QUANTUM ENGINNERING #69: MAKING SENSE OF BECKER’s WORK: SOLVING WHERE CHRONIC DISEASE BEGINS

This might be the most important blog I’ll write when it comes to neurosurgery and the genesis of neurological disease generation and regeneration. It will be a grand unifying theory that explains, childhood cancer, autism, and glioma progression in adults.

Robert Becker proposed on basis of his experimental work that living matter behaves as a semiconductor in a wide range of length scales ranging from brain scale to the scale of the entire body. Direct currents flowing only in the preferred direction would be essential for the functioning of the living manner in this framework.  He found these currents in his experiments but could never explain them today, this blog will explore the generation of these currents.

Becker’s injury currents of regeneration were found but no one has explained where the DC comes from. This blog explores the likely source.  FERROELECTRIC POTENTIAL OF THE MITOCHONDRIAL CYTOCHROME PROTEINS.  Ferroelectricity binds all cells in tissues together so they act quantum coherently.

This explains why Becker found the nerve input (DC electric current) was critical in the current of injury.  This bioelectric current is critical. In neurons, water is released every time an action potential is created in a tissue.  Mechanical deformation in tissues generates action potentials in an injury situation.  This would cause water to move within the nervous system.  Water is polarizable by light.  Birefringence is the optical property of a material having a refractive index that depends on the polarization and propagation direction of light.

To generate a DC electric current from light there has to be a way to turn solar light into electricity to link cells in a tissue.  Nature turned to solid-state physics to do this.  She used ferroelectricity to do it.

WHAT IS SOLID-STATE PHYSICS?

Solid-state physics is a branch of physics that deals with practical and theoretical investigations of the properties of solids, such as superconductivity, photoconductivity, and ferromagnetism. In other words, it is that the study of solids, through various methods like crystallography, quantum physics, electromagnetism, and metallurgy. Solid-state physics is the most important branch of condensed matter physics. It helps to investigate how the large-scale properties of solid materials result from their atomic-scale properties. Thus, physics forms a theoretical basis of materials science.  This blog will make the case that decentralized biology really is a solid-state physical problem to be solved for centralized medicine.

One of the basic ideas of the mitochondriac theory of living matter is that various currents, even ionic currents, are quantal currents. The first possibility is that they are Josephson currents (Quantum brain blog) associated with Josephson junctions but already this assumption more or less implies also quantal versions of direct currents. The quantum model for nerve pulse assumes the use of WBG semiconductors that all use non-linear optics (NLO) to communicate and transfer information in many ways always using energy stored at the electronic level of cells.  This allows atoms to be arranged in such a fashion that light stronger than terrestrial sunlight can be used to target melanin in humans to regenerate and renovate their tissues using endogenous generate DC electric current and quantal ionic currents through the cell membranes where DHA dominates physiological function.  These currents will act like Josephson currents, making the situation automatically stationary.

One can criticize this assumption since the Compton length of ions for the ordinary value of the Planck constant is so small that magnetic flux tubes carrying the current through the membrane look rather long in this length scale. Therefore either the Planck constant should be rather large or one should have a non-ohmic quantum counterpart of a direct current in the case of ions and perhaps also protons in the case of neuronal membrane: electronic and perhaps also protonic currents could be still Josephson currents. This would conform to the low dissipation rate.  For this reason, cells evolved to be non-equilibrium dissipative structures.

Enough with the fancy science stuff written to satisfy my future critics who’ll read this.

Let’s get to the Rock star in this story, Robert O. Becker.

The notion of tissues containing a direct current is indeed familiar already from the work of Robert Becker and in the following the results related to laser-induced healing, acupuncture, and DC currents are discussed first. The obvious question is whether these direct currents are actually currents and whether they could be universal in living matter. The mitochondriac model for quantal direct currents is proposed and its possible implications for the model of nerve pulse are discussed. Whether the model is consistent with the vacuum extremal property remains an open question.

Below is Becker’s work in cartoon form on bone semiconduction.

The gist of Becker’s idea on regeneration & wound healing is present below. in that picture represent the state of Becker’s work in 1972.  The implication here is thus:  The DC electric current from the circulatory system loaded with RBC filled with porphyphrins that absorb sunlight and charge up their cells powerfully because they are DEVOID of mitochondria. This charge density increases the Coulomb force and this creates an electric charge density that can be used and transform the matter in an RBC (hemoglobin semiconductive dye) into more primitive cells.

We call this de-differentiation in biology today.  This is evidence of time reversal in a biological system.  Beckers’s work shows us time can be reversed and light energy can be used to do to regenerate brand-new tissues.  This ability remains in humans but it is not as great as it is in the simpler system of the salamander. Nonetheless, his work is eye-opening when you marry it to the idea of Dr. Doug Wallace who says that mitochondrial redox power makes diseases show up and disappear out of the blue as redox varies.  So it raises the question for the mitochondriac how does this happen in us precisely?

I believe the answer is ferroelectricity.

Electro-optics are part of non-linear optical communication and ferroelectricity is part of the electro-optical story in solid-state physics.

NON-LINEAR OPTICS is the base communication system inside of cells. Color = frequency in light.  Nonlinear optics allows us to change the color of a light beam, to change its shape in space and time, and to create the shortest events ever made by humans. It also allows us to turn light into an electric current.  Nature has been at this game a lot longer than Silicon Valley.  They just began the game in 1961.

Many people forget hemoglobin in an RBC is a crystal.  They really forget that when sunlight hits the water in the circulatory system it takes on a physical state change.  Water become liquid crystalline as well = which gains coherent domains which become redox piles of electrons to be moved in the cell system.  Those electrons are critical for ferroelectric coupling in the circulatory system for arterial elasticity and cardiovascular health.

Applying a voltage to a crystal changes the refractive indices of the crystal and introduces birefringence to the system. This is what a mitochondrion does inside human cells.  Light is capable of changing charges and charges change voltages. We change the voltages on our inner mitochondrial membrane and this changes the colors a mitochondrion can emit.  All those colors stimulate different chromophores inside the structure of a mitochondrion to run the metabolism of oxidative phosphorylation and create water, CO2, and heat to reverse the process of photosynthesis.  The light show cephalopods are putting on is the optical representation of their metabolism in real-time.  It doubles as a communication skill because they can vary their metabolism in the compartments of their cells.  They emit these colors to communicate.  It replaces their ability to speak. Humans have had  560 million years to upgrade and change their communication skills.

I told Dr. Huberman I liked cephalopods because as a neurosurgeon they allow me to look back and see the earliest organizations of a neural network.  Many people do not know that Cephalopods evolved during the Cambrian period (∼530 Ma) very close to when this UV expansion fell to Earth.  This also explains how we went from bacteria and archaea so fast into very complex cephalopod animals.  The earliest melanin chemicals were critical to this rapid evolution.   These animals came from a monoplacophoran-like mollusk in which the conical, external shell was modified into a chambered buoyancy apparatus. During the mid-Palaeozoic (∼416 Ma) cephalopods diverged into nautiloids and the presently dominant coleoids.

The strong linear coupling of the director ň to electric field E in ferroelectric liquid crystals can be utilized to perform high-speed electro-optic switching suitable for device applications.

REGENERATION AND THE DC ELECTRIC CURRENT

Beckers’s work is largely unknown and was buried by the military and Big Pharma.

The implication of his work was toward the idea of human regeneration and renovaBeckers’stion of all disease states.  My work is taking up where he left off.  He is an unknown giant in decentralized medicine in my opinion.

His best work was done in bone regeneration which in human remains.  We do not heal fractures, we regenerate the bone completely.  This statement is huge.

The distinction between bone response to stress and to fracture lies in cellular changes which seem to be of great importance. In the case of fracture repair, Becker found that certain cells under appropriate electrical stimulation (direct current in p.p.amp.ranges) would undergo reversion to a more primitive cell type in the human cell line. Becker found that the physical characteristics of the current were KEY in performing this task.

RBCs from the human circulatory system de-differentiated, and this RBC became transformed into a primitive material found in cells and it was subsequently re-differentiated into those cell types needed for the particular tissue repair process required. Becker was able to study some of the electrical parameters of importance in the injury current; the most outstanding was that the effective levels of voltage and current had both upper and lower limits. In other words, voltages or currents above an upper limit were non-productive of cellular changes until cur- rent densities became high enough to produce heating effects.  I believe the reason for this is because the current links to the dielectric constant in water making humans have the ideal refractive index to be able to use solar power to regenerate our tissues.

During night and day, our refractive indices change because of human ferroelectric ability in tissues that link all cells into a synctium.  This gives us a dark and light mode of plasma possible.  It mimics what plants can do in photosynthesis in the dark and light reactions (pic below).  Recall from Burr’s work all plants also exhibit a DC electric current when they are injured as well. This tells the mitochondriac mind this is a light-mediated function of all cells.

Life, and, in particular, its amazing diversity spanning more than 21 orders of magnitude in size, is the most complex physical system in the universe. In spite of this, biological systems obey a host of remarkably simple and systematic empirical scaling laws which relate to how organismal features change with size over many orders of magnitude. These include fundamental quantities like metabolic rate (the rate at which energy must be supplied in order to sustain an organism), time scales (such as lifespan and heart rate), and sizes (such as the length of the aorta or height of a tree trunk). It is a remarkable fact that all of these can be expressed as power law relationships with exponents that are simple multiples of 1 (e.g. ~, 3, 3). They appear to be valid for almost all forms of life, whether it be mammalian, avian, reptilian, unicellular, or plant-like. Clearly, the universal character of these “laws” is telling us something important about the way life is organized photonic energy at the electronic and vibrational state of matter in cells and the constraints under which it has evolved.

Becker wrote that he felt he knew why human regeneration was limited to the bone to just bone and fingertips.  He theorized that one reason why mammals cannot achieve many kinds of regenerative growth seen in amphibians is the absence of adequate “electrical factors” at the injury site. Acting on that hypothesis, his laboratory initially undertook a study of limb regeneration in the nocturnal white rat. The theoretical current/voltage requirements were small enough so that we could consider bimetallic electrogenic couplings as a power source; similar devices had been used by Professor Stephen Smith in 1967 to restore some measure of limb regeneration in the frog, an amphibian capable of limb regeneration when in the tadpole stage of development but lack this ability in adulthood.  I’d remind you at this point frog melanopsin & melanin and human melanin are almost identical homologs.  Becker never knew this about the non visual photoreceptors in tissues.

Becker investigated this aspect of Smith’s work and found that Smith’s silver-platinum junctions far exceeded currents approximately five times that injury regeneration required.  Becker resolved the problem by putting carbon resistors between silver and platinum electrodes and encasing the system in silicon.  When I read this as a resident I knew what this meant.  He created his own WBG semiconductor and changed the current using NLO.  I do not believe Becker had any idea that he was changing the frequency of light in the diode to alter the DC current downward.  It was a remarkable feat that he should have won the Nobel Prize but I do not believe any but myself realized what he did.  When I did I realized what cells were doing inside of us all the time.  We were filled with Wide Band Gapped semiconductors that were changing sunlight into VUV-IR-A light endogenously and using that light to heal and regenerate us while using ferroelectricity to create the DC electric current.  I was astounded at his experimental brilliance.

When Becker made these adjustments guess what happened in that nocturnal white rat?  He was able to regenerate all the tissues a rat limb needs to form.  He never regenerated the entire limb but he verified that the tissue created was brand new and not just a healed limb.  Below was his setup in his 1969 papers.

FROM REGENERATION TO CANCER GENERATION

I briefly discussed this with Huberman and Rick and Huberman was completely unaware of what Becker had found.  I explained to him I learned about Becker’s work as a neurosurgery resident in learning about bone healing. It was here I learned bone does not heal it regenerates fully from primitive cells.

The importance of Becker’s observation is two-fold to the mitochondriac. The growth pattern makes it clear that the effect of the electrical energy was to bring about the de-differentiation of a cell population and its subsequent regrowth and re-differentiation, with the expression of multiple genetic pathways (ex., the controlled reading-out, and application of the all-purpose structural information that all cells possess-the process which occurs in its most complete form during the development of an embryo).

As a neurosurgeon, I immediately thought about the cancers I treat and how glioma behave via glioma progression. According to the result of several studies I read back then, the frequencies of brain tumors are of different rates according to countries worldwide.  This hinted to me the light environment was critical because of latitude and zipcode effects.  It also made me realize nnEMF likely was playing a role in this disease.  In addition, these differences were observed among different ethnic groups in the same country.  This told me local light factors had to be altering the injury currents in the brain and this led to tumor de-differentiation.  This was when I coined the term, “you cannot get well in the same environment you got sick in”.  It was because of Becker’s finding I just mentioned.  I learned early in my residency that low-grade gliomas could be lived with for some time but with time they always de-differentiated into more lethal tumor types.  I realized right away there had to be a link between the sun, gliomas, and the DC electric current.  (see pic below)

What was the cause of BRAIN CANCER?  Appropriate mtDNA control of apoptosis is important for normal functioning, and unregulated apoptosis has been linked to a variety of disease states. Excess apoptosis is thought to contribute to neurodegenerative diseases, whereas insufficient apoptosis can lead to diseases such as cancer. When UV light is blocked exogenous or endogenously from cells non visual photoreceptors, insuffiencent apoptosis results and this blocks cell cycle progression. I mentioned this in the Tetragrammaton podcast but I do not think Huberman understood the power of my idea.

As a result the cell cannot be removed from the tissue by the immune system and then it self isolates from its embryonic tissue. This changes its bio-electric signature inside the organ in question. It acts like an injury does. It is a stimulus that demands a response. The difference in cancer is the stimulus is ABSENT. Because surrounding ultraweak endogenous UV light is not present, the cell forces itself to remain vital as a solo entity within its embryologic position and this change in bio-electric stimulus leads to oncogenic transformation genetically. The lack of ultraweka-UV light emission causes the isolated cell to want to migrate to tissues who do contain the healing UV light stimulus needed to generate the bio-electric fingerprint to control its growth. Every tissue has its own bio-electric signature from morphogensis. Consider tissues to unique self identifying bio-electric barcodes that determine morphogenetic migration from its embryonic form. If this signature does not by molecular resonance, the migrating cell will resume growing but it will do it in another tissue that does not have its specific and sensitive bio-electric passport. This becomes a metastatic cancer focus. This is why the presence or absence of a tissues ultraweak UV bio-photon emission from their mitochondria is critical in apoptosis control and cancer prevention. This is counterintuitive to the centralized idea present in cancer medicine today.

IMPLICATIONS?

Cancer basicially are cells isolated from Nature and its ability to turn sunlight into a DC electric current.  That DC electric connection comes form the sun and links all cells to the whole by the regenerative DC electric current that Becker discovered.  When the bioelectric fingerprint isolates the cell from the tissue it is in, it cannot cooperarate coherent quantum mechanically and the cell loses its ability to undergo apoptosis, and it become invisible to the immune system and it reverts to its own survival modes built into using hypoxia and HIF-1.  This causes the hijacking of the genome.  If the cell is fully participatory in the bio electrical community in a tissue no oncogenesis is possible even if the genetic changes are present.  People who think the BRCA mutation is a death sentence from cancer are smooth brainers who deserve what centralized medicine will give them.  Oncogensis requires that cells isolate themselves because their is no surrounding ultraweak UV light to get them through the mitosis juncture of the cell cycle.  They self isolate by closing their borders and removing their gap junctions.  As soon as they do this, the conditions for existence of cancer becomes possible.  The overall bioelectric state controls quantum coherence, and that state offers the ultimate control of the genetic state.  The Genetic state of the cell is immaterial if the redox potential is controlled by Nature.

I had finally explained why cancer begins and why gliomas have a progression. Within the brain white and grey matter tracts have a very self similar bio-electric passport because they all come from neuroectoderm and the bio-electric power was high because of the mitochondrial capacity in neurons. I realized that the sensitiveity of the frequency match of the bioelectric current had to be controlled by the specific voltages in ferroelectric currents in the brain for low grade gliomas to grow slower and GBM to have very different bio-electric passports that lead to massive growth rapidly. Things began to make sense quantum mechanically to me.

 

SUMMARY

Becker’s experimental results produced in response to the level of current used (a total of 1 to 3 mJAamp) were extensive enough to warrant the prediction that similar-level bio-electric currents could have profound clinical implications for human disease.

For me Becker’s work, was unravelingthe the control mechanisms of life.  I just had to make sense of the experimental data he had. The key was realizing the sun being transformed from cathode ray to terrestrial visible light and being captured by membranes filled with DHA that were connected to the TCA cycle. This caused the forward spin rate. When there was a defect in the bio-electric charge of the membranes, the TCA cycle would spin counterclockwise and this transformed the light emission of the endogenous WBG semiconductors. That change changed the bio-electric passport of the cells using the ferroelectric mechanism. This mechanism was how sunlight was transformed to a charge density on a membrane that leads to a measurable DC electric current in all cells.   This creates a UNIQUE bio-electric passport for neuron migration in the developing brain and it creates a unique bio-electric zipcode within the tracts of the CNS. This unifies the how autism and brain cancer are bio-electric diseases.

THE EUREKA MOMENT AT DAVID’S FOOT

At that moment, I believed I could cure many diseases and not just treat them.  I  therefore now believe that low-level electrical currents and potentials, produced either by direct injection or by semiconductive rectification and induction from an electromagnetic field (melanin in us), have the FULL capability of bringing about very major biological effects of a very basic nature.

Immediately I realize how we went from chimp to human.  I realized at the foot of David how every disease should be approached in decentralized fashion.  It was 180 degrees from what I was taught in medical school.

The changes Becker found in his experiments appeared to be based upon perturbations produced in pre-existing biological electronic control systems which regulate very basic life functions. I knew immediately that they had to be wide-band gapped semiconductors because the electronic state of water and photosynthesis was 12.06 eV.  This meant plants had to use soft Xrays to split water into hydrogen, oxygen, and 2 electrons.  I asked myself does nature make mistakes?

I told Huberman that this peculiarity for me was always vexing.  How could cells split water if they needed soft X-rays to do so?  Becker’s work told me cells were solid state.  Then it clicked.  We were filled with WBG semiconductors that took the visible spectrum light in eV and added to it with our cellular design.  Then splitting water was easy.  So I pulled out a chlorophyll molecule and saw Mg sitting inside a nitride cage and I looked up the band gap of MgN.  Problem solved.  Its band gap was over 7 eV.  Becker’s fexperiments explained a lot to my simple brain.  They hold MASSIVE promise for a better understanding of ALL of life’s control systems and for clinical application to many mitochondrial diseases.

Becker is a giant to this decentralized mitochondriac.  I cannot overstate the impact of his work on me. Becker taught me that just understanding biochemistry was the losing hand centralized medicine plays.

From his work, the biological effects involve basic functions of living material that are under remarkably precise control by mechanisms that have, to date, escaped description in terms of solution biochemistry. This suggests that bio-electromagnetic phenomena are fundamental attributes of living things, ones that must have been present in the first living things. The traditional approach to biogenesis postulates that life began in an aqueous environment, with the development of complex molecules and their subsequent sequestration from the environment by membranous structures. The solid-state approach proposes an origin in complex crystalline structures that possess such properties as semi-conductivity, photoconductivity, and piezoelectricity. All of the reported effects of electromagnetic forces seem to lend support to the latter hypothesis.

With this knowledge, I went from a centralized pusher of drugs to a decentralized physician pushing solid state physics in Nature overnight.

The neural electronic system also seemed to be related to levels of consciousness and biological cycles, and Becker’s work developed the thesis that this system furnishes the linkage mechanism between electromagnetic forces in the environment and biological cyclic behavior.  In mammals, I found the electromagnetic induction of melanin from POMC was the key to the human system.  It was on the shoulders of Becker, my ideas have gone further.  Without his insight, I would be like any other centralized MD.   In my opinion, human ferroelectricity in the neural and circulatory systems is another critical link in explaining his experimental findings.  There is not a disease we cannot tackle with this wisdom.

The most amazing thing light has built is my species.  It astounds me that light is slowed down by atoms in cells on Earth in a specific way that creatures like us do.  I am amazed at how creation occurred.

All these thoughts created for you above came from starlight.  Sunlight is our remedy in this life.  I need to understand it fully before my “pilot light” goes out.  Light organizes matter and hides in its electronic state but the type of light, the spectrum of this light from a source, has its own unique ability to sculpt atoms in specific ways to create new things from its inherent organizing ability.  It is this ability hidden deep within the light that is the key to understanding life.  It provides change without the perception of change.  The thing that shows up every morning, which is most familiar, remains the most mysterious force in the Universe.  That force organized every life system and every feeling of love that has ever existed. Matter exists to make love to light, to separate its electric and magnetic fields in ways that we just do not understand, and from this dance, light can sculpt a life, make a child, and create a new species.  Everything man has known comes from the mysterious moves of our star’s light as it fell to this wet rocky planet.  It is sheer amazement to me.

Living systems are nests of abiotic carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen, organized together with traces of a few other elements, yet of a complexity of structure that has hitherto resisted all attempts at complete analysis because we do not understand how light and water bind and weave the process of atoms in things.  This makes our protoplasm the most enduring and the most easily destroyed of substances we know; its molecules are constantly programmed electronically by light to break down constantly, yet reorganize under solar power to furnish the power for the manifestations of many vital phenomena.  Yet, through its remarkable property of assimilation of light, a power possessed by few other things on earth, it constantly builds up its substance anew from the surrounding medium and it avoids our perception of its recipe.

Now I knew how life operated at its fundamental levels. Now you do too! Below is one of my members, who just did not get the ideas in this blog together in her own life. She just died of cancer this week. I dedicate this blog to her.

CITES

1. Becker, R. 0., and D. G. Murray, “The Electric Control System Regulating Fracture Healing in Amphibians,” Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, Vol. 73, pp. 169-98, 1970.

2. Frost, Harold M. (ed.), Bone Biodynamics. Boston: Little Brown and Co., 1964.

3. Szent-Gyorgyi, Albert, Introduction to a Submolecular Biology. New York: Academic Press, 1960.

4. Becker, Robert O. Technology Review, December 1972

5. My neocortex —-> https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1780379857295200331.html

6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKPC64n_U0s&t=4161s

7. Go to the 2:24 and listen until 2:28, the rest is superfluous —-> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3lsYlod5OU&t=8898s

8. Michael Levin’s Website: https://drmichaellevin.org

DECENTRALIZED MEDICINE #2: CAN SUPPLEMENTS OPERATE WITHOUT MARCHING ORDERS FROM YOUR MASTER?

Do you know humans are broken and moved to action by their master?

What are minerals at their most fundamental level? Atoms. What are they made of? Electrons, protons, and neutrons have their quantum spin, and the angular orbital momentum is changed by light from the sun. Is this transferred to water and things in our cells? Yep. This is how evolution really operates below your level or a Darwinist to sense it

.

 

Why does just 3% of DNA code for proteins? How could it be the be-all-end-all that the neo-Darwinists say it is? What does the other 97% of DNA do? Is the extra DNA that acts like dark matter in us actually an owner’s manual for how light, our master, is transformed into bioelectricity whose job it is to power up and move the chains found in our proteins to move like a wind chime operates to make music? Is bio-electric function vital to understanding how our master controls the dark matter in us to allow life to manifest somehow, and is centralized science missing?

DNA only codes for proteins. Protein structure is the three-dimensional arrangement of atoms in a molecule. Proteins are polymers of specifically polypeptides formed from sequences of amino acids that the linear DNA code provides. The code of DNA, however, has many other electronic codes contained within it. Watson and Crick did not understand this in 1953, and many in centralized biology are still stuck on their old ideas. Modern decentralized epigenetics and transposons are tuned and turned on and off by bioelectrical signals transformed from sunlight, which have shown us that Watson and Crick’s ideas about DNA are outdated. This implies that the DNA code and proteins it makes are clues to a “quantum evolution” at the depths of life deep inside your cells.

The design process of life begins with the DNA code. Biology today is a detailed, disorganized collection of disparate facts. It is like a hoarder’s basement or a rat’s nest. There is no design connecting to what is buried in DNA’s code. You can scoop up a bag full of facts and try to make sense of it, but that would be an exercise in futility. Proper biological knowledge is fractal and non-linear, filled with optical magics thrown in the recipe.

The design can be complex, with microscopic details, but the overall design is coherent and beautiful. It would help if you linked them together electrically to make extensive collections of proteins act as one and become coherent. This idea implies that they must be tuned as a wind chime is. Cells should have some bioelectric tuning ability built into their protein structure. Do you see what I see yet?

VIDEO

Just one violin that is out of tune in an orchestra or one voice that is off-key in a choir will ruin a beautiful harmony or an enchanting ensemble. It matters not how loudly or softly it grates; if it does not stop, the performance will end.

So it is with the cells of our bodies and of the birds, insects, animals, and plants whose music fills the Earth. When a jarring note is introduced, no matter how softly, chords become discords, melody becomes noise, life degrades and disappears, and chronic disease epidemics become commonplace.

Life, Information, and Electricity

The cohesion of life does not come from chemistry. It comes from the Earth, Sun, and stars.

K.H. Li wrote, in his forward to the book Electromagnetic Bio-Information:

“The informational aspect of biological systems characterizes the essential view of life. And this is less reflected by biochemical findings, but rather by a level beyond the domain of chemical reactivity, namely that of electromagnetic fields.” [1]

Nikolai Kositsky, Aljona Nizhelska, and Grigory Ponezha reviewed 40 years of research in Ukraine and Russia and concluded:

“Biological effects [of electromagnetic radiation] depend not on the strength of the energy carried into one or another system, but on the information carried into it.” [2]

W. Grundler and F. Kaiser wrote:

“Living cells exhibit a high degree of information processing and communication… It is clearly demonstrated that a fast oscillating, very weak outer field is influencing the biological reactions of cells… We have to take into account an ‘internal’ oscillator (the cell itself or parts of the cell or of its environment) coupling with the outer field.” [3]

John Zimmerman and Vernon Rogers wrote:

“Electromagnetic bioinformation depends on the ability of organisms to emit, receive, and interpret spatiotemporal patterns of electromagnetic fields.” [4]

Herbert L. König, a student of Winfried Schumann, wrote:

“Electromagnetic forces in general must play a role of an as yet incalculable importance in the information transfer between or to living organisms.” [5]

Ulrich Warnke wrote:

“The communicative form of antennae contact in bees and ants can be registered by an oscillograph. Every time a short contact occurs between the antennae, a signal is generated in the recipient’s electrolyte system in the form of an impulse.” [6]

Günther Becker showed that termites’ gallery building rate was affected by termites’ existence in an adjoining container but not if the wall between them was shielded with a conductive material. “These results indicate that communication among termite groups is based on either electric or electromagnetic fields produced by the insects,” he wrote. [7]

Bernhard Ruth wrote that the growth of plants and animals cannot be explained in terms of chemical reactions because “all chemical reactions occur equally in all directions,” and biological growth is directional. “The existing cells of an organism have to determine when and where a new cell is to be generated by mitosis. This can only be achieved by means of an information transfer which stimulates the required cell to divide, and which is not emitted in all directions homogenously.” [8]

Helmut A. Fischer wrote:

“There is good reason for believing that, in addition to mechanical and chemical forms of communication, there are more biophysical ways of communication… The findings made so far confirm that the biochemical processes in a cell, besides thermic effects, also elicit other electromagnetic signals.” [9]

Igor Jerman wrote:

.

“Coherent electromagnetic oscillations in cells permit ordered intermolecular processes and highly selective attractions between enzymes and substrates. These oscillations… represent an important means of intercellular long-range connection and thus have an important role in maintaining an intercellular order… Neoplasms follow from the fact that some of the cells within the organism escape from the intercellular coherent field and thus from the intercellular order.” [10]

Living cells emit signals throughout the electromagnetic spectrum

In their study, “Electromagnetic emission at micron wavelengths from active nerves,” Allan Fraser and Allan Frey measured infrared emissions from nerves with wavelengths between 2 and 20 microns at a strength of 6 μW/cm2. [11]

Bernhard Ruth detected light photons emitted by plants:

“The light intensity emitted by seedlings of wheat, beans, lentils, and corn varied between 700 cps (counts per second) and 250 cps… The spectral distribution extended from 400 nm to 600 nm… Yeast cells show a radiation of between 150 and 380 nm.” [8]

Shou Sin-Sung wrote that “DNA is a possible radiation source.” [12]

A.H. Jafary-Asl and Cyril W. Smith detected radio frequency signals from yeast at a frequency of 8 MHz. [13]

Herbert A. Pohl detected signals at 7 and 33 kHz from a species of algae. [14]

J. Kent Pollock and Douglas G. Pohl, in dielectrophoresis studies, detected RF emissions from mouse cells at frequencies between 4 and 9 MHz. Similar emissions were detected from cells of bacteria, yeast, worms, chickens, frogs, monkeys, and humans. Maximum emissions occurred during cell division, and no emissions from dead cells:

“The evidence from the m-DEP experiments and from the closely related pattern experiments consistently indicate that cells are producing radio frequency electric fields.” [15]

Sergey Sit’ko and his colleagues measured emissions from the human body between 37-78 GHz at 0.000000000000001 to 0.0000000000000001 μW/cm2Hz. [16]

It takes little or no power to interfere with life

Allan Frey wrote:

“Electromagnetic fields are not a foreign substance to living beings like lead or cyanide. With foreign substances, the greater the dose, the greater the effect — a dose-response relationship. Rather, living beings are electrochemical systems that use very low frequency EMFs in everything from protein folding through cellular communication to nervous system function. To model how EMFs affect living beings, one might compare them to the radio we use to listen to music.

“The EMF signal the radio detects and transduces into the sound of music is almost unmeasurably weak. At the same time, there are, in total, strong EMFs impinging on the radio. We don’t notice the stronger EMF signals because they are not the appropriate frequency or modulation. Thus, they don’t disturb the music we hear. However, if you impose an appropriately tuned EMF or harmonic on the radio, even if it is very weak, it will interfere with the music. Similarly, if you impose a very weak EMF signal on a living being, it has the possibility of interfering with normal function if it is properly tuned. That is the model that much biological data and theory tell us to use, not a toxicological model.” [17]

Gerard Hyland said:

“The human body is an electrochemical instrument of exquisite sensitivity.” [18] “If a signal can operate a mechanical device, it can disturb every cell in the human body.” [19]

Igor Belyaev wrote:

“While the dose rate/SAR concept is adequate for description of acute thermal effects, it is not applicable for chronic exposures to N[on]T[hermal] M[icro]W[aves].” [20] and ”The 51.755 GHz resonance frequency of the cell reaction to MMWs did not depend on power density (PD) in the range from 10(exp-19) to 3 × 10(exp-3) W/cm2.” [21]

Ross Adey, at Loma Linda University, wrote:

“We have discovered some of the keys to understanding how body cells ‘whisper’ to one another, and, in so doing, we have discovered some of the keys to understanding how electromagnetic fields, so weak that some scientists have regarded them as incapable of biological effects, are detected by living tissues, and we have studied some of the likely consequences for human health… These fields can exert effects even at intensities near zero; in other words, a lower limit or threshold may not exist.” [22]

Neil Cherry presented “conclusive evidence” that “the safe level of exposure is zero” [23] and that radio signals “can interfere with hearts, brains and cells at extremely low intensities.” [24]

Dr. Robert O. Becker wrote:

“There is no effective way to shield yourself from environmental fields except to avoid areas where they are prevalent” [25] and “If the system’s sensitivity is as presently described, then frequency becomes a more important parameter in any experiment than field strength.” [26]

In The Body Electric, he wrote:

“The accumulated research has clearly shown that small doses often have the same effects as larger ones… Indeed there has already been one report of brain wave changes suggesting resonance of neural electrical currents with radio waves and microwaves down to a billionth of a microwatt… We must understand that no amount of artificial EMR, no matter how small, has been proven safe for continuous exposure. Bioeffects have been found at the lowest measurable doses.” [27]

Herbert L. König wrote:

“Biological systems have sensitivity values of the same order of magnitude as the field intensity values of natural fields.” [5]

William Bise testified before the U.S. Senate about the effects on brain waves that he elicited by radio waves at near-zero intensity. The results of his experiments ought to terrify every person who ever uses a cell phone and every doctor who is confronted with the extraordinary amount of anxiety and depression in his or her patients today because the radiation in Bise’s experiments, at exposure levels 10,000,000,000 to 100,000,000,000,000 times lower than a cell phone, had strong and instantaneous effects on all subjects’ brain waves and mental states:

“A pilot study was conducted on five men and five women volunteers… They ranged in age from 18 to 48 years. Three had been occupationally exposed to RF energy; the other seven had not, and all were in apparent good health. The RF ranges covered from .1 to 960 Mhz C[ontinuous] W[ave] and 8.5 to 9.6 Ghz pulse modulated. Power levels were varied from 10(exp-16) wt/cm2 to 10(exp-12) wt/cm2… The experimental time for each volunteer was typically 50 minutes…

“Subjects’ EEG traces displayed desynchronized alpha waves of 15 to 25 percent higher than normal amplitude, and slow waves appeared at certain radio frequencies. Conversely, diminution and desynchronization of alpha wave amplitude on the 20 to 50 percent order occurred at other radio frequencies, and 2 to 6 Hz slow waves appeared. These two anomalous patterns were found in both men and women volunteers. Mental attitudes appeared to change during the tests. CW frequencies at a power density of about 10(exp-15) wt/cm2, which produced EEG changes in males, were found between 130 and 780 Mhz. Female volunteers’ EEG alterations occurred between 350 and 960 Mhz. Pulse modulation tests on two males, at a power density of about 10(exp-12) wt/cm2, showed EEG changes around 9.1 and 9.15 GHz. Brain waves changed almost immediately upon tuning a generator to a frequency that produced them and then reverted to their normal patterns when the generator frequency was altered or turned off.” [28] Read Marino’s book “Going Somewhere for more astounding facts you and your doctor are ignorant of.

Sheldon Meyers, Director of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Radiation Programs, told Congress that “it is not possible to assign a low-intensity limit or threshold below which the exposures are without effect.” [29]

Reba Goodman and Martin Blank wrote:

“Induction of the stress response by magnetic fields occurs at 14 orders of magnitude lower energy density than with thermal stimuli, the current benchmark for cell phone safety standards.” [30]

Yury Shckorbatov found evidence of cell damage after only one second of exposure to 18.75 GHz microwaves at a level of 0.2 mW/cm2. [31]

Low power can be more harmful than high power.

Andrew Wood, Rohan Mate, and Ken Karipidis reviewed 107 experimental studies and found that a lower exposure level tended to have a greater biological effect, and the difference was highly significant (p < 0.001). [32]

Stefano Cucurachi et al. reviewed 113 peer-reviewed field and laboratory studies and found that RF radiation with the lowest power tended to cause the most significant ecological damage. [33]

Maria Sadchikova found that among people occupationally exposed to RF radiation in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, the sickest were those exposed to the lowest, not the highest, levels. [34], [35]

Abraham Lilienfeld analyzed the health of Moscow embassy employees during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, when Russia was continuously irradiating the embassy with microwaves. His report was written for the U.S. Department of State. Table 6.32 of his report shows that male employees exposed to the lowest level of radiation had the most symptoms in 18 of 20 symptom categories. [36]

They had more:

depression

migraine

lassitude

irritability

nervous disorders

anxiety

vibrations

intraocular pain

sensations

loss of appetite

difficulty concentrating

memory loss

dizziness

finger tremor

hallucinations

insomnia

neurosis

other symptoms

Liliya M. Fatkhoutdinova studied the effects of video display terminals on blood pressure. Lower levels of electromagnetic fields raised blood pressure more than higher levels. [37]

Vladimir N. Binhi and Robert J. Goldman studied the proliferation of wound cells in response to electric fields. They wrote:

“Most dramatic is that relatively intense electric fields sometimes do not cause appreciable effect while smaller fields do.” [38]

Herbert L. König wrote:

“Exceptionally intense fields often cause no reaction at all.” [5]

Leif Salford, Bertil Persson, Arne Brun, Henrietta Nittby and their team at Lund University in Sweden researched the effects of RF radiation on the blood-brain barrier for 20 years. They found that the lowest levels of exposure caused the most damage to the blood-brain barrier. [39] They calculated that you will do more damage to your brain if you hold a cell phone one meter away from you than if you hold it up to your head. [40]

Dimitris Panagopoulos found that RF radiation reduced reproduction in fruit flies. The maximum impact on fruit fly reproduction occurred when the source of radiation was at some distance away from the flies. [41]

Igor Belyaev, experimenting on E. coli, found that genetic effects occurred at specific frequencies and that the magnitude of the effect did not change with power level over 16 orders of magnitude, all the way down to 0.000000000001 μW/cm2. [21]

Numerous scientists in many laboratories — Carl Blackman et al. at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [42]; Suzanne M. Bawin, Leonard K. Kaczmarek and W. Ross Adey [43]; Sisir K. Dutta et al. [44]; Jean-Louis Schwartz, Dennis E. House and Geoffrey A. R. Mealing [45]; and Kumud K. Kunjilwar and Jitendra Behari [46] — found that calcium depletion from brain and heart cells occurred at specific frequencies and exposure levels and did not increase with power. Dutta found a 3,000-fold decrease in power caused a 4-fold increase in calcium exiting from cells.

W. Grundler and F. Kaiser halved the growth rate of yeast at a precise microwave frequency. The magnitude of the effect of this frequency did not change with intensity over several orders of magnitude, down to 5 pW/cm2. [3]

Cooking Your Brain and Your DNA

Here are some other findings that should terrify anyone who uses a cell phone, considering the unprecedented numbers of young people today with cancers and neurological diseases.

First are some measurements made by Markus Antonietti, Director of the Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces in Germany. In 2006, when cell phone use was becoming universal, he wondered what they might be doing to the brain. Cell phones exposed the brain to about 1 W/kg SAR, which did not heat the whole brain by more than one degree Celsius, but what about the conditions that exist in the tiny synapses, the junctions between neurons where nerve impulses are transmitted from one nerve cell to another? His research team decided to simulate the conditions between cell membranes with tiny fat droplets in salt water. [47] “Ions accumulate on these,” reported Zeit Online, the newspaper that interviewed him, “and by changing the salt concentration and the droplet size, the conditions of biological tissue can be simulated, i.e., a kind of concentrated liquid brain.

“‘And now comes the tragedy,’ said the Max Planck Director. ‘Exactly where we are closest to the conditions in the brain, we see the strongest heating.’ Temperature peaks of 100 degrees. He had expected to warm, but not to this extent. ‘There is a hundred times as much energy absorbed as previously thought. That is a horror.’” [48]

It turns out a cell phone not only boils your synapses but also your DNA. A number of research teams have discovered that DNA is a good conductor and so, as in the synapses, RF radiation is conducted and amplified tremendously in DNA.

Jacqueline K. Barton and her colleagues at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena observed ultrafast electron transfer in DNA over large distances. [49] “In effect,” she told Science News, “DNA acts like a molecular wire.” [50]

Hans-Werner Fink and Christian Schönenberger reported that the conductivity of DNA is 105 Siemens per meter, which is ten times larger than that of most electrically conducting polymers and about one-tenth the conductivity of mercury. [51]

Charles Polk tells us what the consequences of this are. Based on Fink and Schönenberger’s measurements, Polk calculated that the rate of temperature increase in the interior of DNA exposed to a cell phone at 1 W/kg SAR is 60 degrees Celsius per second! [52].

Your cell phone, if you still use one, is cooking your brain and damaging it, during every second that you use it. The cell towers that it commands are sickening us, no matter how far away from one we manage to be. The satellites — 9,500 of them and increasing rapidly — are polluting our bodies, sterilizing our planet, and severing our connection to our sources of vitality beneath our feet, in the air, in the oceans, and in the heavens.

In my constitutional amendment, there is an entire section dedicated to nnEMF protection that will begin in El Salvador. It not only protects patients but it also has specifics in it for clinicians, students, teachers, and schools. The world is changing right around you now.

Do you sense it yet? If not, why not? Might it be the nnEMF you are imbibing?

CITES

[1] K.H. Li. Foreword to Electromagnetic Bio-Information, Fritz Albert Popp et al., eds., Urban & Schwarzenberg, München (1989).

[2] Nikolai Kositsky, Alona Nizhelska, and Grigory Ponezha. Influence of High-frequency Electromagnetic Radiation at Non-thermal Intensities on the Human Body. No Place To Hide 3(1) Supplement (2001).

[3] W. Grundler and F. Kaiser. Experimental evidence for coherent excitations correlated with cell growth.” Nanobiology 1:163-176 (1992).

[4] John Zimmerman and Vernon Rogers. Biomagnetic Fields as External Evidence of Electromagnetic Bioinformation. In Electromagnetic Bio-Information, Fritz Albert Popp et al., eds., 1989, pp. 226-237.

[5] Herbert L. König. Bioinformation – Electrophysical Aspects. In Electromagnetic Bio-Information. Proceedings of the Symposium, Marburg, September 5, 1977, Fritz Albert Popp et al., eds. Urban and Schwarzenberg, München 1979, pp. 25-54.

[6] Ulrich Warnke. Information Transmission by Means of Electrical Biofields. In Electromagnetic Bio-Information, Fritz Albert Popp et al., eds., 1979, pp. 55-79.

[7] Günther Becker. Communication between Termites by Means of Biofields and the Influence of Magnetic and Electric Fields on Termites. In Electromagnetic Bio-Information, Fritz Albert Popp et al., eds., 1979, pp. 95-106.

[8] Bernhard Ruth. Experimental Investigations on Ultraweak Photon Emission. In Electromagnetic Bio-Information, Fritz Albert Popp et al., eds., 1979, pp. 107-121.

[9] Helmut A. Fischer. Photons as Transmitter for Intra- and Intercellular Biological and Biochemical Communication – The Construction of a Hypothesis. In Electromagnetic Bio-Information, Fritz Albert Popp et al., eds., 1979, pp. 175-180.

[10] Igor Jerman. Electromagnetic Origin of Life. Electro- and Magnetobiology 17(3): 401-413 (1998)

[11] Allan Fraser and Allan H. Frey. Electromagnetic emission at micron wavelengths from active nerves. Biophysical Journal 8: 731-734 (1968).

[12] Shou Sin-Sung. A Possible Biophotochemical Mechanism for Cell Communication. In Electromagnetic Bio-Information, Fritz Albert Popp et al., eds., 1979, pp. 151-174.

[13] A.H. Jafary-Asl AH and Cyril W. Smith. Biological dielectric in electric and magnetic fields. IEEE Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 1983, p. 350.

[14] H.A. Pohl. AC field effects of and by living cells. In Chiabrera A. et al., eds., Interactions between electromagnetic fields and cells, NATO ASI Series A, Life Sciences, Plenum, NY (1985), pp. 435-456.

[15] J. Kent Pollock and Douglas G. Pohl. Emission of radiation by active cells. In Biological Coherence and Response to External Stimuli, Herbert Fröhlich, ed., Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1988, pp. 139-147.

[16] Sergei P. Sit’ko, Yurij A. Skripnik and Aleksey F. Yanenko. Experimental Study of Mm-Range Radiation from Certain Objects. Physics of the Alive 6(1): 15-18 (1998).

[17] Allan H. Frey. Is a toxicology model appropriate as a guide for biological research with electromagnetic fields? Journal of Bioelectricity 9(2):233-234 (1990).

[18] Gerard J. Hyland. Physics and biology of mobile telephony. The Lancet 356:1833-1836 (2000).

[19] Personal communication, December 2018.

[20] Igor Y. Belyaev. Duration of Exposure and Dose in Assessing Nonthermal Biological Effects of Microwaves. In Dosimetry in Bioelectromagnetics, CRC Press 2017, pp. 171-184.

[21] Igor Y. Belyaev et al. Resonance effect of millimeter waves in the power range from 10–19 to 3 x 10–3 W/cm2 on Escherichia coli cells at different concentrations. Bioelectromagnetics 17: 312-321 (1996).

[22] W. Ross Adey. Testimony before the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Consumer and Environmental Issues of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, August 10, 1992.

[23] Neil Cherry. Evidence of brain cancer from occupational exposure to pulsed microwaves from a police radar. Lincoln University, August 15, 2001.

[24] Neil Cherry. Safe Exposure Levels. Lincoln University, April 25, 2000.

[25} Robert O. Becker. Personal communication, May 15, 1986.

[26] Robert O. Becker. A theory of the interaction between DC and ELF electromagnetic fields and living organisms. Journal of Bioelectricity 4(1):133-140 (1985).

[27] Robert O. Becker and Gary Selden. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, NY: William Morrow 1985, pp. 312-313.

[28] William Bise. Hearings before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, Ninety-Fifth Congress. First Session on Oversight of Radiation Health and Safety, June 16, 17, 27, 28, and 29, 1977, Serial No. 95-49, pp. 1220-1223.

[29] Sheldon Meyers. Oversight Hearing before the Subcommittee on Water and Power Resources of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, House of Representatives, First Session on Health Effects of Transmission Lines, October 6, 1987, Serial No. 100-22, p. 166.

[30] Reba Goodman and Martin Blank. Magnetic field-induced stress responses in biological cells by use of cell phones. EBEA 2001. 5th International Congress of the European BioElectromagnetics Association (EBEA). 6-8 September 2001, Helsinki, Finland. Proceedings, pp. 197-198.

[31] Yury G. Shckorbatov et al., Modification of electrokinetic properties of nuclei and membrane permeability in human buccal epithelial cells under the influence of low-level microwave radiation. EBEA 2001, pp. 204-206.

[32] Andrew Wood, Rohan Mate, and Ken Karipidis. Meta-analysis of in vitro and in vivo studies of the biological effects of low-level millimeter waves. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 31: 606–613 (2021).

[33] Stefano Cucurachi et al. A review of the ecological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Environment International 51: 116-140 (2013), Table 4.

[34] Maria N. Sadchikova. State of the nervous system under the influence of UHF. In The Biological Action of Ultrahigh Frequencies, A. A. Letavet and Z. V. Gordon, eds., Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, 1960, pp. 25-29.

[35] Maria N. Sadchikova. Clinical manifestations of reactions to microwave irradiation in various occupational groups. In Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Warsaw, 15-18 October 1973, P. Czerski et al., eds., 1974, pp. 261-267.

[36] Abraham Lilienfeld. Evaluation of Health Status of Foreign Service and Other Employees from Selected Eastern European Posts. Johns Hopkins University, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, MD, prepared for Dept. of State, DC Office of Medical Services, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, July 31, 1978.

[37] Liliya M. Fatkhoutdinova. Hemodynamic indices in VDT users with different exposure to electric and magnetic fields and controls,” EBEA 2001, pp. 292-294.

[38] Vladimir N. Binhi and Robert J. Goldman. The Ion Interference and Electric Field-Induced Wound-Cell Proliferation. In BEMS Twenty-Second Annual Meeting in Cooperation with the European Bioelectromagnetics Association, Abstract Book. The Technical University, Munich, Germany, June 11-16, 2000, pp. 11-12.

[39] Bertil Persson, Leif Salford, and Arne Brun. Blood-brain barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communications. Wireless Networks 3:455-461 (1997).

[40] Henrietta Nittby, Gustav Grafström, Jacob L. Eberhardt et al. Radiofrequency and Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Effects on the Blood-Brain Barrier. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 27: 103-126 (2008).

[41] Dimitris J. Panagopoulos. Analyzing the health impacts of modern telecommunications microwaves. In L. V. Berhardt, ed., Advances in Medicine and Biology, vol. 17, Nova Science Publishers 2011, chapter 1.

[42] Carl F. Blackman et al. Induction of calcium-ion efflux from brain tissue by radiofrequency radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 1:35-43 (1980).

[43] Suzanne M. Bawin, Leonard K. Kaczmarek and W. Ross Adey. Effects of modulated VHF fields on the central nervous system. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 247: 74-80 (1970).

[44] Sisir K. Dutta et al. Microwave radiation-induced calcium ion flux from human neuroblastoma cells: dependence on depth of amplitude modulation and exposure time. In Biological Effects of Electropollution, Sisir K. Dutta and Richard M. Millis, eds. Information Ventures, Phila., 1986, pp. 63-69.

[45] Jean-Louis Schwartz, Dennis E. House, and Geoffrey A. R. Mealing. Exposure of frog hearts to CW or amplitude-modulated VHF fields: selective efflux of calcium ions at 16 Hz. Bioelectromagnetics 11: 349-358 (1990).

[46] Kumud K. Kunjilwar and Jitendra Behari. Effect of amplitude-modulated RF radiation on cholinergic system of developing rats. Brain Research 601:321-324 (1993).

[47] Christian Holtze, R. Sivaramakrishnan, Markus Antonietti, et al. The microwave absorption of emulsions containing aqueous micro- and nanodroplets: A means to optimize microwave heating. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 302: 651–657 (2006).

[48] Quoted by Max Rauner in Zeit Online, August 21, 2006.

[49] Chaozhi Wan et al. Femtosecond dynamics of DNA-mediated electron transfer. PNAS 96 (11) 6014-6019 (1999).

[50] Corinna Wu. An Electrifying DNA Debate: New evidence explains how DNA conducts charge,” Science News 156(7): 104-106 (1999).

[51] Hans-Werner Fink and Christian Schönenberger. Electrical conduction through DNA molecules. Nature 398: 407-410 (1999).

[52] Charles Polk. Implications of Measured Electrical Conductivity of DNA for Bio-Effects of E.M. Fields. In BEMS Twenty-Second Annual Meeting, 2000, pp. 22-23.

DECENTRALIZED MEDICINE #1: HOW WILL WE TEST FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE BELIEFS in EL SALVADOR

The biggest fallacy we are going to test in El Salvador is the one that functional medicine sells to the public. They believe that ordering “their labs” leads to more functional changes that actually happen in cells to change outcomes in disease.

They got this idea from centralized medical textbooks of biochemistry. They knew allopathic docs order certain labs, so they tried to be slick and order more esoteric labs that might better explain organ function. What they forget is this idea is a very reductionist way of doing scince.

What might they have missed from the decentralized perspective? Their heads are filled with beautiful diagrams to illustrate a falsehood belief that biomolecules are static actors who dance in ‘lock and key’ fashion. Centralized biologists/biochemists currently believe in this static principle of ‘recognition’ between enzymes and their respective substrates even today. They think this exists between signal molecules and their respective receptor proteins, as well as between different species of proteins. Yet, everything in quantum theory tells us that molecules never stand still, they always move and vibrate. How would a vibrating lock and key ever work? Moreover, the most important biomolecules, proteins are no exception to this vibration rule. Indeed, the most mobile proteins are enzymes which generally have great specificities for their substrates, and the most mobile parts of the antibody molecules are precisely those containing the recognition sites for corresponding antigens. These observations of reality are difficult to reconcile with the lock and key model. What is more likely to be responsible for intermolecular complexes in the cellular organization is the universal electromagnetic attractive forces between molecules.

The biggest problem for functional medicine, in my opinion? THE STORAGE OF ENERGY tells us labs are useless because most energy in the living state is sotred at the electronic level in cells. Do labs measure this level? NOPE. Since we know this is true today because of quantum biological experimentation, we should be forced back to the drawing board and start rethinking about the theorem of Prigogene and dissipative structures. shouldn’t we? Is functional medicine doing this? Nope?

This is why they will not get a pass in El Salvador. We will test their beliefs before we rubber stamp their beliefs in our system. Nockchains will help us execute this task via my decentralized loop in the Constitutional Amendment.

Sunlight creates electric fields in our atmosphere every day and that sunlight creates a Coulomb force in our body. Coulomb force is an electrostatic force. Electrostatic phenomena arise from the forces that electric charges exert on each other. Such forces are described by Coulomb’s law. Even though electrostatically induced forces seem to be rather weak because of how we experience them in life, when the scale shrinks, as it does in a cell, the electrostatic force increases tremendously in strength as the scale drops. For example, some electrostatic forces such as the one between an electron and a proton, that together make up a hydrogen atom, are about 36 orders of magnitude stronger than the gravitational force acting between them. The electrostatic force generated in your skin is another example of a strong electrostatic force because the skin, as an insulator can hold large amounts of charge. Here is a reminder for all functional practitioners thinking of opening a conceirge practice in El Salvador:

Cellular organization is the key to precision optical signaling. Life is all about optimizing AMO physics INSIDE OF CELLS. It transforms energy from the environment to do this. Modern physics now has proven that energy and information are equivalent in physics. Landauer’s Principle of 1961 & Shannon’s 1948 work was critical in making this linkage.

Modern quantum biology has experimentally proven that energy is trapped directly at the electronic level in cells. Energy is stored not only as vibrational and electronic bond energies in biochemicals, but also in the structure of the system: its membranes, and in gradients, fields and flow patterns, compartments, organelles, cell water, and tissues. All this in turn enables organisms to mobilize their energies coherently at any time it is needed and hence make available the entire spectrum of stored energies for physiological work. It is energy on demand by atomic design. Now explain to me how your labs are going to solve a patient’s mitochondrial problem?

This is not written as a warning to you. It is written as a promise to the public that we will protect your health from pseudoscience.

Since 1998, the water at Lake Coatepeeque has been tested via labs and has not shown the real reason the water changes color as it does now. The belief is that the algae do it, but the tests are not conclusive. The reason they are not conclusive is covered in this blog. The water in this caldera sits on top of a huge magma chamber that is transfering energy to the water in the caldera and this leads to phase transition of the hydrogen bonding network in water.

If you cannot explain it, you do not know the cause.

The same idea is why we will be holding feet to the fire when you practice your version of centrlaized science. If your patients do not get consistent results from your excessive testing, and you cannot explain why to your PEERS, you likely won’t be practicing your craft here without some risk to your portfolio.

You’ve been warned.

CITES

New podcast out today: In this podcast I talk about chronic diseases and how we are going to deal with this at the 13N latitude. Many of these idea have been shared with Nayib bukele, Nicole Shanahan, and Bobby Kennedy Jr https://www.thehighersidechats.com/dr-jack-kruse-light-water-magnetism-the-sacred-cows-of-health/