I’ve decided to release this blog before tomorrow morning’s special Q&A for my website members who signed up for the financial Q&A. If you signed up for it or the recording of this program, please be sure to watch and read it before I speak on this topic.
The frightening fact everyone should know about America is that unelected bureaucrats, often captured by the industry they are supposed to regulate, create most of the federal laws in this country. There are hundreds of federal agencies where this occurs. These agencies run by unelected government bureaucrats adopt regulations, whereas Congress passes statutes– but both statutes and regulations are laws.
Each year, Congress typically passes a few hundred statutes, whereas federal agencies typically adopt a few thousand regulations! Again, both are considered the “law.” You may say, “Hey, I thought the Constitution provided in Article I that only Congress may pass laws,” and you are correct.
But the Supreme Court in 1984 (the Article III branch of our government) said it is fine for these federal agencies, which are part of the executive (part of the Article II branch of our government), to pass regulations to fill in the laws enacted by Congress. In reality, though, unelected bureaucrats create vast and sprawling regulations that do much more than “fill in” holes in laws passed by Congress.
HOW AGENCIES BECAME CAPTURED
This “administrative state” should be deemed unconstitutional. The argument made in support of allowing agencies to adopt endless regulations is that Congress doesn’t have the expertise to write laws in certain areas, so it leaves it to these agencies. In reality, however, that makes it worse, not better, because it means Congress also can’t oversee what laws they are passing and, in the end, these agencies all end up being captured by the very industries they are supposed to regulate. This picture was shared on my Twitter feed during Covid in 2020.
This is why there is a revolving door between agencies and corporations they regulate.
This is partly because it is the industry that has the time and the long-game motivation to influence the agencies and partly because of the revolving door whereby government employees, if they behave, later get a lucrative job in the industry, they are supposed to regulate. This may put into context the Supreme Court’s recent overturning of the Chevron deference last month – this was one small but important step toward removing the power of administrative agencies. It is bad enough that federal agencies get to write laws, but having federal courts defer to the agencies to also interpret laws that were passed by Congress was insane! This deference is what the Supreme Court just overturned.
THE SCOTUS JUST PUT LIMITS ON THE UNIPARTY
Left-winging NPR brought on a Harvard attorney who protects healthcare policy. Justice Kagen is from Harvard, but many people know this. Past regulatory decisions are now fair game for review. One area ripe for this is the FCC decisions on nnEMF and mobile cell phone use. Anyone who supported Chevron’s deference is a supporter of the status quo. The DNC has controlled this part of the law for years. That policy is now over. This decision also weakened the power of the DOJ in the executive branch of government. It means they are now the hunted instead of the hunter.
For those who don’t understand what Chevron Deference is and why SCOTUS ended it, here’s the long and short of it: A family fishing company, Loper Bright Enterprises, was being driven out of business because they couldn’t afford the $700 per day they were being charged by the National Marine Fisheries Service to monitor their company.
The thing is, federal law doesn’t authorize NMFS to charge businesses for this. They just decided to start doing it in 2013. Why did they think they could do away with charging people without legal authorization? In 1984, in the Chevron decision, the Supreme Court decided that regulatory agencies were the “experts” in their field, and the courts should defer to their “interpretation” of the law.
So, for the past 40 years, federal agencies have been able to “interpret” laws to mean whatever they want, and the courts have had to go with it. It was called Chevron Deference, and it put bureaucrats in charge of the country. Did you know It’s how the OHSA decided that everyone who worked for a large company had to get the jab or be fired?
No law gave them that authority; they just made it up, and you had to deal with it. Now, every place that fired someone for the JAB is liable for their actions. That is why this needed its own blog. And it is my duty as a decentralized physician to explain this to you so you can go out and hire an attorney to fight back for what they stole from you.
This is your game plan HYPERLINK to use in these challenges. Be bold. Very bold.
HOW WAS CHEVRON DEFERENCE USED AGAINST AMERICANS?
The FDA’s Legalized Corruption was just released in this brand new investigation by Peter Doshi over at the British Journal of Medicine revealed that the FDA-to-industry transition is common, with 11 out of 20 FDA officials who worked on COVID-19 vaccine reviews now working or consulting for vaccine manufacturers.
The FDA’s standard exit guidance states: “Many departing employees ask how they can stay in touch with former FDA colleagues or continue to support FDA’s public health mission. Although you may not communicate directly with FDA on behalf of your new employer, you may continue to work ‘behind the scenes’ to assist your new employer in its interactions with FDA.”
I mean this is totally outrageous behavior, they don’t even try to hide the conflicts of interest and regulatory capture. According to the article, “It’s appalling that the FDA is telling its employees that they are free to do the bidding of the industry behind the scenes. This practice undermines the integrity of FDA decision-making and industry regulation and is detrimental to public health.” How can anyone trust that our best interests are in mind when you have this level of fuckery?
Let this sink in: “Since 2000, every FDA commissioner, the agency’s highest position, has gone on to work for industry. These include Robert Califf, the agency’s current chief, who re-established ties with industry in between his two stints at the agency’s helm.” “Less is known about the post-FDA trajectories of agency staff not in senior roles. The topic has been studied only sporadically,910 generally finding that a majority of former FDA reviewers take up jobs in industry. In early 2023, when The BMJ asked the FDA whether it kept records on where employees went after they left government service, the FDA spokesperson Jeremy Kahn said, “No, FDA does not keep such records.” So the FDA doesn’t even attempt to learn if the revolving door even exists. This is willful misconduct in order to obfuscate people from learning just how bad it is.
Truly incredible. But there is more fuckery to expose.
It’s how the ATF was able to decide a piece of plastic was a “machine gun.”
It’s how the NCRS was able to decide that a small puddle was a “protected wetland.”
It was how Fauci’s agency mandated masks.
It was how we got TSA rules and how HHS enforces surveillance mandates in the Patriot Act.
This perfectly encapsulates the actions of the FDA from 1984 through 2024.
To those who think that now corporations will be able to put radioactive shrapnel in our food or water supply, you should know two things about this sea change:
FUN FACT #1. Negligence laws still exist on the books. It is time you use them and fight back because the law now has teeth for you, the little guy again.
FUN FACT #2: The Chevron Deference in the law was used to protect big corporations from liability for the harm they caused. The Chevron v NRDC case started because the EPA changed the law’s definition of “source of air pollution” to favor Chevron and other heavily polluting companies. So, the NRDC filed a federal appeal, claiming that the EPA was illegally re-writing the law. The DC Circuit Court ruled in the NRDC’s favor. Then SCOTUS ruled that the EPA were the “experts,” and therefore, the courts (and the nation) had to defer to however they interpreted the law. People like Justice Kagen on the left used this to make people do things those in the government wanted. This allowed for the Deep State power to grow. Kagen and her ilk have always said it was just a ruling to make things easier and streamlined. This was a treasonous comment and opinion held since 1984.
But wait, why would the EPA favor the companies they’re supposed to “protect” us from? Because if a regulatory agency has total control of an industry, the most prominent players in that industry have a vested interest in taking over those agencies. BigHarma used to this control centralized medicine.
First, they fill them with their cronies to protect themselves from being regulated out of existence. But once they’re in the pilot’s seat, they can do whatever they want to “We The People.” They can regulate their smaller competitors out of existence. They can mandate the use of their products. This is how we got the technocracy level control in the USA via the FCC, DoD, DARPA, and the FDA. They can look the other way when they violate their own regulations or redefine the regulation at will (like they did with Chevron). They can do whatever they want, and they have done whatever they want until now. And up until that last Friday in June 2024, the courts were powerless to stop them. So when you hear someone screeching that the end of Chevron Deference means a return to the dark days of pre-1984 America when corporations could put radioactive shrapnel in our food/water, remind them that the exact opposite is true. It also tells you they are supporters of tyranny and treason.
It’s how out-of-control agencies have been able to create rules out of thin air and force you to comply, and the courts have had to defer to them because they are the “experts.” The experts knew how this game was played, so corporations paid experts to say what they wanted in these cases, and they knew that the courts would defer to the agency’s experts to get the outcome they WANTED at your expense.
Imagine if your local police could just arrest you for any reason, and no judge or jury was allowed to determine if you’d committed a crime. Just off to jail, you go. That’s what Chevron Deference was all about, folks. Do you think this is not happening now?
EXAMPLE: Arrested for eating a sandwich, but you can loot stores at will or do heroin on the sidewalk, and nothing happens. Welcome to California. This is how capture agencies allowed these situations to exist. Review this tweet.
https://x.com/PicturesFoIder/status/1808095813874094347
It was not only blatantly unconstitutional, it caused immeasurable harm to everyone. Thankfully, it’s now gone. We haven’t even begun to feel the effects of this decision in the courts. For years to come, it will be used to roll back federal agencies, and we’ll all be better off for it.
This is how capture agencies become extinct.
We need this trend to continue.
We need a SCOTUS to continue to rule like this to strengthen the Constitution. The Constitution was the patient in the ICU that President Bukele was talking about in his CPAC speech.
And that’s why politicians and corporate media are freaking out about it.
The weaponized Executive Branch that’s already ignoring the SCOTUS on student loans is probably not going to listen to the Chevron decision. Giving away free debt = sparking inflation for the future generations of the “We The People.” This should be the GOP hill to die on during an election year – forcing the Executive Branch to comply, but the GOP is part of the UNIPARTY. They are part of the same problem.
SUMMARY
I want you to know your rights so we can destroy the criminal cabal running rampant in Washington, DC. This is decentralized medicine 101. We must always act to strengthen the Constitution and never let it weaken for any urgency or emergency. That next emergency is coming for your food and money. That bird flu thing and that CBDC challenge is coming. Thankfully, the Chevron Deference is not there to be used. This will make the criminals in Washington. DC harder. It also means things are about to get ugly for many of you.
You can bet your ass on it.
More to the point, the end of Chevron Deference means the end of this:
How science worked under Mandy Cohen, who now runs Biden’s CDC:
After reports of Cohen’s appointment surfaced, posts on social media showed her gloating about implementing COVID lockdowns, inconsistently following her own mitigation guidelines, and forcing public schools to have students masked indoors regardless of vaccination status.
The ex-health secretary recalled at one point advising Massachusetts Health Secretary Marylou Sudders to shutter football stadiums to fall in line with North Carolina’s COVID mandates.
“She was like, ‘Are you gonna let them have professional football?’ And I was like, ‘No.’ And she’s like, ‘OK, neither are we,’” Cohen said with a chuckle ——> VIDEO
Why does the left heavily lean on Stanford and Harvard? Because their experts have been used to pollute science using the Chevron Deference as its weapon.
In video footage from June 2021, Cohen also claimed COVID-19 vaccinations would prevent breakthrough cases and further transmission of the virus—a claim also made by Walensky and one that has now been proven false by experts, not in agreement with the CDC or FDA.
Did you know the quid pro quo game that is ongoing in science? Harvard University’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health awarded Mandy Cohen its Leadership in Public Health Practice Award in 2020 for leading the Tar Heel State’s pandemic response — and she was briefly considered to lead the CDC in 2021 before Biden appointed Walensky, who had been on Harvard Medical School’s faculty for almost two decades. So when you review the lawyer’s opinion above in the video at the beginning of the blog remember he works for HARVARD too.
CITES