity)
4. Clones that make it to another bodily system may be different from the primary tumor (inter-tumor heterogeneity)
5. Siphon off all energy/info sources to serve the needs of the tumor and not the body
6. Grow and grow and grow without respect for the borders within the human body (local invasion)
7. Grow new blood vessels to feed the tumor instead of the healthy cells (angiogenesis)
Humans brains shrunk 65,000 years ago. This was linked to melanin destruction as they left Africa and headed to the 51st latitude, where new speciation began inside caves powered by campfires. Art and creativity were the first evidence of what melanin destruction can do. Today, we see this as a positive. Initially, it might have been. But what are the collateral effects of this effect of light on our biology? Is it not unreasonable to say humans have become a cancer on Earth the more they have innovated uses of the electromagnetic spectrum?
Might they be manufacturing the 6th extinction and keeping you in the dark by removing all the fire alarms in society to achieve the goal?
Neanderthal brains shrunk with time as their light stability changed, morphing from equatorial light to light in the tundra.
Art and creativity were its atavist effect. This implies that art has profound lessons to teach us about health.
As light stability was lost and metabolically expensive, larger brains became costly.
Magnetochemistry and POMC sculpted the skulls of our ancestors. Genes had very little to do with these changes.
HISTORY OF MAN:
The human brain has nearly quadrupled in size in the six million years since our species last shared a common ancestor with chimpanzees.
However, studies show this trend toward larger brains has reversed in Homo sapiens. Our species’ average brain sizes have shrunk over the last 100,000 years.
For example, in a recent 2023 study, he tracked the braincase volumes of ancient hominins on a spaceship through time. He started with the oldest known species and ended with modern humans.
They found that rapid brain expansion occurred independently in different species of hominins and at other times across Asia, Europe, and Africa. Species whose brains grew over time include Australopithecus afarensis, Homo erectus,Homo heidelbergensis, and Homo neanderthalensis. It stopped with them.
Why?
The light they lived under changed. Equatorial light has light stability. High latitude light does not have light stability.
The trend for brain enlargement over time was turned on its head with the arrival of modern humans. The skulls of men and women today are, on average, 12.7% smaller than that of Homo sapiens who lived during the last ice age, as the picture above shows.
Note for those who follow culture: When our ancestors had larger brains, there were no culture wars because there was no culture present in the history of homo species up until this time.
So, how can we explain this striking reduction? A study of paleoanthropology suggests that the shrinkage in brain size began around 100,000 years ago when the last ice age began. This corresponds to a period in which humans switched cognitive abilities because this was the time when humans began producing symbolic artifacts and engravings with meaningful geometric images on them. These were the precursors of artwork that was soon to appear on the walls of caves.
As they left the cradle of humanity, temperatures changed, light stability was lost, and more glucose was made from high-latitude light. That higher glucose level created a relative pseudohypoxia that created the need to reduce the size of the brain thermodynamically. The human brain shrank due to the abscopal effects of blue light from a latitude change and the need to use fire to keep warm. This fire was used inside a cave, and for the first time, humans began to use animal skins to cover their skins. The skin is a solar panel for the brain, and with it covered, brain expansion was halted dead in its tracks.
Smaller brains have allowed humans to cool down quickly. It’s well known that humans in hot climates have darker skin and more melanin and have evolved leaner and taller bodies to maximize heat loss. Warmer temperatures link directly to equatorial light stability and melanin biology.
DID YOU KNOW CREATIVITY AND LANGUAGE BOTH SHOWED UP WHEN SUNLIGHT WEAKENED IN OUR FAMILY? IS IT HAPPENING AGAIN IN OUR MODERN WORLD? IS THE RESULT REFLECTED IN ART AND CULTURE?
As man left equatorial Africa and entered the Middle East, the invention of written languages like Sumerian began
Nobody doubts that Albert Einstein had a brilliant mind. But the Nobel prizewinner, famous for his special and general relativity theories, wasn’t blessed with a big brain. Based on the history of hominin speciation, it was smaller than average.
This seems surprising to centralized science because they believe bigger is better. Quantum thermodynamics tells us that smaller is more energy efficient. This means the impetus to shrinkage is likely tied to energy and information loss from the environment. This story should have brought centralized science to the story of light, but it has not. Look at the picture slide show in this blog. The answer is here.
Big brains are a defining feature of human anatomy that we are proud of. Other species might be speedy or powerful, but we thrive using the ingenuity that comes with a large brain. Or so we tell ourselves. Einstein’s brain hints that the story isn’t simple – recent fossil discoveries confirm this. Over the past two decades, we have learned that small-brained hominin species survived on Earth long after big-brained ones appeared. Moreover, evidence shows that they were behaviorally sophisticated as the brain shrunk. Some, for instance, made complex stone tools that could probably only have been fashioned by individuals with language.
These discoveries turn the question of human brain evolution on its head. “Why would selection favor big brains when small-brained humans can survive on the landscape? Neural tissue consumes lots of energy, so big brains must have benefitted the few species that evolved them. But what?
The answer is that it allowed us to concentrate melanin inside our skulls because the light on the exterior created so much POMC translation at our surfaces. The more melanin created on our skin, the more it allowed it to move to our interiors, where it became housed endogenously as our most important wide-band gapped semiconductor that sculpted our body plan from our cousins. The result: Humans have more cognitive abilities than any other primate in history.
So what happened as the brain shrunk? Melanin was degraded and lost, and 125 grams of neural tissues were subtracted, but the amount of CSF in the human brain increased relative to its size.
WATER BECAME MORE IMPORTANT TO THE BRAIN FOR FUNCTIONING.
WHAT IS THE ART CORRELATE TO THIS IN HUMANITY?
At the end of the line, the aqueduct’s contribution to modern human flourishing is marked with a nod to the other great civilizational force that built Rome:
Beauty.
Meet the Trevi fountain. It could have never been built by a Neanderthal brain.
Just as the functioning of the human brain improved when neurons shrunk and water increased, so did the Roman Empire.
At their peak, these systems fed Rome with a million cubic meters of water per day, which was used for baths, fountains, and sewers.
Clean water was the civilizational lifeblood that allowed Rome and its population to rise above all others.
How are stars and water linked?
WHAT ELSE CHANGES THE REFRACTIVE INDEX OF A SUBSTANCE EMITTED BY STARS WHEN THEY ARE CREATED?
WATER.
So, was the shrinking human brain filled with more water and somehow fossilized into human culture?
I think so.
The Trevi Fountain
What’s behind is often forgotten: a 17th-century palace called the Palazzo Poli.
Salvi turned its entire facade into his great stone symphony carved into rock. But people often miss something far more interesting: what’s underneath.
It’s the endpoint of the last of Rome’s 11 ancient aqueducts, the Aqua Virgo, which is still in operation.
The fountain was only completed in 1762, but it was built on a site of ancient significance. This is the same idea we see in the cenote system in Mexico with the Maya.
Following the water beneath the fountain, you’ll find the Vicus Caprarius — the City of Water.
It’s a first-century housing complex, and the water flowing through it and the Trevi Fountain’s water still comes from the ancient aqueduct.
If you follow it further (red line), you’ll end up 20km outside of Rome at the springs that feed it.
Just as water was the key to power generation in the shrinking human brain, Rome’s aqueducts were the key to its dominance: remarkably simple in concept and brilliant in execution.
To bring fresh water right into Rome, all you needed was a slight, continuous gradient from source to endpoint, and gravity handled the rest.
That meant digging tunnels to cut straight through hillsides and erecting bridges to cross valleys…
Sometimes, it meant building 160 feet into the air. From one end of the Pont du Gard to the other (900 feet), the level descends less than 1 inch. The Roman Empire was built on impeccable precision.
At their peak, these systems fed Rome a million cubic meters of water per day: baths, fountains, sewers… Clean water was the civilizational lifeblood that allowed Rome and its population to rise above all others.
At the end of the line, the aqueduct’s contribution to human flourishing is marked with a nod to the other great civilizational force that built Rome:
Beauty.
MAGNETISM
When melanin degrades, there is less of it to deal with the magnetic chemicals made by mitochondrial metabolism. Those chemicals are ROS and RNS. These chemicals control metabolic flux in a cell. Stochastically, they all link back to the light we live under as well. This is why all metabolic pathways have different levels of ATP associated with their use.
Changes in ATP always link to ROS and RNS production, which is why we did not need genes to create man. ROS and RNS chemicals all have one unpaired electron, which makes them the source of magnetic flux in cells. Magnetic flux controls timing sequence in cells and timing is the key to morphologic changes in evolutionary creation. The same is true in our brains concerning art creation.
We used changing light frequencies to become who we are. Our identity is reflected in our art, which begins in our hydrated carbon-based semiconductors. See the paper written three days ago. That is how cutting-edge the science of Nature is.
Diamonds are carbon-based semiconductors.
Did you know that diamonds don’t actually shine on their own?
They reflect light the semiconductor emits!
Might the hydrated carbon-based semiconductors be reflecting their magnetic effects in the artwork humans create? Art is built from that reflected light in our brains.
I think that is exactly why visionary artists use quantum entanglement with their environment to become the first members of a culture to see the world in a new way. This is reflected in their work. When it manifests in reality, culture flows to the rest of the silly-talking monkeys.
This fascinating property is one of the reasons why diamonds make excellent semiconductors.
Here’s why:
1. *Crystal Structure*: Diamonds have a unique tetrahedral crystal structure that allows for efficient electron movement, enhancing their performance as semiconductors. Water made by metabolism also has its own unique geometry.
2. *High Thermal Conductivity*: Diamonds can dissipate heat effectively, crucial for electronic devices to function efficiently and reduce overheating. The water around our semiconductors allows for the same thing.
3. *Wide Bandgap*: Diamonds have a wide bandgap, making them ideal for high-voltage and high-frequency applications. This enables more efficient electronic devices and systems. Diamonds and all hydrated carbon-based semiconductors work well with UV light. I have established in the Quantum Engineering series that we are filled to the gills with wide-band gapped semiconductors that use UV light.
4. *Chemical Stability*: Diamonds are chemically inert, which means they can function reliably in harsh environments. So, the next time you admire a diamond’s brilliance, remember that it’s not just about beauty but cutting-edge technology! Our semiconductors are inert as well under the power of visible light. Any other frequency in the electromagnetic spectrum induces changes to our semiconductors.
Our use of the light spectrum is why chronic diseases are upon us. We have the same number of genes as our nearest relatives. Few see what I see. After I have infected your mind with this idea, I want you to visit any museum and see the history of art.
“What would happen,“Marshall McLuhan wondered in his seminal 1964 treatise Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, “if art were suddenly seen for what it is, namely, exact information of how to rearrange one’s psyche to anticipate the next blow from our own extended faculties?
A surgeon is both an artist and a scientist… Surgeons rely heavily on their intuitive visual-spatial right-hemispheric mode. At the same time, our training is obviously scientific. Left-brained logic, reason, and abstract thinking are the stepping stones leading to the vast scientific literature’s arcane tenets. The need in my profession to shuttle back and forth constantly between these two complementary functions of the human psyche This ability has served me well to see the unknown and hidden messages of art history and evolution.
These thoughts today are on the quantum biology of farming. I show you what planting seen inthe public’s fertile mind can accomplish. You’ll never look at art the same way again. Humanity creates beauty when it is entangled with Nature. It establishes simplified things when it is made to the wrong frequencies of light. Centralization results from this prescription.
Don’t fear burning down art critics’ beliefs about their world today. Today’s ashes are tomorrow’s soil. Moments, like my talk at Palestra Society on Friday, August 15th, 2024, are like seeds to place in that soil.
Any moment’s beginning ends in a moment….and the seed transforms into something new, something different, something unique. The moral of the story of the seed is that if you want something new, you must stop doing something old.
This view below of the sun says something significant about the modern environment of man in the 1960s (above pic)
We have made Nature artificial, and it is reflected in the painting.
Art and the physics of quantum biology are propelled by revolutionary insight — that transcendent clarity of vision that Rilke called a “conflagration of clear sight” — which reframes our understanding of the world.
Although the development of physics has always depended upon the incremental contributions of many original and dedicated workers, on a few occasions in history, one physicist has had an insight of such import that it led to a revision in his whole society’s concept of reality. . . .Think about the contributions of Newton, Faraday, and Einstein as examples.
Emile Zola’s definition of art: “Nature as seen through a temperament,” invokes physics, which is likewise involved with Nature. The Greek word physis means “Nature.”… Like any scientist, the physicist sets out to break “nature” down into its component parts to analyze the relationship of those parts. This process is principally one of reduction.
On the other hand, the artist often juxtaposes different features of reality and synthesizes them so that upon completion, the whole work is greater than the sum of its parts. There is considerable crossover in the technique used by both. The novelist Vladimir Nabokov wrote, “There is no science without fancy and no art without facts.”
In addition to illuminating, imitating, and interpreting reality … artists create a language of symbols for things for which there are yet to be words. Their works are reflections of the light they are forced to imbibe. And we consume it. It reminds us of us we cannot put our finger on, but we know there is a deep connection. This series of blogs makes concrete decentralized connections.
SUMMARY
Art lives not only as an aesthetic that can be pleasing to the eye but also as a distant early warning system occurring in our colony of mitochondria and the collective thinking of a society.
Visionary art alerts the other members that a conceptual shift is about to occur in the thought system used to perceive the world. For the last 120 years, I have not seen one DaVinci, Rembrandt, or Monet producing among us.
In my opinion, Art creation has been creatively dying since 1905.
Is this related to when Marconi harnessed the power of light in radio and wireless transmission?
I’ll leave you to ponder this.
My vision is based on art critic Robert Hughes’s assertion that “the truly significant work of art is the one that prepares the future” and adds:
Repeatedly throughout history, the artist introduces symbols and icons that, in retrospect, prove to have been avant-garde for the thought patterns of a scientific age yet to be born.
They are born; they are just random packets of quanta awaiting to be organized by the melanin in your mind.
Decentralized science carries the torch of a tradition that stretches back through a long line of rebellious thinkers who have resisted the usual dividing lines between physics and philosophy. It is in this space where art is explanatory to human evolutionary history. In experimental metaphysics, the tools of science can be used to test our philosophical worldviews, which in turn can be used to better understand science that remains fuzzy to centralized thinkers.
Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that deals in the deep scaffolding of the world: the Nature of space, time, causation and ex,istence, the foundations of reality itself. It’s generally considered untestable, so centralized science ignores it. This is done at the peril of the public health. Since, metaphysical assumptions underlie all our efforts to conduct tests and interpret results. Those assumptions usually go unspoken.
Most of the time, that’s fine. Within centralized intuitions they foster beliefs of how the world works for their benefit, and it often conflicts with our everyday experience of reality. At speeds far slower than the speed of light or at scales far more significant than the quantum one, we can, for instance, assume that objects have definite features independent of our measurements, that we all share a universal space and time, that a fact for one of us is a fact for all. As long as our philosophy works, it lurks undetected in the background, leading us to believe that centralized science is something separable from metaphysics mistakenly.
But at the uncharted edges of experience, where the quantum biology of the brain lies — at high speeds and tiny scales — those intuitions cease to serve us, making it impossible for us to do science without confronting our philosophical assumptions head-on. Suddenly, we find ourselves in a place where science and philosophy can no longer be neatly distinguished. Art and creativity of society can and do provide answers to the hard questions of evolution.
THE DIVIDING LINE between science and philosophy has never been clear. Often, it’s drawn along testability. Any science that deserves its name is said to be vulnerable to tests that can falsify it, while philosophy aims for pristine truths that hover somewhere beyond the grubby reach of experiments. So long as that distinction is in play, physicists believe they can get on with the messy business of “real science” and leave the philosophers in their armchairs, stroking their chins.
As it turns out, though, the testability distinction doesn’t hold. Philosophers have long known that it’s impossible to prove a hypothesis. (No matter how many white swans you see, the next one could be black.) That’s why Karl Popper famously said that a statement is only scientific if it’s falsifiable — if we can’t prove it, we can at least try to disprove it.
In 1906, French physicist Pierre Duhem showed that falsifying a single hypothesis is impossible. This should teach us that the basis of the scientific method has some limitations. Rarely do we talk about this in today’s science, but it was the talk of the day in the 19th and 20th centuries.
He argued that every piece of science is bound up in a tangled mesh of assumptions. These assumptions are about everything from underlying physical laws to the workings of specific measurement devices. If the result of your experiment appears to disprove your hypothesis, you can always account for the data by tweaking one of your assumptions while leaving your hypothesis intact.
Take, for instance, the geometry of space-time. Immanuel Kant, the 18th-century philosopher, declared that the properties of space and time are not empirical questions. He thought not only that the geometry of space was necessarily Euclidean, meaning that a triangle’s interior angles add up to 180 degrees, but that this fact had to be “the basis of any future metaphysics.” According to Kant, it wasn’t empirically testable because it provided the very framework within which we understand how our tests work in the first place.
Yet, in 1919, when astronomers measured the path of distant starlight skirting the gravitational influence of the sun, they found that the geometry of space wasn’t Euclidean after all—it was warped by the effect of gravity from stars, as Albert Einstein had predicted.
Or did they? Henri Poincaré, the French polymath, offered up an intriguing thought experiment. Imagine that the universe is a giant disk that conforms to Euclidean geometry but whose physical laws include the following: The disk is hottest in the middle and coldest at the edge, with the temperature falling in proportion to the square of the distance from the center.
Moreover, this universe features a refractive index — a measurement of how light rays bend — inversely proportional to the temperature. In such a universe, rulers and yardsticks would never be straight (solid objects would expand and shrink with the temperature gradient), while the refractive index would make light rays appear to travel in curves rather than lines. As a result, any attempt to measure the geometry of the space — say, by adding up the angles of a triangle — would lead one to believe that the space was non-Euclidean.
Any test of geometry requires you to assume specific laws of physics, while any test of those laws of physics requires you to assume geometry. Sure, the disk world’s physical laws seem ad hoc, but so are Euclid’s axioms. “Poincaré, in my opinion, is right,” Einstein said in a 1921 lecture.
He added, “Only the sum of geometry and physical laws is subject to experimental verification.” As the American logician Willard V. O. Quine put it, “The unit of empirical significance” — the thing that’s testable — “is the whole of science.”
The most straightforward observation (that the sky is blue or the particle is there) should force us to question everything we know about the universe’s workings.
But actually, it’s worse than that from a decentralized perspective. The unit of empirical significance is a combination of science and philosophy. The thinker who saw this most clearly was the 20th-century Swiss mathematician Ferdinand Gonseth. For Gonseth, science and metaphysics are always in constant conversation, with metaphysics providing the foundations on which science operates, science providing evidence that forces metaphysics to revise those foundations, and the two together adapting and changing like a living, breathing organism. As he said in a symposium he attended in Einstein’s honor, “Science and philosophy form a single whole.”
Revolutionary art has served the function of preparing the future at all times.
The art of today has me worried about our species’ future. We are headed back to our times in caves.
The art revolution today is being heavily influenced by artificial Intelligence. This concerns me, and it should concern you. Anything crafted by AI adopts a centralizing force in its DNA. This centralizing force sits at odds with the decentralizing forces in Nature.
Revolutionary art and visionary physics attempt to speak about matters that do not yet have words. That is why people outside their fields could better understand their languages. Because they both speak of what is to come, we must learn to understand them.
My art is quantum biology.
Our cognitive de-evolution is real, and it has been reflected in our art since Picasso.
We don’t see things as they are… we see things as they are.
There is a reason we see a lot of minimalist “art,” abstract modern painting, container houses, and buildings that are blocks of concrete with holes for windows when, in reality, everything is artless.
The minimalist trend is an ideology/formatting for people to accept less than they deserve, things that are unbalanced, artless, and heartless. If we look at things from a few decades ago, everything was ornamental, with style and thoughtful design. This shows what you are referring to: when society gets ill, that gets reflected in everything it creates.
Ask yourself right now who the 20-21st century great artists are.
Can you name anyone?
I cannot.
It even shows up in buildings when Marconi and Tesla were ruining humanity.
Some will look at a plumeria flower (gardenia/magnolia) and try to tell us that it results from perfection in minimalism.
This uncovers what they do not know. It is false. For me, it is a reflection of the melanin sheets in them.
The Plumeria flower and the Trevi fountain represent opposite poles of the complexity argument.
Did you know flowering plants like the plumeria species occur due to a lack of CO2 energy? So, their analogy is poor. They are minimalistic flowers/plants because of their low-energy environment. They are great examples of my point.
Plants also are made of DC electric semiconductors like we are. They reflect the light in their environment, structure, and phylogeny. Most plant groups were relatively unscathed by the Permo-Triassic extinction event, although the structures of communities changed. This may have set the scene for the appearance of the flowering plants in the Triassic (~200 million years ago) and their later diversification in the Cretaceous and Paleogene. The latest major group of plants to evolve were the grasses, which became important in the mid-Paleogene from around 40 million years ago. The grasses, as well as many other groups, evolved new mechanisms of metabolism to survive the low CO2 environments linked to warm, dry conditions of the tropics over the last 10 million years. Beauty varies as environmental energies vary. The results are in the art we create, the buildings we make, the brands we’ve built, and the flowers that do best as continue to spread artificial light over the surface of Earth like a viral pathogen spreading cancer.
At a certain point, you would think more people would realize that these minimalist cities are filled with antennas and nnEMF: They have accepted to be a total debt slave to the fiat system, and they do not seem to understand why their beliefs are bending to the will of the oppressor.
Architecture lives not only as an aesthetic that can be pleasing to the eye but, as a Distant Early Warning system occurring in our civilization to our colony of mitochondria which reflects the collective thinking and experience of a society.
You’ve been warned yet again by me. Are you listening to the whispers of Nature, or will you continue to be seduced by man’s technology?
